Tesla's law firm drafts Delaware bill that could salvage Musk pay package
A law firm that represents Tesla and Elon Musk has written proposed legislation that would alter Delaware corporate law, according to a person directly familiar with the drafting of the bill.
The proposed legislation, drafted by Richards, Layton & Finger, or RLF, would amend Delaware General Corporation Law, and if adopted, could pave the way for the reinstatement of Musk's 2018 CEO pay package at Tesla, worth tens of billions of dollars in options.
RLF confirmed their involvement to CNBC.
'Statutory changes are necessary to restore the core principles that have been the hallmark of Delaware for over a century and ensure that Delaware remains the preeminent jurisdiction for incorporation,' Lisa Schmidt, president of RLF, said in a statement.
The bill was introduced in the Delaware General Assembly on Monday and would require approval by the state's two chambers as well as Gov. Matt Meyer before it could become law.
The pay package Tesla granted to Musk in 2018 was the largest CEO compensation plan in public corporate history, but the Delaware Court of Chancery in early 2024 ordered it to be rescinded.
In her ruling, Chancellor Kathaleen McCormick wrote that the pay plan was inappropriately set by Tesla's board, which was controlled by Musk, and that it was approved by shareholders who were misled by Tesla's proxy materials before they were asked to vote on it.
Under the proposed legislation, Musk might no longer be considered a 'controller' of Tesla, said Brian JM Quinn, a Boston College Law professor. Transactions that involve self-dealing with controllers or directors would be subject to less review than they are now, Quinn said. Those transactions range from going-private deals, to mergers and acquisitions, to board and executive compensation decisions.
'The real role of corporate law is to protect minority investors,' Quinn said. 'With this bill, the legislature is saying, 'Now, you know what? Protect them less.''
The proposed legislation would also limit the kinds of documents that minority stakeholders are able to obtain through 'books and records' inspection requests, Quinn said. Those stakeholders would be limited to formal items such as a certificate of incorporation or minutes of stockholder meetings but they'd lose access to informal communications such as emails or other messages between board members and executives, Quinn said.
After the Court of Chancery's ruling last year, Musk started a campaign to persuade companies not to incorporate in Delaware and moved the site of incorporation for his businesses out of the state. He has aimed his ire at McCormick with repeated and disparaging posts about her on X, his social network.
Other prominent executives, including Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong and Bill Ackman of Pershing Square, have also criticized the Delaware judiciary.
'Delaware has taken some heat for supposedly being too hard on controller transactions,' said Renee Zaytsev, partner at Boies Schiller and co-chair of the firm's securities and shareholder dispute practice.
'These amendments seem to be a course correction that would make it significantly easier for boards and controllers to avoid judicial scrutiny of their transactions,' she said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Auto Blog
2 hours ago
- Auto Blog
Trump Signs Ban on California EV Rules, Sparking Nationwide Reactions
President Trump has signed congressional resolutions overturning California's ability to mandate electric vehicle (EV) sales and establish its tailpipe and emissions standards via a federal waiver. Trump's resolutions immediately halt California's 2035 ban on new gas-powered car sales—a plan adopted by 11 states and Washington, D.C. In total, 17 other states representing 30% of the U.S. auto market have adopted some or all of California's stricter vehicle emissions standards. California also won't be able to enforce an increase in zero-emission heavy-duty truck sales and a low-nitrogen oxide regulation for heavy-duty highway and off-road vehicles/engines. 'Today we're saving California, and we're saving our entire country from a disaster,' Trump said, according to The Hill. A Tesla sits parked at an electric vehicle charging station on June 12, 2025 in Corte Madera, California. — Source: Getty How California and other states are reacting to Trump's signing California's governor, Gavin Newsom, announced last month that his state would go to court to protect its federal waiver allowing its own clean air rules, claiming it exists outside of the Congressional Review Act's scope, which repealed the waiver. Now, Colorado, Delaware, Massachusetts, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont, and Washington are among the states joining California's legal battle. In March, the Government Accountability Office said California's waivers can't be repealed under the Congressional Review Act, and the Senate parliamentarian had advised not moving forward with the act, making the Senate's decision to go against the parliamentarian extremely rare. Former President Biden's waiver allowed 80% of the new vehicles that California sells to be all-electric by 2035, with the rest being advanced plug-in hybrids. The mandate's ramp-up period included 35% of new 2026 model cars sold in the state being zero-emission, increasing to 68% in 2030 and 100% in 2035. CA Governor Gavin Newsom in a Tesla — Source: CAGovernor/Twitter California Governor Gavin Newsom ordered the Air Resources Board to craft another mandate for cars and trucks to either support its existing mandates or replace them in the case of a court loss. Newsom also instructed the board to create a public list of automakers and truck manufacturers following California's emissions rules and companies acting early to convert fleets to zero-emission trucks, 'regardless of the status of those regulations under federal law,' Cal Matters reports. The Alliance for Automotive Innovation is backing Trump While Trump's signings generated backlash, The Alliance for Automotive Innovation, representing General Motors, Toyota, Volkswagen, Hyundai, Stellantis, and other automakers, supported the president's decision, describing California's previous mandate as unachievable and something that would raise car prices. EPA spokesperson Molly Vaseliou said, 'This is nothing more than California throwing a temper tantrum because the American people don't want the state's terrible policies,' according to Reuters. More than a quarter of California's new car sales are EVs, with New Jersey and New York following at 15% and 12%, respectively, The Alliance for Automotive Innovation reports. A view of an electric vehicle charging station on June 12, 2025 in Sausalito, California — Source: Getty Final thoughts Meeting California's EV mandates would've been challenging for automakers. Still, Congress's decision to block the state from setting its emissions standards sets off a domino effect that could significantly slow EV development throughout the country. Michael Gerrard, the founder of the Sabin Center for Climate Change Law at Columbia University, said: 'The chief winners of this move are the oil industry and China. Electric vehicles are the main threat to the demand for oil, and this move further cements China as the global leader in producing electric vehicles,' according to NBC. A decrease in EV adoption resulting from Congress's repeal could also pose health risks, as California stated its EV sales mandate would prevent around 1,300 cardiopulmonary deaths between 2026 and 2040. About the Author Cody Carlson View Profile
Auto Blog
2 days ago
- Auto Blog
These 10 Used Cars Saw the Biggest Value Losses in 2025
Tesla dominated the depreciation charts, but it wasn't alone. From luxury EVs to plug-in hybrids, these models lost thousands in value over the past year. A good time to be a buyer Used car prices are finally starting to creep upward after two years of post-pandemic corrections, but that doesn't mean every vehicle is gaining value. According to a new study by iSeeCars analyzing 2.4 million used sales in May 2024 and May 2025, several once-popular models are still dropping fast, especially in the electric vehicle and luxury categories. While the average 1- to 5-year-old used car now costs $32,317 — up 2% from a year ago — some vehicles lost 10% or more of their value. Here are the top 10 biggest losers in 2025. Tesla Model S Tesla Model S — Source: Tesla No vehicle lost more value this year than the Tesla Model S. Once a status symbol for early EV adopters, the average used Model S dropped 16% year-over-year, shedding $8,837 to land at an average price of $46,503. For a vehicle that started well north of $80,000 when new, that's a significant fall, and a reflection of how quickly electric luxury sedans are depreciating. While newer versions still offer jaw-dropping performance and range, the used market is clearly pulling back as buyers consider alternatives with newer battery tech or lower operating costs. Tesla Model Y Tesla Model Y — Source: Tesla The Model Y may be Tesla's best-selling vehicle, but it couldn't avoid a steep value drop. Over the past 12 months, the average used Model Y declined by 14.2%, losing $4,945 in value to settle at $29,789. Several factors likely contributed to the slide, including Tesla's repeated price cuts for new vehicles, increasing competition from other EV crossovers, and growing scrutiny of the brand's quality and leadership. For used buyers, however, this could be a golden opportunity to get into an EV with solid range at a relatively affordable price. Porsche Taycan Porsche Taycan GTS and GTS Sport Turismo — Source: Porsche With an average price of $75,644, the Porsche Taycan remains one of the priciest used EVs on the market, but it's also one of the fastest depreciating. Over the past year, Taycan prices dropped 12.7%, a raw-dollar loss of nearly $11,000. This luxury electric sedan wowed buyers with its performance when it launched, but newer rivals and rapid improvements in EV technology have chipped away at its appeal. Add in the fact that high repair and ownership costs are common with premium German vehicles, and it's no surprise the Taycan is struggling to hold its value. Ford Explorer Hybrid 2025 Ford Explorer — Source: Ford Not all of the biggest depreciation stories are luxury EVs. The Ford Explorer Hybrid lost 11.3% of its value over the past year, dropping by $4,044 to an average of $31,811. The hybrid version of this three-row SUV offers better fuel economy than its gas-only counterpart, but not enough to justify the price premium in the eyes of many used car shoppers. Combined with lackluster reviews and a competitive midsize SUV segment, the Explorer Hybrid has become a tougher sell on the used market. Tesla Model 3 2024 Tesla Model 3 Performance — Source: Tesla Even Tesla's most accessible model isn't immune to falling values. The Model 3 saw a 10.8% decline in resale value this year, losing $3,078 to reach an average used price of $25,361. For years, the Model 3 was seen as the EV market's standard bearer, but recent price drops on new versions and a flood of supply on the used market have pushed values lower. That's bad news for current owners, but for buyers, it means it's now possible to find a well-equipped used Model 3 for under $30,000. Jeep Gladiator 2025 Jeep Gladiator — Source: Stellantis The Jeep Gladiator blends pickup utility with Wrangler off-road DNA, but its value hasn't held up. Over the past year, Gladiator prices dropped by 10.7%, translating to a $4,112 decline and bringing the average price down to $34,253. Part of the problem may be that the novelty of the Gladiator has worn off, and high fuel costs aren't doing rugged, body-on-frame trucks any favors. Still, for fans of outdoor adventure and removable doors, the falling price could be an invitation. Ford Escape Plug-In Hybrid 2023 Ford Escape Plug-In Hybrid — Source: Ford The second Ford on this list is the Escape Plug-In Hybrid, which saw its average resale price drop by 10.7%, or $3,139, bringing it to $26,201. Plug-in hybrids occupy a strange space in the market — not quite electric, not quite gas — and that ambiguity seems to be hurting their resale values. While the Escape PHEV offers decent range and good efficiency, used car buyers may be opting for more straightforward hybrid or EV options instead. Mercedes-Benz GLB 2025 Mercedes-Benz GLB — Source: Mercedes-Benz The Mercedes-Benz GLB is a boxy compact luxury SUV that offers surprising space for its size. Even with that practicality, the GLB lost 9.9% of its value in the past year, about $3,566, bringing its average price to $32,403. Luxury brands often depreciate quickly, especially in the entry-level segments, and the GLB appears to be no exception. Buyers who want a badge and some upscale features without paying new-car prices might find this model appealing — just be ready for premium maintenance costs. Maserati Levante 2021 Maserati Levante Hybrid Maserati's Levante SUV combines exotic styling and performance with an SUV form factor, but its resale value is anything but stable. Prices dropped 9.5% year-over-year, falling by $4,663 to an average of $44,433. That's a steep decline for a vehicle that often carried six-figure MSRPs when new. As with many ultra-luxury brands, the Levante suffers from high depreciation, limited service networks, and concerns about long-term reliability — all of which make used buyers cautious. Tesla Model X Tesla Model X — Source: Tesla Rounding out the list is Tesla's largest vehicle, the Model X. This full-size SUV with its distinctive Falcon Wing doors saw a year-over-year price drop of 8.9%, or $5,292, putting the average price at $54,004. As new EV SUVs enter the market and Tesla's own software and hardware evolve quickly, older Model X units may start to feel dated. Still, for families seeking an all-electric ride with plenty of space and performance, a used Model X is now significantly more attainable than it was even a year ago. Final thoughts As a whole, used car prices are trending upward, but these 10 models show that the market is still volatile for certain segments. Electric vehicles, plug-in hybrids, and luxury SUVs are depreciating quickly, offering opportunities for savvy buyers willing to take on the risks that come with advanced tech or high-end nameplates. For sellers, the message is less optimistic. Anyone trying to offload a used Tesla, Maserati, or hybrid SUV may be in for a surprise, especially compared to the sky-high values seen in 2021 and 2022. But for buyers, particularly those hunting for an electric deal, 2025 may be the best time in years to find one. About the Author Elijah Nicholson-Messmer View Profile
Telegraph
2 days ago
- Telegraph
Staff sergeant defrauds regiment to buy cars and hair transplant
An Army staff sergeant who defrauded his regiment out of more than £330,000 to buy luxury cars, a hair transplant and 'adult services' has been jailed. Andrew Oakes, 39, used his position as financial systems administrator at the Catterick Garrison base in North Yorkshire to transfer £336,448 of public funds into his personal accounts. He used the funds to buy three Tesla cars, a Mini Cooper and a Nissan Qashqai, along with Apple products, a hair transplant and spent £16,500 on 'adult services'. He also paid off debts by writing cheques to himself and disguising the transactions by falsifying stubs in the names of legitimate suppliers, including a regimental accountant and tailoring company. Oakes appeared for sentence on Thursday at Teesside Crown Court after pleading guilty to three counts of fraud by false representation, fraud by abuse of a position of trust and acquiring criminal property between February 2021 and October 2024. He was jailed for three-and-a-half years. 'Multiple suspicious transactions' Prosecutor Tabitha Buck said the role as a financial systems administrator was given to 'trustworthy' personnel because it gave them restricted but 'significant' access to MoD funds. In August 2024, Oakes was quizzed by his military line manager after she uncovered 'multiple suspicious transactions in the system' and reported this to the Royal Military Police. It emerged the scam first got under way in February 2021 when Oakes falsified his bank statements to try to prove that he had £300,000 available to secure a mortgage for a property, claiming he had won the money in 'the army lottery'. Between July 2021 and April 2022, he created false local authority and utility documents to claim £1,584 of mileage allowance. It was in May 2024 that the deception originally came to light, by which time Oakes had written 28 government cheques to himself. The investigation was then passed on to MoD's Economic Crime Team. He was fraudulently taking 'extensive periods of leave' on compassionate and medical grounds claiming that a family member had died. Oakes took 66 medical-leave days and 12 on 'compassionate' grounds, which first 'raised a red flag' among his military bosses. His military line manager said she had been supportive and sympathetic towards Oakes due to the 'family bereavement' and his perceived personal circumstances, which gave rise to his request for leave on compassionate grounds. Oakes, who was representing himself in court, said: 'I just want to apologise to everyone I've hurt – family and the Army especially. I was in a very bad place, drinking a lot of alcohol.' He said he wasn't a 'stable' individual at the time, adding: 'I regret everything I've done.' Judge Nathan Adams said that Oakes had 'wholly abused' a position of trust, prestige and 'high responsibility' in which he was given 'significant' access to state defence funds. He added: 'The impact of your offending is not simply the financial loss to the public purse but also the reputational damage caused to the organisation as a while, to Catterick and your battalion. 'Those officers who supported you with your personal problems felt significantly betrayed when they found out what was really going on and it's had a significant impact on the morale of your battalion in Catterick.' Mr Adams acknowledged Oakes did have genuine personal issues at the time, including the breakdown of his relationship with his former partner, which led to a drink problem. Oakes, of Station Road, Winsford, Cheshire, received a three-and-a-half-year jail sentence but was told under the Government's early-release scheme he would serve less than half of that time behind bars before being released on licence.
