Whitehall departments to be told to move more civil servants out of London or get less cash
Whitehall departments are at risk of failing to get part of their funding in Rachel Reeves's spending unless they decant hundreds of civil servants to other parts of the UK.
A major government shake up will require more civil service jobs to be based in 12 locations outside London, delivering and developing government policy closer to the communities it affects.
The move is expected to provide a £729m boost for local economies across UK in shake up to bring government closer to communities.
The 12 growth areas are: Greater Manchester, Birmingham, Leeds, Cardiff, Glasgow, Darlington, Newcastle and Tyneside, Sheffield, Bristol, Edinburgh, Belfast and York.
As part of the spending review, Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster Pat McFadden will write to all departments requiring them to relocate key roles and strengthen the government's presence in 12 locations by 2030.
A government source has confirmed that success in the project by departments 'will be factored into' their spending review settlement.
The source added: 'We expect all London based Departments to set out ambitious commitments to relocate roles out of London as part of their spending review plans.'
To avoid name plate only efforts, there will be an expectation of 60 per cent working from offices as a minimum.
The plan reflects the movement of part of the Treasury to a new campus in Teesside in the north east of England.
The prime minister is understood to be keen to go further to enhance the impact of government in places across the country, so that the civil service has an active presence in communities across the UK and contributes to local growth and job creation.
The plans will see more roles working closer to frontline services, facilitating greater understanding of the real issues facing local services and people, and how central government policy can support them.
Central government can't solve the issues facing local communities from Whitehall alone. Building real, sustainable links to the communities they serve, the changes ensure civil servants will work with the local community, service providers and local government to develop policy.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
23 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Benefits bill on course to rise by £18billion a YEAR without reform - equivalent to more than the entire police budget
Spending on sickness benefits is on course to rise by £18 billion without reform – more than the entire police budget. Work and pensions secretary Liz Kendall is facing a furious backlash from Labour MPs and campaigners who warn that 'cruel' cuts to disability benefits will drive hundreds of thousands into poverty. But official figures published alongside the Government's long-awaited welfare legislation yesterday reveal that spending on benefits will continue to soar even if the reforms survive a Commons rebellion, with many Labour MPs threatening the first big revolt of Keir Starmer 's premiership. An impact assessment reveals that spending on sickness and disability benefits for working-age adults is set to jump by £18 billion a year to £70 billion by the next election, if nothing is done to trim the bill. The report adds: 'The increase alone is more than the entire police budget.' The 2025-26 police budget is £17.4 billion. A Whitehall source said the surge in spending underlined the need for reform, adding: 'These figures show that the current welfare system is unsustainable.' Ms Kendall's reforms will trim £5 billion from the total unless they are blocked by mutinous Labour MPs. But spending on personal independence payments (PIP), which is at the centre of Labour's civil war on welfare, will rise by £8 billion to £31 billion – an increase of more than a third. Despite a tightening of eligibility criteria, the Department for Work and Pensions estimates another 750,000 will be claiming the benefit by the next election. Ms Kendall said the welfare package 'marks the moment we take the road of compassion, opportunity and dignity'. The cuts were needed to put the welfare budget 'on a more sustainable path'. 'This is about ensuring fairness for people who need support and fairness for the taxpayer too,' she added. But Labour critics warned there was 'no moral case' for taking benefits away from people currently classed as 'disabled'. Labour MP Bell Ribeiro-Addy said the scale of the cuts 'would have made George Osborne blush'. She added: 'We cannot underestimate their human and political cost. The public will not forgive us if we remove support from those most in need of it.' Fellow Left-winger Richard Burgon said: 'These cruel cuts will drive hundreds of thousands of people into poverty. These cuts should have been dropped – now they should be voted down.' More than 100 Labour MPs have raised concerns about the proposals with party whips, but ministers are privately confident they can avoid a humiliating defeat in the Commons early next month. The most controversial cut involves ending eligibility for PIP payments for 800,000 people, who will lose around £4,500 each. The Government's own assessment suggests this will drive 250,000 people into poverty, including 50,000 children. The package also involves 'rebalancing' Universal Credit (UC) payments to end the 'perverse' incentive that makes it attractive for people to claim they are too sick to work. The standard UC payment of just over £400 a month will be increased by more than inflation, while the 'health element', currently worth an extra £423, will be frozen. The changes will hit around three million people. The Policy Exchange think-tank has warned that the sickness benefits bill will hit £100 billion by 2029/30 – meaning £1 in every £4 of income tax will be spent on it.
Daily Mail
37 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Scotland's prosecutors using offender's chosen gender to record crimes
Prosecutors have been accused of 'protecting the egos of offenders' by recording their self-declared gender in official figures. Hate crime data produced by the Crown Office reflects a mix of gender based on physical appearance as recorded by police officers, and self-ID. The Crown Office insists that 'information regarding the sex or gender of accused persons is not essential to prosecute crime' – and that it will respect the 'pronouns of an accused person'. It comes after the Supreme Court ruled that the words 'woman' and 'sex' in the Equality Act 2010 refer to a biological woman and biological sex, rather than chosen gender. Last night Scottish Tory justice spokesman Liam Kerr said: 'This confirms how entrenched the SNP 's gender self-ID obsession is in Scotland's justice system and will undoubtedly lead to further confusion in how crimes are recorded. 'The Crown should have the scope to focus on what really matters, rather than being forced to waste time protecting the egos of offenders.' A Crown Office report on hate crime says 'sex can be considered to refer to whether someone is male or female based on their physiology and genetic make-up', while 'gender' represents a 'social construct or sense of self that takes a wider range of forms'. The Crown said 'in this report we refer to ''sex'' rather than ''gender'' because this better reflects recording practices in relation to this information'. But the report also says: 'In reality, it is likely that recording includes a mixture of physiological and personal identity. 'The sex of a small number of accused is not recorded, where the police have not provided this information to COPFS [Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service].' The report adds: 'Sex, as referred to in this bulletin, is generally identified by a police officer based on their assessment of whether a person presents as male or female – in most cases, this is based on the physiology of a person rather than self-identified gender. 'It is recorded for operational purposes, such as requirements for searching. It is also included in the information reported to COPFS. 'However, in most cases, information regarding the sex or gender of accused persons is not essential to prosecute crime. 'It would only be essential where it is material to the proof of the crime.' The Crown said it 'will respect and use the chosen name and pronouns of an accused person in all communications with them'. Last night Dr Kath Murray, of gender-critical think-tank Murray Blackburn Mackenzie, said: 'The corruption of criminal justice data on sex has come about through a blinkered reliance on activists in pursuit of gender self-identification.'
Daily Mail
38 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
SNP deny 192,000 scots OAPs winter fuel cash
Nearly 200,000 Scots OAPs won't get winter fuel help after the SNP broke their promise on universal payments. The Scottish Government announced yesterday that it would only provide its new devolved benefit to those earning less than £35,000. They will receive payments of £203.40 or £305.10 – figures which have been set marginally higher than the £200 and £300 rates offered south of the Border. But those with personal incomes above £35,000 a year – including pensions, investments and other earnings – will have the payments recovered from them through the tax system. It means that 853,000 will receive the payment and get to keep it, while around 192,000 – or nearly one in five – will have it clawed back because they earn more than £35,000. This is despite the SNP previously pledging that they would provide a 'universal' payment this winter, with everyone receiving at least £100. Scottish Conservative social security spokesman Liz Smith said: 'The SNP, like Labour, shamefully betrayed pensioners by axing universal winter fuel payments, before being forced into a humiliating climbdown by the public outcry. 'But this latest announcement means that hundreds of thousands of Scots will not have the payment even partially restored – despite John Swinney's promise that they would. 'This latest slap in the face will not be forgotten or forgiven.' A series of policy announcements and U-turns have been made about winter fuel payments since the Labour government first announced cuts last year. Over the past winter, only those on pension credit received a payment following the initial cuts by the Chancellor Rachel Reeves and the SNP's decision to delay the introduction of the devolved pension age winter heating payments. First Minister John Swinney committed earlier this week to ensuring that all pensioners receive at least the same amount as those in England. But when SNP ministers unveiled the full detail of their plan yesterday, it was confirmed that the intention is for those with income above £35,000 to have this clawed back through the tax system. The Scottish Government confirmed 133,000 pensioners in receipt of pension credit were already receiving winter fuel payments over the last winter, while an additional 720,000 with earnings below £35,000 will become eligible this winter. Adam Stachura, policy director at Age Scotland, said: 'While this is a considerable increase for the vast majority of pensioners compared to what the Scottish Government had originally planned, it only really brings it back to what they received two winters ago. Around four in ten Scottish pensioners were living in fuel poverty then, and it will have sky-rocketed since. 'The policy making on this payment has been guddled, lacked consultation, and politically charged throughout. 'While this is partly to do with the speed of the UK Government's original change and subsequent U-turn, the Scottish Government's repeated commitment to universality and its benefits has been abandoned in a heartbeat. 'While in the end this payment is broadly now proportionally fairer, it doesn't really match the material need of most older people and take advantage of the financial means the government has available to improve it.' Social Justice Secretary Shirley-Anne Somerville said: 'The UK Government's decision to cut the Winter Fuel Payment last winter was a betrayal of millions of pensioners, and their recent U-turn is welcome if belated. 'Following careful consideration of the options available, the Scottish Government will mirror the approach taken by the UK Government. We will bring forward regulations to ensure that, from this winter onwards, all pensioners will receive either £203.40 or £305.10 per household, depending on age. 'We are in discussion with the UK Government to extend the proposed arrangements in England and Wales to recover payments from those pensioners with an individual income of more than £35,000 through the tax system. 'The intention is that the payment will be recovered automatically, and pensioners will not need to register with HMRC for this or take any further action. 'This approach ensures a higher level of support which those most in need will receive. 'Over 720,000 Scottish pensioners are estimated to benefit from the higher payment.'
