Amid immigration crackdowns, student newspapers grapple with how to cover campus without making targets of their peers
'I've been working here for over three decades, and these are times we have never seen before,' said Mike Hiestand, senior legal counsel at the Student Press Law Center. 'We've crossed a line with the situation at Tufts.'
Situated at the intersection of the Trump administration's targeting of higher education, immigration, and First Amendment rights, student journalists are having to question of the very basics of news gathering: should they
omit the names of some students who express pro-Palestinian views, obscure faces of protesters in pictures, or otherwise self-censor information that could be used to attack and detain their classmates and professors?
Advertisement
The arrest at Tufts is particularly significant for student media given that Öztürk
Advertisement
A pair approach West Hall on the Tufts University campus in Medford on April 2.
Craig F. Walker/Globe Staff
A spokesperson for the Department of Homeland Security previously said she 'engaged in support of Hamas' and Secretary of State Marco Rubio
'Criticizing U.S. foreign policy and human rights violations is neither illegal nor grounds for detention,' said Öztürk's attorney, Mahsa Khanbabai, in a
The threats students face are more pronounced than in previous eras of protest because of the Internet. The names of students and faculty with pro-Palestinian views are readily available from websites such as Canary Mission, which compiles profiles of campus protesters and people like Öztürk who wrote op-eds or appeared in student news articles.
Related
:
That could put student news outlets in an impossible position — where even when they report responsibly or follow the standard ethics in publishing op-eds, their work can be used as a tool to hunt down and punish their peers.
Hiestand estimated the Student Press Law Center has seen a roughly 50 percent jump in requests from student media for legal and reporting advice compared to a year ago. His organization is advising student news outlets not to share anonymous sources with advisors or school officials, keep confidential information off school emails, and revisit policies on when to remove certain information.
He added that while journalists know they are sacrificing a degree of accuracy by using anonymous sources, that could be the only way to tell the story of what's happening while protecting sources, because the stakes are so high.
Advertisement
'I think that we need to really rethink what's up on our pages right now, and what we're going to put up on our pages in the future,' Hiestand said.
Now, with the stark threats against students like Öztürk, student media outlets are increasingly using unnamed sources or removing names of students from stories to protect sources who might risk more than just public criticism for speaking out. That is particularly true at Boston-area universities with a high concentration of international students.
'For now, the anonymous policy has definitely loosened,' said Brendan Galvin, editor-in-chief of the Daily Free Press at Boston University.
One example is by using only the first names or nicknames of students who declined to share their last names, such as in a
organized by the Boston University Students for Justice in Palestine, Galvin said.
A demonstrator raises a fist while holding a sign that reads "DEFEND STUDENT VOICES" during a protest at Powder House Park in Somerville.
Erin Clark/Globe Staff
The student newspaper at Northeastern University, the Huntington News, has also been more lenient with granting anonymity to sources in news articles, but not so with op-eds, said Sonel Cutler, the paper's editor-in-chief. Photographers have also been trying not to take close-up photos of protesters at rallies, Cutler added, especially following the arrest of Öztürk. (Cutler is a former Globe co-op.)
Additionally, the Huntington News has
tried to be more specific in describing to readers why some sources won't be named.
'Last year we did a lot of 'fear of retaliation.' This year we've tried to start doing more of 'fear of retaliation,' of what?' Cutler said. 'Do they actually face any retaliation for saying the content of the quote?'
Advertisement
Caroline Hendrie, executive director of the Society of Professional Journalists, said all news organizations should consider such practices in the current environment.
'The idea of minimizing harm — right at the heart of that is balancing the public's need for information against the potential harm that can come from reporting,' Hendrie said.
Even with an added layer of caution, some student outlets are using the moment to reaffirm their commitments to covering political speech on campus. The Huntington News even relaunched a version of its editorial board that had been dormant since 2019 to speak out as an institution at this moment. Its first editorial was titled,
'This is the time to speak up,' said Rachana Madhav, the publication's opinion editor. 'With the formation of the editorial board, we've been really trying to push that.'
The editors at Tufts Daily, where Öztürk's op-ed was published, declined interview requests from the Globe.
But in a
'The Daily has the ability to conduct its work because of the rights enshrined in the First Amendment — rights that not only allow us to publish freely, but also encourage participation in debate, the expression of ideas and the pursuit of truth,' the student journalists wrote. 'It is our core belief that journalism is one of the critical tenets that upholds our democracy.'
The Tufts editors also reaffirmed that protecting its staff and sources is top of mind, while assuring they will continue to share a diverse array of viewpoints.
Advertisement
'[T]he withholding of ideas and abstinence from debate will only contribute to the erosion of free expression,' they wrote.
A pedestrian walks on the Tufts University Campus in Medford on April 2.
Craig F. Walker/Globe Staff
Antero Mejr, a first-year computer science PhD student at Tufts who
'I think the actions of ICE actually show that people do care about these student publications. They're important,' he said. 'And that's even more reason to keep on it.'
Some student outlets, however, are trying to minimize exposure out of fear they could harm people on their campuses. At least one student paper declined an interview request from the Globe
out of fear that it could put their staff at risk.
Those are valid fears, Hiestand said, who added it's hard for student journalists to tell schoolmates to speak out at this precarious moment, particularly for international students. But he also said it's the job of journalists to speak up, and student media is critical to understanding what's happening on college campuses.
'We rely upon them for a lot of the reporting that just professional media is not able to do anymore,' he said.
Aidan Ryan can be reached at
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
33 minutes ago
- Yahoo
'Israel-Palestine Conflict' section of study guide for New York high schoolers draws outrage
A New York State Regents Exam study guide intended for 10th graders is making the rounds on social media over its section on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. In the guide's section on "Decolonization and Nationalism" — which happens to be Unit 10.7 — the section gives its definition of Zionism and includes notes on the United Nations Partition Plan and acts of terrorism. The widely criticized guide calls Zionism an "example of extreme nationalism" and defines it as the "belief that Jews need a homeland in Palestine." Additionally, its example under the category of "Acts of Terrorism by Israel & Palestine" is "settler movement by Jews taking away land from Palestinians." Student Calls Out Elite University Staffing And Costs Before House Judiciary Committee Half Hollow Hills Central School District Interim Superintendent Brian Conboy addressed the issue at a Board of Education meeting on Monday. He said that the material in question was neither created nor approved by the Social Studies Department or the district. He also noted that the material was created before Hamas' Oct. 7 massacre. "As planned and previously discussed, the HHH Social Studies Department will be meeting to conduct curriculum writing over the next two months to address these exact topics. Moving forward, all curriculum relating to these issues, both historical and modern, will be district-wide and vetted by an outside group of experts in the field," Conboy said. He assured parents that all teachers in Global Studies 10 would use "the same materials and language" on this topic next school year. "On behalf of the district, I want you all to know that offensive and inaccurate materials such as this do not meet our standards of excellence and are not something we take lightly. We can and will do better moving forward," Conboy concluded. Read On The Fox News App Jewish Family's Peace Shattered As Neighbor Is Accused Of Hate-fueled Attack The New York State Education Department (NYSED) Spokesperson JP O'Hare acknowledged the issue in a statement online and clarified that it "does not create or distribute curriculum or study guides." O'Hare also said NYSED would "continue to monitor and take appropriate action as needed." In response to a Fox News Digital request for comment, O'Hare seemed to take a swipe at critics, saying NYSED takes "issue with anyone attempting to cloak misinformation in the guise of combating antisemitism. That's not advocacy, it's manipulation." Despite the school district and NYSED statements on the issue, the study guide has drawn backlash from both sides of the aisle with Rep. Ritchie Torres, D-N.Y., and Rep. Elise Stefanik, R-N.Y., condemning the academic materials. Federal Judge Sides Against Jewish Students Who Sued Upenn Over Antisemitism Torres said the guide "demonizes Zionism" while failing to "label as extreme the anti-Zionist ideology that inspired the October 7th massacre—the belief that Jews should be violently expelled from the land of Israel." "Anti-Israel indoctrination under the guise of academic instruction is one of the pathologies of modern education," Torres wrote in a post on X. Stefanik — who some believe is preparing to launch a bid for New York governor — slammed N.Y. Gov. Kathy Hochul and Democrats. "This New York State Regent Exam is a disgraceful example of the rampant and persistent indoctrination of our children in the K-12 education system perpetrated by radical far-left Democrats," Stefanik said in a statement to Fox News Digital. She also posted a similar message on X, claiming the "aging antisemitism in New York is appeased and promoted by Kathy Hochul and her failing antisemitic NY Democrat Party." Auburn Basketball Coach Accuses Carville Of Spreading 'Hatred' With Statements About Jewish Donors In response to a Fox News Digital request for comment on the study materials, Hochul's office said that the NYSED was responsible for the Regents Exam. However, they also noted Hochul's repeated condemnations of antisemitism and actions taken to combat it, including convening "the first-ever summit on antisemitism in education." Touro Institute on Human Rights and the Holocaust Director Anne Bayefsky said that, "such indoctrination perpetuates antisemitism." She slammed the guide for teaching hate over "tolerance, respect and coexistence." "Anti-Zionism is a form of antisemitism because it teaches that Jewish self-determination is a wrong — instead of the realization of a basic human right. It is time to connect the dots between teaching hate inside the schools and the violence on our streets," Bayefsky told Fox News Digital. As of this writing, the original source of the study guide remains unclear, with neither NYSED nor the school district attributing it to anyone in particular. According to Michelle Herman, a parent at Half Hollow Hills High School East, one teacher who distributed the material did not realize what was in it and has since apologized. Herman emphasized that she does not blame the teacher for the article source: 'Israel-Palestine Conflict' section of study guide for New York high schoolers draws outrage
Yahoo
34 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Federal crackdown on protests raises 1st Amendment concerns
It's been a chaotic few days in Los Angeles amid immigration raids, protests against those raids and violence that stemmed from the throngs who took to the streets of downtown Los Angeles. It's prompted the deployment of military personnel to augment law enforcement in L.A., something Gov. Gavin Newsom and other local leaders say is an unconstitutional use of power by federal officials. But the use of the military isn't the only alleged violation of the Constitution to emerge from this crackdown. Free-speech advocates have noted that some actions by law enforcement aren't targeting those suspected of being in the country illegally. Instead, they're taking aim at those who stand with immigrants and against federal law enforcement, which they characterize as violations of the First Amendment rights to free speech and peaceful protest. Perhaps the most prominent example over the weekend was the arrest of David Huerta, president of the California branch of the Service Employees International Union, who faces a felony charge of conspiracy to impede an officer after a protest on Friday. But the alleged infringement upon First Amendment rights in Southern California dates back farther than just this weekend. In a report about Stephen Miller, a top White House advisor, pressuring federal law enforcement to deport more people, the Wall Street Journal listed a May 1 U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement raid on a home in Irvine as an example of established rules and best practices being thrown out. That day, ICE was looking for Michael Chang, who'd allegedly put up fliers identifying ICE officers in the area. Even though Chang had moved to New York the month before, his parents' Turtle Rock home was raided while they slept by ICE agents who arrived in 'a phalanx of military vehicles.' Federal officials say Chang's fliers were an act of 'doxxing,' or publicizing personal information often with malicious intent. A Department of Homeland Security official responded to KTLA's request for an interview with an agency representative with the following statement: 'Homeland Security Investigations & U.S. Secret Service served a criminal search warrant in an upscale Irvine neighborhood, targeting the suspect they believe was responsible for posting fliers w/ the names, photos, phone numbers, & locations of ICE agents in Southern California in February.' However, Aaron Terr, director of public advocacy for the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression, said identifying law enforcement officers is not a crime unless there's a call for violence or harm. 'In this case, from what we know about what was on the flier, there was nothing that amounted to a threat,' Terr told KTLA. 'There's no evidence of a threat or intent to harm anybody, just the dissemination of information coupled with political criticism.' In the weeks since that Irvine raid, federal officials have kept mum, even as FIRE requested more detailed information, Terr said. U.S. Rep. Dave Min (D-Irvine) released a statement last month saying his office also sought more information, but if they received any updates, they haven't been disclosed. Min's office did not return a request for more information prior to publication. Further complicating the issue, President Donald Trump and his so-called 'border czar' Tom Homan have threatened political opponents and protesters with criminal prosecution, which they say could be necessary to protect the safety of officers. But it's not just officers' safety that seems to be Trump's concern. He's said that anyone who protests the military parade on Saturday — which is also Trump's birthday — will be met with 'very heavy force.' 'If there's any protester that wants to come out, they will be met with very big force,' Trump said, as reported by NBC News. 'I haven't even heard about a protest, but you know, this is people that hate our country, but they will be met with very heavy force.' Terr said that notion doesn't align with the Bill of Rights. 'That's concerning because people who are peacefully protesting shouldn't be met with any level of government force … It's very important for the government and for law enforcement to understand what the First Amendment does and doesn't protect and to let that guide their actions.' Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
34 minutes ago
- Yahoo
New super PAC launches anti-Mamdani ad push amid criticism over pro-Palestinian stance
NEW YORK — A group of executives in New York's finance, law and communications sectors has launched a new super PAC to oppose Zohran Mamdani's mayoral run, kicking off with an ad accusing the socialist of pushing to 'defund the police' amid an increase in pro-Palestinian protests in the city. The PAC, called Sensible City, Inc., disclosed in filings released Tuesday it has raised $211,000 so far to oppose Mamdani, who has consistently polled as the runner-up to Andrew Cuomo, the favorite to win the June 24 Democratic mayoral primary. The ad's focus on pro-Palestinian protests comes as Cuomo and other moderate Democrats have accused Mamdani of aligning himself with antisemitic causes due to his outspoken criticism of Israel's war in Gaza. Mamdani has rejected those accusations as politically motivated, saying he's adamant about fighting all forms of hate. Asked if he recognizes Israel's right to exist as a Jewish state, Mamdani has said Israel has a right to exist as a state with 'equal rights for all.' The PAC was launched by Alan Sash and Daniel Horwitz, partners at two prominent New York law firms, as well as investor Eric Eve and PR professional Lisa Wolford, paperwork shows. The largest single donation to the PAC to date came from Rob Stavis, a partner of Bessemer, a venture capital firm, who gave $100,000. Other contributors include Eagle Capital Management founder Ravenel Curry, who gave $50,000, and designer Danyelle Freeman, who also gave $50,000. Filings show the PAC has already plunked down $100,524 on airing the new ad slamming Mamdani. The ad started going out on digital platforms over the weekend. 'It doesn't stop: day after day, streets blocked, demonstrations, some calling for killing, destruction, it's not safe. Institution walls defaced with symbols to remind us of what can happen only because of who we are. The haters mean every word they utter. What can we do?' a voice in the digital ad says as imagery flashes across the screen of pro-Palestinian protests and anti-Israel vandalism playing out on New York City streets. 'Zohran Mamdani wants to defund the police, we need a mayor who puts more cops on the street. What's your June 24 Democratic primary choice?' A rep for the new PAC didn't immediately return a request for comment from the Daily News. Mamdani, a Queens Assembly member and democratic socialist, has in the past supported calls for defunding the police. As a mayoral candidate on the 2025 campaign trail, he has called for keeping NYPD staffing levels flat. Mamdani spokesman Andrew Epstein called the new PAC expenditure a 'desperate' attempt to push back on the candidate's left-wing agenda, which includes vows to increase taxes on corporations and millionaires to bankroll expanded free child care and public transit. 'It's always amusing when some of the richest people in the city are so outraged at the idea of paying just a little more in taxes that they spend tens of thousands of dollars on deceitful and slanderous attack ads,' Epstein said. 'New Yorkers will see this for exactly what it is: desperate.' The new PAC spending comes as recent polls have shown Mamdani closing in on Cuomo. A May 28 poll from Emerson University put Mamdani just 8% behind Cuomo. A separate PAC, Fix the City, has raised more than $12 million, mostly from billionaires and powerful business executives, to boost Cuomo with ads and other political messaging. The Fix the City expenditure is the largest super PAC spend on a single election in New York history. _____