Algoma University pauses five programs to improve finances
Algoma University will temporarily suspend first-year admissions to five undergraduate programs in an effort to strengthen the institution's long-term financial sustainability, according to an internal memo obtained by The Sault Star.
The five low-enrollment programs that will be paused are Geography, History, Music, Sociology, and Visual Arts.
As of April 28, only 18 students had accepted offers to these programs, based on data from the Ontario Universities' Application Centre.
This decision follows recommendations from the Ontario Auditor General's 2022 Value-for-Money Audit on university finances, which looks at the financial contributions of each of its academic offerings.
A 2024 follow-up report criticized the university for making 'little to no progress' in determining whether programs could be restructured to provide a net-positive financial return.
'This decision was not easy, nor was it taken lightly,' wrote Interim President and Vice-Chancellor Donna Rogers in the memo. 'Low-enrolment programs create long-term financial risks for universities, including reduced funding for student services, research grants, and faculty development.'
Those already enrolled in the affected programs will continue their studies without disruption, with full access to courses and academic support. No layoffs will occur as a result of the decision.
Prospective students who had accepted offers have received personalized communication from the university, along with alternative program options and assistance from the Registrar's Office.
Rogers emphasized that the move is not a program cut or suspension — decisions which fall under the authority of Senate — but a temporary measure designed to allow departments to reflect on program design and future viability.
The Board of Governors approved the pause earlier this year as part of the university's broader commitment to sustainable academic programming. Discussions with impacted departments are ongoing, with a focus on collaborative solutions.
'We are deeply grateful to all faculty and academic leaders for their partnership in this important work,' Rogers wrote.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
8 hours ago
- Yahoo
Data, downloads and detective work - chasing rugby's salary cheats
Seven months after beating Exeter 37-34 to win their fourth Premiership title in five years, Saracens were relegated to the Championship for repeated salary cap breaches [Getty Images] Andrew Rogers has lots of pieces of technology to help him. A Batphone-style hotline isn't one, though. "It is not a case of having a red phone in the corner that lights up," says Rogers, the Premiership's salary cap director. Advertisement Instead, whistle-blowers concerned a club might have breached the £6.4m cap on players' pay sound the alarm in more subtle ways. "I've worked in rugby for nearly 20 years," says Rogers, who set up the agent registration scheme at the Rugby Football Union (RFU) earlier in his career. "It is a social sport and it is very valuable having a trusted network of individuals and people who will talk to you. "It can be very informal. That is one of the joys of it - how you obtain information, how you assess it and understand the value of it, whether it's credible." The Premiership has had a salary cap since 1999, with the aim of keeping the league closely fought and sustainable. Advertisement For owners with deep pockets and a yearning for success, though, it can be an irritation. When it emerged in 2020 that Saracens' dominance, titles and star-studded squad were underpinned by payments that breached the cap, their lawyers claimed the whole concept was unenforceable under competition law. The challenge was dismissed, Saracens were demoted and Rogers was given new, wider powers to catch the next club that might try it. "There is a saying 'never waste a crisis', and that judgement against Saracens was a big springboard to enhance the whole system," he says. He now has an ocean of data to dive into. Advertisement Copies of players' contracts, image rights deals and other employment arrangements are sent to Rogers within 14 days of being signed. Every year, every club makes a declaration - signed off by the chief executive, director of rugby and other top officials - confirming how they reward players. Every player also fills in an annual return detailing what they earn, their living arrangements, any companies they are involved with and information about their bank accounts. Rogers and his team have full access to all club accounts over the past five years to audit those claims. The numbers are then cross-checked against words. Advertisement Rogers interviews more than 40 officials and players from across the league, digging further into their finances and ferreting out any inconsistencies. But he knows it is still not enough. His prying eye has to extend further. "A lot of the time the stuff that's really going on is 'off book'," he says. "We can do all these brilliant things 'on book' and all the audits, but you know where someone is saying 'listen, I'll make sure you get this', that's more likely to be through a conversation via a WhatsApp or an email. "That was one of the things that came out of Melbourne Storm case back in 2010 - the Australian rugby league team who had a big salary cap 'rort' as they call it there. Advertisement "There were lots of fake emails created to try and cover tracks." When they extend their investigations, Rogers and his team will harvest data from players and officials' phones, searching for key terms that might refer to illicit, undeclared payments. "It's really key," he says. "We will be looking at messages between agents, owners and players etc and it's a very, very helpful and insightful medium." Sometimes Rogers doesn't need a tip-off to spark a more in-depth probe. A club can bring suspicion on themselves. "I look at the total value of a contract and consider whether it I would deem it market rate for that player," says Rogers. Advertisement "We have a database of salaries and information, and I can slice and dice it depending on a players' age, position, experience, be it international or Premiership. "So if there's a 25-year-old scrum-half who has played 40 games in the Premiership and has got two international caps, where does he sit with other people within that kind of range? Is there an issue there or not?" For some clubs, there clearly isn't. Many in the league are operating well under the cap. Last year's champions Northampton have argued for a reduction. Bath, runaway leaders at the top of this season's standings and favourites to win their first English title in 29 years on Saturday, seem to be running closer to the line. Advertisement The depth and quality of their squad, which will be augmented by the signing of England wing Henry Arundell and Gloucester full-back Santiago Carreras this summer, is marked. Steve Diamond, Newcastle's director of rugby, said this season that they had done "magnificently" Bristol counterpart Pat Lam estimated that Bath had spent several million pounds more on their squad than the Bears could muster. Rogers says all 10 Premiership clubs are in communication with him to ensure they do not run the risk of beefed-up punishments that now include relegation and the removal of titles. "There are a lot of clubs who will be in almost daily contact with me, checking things and making sure what they're doing is right and wanting to make sure that any approach is appropriate and compliant within the regulations," he says. Advertisement "The clubs will talk to me a lot, whether they're way off the cap or they're very close to it." Clubs can squeeze more talent under the limit by distributing pay unevenly across the course of a contract. They might choose to backload a new deal in the knowledge that another high-earner will be off the books by the time it comes to pay up, flattening out their spending and staying the right side of the cap. Credits for homegrown and international players also give them licence to spend more. "Modern governance for me involves helping people work in the system," says Rogers. Advertisement "It's no longer the days where you set write a set of regulations, leave them on the shelf and then when low-hanging fruit happens, you dust off the book and take inappropriate action. "This is about effective monitoring, good communication, support and education for those working within it and then constantly evolving the system to make it right for your own sport." On Friday he will get a chance to compare notes. In London officials in charge of financial regulations across 20 different sports will get together to talk about how they chase cheats. Among them will be representatives from football's Premier League, EFL, Uefa, the Women's Super League, Major League Soccer and La Liga, officials from the three biggest American sports leagues - American football's NFL, basketball's NBA, baseball's MLB - and figures from motor racing's Formula 1 and FIA. Advertisement "I speak to them a lot individually, but this is the first time we're all getting together, which is really exciting," says Rogers. Samuel Gauthier will also be there. Rogers' counterpart from France's Ligue Nationale de Rugby has been busy. In March, Toulouse were fined 1.3m euros (£1.1m) over undeclared financial help they gave France full-back Melvyn Jaminet to buy himself out of his contract at Perpignan and ease a move to the six-time European champions. Melvyn Jaminet joined Toulouse in 2022 before leaving for Toulon the following year [Getty Images] Gauthier and Rogers meet at least twice a year, in Paris or London, and are close to formalising a data-sharing agreement that will help them compare contracts for a player swapping the Premiership for the Top 14 or vice-versa. Advertisement However, one question that Rogers, Gauthier or anyone at Friday's summit can never be sure of is their hit-rate. How much financial sleight of hand evades their detection? "The system is now really robust," says Rogers. "Look at all the different information we get on a weekly and seasonal basis and the incredible set of tools we have - examining tax returns, bank statements, phones, emails and Whatsapps - if we need to go in and do a proper investigation on a club. "All that goes a long way to reduce that risk. "It would be foolish to say we're pretty confident there's nothing else going on - we've always got to keep an eye on things - but the system is in a strong place." Advertisement Defensive systems, innovative tactics, technology, communication and a bit of old-fashioned human nous - the spreadsheet contest isn't that different from what happens on the pitch.
CNBC
9 hours ago
- CNBC
How we are choosing America's Top States for Business in 2025
Since taking office for his second term, President Trump has set out to fundamentally change the relationship between the states and the federal government. That, in turn, has changed the way the states compete for business and jobs. In the long run, Trump's tariffs could provide incentives for foreign companies to set up shop in the U.S. Already, some companies are actively searching for locations, and states are working hard to attract them. "This has been one of the busiest periods that we've had in our 30 year careers," said Tom Stringer, principal and leader of the site selection and incentives practice at Grassi Advisors in New York. He said many companies are deciding they can't afford to wait until the tariff regime is ultimately decided to come up with a tariff-free location in the U.S. "Businesses crave certainty," he said. "It's fair to say, none of us, except for one person, really has any knowledge as to where the tariffs are going to go or finish up. And so the way to deal with that has been to strategically start to place some capacity here in the U.S." But that takes time. In the interim, the tariffs also introduce new risks. Those risks disproportionally hit states that depend more on foreign trade, especially when it comes to a major target of Trump's ire: China. In states where international trade has been an economic engine, it is now a double-edged sword at best. Similarly, federal spending, jobs and research dollars have historically been important economic drivers in some states more than others. Now, those states are dealing with massive federal budget cuts, while states that are less dependent on Uncle Sam have new advantages. Through it all, new industries and technologies like artificial intelligence and quantum computing continue to expand, with a voracious appetite for electrical power, computing power, and space to build. "Who's got the project site ready to go, with infrastructure, with entitlements that we can execute on in fairly short order?" Stringer said. "And maybe the biggest component of that is adequate power." All these changes have led to some important changes in America's Top States for Business — CNBC's exclusive study, now in its 19th year. The fundamentals of the study are the same as they have always been since the project began in 2007. We begin with ten broad categories of competitiveness. These are the factors companies consider year after year when making site selection decisions, and that states pitch in their efforts to woo business. Next, we analyze each state's economic development marketing pitches to determine the appropriate weight for each category. The more that states are talking about a particular aspect of competitiveness, the more weight it carries in the rankings. In 2025, amid recession fears, more states than ever are touting their economic strengths. That makes Economy this year's most important category. Other categories rising in importance this year include Cost of Doing Business and Cost of Living, as inflation fears persist. Business Friendliness carries more weight this year as foreign and domestic companies seek the quickest path to the U.S. market. And Technology and Innovation rises to reflect the growing battle for dominance in fields like AI. The more weight a category carries, the more metrics it includes. While most metrics remain constant from year to year, we also choose our metrics each year to reflect the current competitive landscape. So, in 2025, we have added new metrics to gauge the states' risks from a trade war and a shrinking federal budget, including sweeping cuts in federal research grants. We have also enhanced some of our Infrastructure metrics to determine how the states are delivering on companies' power and data demands. This year's Top States study employs 135 metrics, the most ever. Each state can earn a maximum of 2,500 points across the ten categories. The states with the most points are America's Top States for Business. Our study is not an opinion survey. We gather empirical data on the states' performance in each metric using the most recent figures available. Where it makes sense, we calculate some metrics on a per capita basis or in relation to a state's gross domestic product (GDP), to allow large and small states to compete on a level playing field. In addition to their point totals, states receive a letter grade in each category to measure their performance relative to the competition. Grading is scaled, with the high score equal to 100 percent and the low score equal to 50 percent. However, each state's overall ranking, as well as its ranking within each category, is based solely on the number of points scored. Here are this year's categories and weightings, and an explanation of each: Economy Particularly in uncertain times, companies are seeking states with stable finances and solid economies. We examine the economic strength of each state by looking at GDP growth and job growth over the past year. We measure each state's fiscal condition by looking at its credit ratings and outlook, its overall budget picture including spending, revenues and reserves, as well as pension obligations. We rate the health of the residential real estate market based on multiple factors including inventory, price appreciation, equity, foreclosure activity and mortgage delinquencies, affordability, home seller gains, and property taxes. Because a diverse economy is important in any environment, we consider the number of major corporations headquartered in each state. We measure each state's entrepreneurial economy based on new business formations. New in 2025, we measure the states' tariff risks by considering the importance of international trade in relation to their overall economy, their dependence on trade with China in particular, and the potential costs of increased tariffs. We also consider the role of federal spending and employment in each state's economy, and their overall dependence on federal dollars. Also new in 2025, we consider the survival rates of new businesses. Infrastructure Revitalizing domestic manufacturing, rebuilding supply chains and redefining the very nature of work takes a reimagined infrastructure. We measure the vitality of each state's transportation system by the value and volume of goods shipped by air, waterways, roads and rail. We look at the condition of highways and bridges, the availability of air travel, and the time it takes to commute to work. With skyrocketing demand for abundant, reliable power, we measure each state's electrical grid. Water demand is soaring too, so we evaluate the condition of each state's water and wastewater utilities. And, in an increasingly data driven world, we look at broadband connectivity. New in 2025, we also measure large-scale computing power in each state. We consider access to markets by measuring the population living within 500 miles of each state. We look at the availability of vacant land and office and industrial space, and we measure state site readiness programs in terms of their overall funding and the number of certified or "shovel ready" sites. We measure each state's sustainability in the face of climate change, looking at the risk of flooding, wildfires, and extreme weather. New this year, we also look at resiliency measures that allow states to withstand disasters. Workforce With skilled workers in such short supply, and with the rising role of advanced manufacturing, the definition of a qualified worker is expanding. In addition to measuring each state's concentration of science, technology, engineering and math (STEM) workers and the percentage of workers with college degrees, we also consider workers with associate degrees and industry-recognized certificates. We look at which states are most successful in attracting talent at all levels, considering the net migration of educated workers to each state, and how states are faring in the competition to attract skilled workers. We look at state worker training programs, right to work laws, and worker productivity based on economic output per job. Cost of Doing Business With costs a growing concern amid recession fears and persistent inflation, we look at each state's ability to ease business expenses. We consider the competitiveness of each state's tax climate. We also measure wage and utility costs, as well as the cost of office and industrial space. With the nationwide insurance crisis spreading, we are looking more closely in 2025 at the cost of property-casualty insurance, along with forecasted premium increases. We consider the incentives and tax breaks that states offer to reduce business costs, and we consider available incentives targeted toward development in disadvantaged communities. Business Friendliness Companies follow the path of least resistance. That includes a legal and regulatory framework that does not overburden business. We measure each state's lawsuit and liability climates, regulatory regimes covering areas such as trade and labor, as well as overall bureaucracy. As companies race to build new facilities and expand existing ones, we look at state land use regulations. We also consider how hospitable states are toward emerging industries including artificial intelligence and cryptocurrency, giving them a framework for growth without stifling innovation. Quality of Life With workers in short supply, companies are seeking to locate in states that can attract a broad array of talent. That makes quality of life an economic imperative. We rate the states on livability factors like per capita crime rates, environmental quality, and health care. With studies showing that childcare is one of the main obstacles to employees entering the workforce, we consider the availability and affordability of qualified facilities. We look at worker protections including livable wage policies, paid leave, and rights to organize. We look at inclusiveness in state laws, including protections against discrimination of all kinds, as well as voting rights and secure election systems. And with surveys showing a sizeable percentage of younger workers would not live in a state that bans abortion, we factor reproductive rights in this category as well. Technology & Innovation Truly competitive states prize innovation, nurture new ideas, and have the resources to support them. We measure the states based on results, including the number of patents issued per capita. We also consider federal health, science and agriculture research grants. But with many of those programs now on the chopping block under the Trump administration, we also measure each state's risk from cuts and changes in grant formulas. We also consider which states provide their own support for research and development, independent of the federal government. With domestic semiconductor research, development and manufacturing taking center stage, we look at each state's place in this crucial technological ecosystem. And we measure each state's role in the artificial intelligence revolution in terms of where new AI models are being developed and where the AI jobs are. Education A state's education system is its main source for talent and an engine of innovation. It is also a key consideration for companies and families deciding where to put down roots. We look at multiple measures of K-12 education including test scores, class size and spending. We consider the number of colleges and universities in each state as well as long-term trends in state support for higher education. We also consider historically Black colleges and universities (HBCUs), which companies are increasingly seeking to partner with. With the search for talent expanding to include employees with marketable, industry-recognized skills, we measure each state's community college and career education systems. Access to Capital Companies large and small need ready access to financing. We look at venture capital investments in each state, as well as traditional bank lending by state in relative and absolute terms. We also look at state-backed capital assistance and loan guarantee programs. And we measure foreign direct investment in each state. Cost of Living With inflation persisting, companies and workers are seeking states where prices are stable and daily living is affordable. The cost of living helps drive the cost of doing business. We measure the states based on an index of costs for basic items. With a deepening national housing crisis, we are looking more closely at housing costs in 2025, considering the impact for both homeowners and renters. And as the insurance crisis spreads, we consider the cost to insure a median priced home in each state. Our Sources We base our rankings primarily on publicly available data. In addition, real estate cost and availability data are compiled for CNBC by CoStar Group, and they are factored in the Infrastructure and Cost of Doing Business categories. Labor market data firm Lightcast developed a State Talent Attraction Scorecard exclusively for CNBC. Those results are factored into the Workforce category. In our Infrastructure category, First Street Foundation, a non-profit, nonpartisan climate risk research firm, provided data on sustainability, and Cotality, a property risk data analytics firm, provided state level data on resilience using its Property and Mortgage Resilience tool. The Site Selectors Guild, an international association of site selection professionals, compiled data on state site readiness programs. Most of the rest of our information comes from federal government databases. In the cases where government statistics are not available, we seek neutral and/or ideologically diverse data sources. We use data from every state's primary economic development arm, and from the most recent Annual Comprehensive Financial Report (ACFR) issued by each state, in addition to the sources listed below.
Hamilton Spectator
16 hours ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Milton downtown small businesses seek financial support
Milton's downtown core is home to a vibrant business community, with more than 185 businesses operating in the area — approximately 82 per cent of them classified as small businesses, according to the Town of Milton. The Downtown Milton Business Improvement Area (DMBIA) represents more than 220 business operators and property owners, reflecting the area's dynamic and evolving commercial landscape. However, since the COVID-19 pandemic, many local shops have struggled to recover financially. While public spending habits have shifted back to in-person shopping, many residents continue to favour national chains over local downtown businesses — limiting economic recovery for the small business community. Avery Teal, social media co-ordinator at the Milton Chamber of Commerce, said the Chamber has been working to promote local businesses through various media platforms. 'We've been helping small businesses increase their visibility through platforms like Instagram, TikTok and LinkedIn,' Teal said. 'The goal is to bring more attention to the businesses that make Milton unique.' As part of the Chamber's outreach, Dan Rogers, owner of RX Recourse — a corporate fitness and wellness service based downtown — partnered with the Chamber to produce a promotional video. The video, posted to LinkedIn, featured Rogers explaining his services, including 'Team Building 101.' 'The Milton Chamber of Commerce was kind enough to help me build a commercial to briefly explain what I do,' Rogers said in a post. The video served as a tool to boost visibility for RX Recourse within the local community. In addition to the Chamber's efforts, the Milton BIA partnered with Digital Main Street Ontario to launch a Digital Service Squad (DSS). The initiative offered one-on-one support for small businesses looking to improve their digital presence, including website creation and marketing strategy development. Mira Nasser, events manager at the BIA, said the program offered grants of up to $2,500 for digital upgrades. In total, $80,000 in funding was distributed to support 32 businesses in Milton. Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .
