2 task force members say prison, site must fit needs
Task force member Republican Sen. Jim Mehlhaff said he doesn't want the state to pursue a project that fits only a few years with a need to address additional issues. 'If we do that, we've failed,' Mehlhaff said.
A prison project is something the state wants to do every 50 to 100 years, he said.
The task force is reviewing a study of the prison and recommendations to replace the existing men's prison in Sioux Falls. Consultant Arrington Watkins has done the study and one its recommendations is to build a 1,500 to 1,700 bed facility as soon as possible. The task force will also evaluate potential sites, narrow down those sites and the consultant will develop a plan based on those potential sites. The potential site includes a location in Lincoln County between Harrisburg and Canton that has received strong opposition.
'The existing prison is a horrible place for staff and inmates,' task force member Minnehaha County Sheriff Mike Milstead said.
Sioux Falls Mayor Paul TenHaken and Sioux Falls Police Chief Jon Thum both said in a letter obtained by KELOLAND News Wednesday that they did not support possible sites in Sioux Falls. They did support the original site in Lincoln County and another possible site near Worthing.
'The one thing I'd say about sites, clearly, there is strong objection to the Lincoln County site,' Milstead said.
Milstead described it as Not In My Backyard or NIMBY. He understands that those who are opposed may be living in lifetime rural homes or have had farms passed down through generations. And that they were surprised to learn a prison could be built in the area.
Yet, 'If you looked at the sites in Sioux Falls, there are hundreds of not thousands who live in the general area,' Milstead said. He's heard 'significant strong' opposition to several sites in Sioux Falls from neighboring residents and businesses, Milstead said.
Mehlhaff said some of the proposed sites will be easier to eliminate such as in Grant County near Big Stone City. 'That proposal is getting robust push back,' he said. Even so, the site is too far away, Mehlhaff said. For example, it's impractical and too far if inmates are transported from Pennington County, he said. He's also concerned about available workforce and medical services.
Mehlhaff was asked specifically about the former Citibank site in Sioux Falls. Lawmaker and task force member Republican Sen. Chris Karr recently told South Dakota Searchlight that the Citibank property was 'almost turn-key.'
'In my mind there are a lot of hurdles before that becomes a viable option,' Mehlhaff said of the Citibank property.
The property could provide for some prison needs but does not believe the buildings could be used for inmate housing, Mehlhaff said. '…it would not take care of all of our needs,' he said.
The Arrington Watkins report also cited a 2023 law which requires offenders of certain violent crimes to serve 100% of their sentences and others to serve 85% of their sentences as a major factor in increasing the prison population. The report recommended the state build a second 1,700 project because of the expected increase in the prison population because of longer mandatory sentences.
Milstead said it's too soon to estimate the impact of the 2023 law Senate Bill 246 called Truth in Sentencing. Before the 2023 law, judges may have sentenced an offender to 15 years and the offender may have only served two. Because of the 2023 judges may decide to sentence the offender to five years knowing they'd serve the full five or to two years knowing the offender would serve the full two years, Milstead said. Those scenarios would not necessarily increase the prison population, he said.
Still, he said, the law's impact will need to be monitored, Milstead said. But, the task force is not responsible for recommending program changes or additions or to weigh in on policy, he said.
The task force's role is to deal with the need for a prison, select a project and site to recommend to the Legislature, Milstead said.
In a Tuesday KELOLAND News story, task force members Democrat Sen. Jamie Smith and Democrat Rep. Erin Healy said prison policies including the 2023 Senate Bill 246 law need to be studied. A prison may be needed but the state must also find ways to better prevent crime and improve chances at an offender's reentry in to the community, they said. A summer study is planned for prison policies and sentencing.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
an hour ago
- The Hill
Red states lead push for MAHA soda bans
Republican-led states are leading the charge to ban soda and candy from their food stamp programs, as Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s 'Make America Healthy Again' (MAHA) movement flips traditional partisanship on its head. Colorado is the only blue state to seek and have a soda ban waiver approved, and the only waiver state to propose expanding SNAP benefits in conjunction with limiting its scope. Both parties at times have expressed interest in eliminating soda from the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), but the Trump administration is the first to encourage states to do so. Recent attempts at soda regulation have mostly been concentrated in blue cities. Former New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg (D) infamously tried to ban the sale of supersized sugary drinks in 2013, prompting Republicans to decry his 'nanny state' tactics. With the healthy-eating push now under the MAHA branding, GOP states are jumping aboard. Kennedy doesn't run SNAP — that falls under the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA). But as the face of MAHA, Kennedy has been alongside Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins to promote soda and candy bans. In just the first six months of the new administration, 12 state waivers have been approved by USDA that restrict SNAP recipients from purchasing some combination of soft drinks, sugary beverages, energy drinks and candy 'We all believe in free choice, we live in a democracy … if you want to buy sugary soda, you ought to be able to do that. The U.S. taxpayer should not pay for it,' Kennedy said during a recent press conference. The states that have claimed waivers are Arkansas, Colorado, Florida, Idaho, Indiana, Iowa, Louisiana, Nebraska, Oklahoma, Texas, Utah and West Virginia. SNAP dollars can be used to buy any food or beverage from a grocery store except alcohol, nutritional supplements or hot food. The idea of policing the shopping carts of low-income Americans has never sat well with anti-hunger advocates, who've argued it's paternalistic and stigmatizing for low-income Americans. Additionally, while federal data show sugary drinks are the leading source of added sugars in the American diet, nutrition experts said there is limited evidence that shows SNAP soda bans lead to better health outcomes. There's even less evidence that banning candy and dessert foods from SNAP can positively impact a person's diet. 'Claiming that implementing these restrictions will absolutely lead to a curb in diet-related diseases, you cannot confidently say that. There is no evidence to support that statement,' said Joelle Johnson, the deputy director for Healthy Food Access at the Center for Science in the Public Interest, a group that advocates for stronger nutrition regulation. The SNAP waivers are for pilot programs only, so they won't immediately lead to long-term policy changes. They are a chance for states to conduct the research that's been missing — if they want to find out. Barry Popkin, a professor of nutrition at the University of North Carolina School of Global Public Health, said he thinks waivers are toothless ways for states to show their MAHA bonafides. 'None of these states are doing more than pleasing MAHA, doing what's easy. They can do this internally. They don't have to go to the politicians [and pass laws],' Popkin said, 'Waivers do nothing except allow a state to say you can't buy junk food.' Experts said historically, Republicans who have wanted to ban soda from SNAP also viewed it as a way to trim spending on the program. Some advocates continue to view the latest push with skepticism. One of the groups pushing hard for state SNAP waivers is the Foundation for Government Accountability, a conservative think tank based in Florida that's been working for over a decade to reshape the nation's public assistance programs and significantly cut spending. Johnson said she is worried about a slippery slope. If fewer items are eligible for SNAP, she's concerned GOP leaders will use that as an excuse to cut back on people's monthly benefits. Priya Fielding-Singh, director of policy and programs at the George Washington University's Global Food Institute, said there could be benefits in trying to focus SNAP purchases on healthy food. But it's hard to look at a soda-and-candy ban in isolation, she said. The Agriculture Department slashed about $1 billion in funding that let schools and food banks buy food directly from local farms and ranchers. The White House is proposing deep cuts to fruit and vegetable benefits under the WIC program (Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children). The GOP's new tax cut law is projected to cut $186 billion from SNAP in the next decade and disqualify millions from eligibility. 'It's hard to separate the soda ban from the larger political efforts to shrink SNAP overall. So are these bans about promoting health or are they about shrinking SNAP? And I think the distinction really matters,' Fielding-Singh said. She added that any moves to restrict what people can buy with SNAP should be paired with efforts to give people the 'means and access and resources to eat more healthfully.' But so far, none of the red state waivers does that. Gov. Jared Polis (D) in a statement on Colorado's waiver, called it 'a big step towards improving the health of Coloradans, and reducing obesity rates, diabetes, and tooth decay' that 'will help to ensure that more Coloradans participating in SNAP have access to healthy foods.' The Trump administration has not yet given them the green light on a separate waiver to cover hot foods from grocery stores like rotisserie chicken or soup. Democratic Govs. Laura Kelly (Kan.) and Katie Hobbs (Ariz.) each vetoed bills that called for their states to submit waivers to ban candy and soda. 'I support the idea that Kansans should eat healthier. However, changes to the SNAP food assistance program should be made at the federal level, not on a patchwork, state-by-state basis,' Kelly wrote in her veto message. She also noted the language in the bill would have mandated businesses to stop accepting food assistance benefits for 'healthy' items like protein bars and trail mix while continuing to allow Twix, Kit Kat, and Twizzlers. Kennedy this week said he expects more blue states to be filing waivers. 'I was at the governors' conference in Colorado last week, and I met with a whole string of Democratic governors and they all committed to filing SNAP waivers,' Kennedy said. Kennedy also said those governors also committed to put forward other 'MAHA legislation' but he acknowledged they may not want to be associated with the term because it's become 'kind of a partisan brand.' As she signed Colorado's waiver, Rollins said healthy eating should be bipartisan. 'This is not red or blue, Republican or Democrat,' Rollins said. 'We are discussing and working with every state, so really excited to continue to work with Gov. Polis.'
Fox News
an hour ago
- Fox News
Gavin Newsom's desire to abolish California's redistricting laws would 'disregard the will of voters,' says GOP lawmaker
Rep. Kevin Kiley, R-Calif. discusses the redistricting efforts in the Golden State on 'Fox Report.'
Chicago Tribune
2 hours ago
- Chicago Tribune
US Rep. Mrvan makes pitch to maintain Winfiled's postal substation
U.S. Rep. Frank J. Mrvan, D-Highland, continues to seek answers regarding the U.S. Postmaster General's decision in late May to close the Winfield contract postal unit. Mrvan, in his most recent inquiry, sent a letter on July 30 to United States Postmaster General David Steiner regarding the termination of the contract postal unit located in Winfield set for closure on Sept. 30. 'The planned closure of the Winfield (CPU) could hinder my constituents' ability to access convenient, reliable, and efficient postal services. I urge Postmaster General Steiner to clarify the postal service's reasoning for the termination of the Winfield CPU contract, provide a public comment period to allow community members to express their concerns and reconsider this decision,' Mrvan said in his letter. Other local, county and state representatives have also continued to seek answers, including Winfield Town Council President Zack Beaver and Winfield Township Trustee Cody Reynolds. 'It's pretty straightforward to me. I'm thankful that Congressman Mrvan has heard the appeal from his constituents in Winfield and was willing to write that letter. I'm not overly optimistic that this will reverse the course on the closure but if successful, it will be a pleasant surprise for a number of Winfield residents,' Beaver said. Reynolds said he sent letters early on, in support of keeping the post office, as have other representatives, including Lake County Republican Chairman Randy Niemeyer; State Rep. Julie Olthoff, R-Crown Point; State Sen. Rick Niemeyer, R-Lowell; and Lake County Commissioner Jerry Tippy, R-3. Ideally, given that the Winfield area is one of the fastest growing in the state, Reynolds would like to see residents have their own post office and not just a contract postal unit. 'I'd like to see this (letter) be an initiation of a conversation so that the town of Winfield and Winfield Township can receive local postal services going forward. We need full services,' Reynolds said. Reynolds said he understands the idea of making things more efficient but this boils down to the allocation of resources. 'Why should a community of some 15,000 (the population of Winfield and LOFS) be forced to drive to the Leroy post office, of 200-400 people, and it's not even full service, since it's only open four hours a day during the weekdays,' Reynolds said. Notice of contract termination was emailed by a U.S. Postal Service official in late May to Amy Culver, the customer service agent for the post office, and George and Diane Smith, owners of the building, which shares space with U-Haul Rentals. Susan W. Wright, Strategic Communications Specialist for the U.S. Postal Corporate Communications, responded with the following email when asked the reason behind the termination: 'The Postal Service sometimes contracts with retailers to host Contract Postal Units, or CPUs, within a retail establishment, operated by the retailer's employee. CPUs can provide communities with expanded access to postal services, but they are not operated by the Postal Service. In all instances, CPU agreements may be terminated by either party upon 120 days' written notice.' 'In the case of the Winfield CPU at 8380 E. 109th Ave., Crown Point, the Postal Service determined the nearby postal facilities are able to fully serve the community and the CPU was no longer needed.' Wright could not be immediately reached for comment on Friday. Culver and the Smiths, at the time, said they were blindsided by the email notifying them of the 120-day termination since they thought all was well. 'This came out of nowhere,' Culver said. The U-Haul Rentals and the post office had a 'permanently closed' sign on the front door on Friday morning during a drive-by of the property. Diane Smith, when contacted at home, said the post office and U-Haul were both closed on Aug. 6 because Culver, who managed both businesses, had gotten another job. In addition, postal officials have removed all their equipment from the building, which will be used as offices for the Smiths and their daughter. 'It's really sad,' Smith said. Mrvan, in his latest letter to the postmaster general, asked for answers to several questions, including: — Why was the Winfield CPU specifically selected for termination? Is this an isolated incident, or is it part of a wider USPS effort to terminate CPU contracts? — Given the USPS stated goal to improve 'efficiency,' what is the projected economic impact of the Winfield CPU closure on USPS? — What are the current average wait times for customers at the Leroy and Boone Grove post offices, and how is the closure of the Winfield CPU expected to affect wait times? — Local elected officials in Winfield Township have expressed their concerns that USPS is also having discussions about closing the Leroy Post Office, which would significantly exacerbate the impact of the Winfield CPU closure. Can you provide assurances regarding the continued operation of the Leroy Post Office and other nearby post offices operating in Indiana's First Congressional District? — While there is no statutory requirement that USPS provide a public comment period before CPU closures, I believe it is critical to gather stakeholder input and conduct an impact assessment before proceeding with the decision. 'On behalf of my constituents, I urge you to provide detailed answers to the above questions, conduct a stakeholder-driven impact assessment of this decision, and reconsider the planned closure of the Winfield CPU. I look forward to your prompt response, and stand ready to work together to ensure continued access to efficient, reliable and convenient postal services for residents of Indiana's First Congressional District,' Mrvan said in his letter. The Winfield postal substation was opened in April 2021 and before that, was housed for many years inside the former Fagen Pharmacy, now CVS Pharmacy, 10809 Randolph St., before Fagen's closed in 2017. The town of Winfield and nearby unincorporated Lakes of the Four Seasons, which use a Crown Point ZIP code, have mail delivered through the Crown Point Post Office on Summit Street in Crown Point.
