Yosemite's ultra-deep canyon may have been carved in part by a ghost volcano and river, provocative research suggests
A provocative new hypothesis suggests that Yosemite Valley was carved by an ancient volcano and a disappearing river, both of which have long since eroded away.
Geologists have long debated why Yosemite Valley is so deep, with walls that tower up to 4,000 feet (1,219 meters) above the valley floor. The prevailing explanation is that in the last 10 million years, the Sierra Nevada mountains of California experienced a period of uplift, steepening their slope and causing the rivers to flow more quickly and erode more quickly into the granite around them.
But a new study, published April 3 in the journal Geosphere, suggests uplift wasn't the real reason Yosemite exists. Instead, said study co-author Manny Gabet, a geomorphologist at San Jose State University, the landscape of Yosemite and the surrounding Sierras is better explained by a long-vanished river.
Millions of years ago, this river would have increased the flow to the modern day Merced River and Tenaya Creek, which would have then had enough power to slice through the Sierras to create Yosemite Valley and nearby Tenaya Canyon.
"At some point in time," Gabet told Live Science, "there was a big river here. And now that river is gone."
Geologists agree that in the last 2 to 3 million years, Yosemite was under a glacier that helped deepen the valley. But they also believe that this glacier filled a pre-existing deep valley, said Kurt Cuffey, a geologist at the University of California, Berkeley, who was not involved in the new research.
"So why did the canyon form in the first place?" Cuffey said.
There are a lot of faults on the east side of the Sierra Nevada that likely would have caused the mountains to rise and get steeper, Cuffey told Live Science. But geologists can't say how much higher the mountain range got, or if it was high enough to substantially increase the erosive power of the rivers. It's a controversial topic, he said.
Uplift also doesn't explain three odd observations, Cuffey said. The first is that Tenaya Canyon, a steep and treacherous canyon that runs from Tenaya Lake into Yosemite Valley, is way too deep to have been cut by the stream that runs through it today, Tenaya Creek. "It's just a really small river," Gabet said. "You can jump across it. The mystery is, how did this tiny creek cut through thousands of feet of very resistant, very massive granite?"
The second mystery is that in California's Central Valley, where the Merced River spills out of Yosemite and creates a fan-shaped layer of sediment it has carried from the mountains, there are huge deposits of volcanic rock that shouldn't be there. "You've got 8 cubic miles [33.3 cubic kilometers] of volcanic sediment deposited in the Central Valley by the Merced River, but you can't find a scrap of these volcanic rocks," in the area around the river, Gabet said.
The third mystery has to do with the uneven shape of the valley cut by the Tuolumne River just north of the Merced, Cuffey said. This valley is much larger on one side than the other. It's a relatively subtle point to a non-geologist, but "that needs an explanation," he said.
Gabet's hypothesis harkens back to 5 to 10 million years ago, when a chain of volcanoes had buried the northern Sierra Nevada in huge mudflows, creating a gently sloping volcanic plain with only a few mountain peaks poking out of it. These deposits are still seen north of Yosemite, but not in the area around the Merced River.
"I realized these volcanic rocks that had been transported by the Merced River must have come from this chain of volcanoes," Gabet said.
The peaks of such a volcanic chain would have been drained by a large, now lost river, he said. This river would have flowed from now-vanished volcanic slopes north of where the National Park is today and then gushed into the ancient Merced and Tenaya Creek, enabling them to carve out Yosemite Valley and Tenaya Canyon.
RELATED STORIES
—Flowing fire? Yosemite's burning waterfall explained
—Photos: Take a tour of spectacular Yosemite
—Earth's crust is peeling away under California
The influence of this river would have made both the Merced and Tenaya Creek much larger than today's relative trickle — so large that they could have cut down the canyons. The drainage patterns from this ghost river would also explain the lopsided topography around the Tuolumne River , Cuffey said. Finally, the river would have carried the volcanic rock now found in the Central Valley down from the northern Sierra Nevada, a journey that is hard to explain otherwise.
The river and volcano would have themselves eventually eroded to nothing, so there is no way to check if they ever existed. One of Gabet's students is now working on a project to try to recreate the ancient topography of the Sierra Nevada to better understand how the geology of the mountains evolved and perhaps shed more light on the possibility.
"He's got a really interesting thing going," Cuffey said of Gabet. "I really don't know if it's true or not at this point, but it's a great hypothesis that we should think about."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Meta chief AI scientist Yann LeCun says Elon Musk risks 'killing breakthrough innovation' at xAI. Here's why.
Meta's Yann LeCun disagrees with Elon Musk about the role of researchers at AI companies. Musk earlier said xAI is ditching the "researcher" job title in favor of "engineers." LeCun said ignoring the distinction between them could risk "killing breakthrough innovation." Meta's chief AI scientist, Yann LeCun, doesn't agree with Elon Musk's latest take on AI development. Like, at all. Musk sparked a conversation about the roles of researchers and engineers at tech companies on Tuesday in an X post. Musk said his AI startup, xAI, would ditch the "researcher" job title in favor of "engineer." "This false nomenclature of 'researcher' and 'engineer', which is a thinly-masked way of describing a two-tier engineering system, is being deleted from @xAI today," Musk said. "There are only engineers. Researcher is a relic term from academia." Two days later, LeCun shared a screenshot of Musk's X post on LinkedIn with a multi-paragraph response. "If you make no distinction between the two activities, if you don't evaluate researchers and engineers with different criteria, you run the risk of killing breakthrough innovation," LeCun said. "True breakthroughs require teams with a long horizon and minimal constraints from product development and management." Musk isn't the first person to question the distinction between AI researchers and engineers. Other leading AI companies have, too. In a 2023 X post, OpenAI President Greg Brockman said that the company didn't want to put its workers into such defined buckets. Instead, the ChatGPT-maker settled on the phrase "Member of Technical Staff." Anthropic, which makes Claude, also uses "Member of Technical Staff" as a job title. "While there's historically been a division between engineering and research in machine learning, we think that boundary has dissolved with the advent of large models," Anthropic says on its careers page. LeCun, however, says the research labs that shaped what the science and tech industries have become were all separate from engineering divisions. "The industry research labs of yore that have left an indelible mark on scientific and technological progress (Bell Labs Area 11, IBM Research, Xerox PARC, etc) were all research divisions that were clearly separate from engineering divisions," LeCun said. Read the original article on Business Insider
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
SpaceX Dragon carrying 4 astronauts zooms back to Earth
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. On July 15 2025, the four astronauts from the private Axiom-4 space mission splashed down in the Pacific Ocean off the coast of California, concluding their two-week long stint aboard the International Space Station (ISS). To return from the space station to Earth, the crew hitched a ride on SpaceX's Dragon spacecraft. What is it? The Dragon spacecraft is SpaceX's workhorse for moving crew and cargo to the ISS in low-Earth orbit. It's large enough to hold seven crew members. In the photo the spacecraft is seen separating from its trunk as it returns to Earth. The streak is a plasma trail created by intense friction between Dragon's heat shield and atmospheric gases arising as the craft reenter's Earth's atmosphere, according to NASA. Where is it? The photo was taken aboard the ISS as the Crew Dragon reentered the atmosphere somewhere above Earth as it headed towards its Pacific Ocean splashdown. Why is it amazing? The Axiom-4 (Ax-4) mission was a mission of firsts, as it sent the first astronauts from Hungary, India and Poland to the ISS, becoming the first ISS astronauts from their countries on the space station. Additionally, Ax-4 commander and NASA astronaut Peggy Whitson extended her record of cumulative days spent by an American in space to 695. At the ISS, the astronauts spent two weeks running various scientific studies in the microgravity atmosphere. However, their stay was extended by four days to achieve favorable orbital phasing for their return. They flew back to Earth on the SpaceX Dragon capsule before safely landing in the Pacific ocean. Want to learn more? You can read more about Axiom Space's private missions, the ISS, and SpaceX's spacecraft. Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
Startup launches project to create fuel for near-infinite energy machines: 'We can do it in a facility the size of a Starbucks'
If Austin's Hexium successfully delivers a key fusion fuel isotope, it will be thanks to a storyline that includes lithium, lasers, and technology developed in the 1980s. And it will all amazingly happen inside a building the size of a Starbucks, one of the men behind the effort told TechCrunch. "We don't have to build a facility the size of a Costco or a football stadium," co-founder Jacob Peterson said in the story. "We can do it in a facility the size of a Starbucks, and we achieve good economics at very small scale, and then we just parallelize our process." Peterson and co-founder Charlie Jarrott have already been making headlines for California-based Focused Energy, which was founded to develop laser-based fusion power at a $65 million facility. Hexium is intended to gather a key part of fusion fuel from lithium, a complicated and necessary hurdle for labs from around the world that are trying to harness the power of the sun. The process often involves huge magnetic machines designed to contain swirling plasma and extreme heat. "I realized no one is working on this supply chain stuff," Jarrott told TechCrunch. While Focused and Hexium use lasers, the process is different at each company. For the latest effort, the laser tech dusts off a U.S. Department of Energy approach called atomic vapor laser isotope separation to corral lithium isotopes. Lithium-6 is the rare one needed for fusion fuel. The government had planned to use lasers to complete the same task for uranium isotopes for common fission power plants. But after the Soviet Union fell, nuclear fuel was more widely available from old Russian weapons-grade uranium, according to the TechCrunch story. Unlike fission, fusion does not produce long-lasting nuclear waste or carry a meltdown risk, answering safety concerns from critics. Fusion combines particles, creating new atoms to make energy; fission splits them. The challenge for fusion is sustainably maintaining reactions that involve temperatures hotter than the sun, all per government reports. Hexium announced $9.5 million in seed funding in the spring. The experts are tweaking the government laser process to accommodate lithium. They can hone low-energy beams to separate lithium-6 from lithium-7 in vapor metal clouds. The lasers will condense lithium-6 into a liquid, where it will run into a trough for collection. The isotope will be sold to fusion labs to make fuel. Lithium-7 can be used in traditional nuclear operations, all according to TechCrunch. Hexium's website also noted medical and industrial uses for the collected isotope. The team plans to have a pilot plant running this year making up to hundreds of pounds of lithium-6. Should we be harnessing the ocean to power our homes? Absolutely Leave it be It depends I'm not sure Click your choice to see results and speak your mind. It's an exciting update for nuclear energy, which produces abundant power with no heat-trapping air pollution. NASA links rising temperatures to increased severe weather risks, including floods. However, fusion isn't yet ready for sustainable production. And nuclear power is increasingly costly and slow to develop, Colorado energy think-tank co-founder and physicist Amory Lovins told The Cool Down. He said that solar and wind projects are the fastest, cheapest form of energy to build in response to growing grid demand. It's an energy source that can be leveraged at home, as well. Tax credits of up to 30% expire at the end of the year, thanks to President Donald Trump's Big Beautiful Bill, but EnergySage can help you lock in the rebates before they expire. The incentives and the right installer can save you thousands of dollars. What's more, the tech can reduce or eliminate your power bill. North Carolina State University's Clean Energy Technology Center has a database of perks offered at the state level, as well. At Hexium, the founders see potential in fusion immediately, specifically providing a key resource to make the fuel needed for experiments. "There isn't a single company that is going to make the fuel for those companies," Jarrott told TechCrunch. Join our free newsletter for weekly updates on the latest innovations improving our lives and shaping our future, and don't miss this cool list of easy ways to help yourself while helping the planet.