UK watchdog bans Zara ads over 'unhealthily thin' model photos
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
Britain's advertising regulator on Wednesday banned two adverts by Spanish clothing group Zara for featuring models that appeared "unhealthily thin", calling the images "irresponsible".The Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) said it took action after it received a complaint about the ads, which were listed on Zara's website in May.One image showed a model with "protruding" collarbones, with her pose and styling making her appear "very slim".Another featured a model who looked "slightly gaunt" owing to a slicked-back hairstyle and that the lighting and clothing made her appear "noticeably thin", the ASA said.The watchdog ruled the ads breached social responsibility rules and must not appear again in the same form.Zara told the ASA that the models were medically certified as healthy, in line with British guidelines.It also assured that only minor lighting and colouring edits were made on the images.The ads were removed after the ASA made the company aware of the complaint, Zara said in a statement.It added that Zara "follow stringent guidelines and controls in the selection and photographing of models".Earlier this year, the ASA banned similar ads from British retailers Next and Marks & Spencer.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
9 hours ago
- Time of India
Monetary policy: Bank of England trims rate to 4%; signals cautious easing ahead
Bank of England (Picture credit: AP) The Bank of England on Thursday trimmed its key interest rate by 25 basis points to 4 per cent, marking the fifth reduction since August 2024, as it seeks to support Britain's slowing economy amid concerns over rising US tariffs and domestic tax hikes. The latest cut brings borrowing costs to their lowest level since March 2023, with Governor Andrew Bailey cautioning, 'Interest rates are still on a downward path, but any future rate cuts will need to be made gradually and carefully.' The move came despite inflation rising to an 18-month high of 3.6 per cent in June, well above the BoE's 2 per cent target, driven by persistent fuel and food prices. As per news agency AFP, the BoE now expects inflation to peak at 4 per cent next month, before easing back to target by the second quarter of 2027. The central bank also raised its growth forecast slightly, expecting the UK economy to expand by 1.25 per cent this year, up from the earlier 1 per cent estimate. While the direct impact of US tariffs is 'milder than feared,' the central bank noted that broader uncertainty linked to tariff policies continues to dampen business sentiment. In May, the UK and the US agreed to lower tariffs, previously set above 10 per cent, on select British exports, including cars. However, baseline tariffs of 10 per cent on most UK goods introduced by US President Donald Trump in April remain in place. The BoE's Monetary Policy Committee faced an unprecedented situation during its deliberations. Initially split in a three-way vote, four members backed the cut, four favoured no change, and one called for a deeper 0.5 per cent cut, the decision passed only after a second round of voting, a first since the bank gained independence in 1997. The UK economy contracted for a second consecutive month in May, and unemployment has climbed to 4.7 per cent, its highest since 2021. As per AFP, analysts, including those at the National Institute of Economic and Social Research, believe the Labour government's decision to raise business taxes in April has also weighed heavily on business activity. 'There are slightly more risks on the downside to activity,' said Bailey after the rate cut, as per AFP. 'Economic growth is subdued, the labour market continues to loosen and consumption growth may take longer to pick up.' Treasury chief Rachel Reeves welcomed the BoE's move, saying it would help reduce costs for 'mortgages and loans for families and businesses.' She added that the government remained focused on boosting long-term growth through infrastructure investment and trade partnerships. Expectations that rates will remain steady at 4 per cent for longer have lent support to the pound, even as some traders remain cautious ahead of the Autumn Budget. Stay informed with the latest business news, updates on bank holidays and public holidays .
Mint
10 hours ago
- Mint
Swiss Leader Who Admires Thatcher Reaches Limits in Trump Clash
Karin Keller-Sutter admires the grit of former British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher and as Swiss president is known as technocratic and tenacious. Those traits look to have backfired when she faced off with Donald Trump and led her country into crisis. KKS — as she is known in Swiss politics — has had the worst week of her more than three-decade career. It's even worse than in 2023, when over a frantic weekend she pushed through Credit Suisse's forced marriage to UBS Group AG to limit the fallout on the country's prized banking sector. With Trump levying the highest tariffs in the developed world on Switzerland at 39% — more than double the European Union's rate — there's little relief in sight. After the 61-year-old came home empty-handed from a last-ditch trip to Washington, the Swiss government had few answers after an emergency meeting of the seven-member federal council on Thursday, saying it would continue to seek to secure concessions. While the country's leadership is a shared responsibility — the presidency rotates every year among the members of the cabinet — the tariff debacle bears Keller-Sutter's fingerprints. When asked about her leadership role models during a Bloomberg interview last fall, the politician, who is also finance minister, noted her admiration for Thatcher, saying that the so-called Iron Lady was 'quite a person' and showed she can 'stick to her convictions and decisions.' Similar determination led her to stand up to Trump. It looked like it might pan out, with Swiss negotiators thinking they had a deal in sight, but then came a bumpy call last week. In what was described as a lecturing tone, she dismissed the notion that Switzerland was stealing from the US and insisted on including services in the discussions. That ran afoul of Trump's focus on the US deficit in goods from exports such as luxury watches, gold and pharmaceuticals. Her position was that Switzerland stands by its word and it was better to have no deal than a bad deal. But that didn't go down well with the White House, and Switzerland didn't have the leverage of bigger trading partners and put little on the table. The paradox faced by Keller-Sutter is that any concessions would have been politically costly without meaningfully curbing the trade gap. But appearance counts and she didn't give Trump anything he could pass off as a deal. In an interview with CNBC, he said the Swiss president didn't want to listen. In a press conference in the Swiss capital of Bern on Thursday, she pushed back and again dismissed the characterization of Switzerland causing losses for the US. 'I have listened,' she said. 'But I didn't agree that Switzerland is responsible for a loss of $40 billion,' adding that 'I have represented Switzerland's interests.' Her approach is steeped in Swiss pragmatism. Born in a small village about 60 kilometers east of Zurich, her political career started in 1992 as a local council member of the municipality of Wil. A member of the pro-business liberals, she steadily rose through the ranks. She finally succeeded in becoming a federal minister in 2018, leading the ministry of justice before becoming Switzerland's top financial official in 2023 — only the second woman to hold the post since 1848. A few months into the job, she faced one of the darkest hours for Switzerland. Despite having no banking experience, the trained translator oversaw negotiations between UBS, the Swiss National Bank and country's financial regulator to contain the damage from Credit Suisse's collapse. 'I had the impression that the world was holding its breath until we had a solution,' she said in interview with public broadcaster SRF in March 2024. With the international community roiled by Trump's trade wars, no one is waiting for Switzerland this time. The crisis poses a unique challenge for the country of 9 million by raising questions about the viability of its tradition of neutrality in the midst of geopolitical upheaval. Recent episodes, including the Credit Suisse demise and an upcoming plebiscite about inheritance tax, have also undermined Switzerland's image as one of the business-friendliest places on the planet. In the aftermath of the Credit Suisse failure, Keller-Sutter became a driving force behind stricter capital requirements for UBS. Maneuvering out of a political corner, she deferred a decision to parliament on whether the Swiss bank would need to provided full backing of its foreign subsidiaries. The capital move led to a falling out with UBS. After the failed Trump talks, Keller-Sutter faces pressure again. While she's known as being skeptical of having tight relations with the EU, opponents are pushing for exactly that. Despite stumbling, her resignation is seen as unlikely. The rotating Swiss presidency means change will come soon in any case, which makes sudden departures rare. She isn't facing serious rivals within her own party, which needs her profile amid fading support. There also is little pressure from other cabinet members. 'We win together and we lose together,' said Swiss Vice President Guy Parmelin, when asked if she deserved the blame. The federal council speaks with one voice, he added. Keller-Sutter also isn't easily intimidated. After clamping down against violence in soccer as justice minister, she once demanded that a hooligan delete a photo he took of her. That fighting spirit recalls another one of her personal heroes. 'I'm a great fan of Muhammad Ali,' she said. 'He's an idol because he was very talented, he was very strong, he went through very difficult situations.' With assistance from Bastian Benrath-Wright. This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.
Hindustan Times
12 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
Rude Food by Vir Sanghvi: No bitter memories
Chocolate is the smell of my childhood. I would wake up every morning to chocolate aromas wafting up to the top of Mumbai's Cumballa Hill where I lived. On Peddar Road, at the bottom of the hill, in a not-very-large white building, was the Cadbury factory, and the aromas it exuded defined much of my growing up. (It cannot be a coincidence that vanilla is still one of my favourite smells.) Indian chocolate brands such as Manam use beans grown on Indian soil. As I grew older, the factory moved to the suburbs and the white building became the office. But they kept the bungalow next to it, where the managing director lived. In my early years as a journalist, I was once sent to interview the British MD of Cadbury in that bungalow. He was kind enough to take an inexperienced journalist seriously and explained that one of the biggest challenges in his job was keeping the prices of such popular Cadbury brands as Fruit & Nut low because Cadbury imported chocolate, and global prices were volatile. But because he did not want to disappoint the many children who loved 'Cads', as the chocolate bar was nicknamed, the company had evolved two strategies. The first was to create bars that used less of the expensive chocolate: The 5 Star was one example. This was a familiar strategy already employed in many foreign countries: 5 Star was probably inspired by the Mars Bar. Forty years ago, Cadbury was trying to persuade Indian farmers to grow the cocoa bean. (ADOBE STOCK) The second strategy involved a higher degree of difficulty. Cadbury was trying to persuade Indian farmers to grow the cocoa bean so it was less dependent on imported chocolate. The problem, he said, was that the Indian bean just didn't taste right when you turned it into chocolate. Experts from Cadbury UK had worked with local farmers, he said, and had managed to get around that problem. He thought that Cadbury would eventually be able to depend on Indian farmers for a substantial proportion of its chocolate needs. This was forty or so years ago, so there was nothing unusual about chatting to a Brit who lived in a lovely bungalow in the shadow of Cumballa Hill, about Indian farmers. And because the gobbledygook had yet to be invented, he did not use such expressions as farm-to-table or bean-to-bar or talk about Cadbury's commitment to Indian farmers or about localisation and carbon miles. He was a practical man, and his focus was on keeping the prices of his chocolates low enough for children to be able to enjoy them. I did not know enough then to discuss the decision to grow the cocoa bean in India from a historical perspective. Most food historians regard the story of chocolate as a prime example of imperialism in action. The cocoa bean was brought to Europe by Spanish invaders, who found it in South America. And the chocolate we buy today is a European/American creation. In 1847, JS Fry, an English company, invented the chocolate bar. In 1868, Cadbury invented the chocolate box. In 1879, Nestlé invented milk chocolate. In 1900, America saw the first Hershey bar, with its distinctive spoilt-milk taste. The Mars bar appeared in England in 1932. In African countries, governments force farmers to sell cocoa beans at half the global price. (ADOBE STOCK) All of these advances were based on a South American cocoa bean. Europe did not grow chocolate. So the big Western companies got the profits, while the poor South American farmers were paid a pittance. As the demand for chocolate went up, cocoa plantations were developed in Africa and in other colonies by European powers. All of the cocoa was exported to the factories of the West. That trend has continued. When you hear of the great chocolatiers of Belgium, rarely is the source of the bean mentioned. Switzerland, a country that grows no cocoa, has a global reputation for chocolate. Valrhona, a name that chefs revere, is a French company that buys its chocolate from the Third World. Nutella comes from Italy, where no cocoa grows. So, the Cadbury initiative to help farmers cultivate the cocoa bean in India was intriguing. They were not growing it for export. They were cultivating it for Indians. I thought back to my conversation with the MD of Cadbury because of two recent developments. When Manam opened a store-restaurant in Delhi, people queued up on weekends. The first is the rise in global prices of the cocoa bean. It has tripled over the last two years and hovers at around $10,000 a tonne. In many African countries, the governments compulsorily purchase beans from farmers at half the global price. This has led to a boom in cocoa smuggling, the creation of chocolate mafias and a rise in crime. It is another of colonialism's unhappy legacies. The second development that struck me was the frenzy that accompanied the opening of the large Manam Chocolate store-restaurant in Delhi. On any weekend, there are queues of people trying to get in. This is unusual because Manam, launched only in 2021, was not a brand that anyone in Delhi knew well. Nor is there any precedent for a chocolate place becoming such a rage. The connection between Manam and my chat with the Cadbury MD decades ago is the bean. While Manam does import some beans, its real claim to fame is that it mostly uses Indian cocoa beans. As Chaitanya Muppala, the 34-year-old founder of the brand, told me, they work with 150 farmers, who cultivate the bean across 3,000 acres. Chaitanya's father ran a medium-sized mithai business in Hyderabad; when he took it over, he embarked on a massively successful expansion, opening many new outlets and branches. He was not a chocolate nerd to begin with, but saw that the chocolate market was growing at 12 to 13 per cent in India and got into it. Ruby Islam is head chef at Manam Chocolate. They have 350 products across 50 categories. His big insight was that the Indian cocoa bean, introduced originally by Cadbury, could yield world-class chocolate. He worked closely with farmers on the soil, seed genetics and cultivation. He helped introduce better drying techniques (the laborious business of turning the raw bean into chocolate is often the key to flavour) and was involved with the process long before the raw material reached the Manam 'karkhanas', as he calls them. He was also willing to take big bets. Manam has over 350 products across 50 categories, and the size of its range sometimes seems overwhelming. Its large Delhi restaurant-shop resembles something Willy Wonka would dream up, and many of the hundreds of people who throng there each day come out of sheer wonder not just out of love of chocolate. Chaitanya now has successful restaurant-shops in Hyderabad and Delhi. I imagine Mumbai and Bangalore will be next. Everyone who has tried his chocolate only has good things to say, and his PR operation is superb and formidable. While he obviously does not see Manam as an industrial operation, most of which are based on poor-quality raw material, he doesn't see it as an artisanal operation either. He makes craft chocolate, he says. And what is craft chocolate? It's chocolate that is all about the bean and its flavours. A hugely successful chocolate company based on the Indian bean? Who would have thought we would get to this stage when Cadbury first planted beans in India? It's an amazing achievement, not just because the chocolate is so good, but because it reverses colonial history. This is Indian chocolate, Chaitanya says, made for Indians, by Indians from Indian beans. From HT Brunch, August 09, 2025 Follow us on
