
Dior's First Female Designer Says Farewell
It's one way to have the last word.
Indeed, the fog that drifted in over the manicured lawns of the Villa Albani Torlonia in Rome just as the show began lent what was already a surreal moment an extra-otherworldly air.
Ms. Chiuri had requested that all of the female guests wear white, even Natalie Portman and Rosamund Pike; the men, black. As they entered the verdant inner courtyard of the private manse, with its collection of Greco-Roman antiquities, they walked past dancers posed like moving statuary. When the first models appeared, to the strains of a live orchestra, light rain began to fall.
Along with the mist, it made the clothes, almost all ivory and often so light as to be practically transparent, seem ghostly (even for someone like me, watching through the computer screen): an ethereal stew of references in lace, silk and velvet — with the occasional tailcoat — to different periods in history and imagination.
In a video call before the show, Ms. Chiuri said she had been after what she called 'beautiful confusion,' the phrase the screenwriter Ennio Flaiano originally suggested as a title for Fellini's '8½.' It was an apt description, not just of the collection itself, which seemed made for phantoms slipping from one era into the next, but also of what was then a question mark surrounding her own position.
Ms. Chiuri had nominally brought Dior back to her home city to celebrate the romantic spirits that formed her (and helped shape fashion), from La Cinecittà to the director Pier Paolo Pasolini and Mimì Pecci-Blunt, an early 20th-century patroness of the arts who had built a private theater Ms. Chuiri recently restored. But she also brought herself and her audience full circle, back to the place she began.
To do so, she enlisted a host of collaborators: the Tirelli costume house, the director Matteo Garrone (who made a short film in honor of the collection), the artist Pietro Ruffo, the Dutch choreographers Imre and Marne van Opstal. If that sounds like a lot to cram into what was essentially a 20-minute fashion experience, it was on purpose. At that point, no one was admitting that she was about to leave — not even her. When asked directly, Ms. Chiuri had simply said, 'Oh, I don't answer this question.'
Now everyone knows the answer.
Still, it's too bad no one had been willing to acknowledge it sooner. Because the lack of clarity about Ms Chiuri's future, combined with the actual fog, merely gave an ambiguous edge to what could have been a triumphant farewell. Turned it into a vaguely elegiac swan song.
Maybe Ms. Chiuri, who has the thick skin and stubbornness of many pioneers, didn't want it to be nostalgic or sentimental. But while the collection was lovely and she got a standing ovation, it could have been so much more.
It could have been an exclamation point at the end of what will surely be seen as a meaningful era in the life span of a major brand. A celebration of the contribution of the first woman to run the house.
Such a farewell is not unheard-of in fashion, even if designers now turn over so often and so brusquely that it seems rarer than not. Tom Ford ended his Gucci period with a shower of pink rose petals, a standing ovation and 'Nothing Compares 2 U.' Dries Van Noten went out on a silver foil runway with a giant disco ball to commemorate the moment. There's nothing wrong with designers being recognized for what they brought to a brand, even if, as in this case, the decision to part ways doesn't seem to have been entirely mutual. (In the announcement of her departure, the decision was cast as Ms, Chiuri's.)
Especially a designer like Ms. Chiuri, who both helped grow Dior to what is estimated to be close to $9 billion in revenue and expanded its identity more than anyone may have realized. She is quoted in the documentary 'Her Dior' — a study of Ms. Chiuri's work with female artists directed by Loïc Prigent and released in March (an early sign, perhaps, of legacy building) — saying she knew what she was doing. She did.
As Delphine Arnault, the chief executive of Dior, said in the news release about Ms. Chiuri's departure, 'She has written a key chapter in the history of Christian Dior.'
She used her power and position, the financial might of her company, not just to assert a somewhat hackneyed feminism (who could forget the slogan tees or the weird playsuits under princess dresses?), but also to support a variety of female artists as well as a panoply of artisans. To insist on the radical idea that craft belonged on the same level as couture. And, perhaps most significantly of all, to break the stranglehold of the New Look.
In 'Her Dior,' Ms. Chiuri said she told the Dior executives when she was hired that the brand's most signature silhouette, with its cinching and constriction of the female figure, was not for her. To look back at her collections is to see her methodically dismantling it.
She did so first by going through the motions of loosening the stays — figuring out how to preserve the shape without the restrictive underpinnings — and then by eschewing it entirely. Her strength as a designer wasn't in the giant productions that surrounded her collections but in the internal magic she worked with construction and material. It's why her work often seemed more enticing in previews, experienced up close, than on the runway, where it could look banal.
It is worth noting that there was not a single bar jacket in the whole cruise show. Or a high heel.
As an alternative, it was strewed with Easter eggs that suggested a finale: references to Chiuri-isms past (to the short film she and Mr. Garrone made during Covid and to the dancers she had included in other shows); to a possible future (her work with the Roman theater); to the last show of her colleague, the former Dior men's wear designer Kim Jones, who resigned in January. (As in that show, some of Ms. Chiuri's models were wearing blindfolds.)
Even the inclusion of 31 couture looks among the ready-to-wear seemed a goodbye of sorts. Couture is the next season on the women's wear schedule, and it would have been Ms. Chiuri's next collection, if there actually were one. Instead there was just the cruise show's closing look: an extraordinary gown micro-beaded to resemble a trompe l'oeil heroic torso. Or a relic, perhaps, of what is now officially a time gone by.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time Business News
2 hours ago
- Time Business News
Oud Perfume UK: A Complete Guide to Buying Authentic Scents
When it comes to luxury fragrances, few scents carry the depth, history, and prestige of oud perfume. In recent years, oud perfume UK searches have grown rapidly, with fragrance lovers across the country exploring this exotic note once reserved for Middle Eastern markets. Whether you are discovering oud for the first time or looking to purchase a long-lasting and authentic scent, this guide will help you understand everything about oud and how to find the right fragrance in the UK. What Is Oud Perfume and Why Is It So Valued? Oud, also known as agarwood, is one of the rarest and most expensive perfume ingredients in the world. It forms when the Aquilaria tree becomes infected with a specific type of mould, producing a rich and dark resin with an intoxicating aroma. For centuries, oud has been an integral part of Middle Eastern traditions. It has been used in religious ceremonies, hospitality rituals, and personal grooming. Oud oil and wood chips are still burned in homes as a sign of welcome and purity. Due to its rarity and the complex process of extraction, oud is often referred to as 'liquid gold.' A single kilogram of high-quality oud oil can cost tens of thousands of pounds, making it one of the most luxurious ingredients in perfumery. The Rise of Oud Perfume in the UK Market Oud was once an exclusive note found mostly in Arabian perfumery. However, it has gained mainstream popularity in recent years in the UK. UK consumers are increasingly drawn to bold and long-lasting fragrances. Oud's woody, smoky, and sometimes sweet undertones make it versatile for both men and women. Perfume houses now craft oud blends with citrus, floral, or musky notes to suit modern tastes. International luxury brands such as Tom Ford, Dior, and Armani have incorporated oud into their collections. This has exposed a wider UK audience to the scent, making it a regular feature in high-end department stores and online fragrance shops. How to Choose the Right Oud Perfume in the UK With a wide range of oud perfumes available, it can be overwhelming to decide which fragrance best suits you. Oud comes in different concentrations, from Eau de Parfum (EDP) to pure oud oil. Eau de Parfum : Blended with other notes, wearable daily. : Blended with other notes, wearable daily. Oud Oil: Intense, concentrated, and often worn in small drops. Fresh Oud – lighter, often blended with citrus or florals, ideal for daytime wear. – lighter, often blended with citrus or florals, ideal for daytime wear. Woody Oud – earthy and smoky, giving a more traditional, masculine feel. – earthy and smoky, giving a more traditional, masculine feel. Sweet Oud – mixed with vanilla, amber, or rose, offering a warmer and more romantic aroma. For formal occasions , choose deep, woody oud. , choose deep, woody oud. For day-to-day use , go with fresh oud blends. , go with fresh oud blends. For special evenings, sweet oud adds sophistication and charm. Where to Buy Authentic Oud Perfume in the UK Finding genuine oud can be challenging due to the number of imitations in the market. Department Stores (e.g. Harrods, Selfridges): Stock premium oud perfumes from global brands. (e.g. Harrods, Selfridges): Stock premium oud perfumes from global brands. Specialist Boutiques : Offer niche and artisanal oud perfumes, often imported directly from the Middle East. : Offer niche and artisanal oud perfumes, often imported directly from the Middle East. Trusted Online Retailers: Provide both branded and independent oud perfumes, but always check for authenticity guarantees. Price : If it's too cheap, it's likely synthetic. : If it's too cheap, it's likely synthetic. Longevity : Authentic oud lasts for hours on the skin. : Authentic oud lasts for hours on the skin. Complexity: Genuine oud evolves with time, changing notes as it settles. Entry-level designer oud perfumes: £70 – £150 Niche UK and Middle Eastern brands: £200 – £500 Pure oud oil: £500+ depending on rarity and source. Caring for and Wearing Oud Perfume Properly Oud perfume is powerful, so correct application ensures the best experience. Apply on pulse points such as the wrists, behind the ears, and base of the neck. This allows the warmth of your body to release the fragrance gradually. Keep bottles in a cool, dark place away from direct sunlight. away from direct sunlight. Avoid storing in humid areas like bathrooms, as moisture can alter the scent. Some enthusiasts layer oud with lighter perfumes to create unique blends. For example, pairing a citrus-based cologne with a drop of oud adds richness without overwhelming the senses. Common Questions About Oud Perfume in the UK Why is oud perfume so expensive? The high cost is due to its rarity, labour-intensive harvesting, and complex extraction process. Does oud perfume last longer than regular perfumes? Generally, yes. A good oud perfume can last 8–12 hours, while pure oud oil can last even longer. Where can I find niche oud perfumes in the UK? Look into boutique perfume houses in London and Manchester, as well as online retailers specialising in Middle Eastern imports. Final Thoughts The demand for oud perfume in the UK continues to grow as more people discover its depth, luxury, and cultural heritage. Whether you prefer a subtle fresh oud for daytime use or a deep woody oud for evening occasions, there are countless options available across the UK market. By understanding how to identify authentic oud, exploring different blends, and knowing where to shop, you can confidently invest in a fragrance that will stand out for years to come. TIME BUSINESS NEWS
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
India curbs solar power output to keep grid stable amid low demand, ministry says
By Sudarshan Varadhan and Sethuraman N R SINGAPORE/NEW DELHI (Reuters) -India is curbing solar output during periods of low demand to keep its power grid stable and to ease congestion in power lines as green energy supply rises, its Ministry of New and Renewable Energy (MNRE) told Reuters. Congestion in power lines due to some new plants coming into operation ahead of schedule and delayed transmission projects have also forced power output curbs, also known as curtailment, the MNRE said in an emailed response to questions late on Monday. The curtailments are the latest setback to India's renewable power developers, who are increasingly languishing without supply contracts as demand for power slows. The National Solar Energy Federation of India (NSEFI) said in a July 24 letter to the ministry that solar power producers in Rajasthan, the top green power producing state, were facing prolonged and frequent curtailments, which had risen to 48% of output during peak generation hours. The producers have lost more than $26 million in revenue since April due to the curbs, NSEFI said in the letter reviewed by Reuters. NSEFI, whose members include the green energy arms of Indian conglomerates Adani and Tata, Amazon Web Services, Dutch investment firm SHV and Malaysia's Gentari, said curtailments undermined project viability and future investments. "Projects in the state had been deferred by 18-20 months to accommodate for the delays in the transmission system, but are still unable to be commissioned due to even further delays," NSEFI said. NSEFI has asked the government to accelerate transmission and battery storage projects, some of which face up to two years of delay. The federal power ministry has said it is fast-tracking interstate transmission lines to support renewable energy. BEYOND RAJASTHAN While Rajasthan is the worst affected by curtailments, other major green energy producers such as the southern Tamil Nadu state, and Gujarat and Maharashtra in the west are also curbing output, according to four industry officials and analysts. Data compiled by Tamil Nadu's Renewable Energy Producers Association showed solar output was 10% lower than forecast in the quarter ended June. J Radhakrishnan, a spokesman for the Tamil Nadu energy department said solar was being curbed as a "last resort" measure, and that coal power was also being curtailed amid low demand. India's renewable energy generation, mainly solar, rose at a record pace in the six months ended June as previously awarded projects came online, while overall power generation growth was largely flat compared with an increase of nearly 6% in 2024. However, solar projects awarded in the three months ended June fell 75% annually and tenders for new projects declined 65%, according to clean energy consultancy Mercom. The decline reflects a "temporary recalibration rather than a slowdown," MNRE said, adding that bids were being issued in line with national targets and demand. Government data shows the usage rate of solar capacity fell to 21.4% in May and 19.5% in June. The MNRE said some of it was due to lower irradiance, adding it expected capacity utilisation of 21%–25% range from February to June in the future.
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
Sam Altman might be right: He's not the only one who thinks the stock market is in ‘bubble' territory
Sam Altman may be right to say that investors in AI are 'overexcited,' but this isn't a bubble in the tulip mania sense. OpenAI has real revenues ($13 billion) and massive user growth. Still, tech valuations, especially the Magnificent Seven's dominance in the S&P 500, look overheated, suggesting a potential correction even if fundamentals remain strong. OpenAI CEO Sam Altman said the word 'bubble' three times in 15 seconds in a room full of reporters and then urged them not to write a story about it—thus ensuring that plenty of stories would be written. He was arguing that investors are 'overexcited' by AI. Is he right? From the point of view of technical stock valuations, probably yes. From the point of view of fundamentals, maybe not. A classic bubble exists when the assets being valued are fundamentally not worth their price (and never will be) or when the underlying value is close to zero. So, in the great Dutch 'tulip mania' of 1637, it is clear in hindsight that the price of a tulip bulb should never be equal to 10 times an annual salary. And in the Great Financial Crisis of 2008, it became clear in hindsight that many mortgages had been given to people who simply didn't have the ability to afford them, and thus those mortgages were worth far less than banks' balance sheets said they did. So the question becomes whether AI is a bubble or not right now. From the fundamental point of view, the answer is no. OpenAI isn't literally worth nothing. It's not a tulip bulb or a tract home in the middle of nowhere. There is a real business there. JPMorgan's Brenda Duverce told clients in a recent note that 'OpenAI's ARR has reached ~$13bn (up 30% from Jun-25), and the company has reported it is on track to reach 700mn weekly active users (up 40% from Mar-25), while surpassing 5mn paying business users (up 66% from Jun-25).' She also noted that a 'secondary market transaction that could push the company's valuation to $500bn, up from the previously cited $300bn post-money figure from Mar-25, which would make OpenAI the most valuable private company in the world.' To put that bluntly, a company with a chatbot that often gets things wrong is somehow about to become the largest unicorn earth has ever seen. That does feel frothy. But OpenAI isn't worth nothing: $13 billion in revenues is a real thing. Maybe the value of its equity will decline in the short term but the company isn't teetering the way Lehman Brothers was in 2007. But how about the technical point of view? There is a lot of chatter on Wall Street right now about whether tech stocks are overvalued in a way that looks like a bubble. They have some scary charts! Here is a real head-scratcher: The contribution to U.S. GDP growth from data center spending is now the same as that from consumer spending, according to Apollo Management. The obvious problem with that: This state of affairs exists because consumers have reduced their spending habits as data spending has increased. Unless data centers suddenly start buying cars or shopping at Home Depot, this isn't good for the long run. It's especially not good because the run-up in value of tech stocks is now overpowering the rest of the S&P 500. John Authers of Bloomberg wrote this morning, 'It's unheard of for 2% of the index's companies to account for virtually 40% of its value.' And here is a chart from Bespoke Investment Group. It shows the performance since 2015 of the Magnificent Seven companies vs. the rest of the market. 'Bloomberg's Mag 7 index vs. its 500 Ex Mag 7 index is pretty unbelievable. You can barely see the 'Ex Mag 7's' 129% gain because of how much the 2,800% gain for the Mag 7 overshadows it,' the company says: Goldman Sachs' David Kostin has reportedly said that the Mag 7 stocks grew their earnings per share in Q2 by 26% year on year. So there is real money fueling a real business there. The partial conclusion must be: This isn't a bubble of fundamentals. No one thinks AI is made of tulips. But it does look a lot like some stocks are technically overvalued, and it should not surprise anyone if this 'bubble' bursts. Here's a snapshot of the action prior to the opening bell in New York: S&P 500 futures were flat this morning, premarket, after the index closed flat yesterday near its record high. STOXX Europe 600 was up 0.54% in early trading. The U.K.'s FTSE 100 was up 0.31% in early trading. Japan's Nikkei 225 was down 0.38%. China's CSI 300 was down 0.38%. The South Korea KOSPI was down 0.81%. India's Nifty 50 was up 0.42% before the end of the session. Bitcoin fell to $114.9K. This story was originally featured on Sign in to access your portfolio