Lawmakers look to protect the Pecos Watershed from new mining operations
'We need to remember the headwaters of the Pecos provides life-giving water all the way through the Pecos, down through the village of Villanueva where my family is from, all the way to Texas. These are pristine waters,' said Rep. Teresa Leger Fernandez (D-Santa Fe, Congressional Dist. 3).
The latest fight from New Mexico's congressional delegation aims to protect the Pecos as they reintroduce the Pecos Watershed Protection Act. The federal legislation looks to stop mining around the northern New Mexico river.
Middle schoolers invited to hands-on outdoor adventure exploring Bosque wildlife
'They would prevent any destructive activity and not just in the area but also the flow downstream from any damage,' said Rep. Anita Gonzales (D-San Miguel, Torrance Counties).
The legislation comes after the Trump Administration's recent decision to reverse the Bureau of Land Management's and the U.S. Forest Service's protections of the Upper Pecos Watershed from new mining operations. The reversal reopens mining opportunities on federal lands.
Opponents on Monday said rural communities want to protect the river because farmers, recreationists, and others rely on it. 'The water is important because it is both the source of their drinking water and it is the source of the water that floods their fields in the springtime,' said Rep. Leger Fernandez.
Travel + Leisure rates New Mexico spot as most beautiful
Lawmakers have been trying to get the act passed since 2020 in each Congress, recalling the 1991 toxic waste spill from a closed mine, which caused a massive fish kill. 'We do not want that contamination again. We have lived through what mining can do to the waters of the Pecos, and we want to prevent that,' added Rep. Leger Fernandez.
The Trump Administration hasn't said yet if the feds are working on any new mining agreements near the Pecos. However, a company has shown interest in years past for an exploratory mining project in the area.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Trump's Treasury Set to Decide Fate of Hundreds of Wind, Solar Projects
(Bloomberg) — A Treasury Department decision due next week threatens to undermine the financial viability of hundreds of planned clean energy projects, adding to an escalating Trump administration campaign against wind and solar power. The US-Canadian Road Safety Gap Is Getting Wider Sunseeking Germans Face Swiss Backlash Over Alpine Holiday Congestion To Head Off Severe Storm Surges, Nova Scotia Invests in 'Living Shorelines' Five Years After Black Lives Matter, Brussels' Colonial Statues Remain For Homeless Cyclists, Bikes Bring an Escape From the Streets President Donald Trump last month ordered the department to tighten long-standing guidance used to determine whether projects can qualify for clean-energy tax credits. Until now, projects were eligible if developers spent at least 5% of the planned cost by a certain deadline. The president is pushing Treasury officials to significantly raise that amount or require developers to show more construction progress, which would make it more difficult, or even impossible, for many projects to qualify for the tax breaks that are often essential to their profitability. Developers' appetite to stick with the renewable energy projects or even secure financing for them will hinge on how far the Treasury Department goes in toughening eligibility standards. More than 2,500 announced wind and solar projects — with a combined generating capacity equivalent to roughly 383 nuclear reactors — that have yet to begin construction could be affected by the Treasury Department's decision, said Atin Jain, an energy analyst with BloombergNEF. In just the past few weeks, the Trump administration has targeted wind and solar power through a rapid-fire series of permitting reviews. It imposed standards that would essentially prevent new developments on federal land. It rescinded Biden-era decisions earmarking coastal waters for future wind turbines. And it revoked federal approval for a massive planned wind farm in Idaho. Despite rising demand and prices for electricity, the impending tax guidance could deal the final blow to many wind and solar projects, said Rhone Resch, the chief executive officer of Advanced Energy Advisors, a risk management consulting firm for renewable energy development. 'Projects will get canceled,' Resch said. 'A lot of projects just aren't going to be able to adapt to these new deadlines.' Other developments, Resch added, will survive, but will take a hit to their profits. More stringent standards for the tax credit also will drive up electric utility rates for consumers faster since renewables, particularly wind and solar, are the only energy sources that can be scaled up quickly to meet rising demand, said Brian Murphy, Ernst & Young LLP's Americas Power, Utilities and Renewables Tax Leader. Trump's executive order last month signaling stricter limits for the tax credits set off a furious behind-the-scenes struggle within the Republican party, pitting senators sympathetic to wind and solar power against ultra-conservatives in the House hostile to renewable energy tax breaks. Several Senate Republicans negotiated a longer phase-out period for wind and solar credits in exchange for supporting Trump's signature tax law. But the president also struck a deal with members of the hardline conservative House Freedom Caucus to use his executive authority to curtail the tax credits in order to win their support for the same bill. Under the provision negotiated by Senate Republicans, wind and solar projects that qualify as under construction by July 4, 2026, would have four years to complete work and collect the credit. Otherwise, they would have to be ready for use by the end of 2027 to be eligible. Long-standing Treasury guidance set a safe harbor deeming projects under construction if developers met the 5% spending threshold by the deadline. That has been cast in doubt by Trump's executive order, issued last month just days after the tax law passed. Trump directed the Treasury Department to ensure projects cannot qualify for the credits unless 'a substantial portion' of the facility is completed by the deadline next year. The president also urged the department to prevent 'artificial acceleration' of wind and solar projects to qualify for the tax credits. Developers thought 'they had at least gotten to a point where now we know the new rules' when the tax bill passed, Murphy said. Then Trump's executive order kicked off 'a new round of uncertainty.' Mike Carr, a partner at the government affairs firm Boundary Stone Partners who represents domestic solar manufacturers, said the impending Treasury Department guidance is now 'the main game in town' for the Department spokespeople didn't respond to requests for comment. Republican Senator Chuck Grassley of Iowa, whose home state generates more than half its electricity from wind and whose support for the tax credit stretches back to a provision he helped insert into a 1992 energy law, has threatened to hold up confirmation of three Treasury Department nominees until he's certain the department's guidance adheres to 'the law and congressional intent.' Senator John Curtis, a Utah Republican, has joined him in the threat. The two senators were still negotiating with the Trump administration as of Tuesday, according to a person familiar with the matter. Americans Are Getting Priced Out of Homeownership at Record Rates Dubai's Housing Boom Is Stoking Fears of Another Crash Bessent on Tariffs, Deficits and Embracing Trump's Economic Plan Why It's Actually a Good Time to Buy a House, According to a Zillow Economist The Electric Pickup Truck Boom Turned Into a Big Bust ©2025 Bloomberg L.P. Sign up for the Yahoo Finance Morning Brief By subscribing, you are agreeing to Yahoo's Terms and Privacy Policy
WIRED
4 hours ago
- WIRED
The First Federal Cybersecurity Disaster of Trump 2.0 Has Arrived
Aug 14, 2025 6:20 AM The breach of the US Courts records system came to light more than a month after the attack was discovered. Details about what was exposed—and who's responsible—remain unclear. Photo-Illustration:The second Trump administration has its first federal cybersecurity debacle to deal with. A breach of the United States federal judiciary's electronic case filing system, discovered around July 4, has pushed some courts onto backup paper-filing plans after the hack compromised sealed court records and possibly exposed the identities of confidential informants and cooperating witnesses across multiple US states. More than a month after the discovery of the breach—and in spite of recent reports from The New York Times and Politico that Russia was involved in perpetrating the hack—it is still unclear exactly what happened and which data and systems were affected. Politico first reported the breach of the 'case management/electronic case files,' or CM/ECF, system, which may have impacted criminal dockets, arrest warrants, and sealed indictments. The CM/ECF system also suffered a breach in 2020 during the first Trump administration, and Politico reported on Tuesday that, in the recent attack, hackers exploited software vulnerabilities that remained unaddressed after being discovered five years ago in response to that first incident. Security researchers say that gaps in public information about the situation are concerning, particularly when it comes to lack of clarity on what data was affected. 'We're more than a month into detecting this intrusion and still don't have a full accounting of what's impacted,' says Jake Williams, a former NSA hacker and current vice president of research and development at Hunter Strategy. 'If we don't have sufficient logging to reconstruct attack activity, that would be extremely disappointing, because this system has been repeatedly targeted over the years.' In response to a request for comment, the United States Courts referred WIRED to its August 7 statement, which says the federal judiciary 'is taking additional steps to strengthen protections for sensitive case documents' and 'further enhancing security of the system.' The courts also mention that the 'vast majority of documents filed with the Judiciary's electronic case management system are not confidential and indeed are readily available to the public,' while conceding that 'some filings contain confidential or proprietary information that are sealed from public view.' The Department of Justice did not immediately respond to requests for comment about the scope of the breach or who perpetrated it. Reports this week that Russia was involved in the attack or may be the sole perpetrator have been difficult to interpret, given other indications that espionage actors backed by multiple countries—and possibly organized crime syndicates—may have been involved in or piggybacking on the breach for their own exfiltration. John Hultquist, chief analyst in Google's Threat Intelligence Group, says it is not uncommon to see multiple actors poking at a sensitive, and potentially vulnerable, system. 'Investigations are regularly targeted by cyberespionage actors from several countries,' he says. News of the breach comes as the Trump administration has continued to slash the federal workforce, including combing intelligence and cybersecurity agencies to remove officials or pressure them to resign. 'I think federal investigators probably know who was behind the attack, but given the climate, I would suspect that no one wants to say with certainty,' Hunter Strategy's Williams says. Multiple administrations have struggled to get a handle on insidious espionage operations, particularly campaigns perpetrated by Chinese and Russian actors. But researchers emphasize that vulnerabilities enabling the attack on CM/ECF should have been addressed after the 2021 breach. 'Enforcing policies to require that sealed or highly sensitive documents be handled via air-gapped systems or secure isolated networks rather than through CM/ECF or PACER would have dramatically limited exposure. And this was actually recommended post-2021,' says Tim Peck, senior threat researcher at the cybersecurity firm Securonix. 'Instituting consistent, centralized logging—among other things—across all disparate CM/ECF instances could have enabled earlier detection and rapid mitigation before data exfiltration escalated as far as it did.' In other words, highly targeted systems like those of the US Courts are likely going to suffer breaches. But the best way to reduce the likelihood and severity of these attacks is to make sure you fix the flaws after they're exploited the first time around.
Washington Post
4 hours ago
- Washington Post
Here's what it takes to encourage Americans to have more babies
An analysis of where Americans keep having babies reveals what works The Trump administration wants an American baby boom, but so far this ambition has been a bit of a bust. The much-hyped baby bonus — a proposal to give mothers $5,000 after they give birth — ended up becoming a restrictive investment account where funds are inaccessible until children reach 18 years old. Meanwhile, Trump's campaign promise to mandate IVF care appears to be sidelined. The latest data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention showed that the United States reached its lowest fertility rate in history in 2024: Every American woman is now estimated to have 1.6 children during their lifetime, much lower than the 2.1 rate needed to keep population at its current level without immigration. An analysis of birth rates nationally showed two forces are pushing Americans away from having children: a broad cultural shift away from traditional families and a lack of high-quality, affordable child care and housing. Story continues below advertisement Advertisement The financial burden of raising children A family with two working parents in 2024 needed to increase its income by almost 40 percent, about $26,900 extra per year, to maintain their standard of living after having their first child, according to an analysis of data from the Economic Policy Institute. Type in the county you live in below to find out how much it would cost in your area: Find a county Search In the United States, a family of two would need to increase their income by 39 percent, for a total of $95,300 per year, to raise the first child. 39% increase in income for raising the first child The annual living cost of a two-adult family $68,400 $26,900 Raising two children requires a 67% increase in income Raising three children requires a 100% increase in income Raising four children requires a 117% increase in income Source: Family Budget Calculator by the Economic Policy Institute, author's analysis That's a tall order in the current economy and a stark increase from just a decade ago, when the Agriculture Department estimated that an average American family of two parents needed 24 percent additional income to raise one child. It matters because birth rates are lower in areas where raising children takes a bigger share of a family's income, as the chart below shows: Each dot represents one county Percent of additional income needed to raise one child Birth rates are available for counties with populations of more than 100,000. Only 580 counties are shown. Source: Author's analysis of data from CDC and Economic Policy Institute Policies that lower the financial burden for families — not just once, but consistently throughout a child's life — are key. Story continues below advertisement Advertisement What we can learn from areas of high birth rates If encouraging Americans to have babies is a genuine policy goal of the Trump administration, it should look around the country to find what works. The birth rate in the U.S. has been declining for the past two decades. But the decline across the country is uneven. Some areas have retained a high birth rate, and in a few, the rate has even increased. If we look at the 10 counties with the highest birth rates, we can draw some preliminary conclusions about what makes a place baby-friendly: Onslow County, North Carolina — the county that has had the top birth rate across the country in the past five years — exemplifies what subsidized child care can achieve. Map of Onslow County, North Carolina NORTH CAROLINA Durham Charlotte Onslow County Wilmington 100 MILES NORTH CAROLINA Durham Charlotte Onslow County Wilmington 50 MILES north carolina Durham Charlotte Onslow County Wilmington 50 MILES Sitting on the east coast of North Carolina, Onslow resembles an average American place, with a population that is 69 percent White, 11 percent Black and 14 percent Hispanic. But it's cheap to live there: The median home price is about $219,000, and it costs about $20,800 a year to raise a child — both lower than the national average. What brings Onslow to the top of the chart is its large share of military families because of two nearby Marine Corps bases — and the resulting subsidized child care. The state estimated that 46 percent of students in the Onslow County public school system were from a military family in the 2023-2024 school year. School-age children from military families are eligible for federal child care subsidies. If Onslow illustrates the effect of subsidized child care, the next three counties with the highest birth rates on the chart bring up another equally important factor: culture. Map of the three top counties Rockland County a N.Y.C surburb with the largest Jewish population per capita of any U.S. county NY Salt Lake City New York UNITED STATES UT Dallas TX Utah County The county with the highest proportion of Mormons in the nation Ector County Sixty-four percent of Ector County residents are Hispanic. Source: U.S. Census and Rockland County, and Public Religion Research Institute Rockland County an NYC exurb with the largest Jewish population per capita of any U.S. county NY Salt Lake City New York UNITED STATES UT Dallas TX Utah County The county with the highest proportion of Mormons in the nation Ector County Sixty-four percent of Ector County residents are Hispanic. Source: U.S. Census and Rockland County, and Public Religion Research Institute Rockland County, NY an NYC exurb with the largest Jewish population per capita of any U.S. county ny Salt Lake City Utah County New York City UT tx Dallas Ector County The county with the highest proportion of Mormons in the nation Sixty-four percent of Ector County residents are Hispanic. Source: U.S. Census and Rockland County, and Public Religion Research Institute Rockland County, NY an NYC exurb with the largest Jewish population per capita of any U.S. county ny Salt Lake City Utah County New York City UT Dallas Ector County Tx The county with the highest proportion of Mormons in the nation Sixty-four percent of Ector County residents are Hispanic. Source: U.S. Census and Rockland County, and Public Religion Research Institute Rockland County, New York, is a wealthy exurban area with the largest Jewish population per capita of any U.S. county. Ector County, Texas, has a large oil and gas industry presence, and 64 percent of its residents are Hispanic. In Utah County, Utah, seven out of 10 people are Mormon — the highest concentration in the nation. What do these places have in common? They are all highly religious: 65 percent of the population in Rockland, 50 percent in Ector County and 89 percent in Utah County went to church regularly, according to data from 2020, far above the national average of about 30 percent. Religious people are more likely to have children than the nonreligious. But most Americans do not go to church today. If there's a magic bullet to restore faith in Americans, it might also restore birth rates. But that seems unlikely. A more realistic approach would be to replicate cultural aspects among religious communities that make it easier to have babies. By culture, I mean a place where parents foster strong family relationships by spending more time with their kids and where children are valued and cared for with the participation of the larger community, so that children growing up in such an environment would themselves aspire to be parents one day. Story continues below advertisement Advertisement How does that look in a secular world? France offers an example. While France has also experienced a fertility decline in the past decade, it has slowed the decline more successfully than peer countries, including the United States. Despite the fact that France is less religious than such neighbors as Spain, Italy or Germany, it has topped the fertility rate among European peers for more than a decade. France achieved that with policy measures that support families through every stage of a child's growth including up to three years of parental leave and tax credits covering up to 85 percent of the cost of day care or nannies. Public preschools in France are free for kids from 3 to 6 years old. The French government gives monthly support to families with special needs through cash allowances, tax credits and subsidized services until children reach age 20. The point is not to exactly match the government-sponsored family support in France, but to design policies that foster a culture that puts the values of family first. The right policies can make childbearing more desirable. They can help to change culture and counter the trend in a secular world. It has been done here before: Oklahoma, a solidly red state, started offering universal prekindergarten education to 4-year-olds in 1998. Today, it's one of the states with the highest fertility rates in the country. If Oklahoma could do it 20 years ago, why not the entire country?
