Trump wants to make one of his controversial former defense lawyers an appeals court judge
Nearly 20 years ago, during George W. Bush's fifth year in the White House, the Republican president thought it'd be a good idea to nominate his own former lawyer, Harriet Miers, to serve as a U.S. Supreme Court justice. This quickly proved to be a fiasco, which collapsed within weeks.
Two decades later, Donald Trump is apparently thinking along similar lines: The incumbent GOP president, also in his fifth year, is nominating one of his own former lawyers to serve on the federal appellate bench. The New York Times reported:
President Trump announced Wednesday that he would nominate Emil Bove III, the polarizing and widely feared top Justice Department official responsible for strong-arm tactics in enacting Mr. Trump's immigration agenda, to be a federal appeals judge. Mr. Bove, 44, is a former criminal defense lawyer for Mr. Trump. He would fill a vacancy on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, which covers Pennsylvania, New Jersey and Delaware.
In a statement published to his social media platform, the president insisted that Bove 'is SMART, TOUGH, and respected by everyone.'
All things considered, 'everyone' was probably the wrong choice of words.
Let's start with Bove's rise to prominence as a prosecutor in the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York, where he faced a variety of allegations about his lack of professionalism. The Associated Press reported a few months ago, 'One lawyer complained in the 2018 email that Bove was 'completely reckless and out of control' in how he handled his cases. Another, upset about Bove's rudeness and power plays, said he needed 'adult supervision.' A third, a top federal public defender in the city, said 'he cannot be bothered to treat lesser mortals with respect or empathy.''
The AP quoted Christine Chung, a former federal prosecutor, who said, 'In my experience litigating against him, what [Bove] enjoyed most as a prosecutor was wielding power — the single worst possible trait for a public servant. But people won't speak against him publicly because he's also vindictive.'
Bove later parlayed this background into a role as a Trump defense attorney, punctuated by his defeat in the Stormy Daniels case.
After his former client was elected to a second term in the Oval Office, Bove was rewarded with a powerful position in the Justice Department, where he fired federal prosecutors who worked on Jan. 6 cases and helped to oversee the scandalous dismissal of New York City Mayor Eric Adams' corruption case (among other things).
In fact, as my MSNBC colleague Lisa Rubin noted in February, Bove's handling of the Adams case generated 'at least three complaints about him ... to the relevant New York state body responsible for attorney discipline.' Around the same time, Rubin added, the Campaign for Accountability submitted a similar complaint to both the state and the chief judge of the Southern District, alleging that Bove's conduct in connection with the Adams case may have violated at least six different ethical rules.
The idea that this guy deserves a lifetime position on the federal appellate bench is plainly absurd. Trump's nomination creates yet another test for Senate Republicans, which, if recent history is any guide, they will almost certainly fail.
The confirmation hearings are bound to be interesting. Watch this space.
This article was originally published on MSNBC.com
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
26 minutes ago
- Yahoo
People Truly Can't Believe The Location This Republican Senator Chose To Film Her "Apology"
I'm sure you've heard of Iowa Senator Joni Ernst's "we all are going to die" thing. She held a townhall on Thursday, and a clip of her comments about SNAP and Medicaid cuts went viral: At her town hall, when the crowd says people will die due to Medicaid and SNAP cuts, Joni Ernst responds "well we all are going to die." #iasen — danny (@dabbs346) May 30, 2025 ABC/dabbs346/Twitter: @dabbs346 Someone from the crowd shouted, "People are going to die," and Joni responded, "Well, we all are going to die." FWIW, The Hill reported she went on to say that Republicans would protect Medicaid for "the most vulnerable." She also said, "SNAP overpayments that the states have been making will need to stop," and "When you are arguing about illegals that are receiving Medicaid benefits, 1.4 million, they're not eligible, so they will be coming off." ANYWAY, this whole thing kind of blew up. People are calling this "one of the worst politician quotes" they've ever heard. And people are joking: "New GOP slogan: 'We're all gonna die!'" Related: 18 Major Global Events That American Media Is Ignoring Right Now, And Why They Actually Matter To Us Sooo, we're on round two from that. Senator Ernst decided to issue an "apology" that isn't really an apology at all. Against all odds, Joni Ernst has made it worse — Keith Edwards (@keithedwards) May 31, 2025 joniernst/Twitter: @keithedwards "Hello everyone, I would like to take this opportunity to sincerely apologize for a statement that I made yesterday at my town hall," she said. "See, I was in the process of answering a question that was asked by an audience member when a woman who was extremely distraught screamed out from the back of the auditorium, 'People are going to die.' And I made an incorrect assumption that everyone in the auditorium understood that, yes, we are all going to perish from this earth." "So, I apologize, and I'm really, really glad that I did not have to bring up the subject of the tooth fairy as well. But for those that would like to see eternal and everlasting life, I encourage you to embrace my Lord and savior Jesus Christ." Related: "I Am So Torn With What You Are Doing" — 11 Posts From MAGA Business Owners Who Are So Close To Getting It Yeaaah, people are unpacking this one. "I'm at a loss for words..." one person said. Another person encouraged her to keep digging in, "Keep posting through it Joni you're almost there." And this person joked, "Leave the tooth fairy out of this, you monster." But the #1 thing people can't believe is the location where she recorded it. It appears that she's walking through a cemetery. "I'm sorry... is she walking through a cemetery as she makes this?" one person asked. Another person said, "No way that Joni Ernst apology video can be real is she in a cemetery." And this person gave her a new nickname: "Senator Grim Reaper." Thoughts? Also in In the News: People Can't Believe This "Disgusting" Donald Trump Jr. Post About Joe Biden's Cancer Diagnosis Is Real Also in In the News: Miss USA's 2024 "National Costume" Has Been Revealed, And It's Obviously An Interesting Choice Also in In the News: One Body Language Expert Spotted Something Very Telling When Donald Trump "Held His Own Hand" At His Recent Press Conference
Yahoo
31 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Do Merit Medical Systems' (NASDAQ:MMSI) Earnings Warrant Your Attention?
For beginners, it can seem like a good idea (and an exciting prospect) to buy a company that tells a good story to investors, even if it currently lacks a track record of revenue and profit. Sometimes these stories can cloud the minds of investors, leading them to invest with their emotions rather than on the merit of good company fundamentals. Loss making companies can act like a sponge for capital - so investors should be cautious that they're not throwing good money after bad. Despite being in the age of tech-stock blue-sky investing, many investors still adopt a more traditional strategy; buying shares in profitable companies like Merit Medical Systems (NASDAQ:MMSI). While profit isn't the sole metric that should be considered when investing, it's worth recognising businesses that can consistently produce it. Trump has pledged to "unleash" American oil and gas and these 15 US stocks have developments that are poised to benefit. If a company can keep growing earnings per share (EPS) long enough, its share price should eventually follow. So it makes sense that experienced investors pay close attention to company EPS when undertaking investment research. It certainly is nice to see that Merit Medical Systems has managed to grow EPS by 34% per year over three years. As a general rule, we'd say that if a company can keep up that sort of growth, shareholders will be beaming. Careful consideration of revenue growth and earnings before interest and taxation (EBIT) margins can help inform a view on the sustainability of the recent profit growth. Merit Medical Systems maintained stable EBIT margins over the last year, all while growing revenue 8.2% to US$1.4b. That's a real positive. In the chart below, you can see how the company has grown earnings and revenue, over time. Click on the chart to see the exact numbers. View our latest analysis for Merit Medical Systems The trick, as an investor, is to find companies that are going to perform well in the future, not just in the past. While crystal balls don't exist, you can check our visualization of consensus analyst forecasts for Merit Medical Systems' future EPS 100% free. We would not expect to see insiders owning a large percentage of a US$5.6b company like Merit Medical Systems. But we do take comfort from the fact that they are investors in the company. Notably, they have an enviable stake in the company, worth US$132m. Holders should find this level of insider commitment quite encouraging, since it would ensure that the leaders of the company would also experience their success, or failure, with the stock. If you believe that share price follows earnings per share you should definitely be delving further into Merit Medical Systems' strong EPS growth. With EPS growth rates like that, it's hardly surprising to see company higher-ups place confidence in the company through continuing to hold a significant investment. On the balance of its merits, solid EPS growth and company insiders who are aligned with the shareholders would indicate a business that is worthy of further research. However, before you get too excited we've discovered 1 warning sign for Merit Medical Systems that you should be aware of. There's always the possibility of doing well buying stocks that are not growing earnings and do not have insiders buying shares. But for those who consider these important metrics, we encourage you to check out companies that do have those features. You can access a tailored list of companies which have demonstrated growth backed by significant insider holdings. Please note the insider transactions discussed in this article refer to reportable transactions in the relevant jurisdiction. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
The Hill
31 minutes ago
- The Hill
Johnson says 4.8 million Americans won't lose Medicaid access ‘unless they choose to do so'
Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) doubled down on his claim that there won't be Medicaid cuts in President Trump's 'big, beautiful bill,' despite projections that millions of low-income individuals would lose health insurance as a result of the bill. Johnson, during an appearance on NBC's 'Meet the Press,' pushed back on independent projections that the bill would lead to 4.8 million who would lose coverage because of work requirements, saying they won't lose it 'unless they choose to do so.' 'Those 4.8 million people will not lose their Medicaid unless they choose to do so,' he told host Kristen Welker. 'You're telling me that you're going to require the able-bodied — these young men, for example, okay — to only work or volunteer in their community for 20 hours a week, and that's too cumbersome for them? I'm not buying it. The American people are not buying it.' He added that the people who are complaining about losing their coverage are doing so 'because they can't fulfill the paperwork,' noting that the policy follows 'common sense.' 'When people work, when able-bodied young men work, it's good for them, for their dignity, their purpose, and it's good for the community,' he said. 'If you can't find a job, then volunteer in your community for 20 hours, and you will meet the requirement.' The proposed Medicaid and health care reforms would require states to impose work requirements on childless adults aged 19-64 to be eligible for Medicaid. It also aims to shorten the open enrollment period for the Affordable Care Act, among other changes. The reforms are key components of the bill, which the House Energy and Commerce Committee crafted after being tasked with finding more than $800 billion in savings over a decade. Those portions of the GOP proposal would save $625 billion over 10 years, according to the CBO. Johnson said that the bill 'strengthens' Medicaid and said what they are doing is 'an important and frankly heroic thing.' 'It's intended for young, you know, single, pregnant women and the disabled and the elderly,' he said. 'But what's happening right now is you have a lot of people, for example, young men, able bodied workers, who are on Medicaid. They're not working when they can.' His comments are just the latest assertion from Johnson that the bill won't threaten Medicaid coverage for people who need it. However, the bill is hitting some roadblocks for Republican lawmakers, who are finding themselves enveloped in criticism at their town halls.
