
Education advocates press Senate for changes to Trump's ‘big, beautiful bill'
House Republicans' 'big, beautiful bill' doubles down on President Trump's education agenda, including raising taxes on university endowments and overhauling the student loan program, even as colleges are already feeling a funding pinch and borrower defaults are on the rise.
Advocates are hoping to seize on the opportunity to have the legislation reformed in the Senate, where GOP moderates and conservatives are calling for significant — and sometimes contradictory — changes.
Education experts warn that in its current form the package, which also boosts student vouchers and gives a tax break to religious colleges, will financially cripple student loan borrowers and universities alike.
'The major takeaway is that this bill is going to make paying for college and paying off student loans more expensive and more risky for millions of students and working families with student debt,' said Aissa Canchola Bañez, policy director for Student Borrower Protection Center.
Student loan borrowers have faced a whirlwind in policy shifts between former President Biden and President Trump, but the current budget reconciliation bill would be an earthquake to the 45 million Americans with student debt. It would reshape repayment options, only offering one income-driven repayment plan or a standard repayment plan; all other options would be terminated.
Advocates fear significant increases in monthly payment as more generous repayment plans disappear at a time when default rates are already going up.
'It's very bad for borrowers. I don't want to sugar coat it, you know, it's not looking good,' said Natalia Abrams at the Student Debt Crisis Center.
'It will lengthen the time for undergrads from 20 years to 30 years' to receive debt forgiveness after consistent payments, she added. 'For grad students, from 25 to 30 years. It's really unfortunate that this bill passed, especially by one vote' in the House.
The package also intends to end Parent PLUS loans, limit how much federal student loan debt an individual can take out and changes eligibility to Pell Grants.
The maximum an undergraduate student could take out is $50,000, with parents able to match the amount.
For Pell Grants, the number of credits needed to qualify will increase. Other changes include eliminating subsidized loans.
'One of our big worries is that there will be borrower confusion amidst this return to repayment and with servicers potentially needing to implement, if this reconciliation bill goes through, a new income driven repayment plan that departs significantly from any IDR plan that has come before. And so, I think that borrower confusion is a big problem for policymakers,' said Sameer Gadkaree, president and CEO of the Institute for College Access & Success.
Republicans and conservatives have cheered the legislation as a way to simplify student loan repayments and ensure those who did not go to college do not pay off others' debt through their taxes.
'It's time we stopped asking taxpayers to foot the bill for our broken student loan system that has left borrowers in trillions of dollars of debt and has caused college costs to balloon,' said Rep. Tim Walberg (R-Mich.), chairman of the House Committee on Education and the Workforce.
'It's time we stopped asking a factory worker in Michigan or a rancher in Texas to subsidize the student debt of a lawyer in Manhattan. I urge my colleagues in the Senate to end the status quo and get this bill to the president's desk,' he added.
Colleges, already beset by the Trump administration, face a financial hit too: tax increases on their endowments ranging from 1 percent to 21 percent, with major universities such as Harvard and Yale at the top end.
Those are an addition to the taxes on endowments passed in 2017 during Trump's first administration back. Before then, endowments were never taxed.
'We know that almost 50 percent of endowment spending goes to financial aid. If you add financial aid and academic programs, that's two-thirds of endowment spending, and so, if you take money away from the school, from its endowment resources, it's going to undermine their ability to provide robust financial aid. That's why we call it a scholarship tax, because that's what it is,' said Steven Bloom, assistant vice president of government relations at the American Council on Education.
Despite Trump calling for Republicans to unite around the bill, some in the Senate are demanding changes before they'll give it their support.
'I've told them if they'll take the debt ceiling off of it, I'll consider voting for it,' said Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.).
The infighting has led to some optimism that there is still time to get some changes.
'It seems like folks in the Senate have a bit of heartburn about the level of cuts to the Pell program, and that there might be a discomfort in adopting what the House has put together on that front,' Canchola Bañez said.
'I would hope that senators would look at the ways in which the House proposal will make it significantly harder for folks to afford to repay their loans. And in a world where these policymakers want to ensure that student loan borrowers can repay their debts, we need to make sure that there are actual safeguards in place,' she added.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
30 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Jubilee Industries Holdings Full Year 2025 Earnings: S$0.011 loss per share (vs S$0.008 loss in FY 2024)
Revenue: S$1.59m (down 52% from FY 2024). Net loss: S$3.56m (loss widened by 41% from FY 2024). S$0.011 loss per share (further deteriorated from S$0.008 loss in FY 2024). Trump has pledged to "unleash" American oil and gas and these 15 US stocks have developments that are poised to benefit. All figures shown in the chart above are for the trailing 12 month (TTM) period Jubilee Industries Holdings' share price is broadly unchanged from a week ago. Before you take the next step you should know about the 5 warning signs for Jubilee Industries Holdings (4 make us uncomfortable!) that we have uncovered. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
Yahoo
34 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Rep. Hinson on Tax Bill, Medicaid Cuts
Representative Ashley Hinson (R) Iowa weighs in on what she expects from the Senate as members look over the Tax bill. She also talks about how the Tax bill impacts medicaid, wanting longterm changes to the program, and her willingness to have conversations with Senators on the tax bill. Representative Hinson speaks with Kailey Leinz and Joe Mathieu on the late edition of Bloomberg's "Balance of Power."
Yahoo
35 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Nevada Becomes the 21st State To Strengthen Donor Privacy Protections
On Thursday, Nevada Gov. Joe Lombardo (R) signed Assembly Bill 197 into law, prohibiting state agencies from demanding or releasing personal information of nonprofit supporters—actions that could potentially chill speech or violate the right to privacy. With the bill's passage, Nevada becomes the 21st state to strengthen First Amendment protections for donors, volunteers, and members of nonprofit organizations. The A.B. 197, which was cosponsored by Assemblymembers Shea Backus (D–Las Vegas) and Gregory Hafen (R–Pahrump), clarifies that state governmental entities cannot require nonprofit organizations that have applied for or received a 501(c) tax-exempt status from the IRS to disclose personal information of their supporters, including names, addresses, phone numbers, and donation details. Only certain exceptions apply, such as when such information is required under federal law or a court order, in which case the state must keep the individuals' personal information confidential. Anyone harmed by a violation of this law may bring a civil action against the state and seek damages. Nonprofit donor privacy is constitutionally protected under the First Amendment, as was first determined in the Supreme Court's unanimous National Association for the Advancement of Colored People v. Patterson ruling. The 1958 decision blocked the Alabama state government from forcing civil rights organizations to release personal, identifying information of supporters, thereby preventing threats, harassment, and intimidation of individuals for their beliefs. The right was reaffirmed and further clarified in the Court's 2021 Americans for Prosperity Foundation v. Bonta opinion, which struck down a mandate from former California Attorney General Kamala Harris requiring nonprofits to provide certain donor information to remain registered with the state. The Nevada bill passed through both chambers of the Legislature with an overwhelming majority and only one vote against it. Even more strikingly, nonprofits from across the political spectrum, such as the American Civil Liberties Union of Nevada, Americans for Prosperity, Nevada Right to Life, and Planned Parenthood Votes Nevada, supported the measure. "Americans are fed up with the abuse of their privacy and First Amendment rights. No one should face threats, doxing, or retaliation simply for supporting a nonprofit organization," said Heather Lauer, CEO of People United for Privacy Foundation, a national privacy rights organization, in a press release. With the passage of A.B. 197, Nevada joins 20 other states across the political spectrum that have passed similar legislation since 2018. In a time of hyper-partisanship and regular free speech violations—especially from the federal government—it's encouraging to see some state governments still honoring the constitutional protections enshrined in the First Amendment. The post Nevada Becomes the 21st State To Strengthen Donor Privacy Protections appeared first on