The Iranian Man Imprisoned For Supporting Women's Rights
این متن را به فارسی بخوانید
Reza Khandan was arrested in December 2024 for supporting women's rights in Iran, and creating thousands of homemade buttons that said, 'I Oppose the Mandatory Hijab.' He had previously been imprisoned for 111 days in 2018 for this so-called crime before being released on bail.
Reza's wife, Nasrin Sotoudeh, spent over six years in Iranian prisons for her work as a human rights attorney and activist. Reza raised their daughter and son while maintaining his graphic design business, and defying government threats as he campaigned for Nasrin's freedom. Now, Nasrin is home on a medical furlough for a heart condition that was exacerbated by COVID-19 and mistreatment in prison, and Reza is facing at least three more years in Tehran's notorious Evin Prison.
I got to know these good people when I directed and produced Nasrin, a 2020 documentary about her life and work. She was in prison most of the time we were filming, and I saw Reza's character— and love—repeatedly tested by a regime that punishes families as a way of inflicting additional pain on its detainees.
This interview started in April when I sent a series of questions to Reza. Slowly and with some complicated back and forth, he passed his answers to me.
Why have you put yourself at risk (in and out of prison) by criticizing your government—and is it dangerous for you to do this interview? I have a duty and the privilege to defend my rights and the rights of others. Without that, there is a dark future for us and our children. In a country like Iran, with this government, every protest and criticism carries a risk, but that's a chance I'm willing to take.You are a man, with all the privileges that brings in virtually every country. Why do you so strongly support women's rights? No country can achieve democracy, and development with justice and human dignity, without guaranteeing equal rights for women and men. A society that ignores the rights of half of its population will never achieve real greatness.
Describe your December 2024 arrest. That morning, I'd gone to the store so I could do some work at the house. On my way back, I noticed several people standing by the entrance talking to the building manager. As soon as I got out of the car, they came towards me, pointed at my license plate, and said they were investigating a crime that had been committed with my car.
It quickly became clear that all of their words were lies, and their real intent was to arrest me for my judicial case. After a minute or so, Nasrin joined us. She asked if she could get our son Nima from upstairs so he and I could have a moment together before they took me away. They said yes, but when she left to get him, they forced me into their car and drove off. I never got a chance to say goodbye to my son.
I slept in the detention center that night. It was extremely cold. They intentionally turned off the radiator, and there was no other heating device. The detainees were not given food or water. The cells had no beds and there were only a few dirty blankets to somehow be shared by about a dozen people. The Guardian Officer responded to my protests with dirt and ridicule. The filthy bathroom had no soap. They weren't even willing to even let me buy soap with my own money.
The next morning, I was transferred to the prosecutor in Evin Prison's court. After hours of being interviewed and processed, I was transferred to a prison quarantine, where I stayed for nine days without any outside contact.Read more: Why Iran's Leading Women's Rights Defender Thinks the Protesters Could Topple the Regime
What is your typical day like in prison? Part of my day is spent cleaning and doing personal chores like buying supplies that are available in the prison store. Food in Iranian prisons is rarely edible, so we have to purchase whatever ingredients we can and prepare our own meals. Ward 8, where I am held, has 33 gas burners for around 600 people. I am part of a group of about ten inmates who cook and eat together, and we are allowed to use a burner three times a week.
When possible, I read in the library, and I make sure to exercise. I also walk with friends, which gives us the opportunity to exchange opinions about the news we get through contact with our families. The big problem for an inmate is usually the very slow passage of time, but for me it is just the opposite. I don't want my time here to pass faster because that means I am losing all the moments I should be sharing with my wife, my children, and others I love.
Describe Evin Prison and the ward you are in. Evin Prison houses about 15,000 inmates divided into different wards, and there is extreme overcrowding. The reason Evin is infamous is because of its terribly cruel high security detention centers that are poorly supervised by the Prison Chief. Each of these security areas is controlled by of one of the government's security bodies, such as the Ministry of Information, the Revolutionary Guards, and the Judiciary.
These detention centers do not comply with any law. Their interrogators employ all kinds of inhumane behavior with the inmates, who are systematically deprived of their rights. Prisoners face beatings, denial of medical care, months in solitary confinement with a total news-blackout, crushing interrogations, forced confessions that taped and broadcast on national television after heavy editing, plus psychological, physical, and sexual torture.
Even seemingly small acts deliver needless cruelty. For instance, prisoners have to wear a blindfold and be escorted by an officer if they need to use the bathroom or go to the nurse's office.Read more: 'It's Like We're Hanging in the Air.' Iranian Activist Nasrin Sotoudeh's Husband on Her Temporary Release From Prison
After the interrogation phase and the issuance of a sentence, prisoners are transferred to a public ward. This is where we will remain until our sentence expires. I am in Ward 8, which has about 600 prisoners. Almost 80% of these men are held for public offences, and the rest are political. Political prisoners do not enjoy equality with ordinary prisoners. We are constantly monitored and followed, our phone access is strictly controlled, the limited calls we do get are constantly cut off for false reasons during conversations, and we rarely get parole.
Bedbugs continue to plague all the prisoners. Drugs are rampant. The prison yard has become unusable due to drug use in front of guards and cameras.
The slightest complaint about the prison administrators' performance is severely suppressed. This is why I have gone on several hunger strikes since my arrest.How and why have the authorities harassed and hurt your family? How does this make you feel? The Iranian government actively suppresses the voices of civil society, especially women, and it reacts with great brutality to the smallest protest or disobedience. My wife Nasrin was imprisoned for over six years for her work as a human rights attorney. Our daughter Mehraveh has been threatened and harassed in numerous ways (including a forced daylong interrogation). Our son Nima was savagely beaten by prison guards when he tried to visit me (this was no accident, but a planned assault). In addition, our bank accounts were frozen, and now I am held in one of the worst wards of Evin Prison because I support women' rights and I made buttons that said, 'I oppose the mandatory hijab.'
Many others have faced similar cruelties, and much worse.
Despite all the difficulties and hardship that Nasrin has endured on this path, she doesn't doubt her choices. Neither do I. We can't be apathetic towards injustice and oppression. I think this is why regardless of the challenges and struggles we've faced; we have kept the family close and as strong as ever. This is the treasure that has made all our activism possible.
What has your wife Nasrin taught you and how does she inspire you? I've loved Nasrin since we first met, and a shared commitment to women's rights and opposition to the compulsory hijab has always been part of our relationship.
Nasrin was unjustly and cruelly imprisoned for her legal work representing Iranian human rights and women's rights activists from 2010 through 2013 (when our children were very young), and again from 2018 through 2021 (she was eventually released on a medical furlough due to a serious heart problem). In October 2023, she was beaten, arrested, and detained for several weeks for attending the funeral of Armita Geravand, a 17-year-old who was killed for supposedly not properly wearing her hijab.
All this time, Nasrin has never stopped showing a deep concern for her family, and she has never given in to enormous pressure from the government. I am inspired by those qualities, and more. I am also inspired by my fellow inmates who have been arrested for their support of human rights, in Iran and around the world.Read more: Nasrin Sotoudeh Is on the 2021 TIME100 List
You have spoken openly about some of your cellmates who are also imprisoned for being human right activists. If it will help and not put them at risk, please share what you can about them. We have no statistics of the number of political prisoners in the security detention centers inside Evin Prison, but I estimate that there are about 300, and about 70 of them are women. There are nearly 80 political prisoners in our ward alone, including men with dual citizenship, women's rights and democracy activists, and those held for a variety of ideological beliefs.
Reza Valizadeh is currently the only dual-national political prisoner with American citizenship. Last year he visited Iran to see his aging parents. After a few months of harassment and interrogation, he was finally arrested and sentenced to ten years in prison. Valizadeh was a radio reporter until a few years ago, so they tried to force him to confess to 'collaborating with a foreign government.' The also tried to get him to speak against his former colleagues at Radio Farda, which he strongly rejected. Valizadeh has consistently stood up against their inhumane demands.
Mohammad Najafi, Mohammad Reza Faghihee and Taher Naghavi are lawyers who are in prison for their human rights activities. Mohammad Najafi holds the record in having the most cases created against him. He has been in prison for nearly 7 years.
Vahid Khadirzadeh is a young man who was convicted and incarcerated for protesting the forced veiling of women, and he is somewhat similar to me and my friend Farhad Meysami (Farhad was imprisoned for 5 years).
Another man is in prison for the fourth time for a total of 8 and a half years. He says he spent 120 days in solitary confinement during one of his detentions. Because of this experience, he was so intellectually and psychologically disturbed that at the end of confinement when they gave him a piece of fruit, he could not remember the word 'orange.'
What personal message can you say to your daughter Mehraveh and your son Nima? Nasrin and I at all times think about our son and daughter. When we are working for individual freedoms and human rights, and when we are away in prison for those activities, Mehraveh and Nima are in our hearts. We consider their circumstances, their dreams, their future, and the future of all the children in this country. They deserve a better life.
All our strength and energy come from our children, who have suffered more than us. Nasrin and I are very proud of them, and we have learned from them greatly. Being separated from Mehraveh and Nima, and from Nasrin, is agony. I love them very much.
You are in prison in part because you believe in a democratic ideal, yet democracy is being seriously challenged in many countries, including America. Do you still believe in democracy and where do you see the world headed in the next decade or two? The process of democratization starts and stops, but the world is moving forward. Progress is inevitable. Perhaps it is hard for people in other countries, like yours, to imagine having leaders who have so little concern for human rights that they will lock up individuals for trying to make their society better. This can happen if you are not careful.
In Iran, I feel the arrest of people like me, activists in the women's movement, protesters of the compulsory hijab, and advocates of a just civil society, is a last desperate and senseless attempt to continue this incompetent and corrupt government.
I do draw hope and strength from those here who support the process of democratization, and from people half-way across the world whose daily lives are dedicated to the fight against injustice. I am proud of our work and am sure that we have taken the right path.
How can you keep hope alive in prison? The most important point of hope is that it strengthens our belief in change and in the impact our activities have outside of prison. When political prisoners hear of support from people like you, it has a direct benefit. Knowing we are not alone and not forgotten is very closely tied to keeping our sense of purpose.
Of course, all prisoners must have a plan for themselves. Reading, exercise, exchange of information and ideas with fellow inmates, and helping each other, all helps us to serve our sentence with the least damage.
What message do you have for the leaders of Iran? Leaders of authoritarian governments do not want to hear anything except praise. They always deem themselves to be an exception to the lessons of history. But they should know, history doesn't have any exceptions.
I also want to say, "I demand freedom for all political prisoners,' and 'I object to the compulsory hijab!'
What would you like to say to all the people who signed the petition calling for your freedom? When Nasrin told me that this petition was signed by so many people from dozens of countries around the world, it made me very proud and hopeful. I am deeply grateful to every one of these dear friends. Were it not for this level of concern, awareness, and public pressure for the release of me and other political prisoners, our condition would be much worse and more dangerous. This a great blessing.
Farsi translation by Parisa Saranj
Contact us at letters@time.com.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New York Post
10 hours ago
- New York Post
New details shed light on why 15-year-old may have killed parents, 3 siblings in Washington mansion
The deranged 15-year-old accused of slaughtering all but one of his family members in their ritzy lakeside Washington mansion was kept isolated from the world and raised under a 'rigid, militant survivalist ideology,' his lawyer claims. Mark and Sarah Humiston drove their future killer son to the heinous crime after hammering him and his siblings with years of religious extremism and government paranoia, according to court documents filed last week. Prosecutors say their oldest son — whose identity has been kept under wraps — shot his parents, brothers Benjamin, 13, Joshua, 9, and sister Katheryn, 7, in the middle of the night in October. His 11-year-old sister survived the bloodbath by playing dead. 3 Mark and Sarah Humiston and three of their children were killed by their oldest son last fall. Facebook 'A common theme that has been expressed amongst extended family, neighbors, and those who knew the Humistons is that the children were isolated from the outside world and did not engage socially with many peers – only a select few families that went to their church and were friends of their family,' the court documents, obtained by KOMO News, said. 'Furthermore, initial reports indicate the home was abusive, tightly controlled, and dominated by extreme religious beliefs.' The killer and his dead siblings were homeschooled and kept under a 'rigid, militant survivalist ideology,' the documents claim. The Humisons were allegedly deeply paranoid of the government and medical professionals, especially surrounding the COVID-19 vaccine, leading to what the defense team painted as an isolating lifestyle. 3 The parents were allegedly religious extremists and ran a 'militant' household. Facebook They were also all allegedly given access to firearms, including Mark Humiston's handgun that the teenager used in his attempt to wipe out his entire family. The revelations were pieced together from nearly 100 interviews with witnesses and family members, many of whom spoke of the killer teen as 'kind, respectful, and deeply devoted to his family.' Even the boy's maternal grandmother sided with him, telling attorneys that Sarah Humiston 'was abusive and demeaning to the children.' 3 The murder took place in the family's $2 million Washington home. KOMO News The woman allegedly told cops she had previously threatened to report the Humiston parents if their abuse did not stop. The alleged abuse apparently came to a head last October when the 15-year-old methodically gunned down his family members one by one in their $2 million suburban Seattle mansion. The teen opened fire around 5 a.m., chillingly shooting them and then returning to check their pulses. Only his sister, an 11-year-old, survived by playing dead when he fired at her neck and hand. She slipped out of a window to a neighbor's house before he could finish the job, police said. At the same time, the gunman called 911 and told dispatchers that his 13-year-old brother had killed their family and 'taken himself out' because he had gotten in trouble looking at pornography the night before. He then staged the bloody scene before first responders arrived in an attempt to pin the killings on his dead brother, even putting a gun in his hand, according to the charging documents. The teen was immediately taken into custody and faces five counts of first-degree aggravated murder and one count of first-degree attempted murder.
Yahoo
12 hours ago
- Yahoo
People Are Rolling Their Eyes Into Oblivion After Hearing Karoline Leavitt's Latest Claim About Trump
White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt is getting put on blast after she once again demanded that President Donald Trump be given the Nobel Peace Prize. 'President Trump has brokered, on average, about one peace deal or ceasefire per month during his six months in office,' she said as she listed some of those efforts. 'It's well past time that President Trump was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize.' While Trump has had his hand in some ceasefire agreements, his efforts overall have been a mixed bag. A ceasefire between Israel and Iran, for example, came only after he launched a US strike on Iranian facilities. And some of the biggest conflicts have continued to rage. Related: Trump vowed repeatedly to end the war between Russia and Ukraine on his first day in office, but the situation has only worsened. He's also promised to end the war in Gaza, but Israel's assault in response to the Oct. 7, 2023, terrorist attacks has continued, and the humanitarian crisis has escalated. Trump has instead complained that he didn't get a 'thank you' from Gaza for sending money intended for food aid. But Leavitt's demand is in line with Trump's longtime grievance over the award. He's complained repeatedly about not getting one during his previous term in office, insisting that he should have had 'four or five' of them by now. And he really doesn't like that President Barack Obama was awarded one. Earlier this month, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said he had nominated Trump for the honor in a move many observers believed was just a blatant attempt to curry favor. As a result, Leavitt's critics fired back with a number of facts about her boss. Some also noted that she seemed to pronounce 'Nobel' as 'noble,' which, ironically, is how Trump himself has spelled the name of the prize in the past. Related: And a few compared her over-the-top praise for her boss to North Korean propaganda. @olddog100ua @3mendous @scarylawyerguy @djomegamvp Related: @jimstewartson @mermaid8861 @LucasSa56947288 @rpsagainsttrump @gregtsargent @chetterhub Related: @brettsbaker @ShayneALong @ronxyz00 @johnbrynt This article originally appeared on HuffPost. Also in In the News: Also in In the News: Also in In the News:


NBC News
13 hours ago
- NBC News
Less staff, even less trust: Some states say they can't rely on Trump's DHS for election security
When Arizona discovered in June that its website for politicians to file as candidates had been hacked, Secretary of State Adrian Fontes did something that would have been unthinkable in the past two presidential administrations: He kept the feds in the dark. Hackers had replaced past candidates' photos with that of Iran's former supreme leader, Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini. Such website defacements are relatively common and are often crimes of opportunity, where hackers spot a flaw they can exploit and use it to draw attention to their cause without doing serious damage. Arizona took the portal offline and remedied the issue. Still, an attack by pro-Iranian hackers is something to note, the kind of thing that secretaries of state and cybersecurity experts share in order to keep colleagues aware of ongoing threats. But in this political climate, Fontes decided it was best to handle on his own. 'The political theater that we've seen out of the Department of Homeland Security, I don't want that anywhere near my security operations,' he said. 'I don't want that anywhere near my Threat Assessment operations. I don't want that anywhere near my technicians or the folks who are actually doing the hard work keeping us and our system safe.' Fontes' decision highlights a major concern around cybersecurity cooperation and election security in the second Trump administration. Cuts to the federal government's election security work and the politicization of Homeland Security have left somestate election heads unsure of how they would work with the federal government if they are hacked. Experts say that a lack of communication could lead to more and worse hacks surrounding elections. 'The challenge in the wake of the evisceration of election security funding by the Trump administration is that it is unclear who to call at [the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Agency] to share this information and what resources are still available,' Shenna Bellows, the secretary of state of Maine, told NBC News. Bellows and Fontes are Democrats. The Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Agency (CISA), created in 2018 in the first Trump administration as part of the Department of Homeland Security to protect crucial services from hackers, has emerged in recent years as the clearinghouse for election officials to share cybersecurity information. But things have changed in the second Trump administration, which has cut most of CISA's election security services and has sought to punish its first director for openly defying the president, particularly around election fraud claims. Three state election heads and a former CISA official who spoke to NBC News said it's clear the agency is no longer as effective in protecting U.S. elections. 'You're hanging states out to dry, basically, to let them fend for themselves,' said Pam Smith, the president of Verified Voting, a nonpartisan nonprofit devoted to providing election officials with resources for their jobs. 'If you do that, I don't think you can expect that people will share,' she said. 'That sort of trusted relationship is essentially broken. That's not to say that it couldn't be rebuilt, but it would require some evidence that they've got your back.' Bellows said that it was unclear how helpful the agency will be going forward or even if it can help. 'It's not that I don't know the names of appointees in certain titles," Bellows said. "But the people doing the work on the ground over the last four years, many of them were fired, and funding for core election cybersecurity services has been eliminated." Phil McGrane, Idaho's secretary of state and a Republican, said the lack of resources at CISA is clear, leaving state officials to figure out a new way forward. 'As a community, we're going through a process right now trying to determine, 'All right, what does this look like moving forward? How much do the states pick up and do some of this work and provide services to their offices?'' he told NBC News. The Trump administration has cut most election security resources from CISA, which before this year had worked to beef up trust with state and local election officials. A CISA spokesperson declined to tell NBC News if any dedicated election security officials still worked at the agency, citing a policy of not discussing personnel matters. The agency also cut funding for the EI-ISAC, a threat information sharing program for election officials. Election officials are still able to receive CISA's general warnings of cyberthreats, like the recent flaw in Microsoft's SharePoint platform. In an emailed statement, a DHS spokesperson said: 'The integrity and security of our nation's elections systems are non-negotiable. We look forward to working with Arizona to continue making sure their citizens get what they deserve — secure and transparent elections.' The White House did not respond to a request for comment. In the Biden administration and during Trump's first term, CISA was the central hub for election cyber information. It may not have been able to keep a state like Arizona from being hacked, but it could have quickly sounded the alarm if it were, minimizing the chance that other states fell to the same tactics. CISA also had open channels with intelligence agencies like the FBI and National Security Agency to get advance warning of what foreign intelligence agencies were planning, information not generally available to local election officials. But CISA caught Trump and his allies' ire in 2020 when it publicly rebutted false claims about elections being rigged or stolen, countering Trump's insistence that he had actually won that year's election. Since retaking the presidency, Trump has called for the agency's director in his first term, Christopher Krebs, to be investigated despite no public evidence of wrongdoing, a move that has disheartened and upset agency employees. One former CISA official, who requested to not be publicly identified because of the current political atmosphere around the agency, said open communication between the agency and states was fundamental to how the government protected elections from hackers. 'Encouraging voluntary information sharing during incidents was so vital to the whole enterprise, and that appears to be severely degraded,' he told NBC News. 'Less complete information and slower response means potentially more victims and more disruptive impact.' 'We would have been all over this. 'We'd want to know, is there a foreign nexus?' he said about the Arizona hack. 'What else did they try to get into? Was it in other states? Did compromises occur elsewhere? There would be people looking at [reports], working with federal and industry partners, trying to figure out how widespread or isolated it was. Was it targeting elections, was it broader?' he said. Voting machines are generally not directly connected to the internet, and the likelihood of a hacker remotely changing official results is extremely low. The vast majority of voting machines in the U.S. now use paper ballots, which the voter can verify and which can be audited. But many other election-related systems are online, and hackers can theoretically exploit them to make it more difficult for people to vote or to sow chaos around unofficial results as they come in. Smith, the head of Verified Voting, questioned why the cuts to election security happened in the first place. 'The most important thing is that relational trust got broken," she said. "You slash funding for important threat sharing centers. You cut whole teams of people whose job it was to support election officials and their work. 'There's no sign of any explanation about why all of that is necessary, or prudent, or helpful,' she added.