
AI pioneer Bengio launches $30M nonprofit to rethink safety
Machine learning pioneer Yoshua Bengio is launching a new nonprofit lab backed by roughly $30 million in funding to make AI systems act less like humans.
Why it matters: While the move bucks a trend toward AI that acts independently, Bengio and others argue the current approach risks creating systems that may pursue their own self-preservation at the expense of humanity.
"We've been getting inspiration from humans as the template for building intelligent machines, but that's crazy, right?" Bengio said in an interview.
"If we continue on this path, that means we're going to be creating entities — like us — that don't want to die, and that may be smarter than us and that we're not sure if they're going to behave according to our norms and our instructions," he said.
Driving the news: Bengio, a Montreal-based researcher who has long warned about the risks of a technology he helped develop, has raised about $30 million for the nonprofit, dubbed LawZero.
LawZero currently has about 15 staffers, Bengio said, "but the goal is to hire many more."
Bengio is among those who have called for tougher regulation of AI development and even the breakup of big tech companies.
Earlier this year he gave a TED Talk urging greater caution and collaboration.
The big picture: There's a growing sense of worry among critics — and even AI practitioners — that safety is taking a back seat as companies and countries race to be first with AI that can best humans in a wide variety of tasks, so-called artificial general intelligence (AGI).
Bengio said there is also a high risk in concentrating control of advanced AI in a handful of companies.
"You don't want AGI or superintelligence to be in the hands of one person or one company only deciding what to do, or even one government," Bengio said. "So you need very strong checks and balances."
Between the lines: Bengio says a large part of the problem is how current systems are trained. During initial training, the systems are taught to mimic humans and then they're honed by seeing which responses people find most appealing.
"Both of these give rise to uncontrolled agency," Bengio said.
Some early glimmers of this are already appearing, such as Anthropic's latest model which, in a test scenario, sought to blackmail its engineers to avoid shutdown.
By contrast, Bengio says he wants to create AI systems that have intellectual distance from humans and act as more of a detached scientist than a personal companion or human agent.
"The training principle is completely different, but it can exploit a lot of the recent advances that have happened in machine learning," he said.
Yes, but: Bengio told Axios that the $30 million should be enough to fund the basic research effort for about 18 months.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Bloomberg
20 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Enterprise Products Says US Set to Deny Its China Ethane Export License
Enterprise Products Partners LP received a notice saying the US intends to deny licenses for three proposed cargoes of ethane heading to China as the Trump administration doubles down on security for exports to the country. The Houston-based midstream energy company has up to 20 days to issue a rebuttal to the notice from the Bureau of Industry and Security at the US Department of Commerce, Enterprise said in a statement Wednesday. The cargoes contain about 2.2 million barrels of ethane.


Bloomberg
25 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
23andMe Judge Questions Limits for New Auction for Bankrupt Firm
The judge overseeing the bankruptcy of 23andMe questioned the limits proposed for a second auction that is designed to push bids higher than a current $256 million offer from Regeneron Pharmaceuticals for the genetic-testing firm. US Bankruptcy Judge Brian Walsh asked lawyers for Regeneron and 23andMe to justify the limits they're supporting, but which have been criticized by the only other bidder, a California-based research institute backed by former 23andMe Chief Executive Officer Anne Wojcicki.
Yahoo
33 minutes ago
- Yahoo
US State Department's planned layoffs may violate court order, judge says
By Daniel Wiessner (Reuters) -A federal judge in California on Wednesday said her recent ruling barring President Donald Trump's administration from laying off tens of thousands of federal employees likely blocks the U.S. State Department's reorganization plan that includes 2,000 job cuts. U.S. District Judge Susan Illston in San Francisco during a virtual meeting in a lawsuit by unions, nonprofits and municipalities said she was concerned that the State Department is flouting her May 22 order that broadly blocked government-wide mass layoffs. Illston temporarily blocked about 20 agencies, including the State Department, from carrying out plans to downsize and restructure federal agencies at Trump's direction. But the department told Congress last week that it still planned to notify about 2,000 employees this month that they were being laid off and would reorganize or eliminate more than 300 bureaus and offices. 'At this point there are some semantics being bandied about, but it appears to me that what is being implemented at the State Department now is covered by the injunction,' said Illston, an appointee of President Bill Clinton, a Democrat. Illston ordered both sides to file briefs on the matter next week and said she would hold a hearing by June 13, the earliest date that State can issue layoff notices after it submitted its plan to Congress. In her May ruling, Illston said the White House cannot order the restructuring of federal agencies without authorization from Congress. The Trump administration has asked the U.S. Supreme Court to pause Illston's decision while it appeals, after a San Francisco-based federal appeals court refused to permit the pause. Illston's ruling was the broadest of its kind against the government overhaul that was spearheaded by Trump ally Elon Musk, the world's richest person and CEO of electric vehicle maker Tesla. Musk last week said he was ending his stint with the administration, raising questions about the future of his Department of Government Efficiency. During Wednesday's 30-minute meeting, U.S. Department of Justice lawyer Andrew Bernie argued that the State Department's reorganization plan predated a February executive order and subsequent White House memo directing mass layoffs, placing it outside the scope of Illston's decision. 'We of course recognize and take with the utmost seriousness our obligation to comply with the injunction, and we are complying,' Bernie said, adding that 17 federal agencies have halted planned layoffs. But Danielle Leonard, a lawyer for the plaintiffs, countered that State Department documents and statements regarding the planned layoffs specifically reference orders from the White House. 'We've heard some things from Mr. Bernie today, but we haven't seen anything sworn under penalty of perjury saying this was … independently done,' she said. Illston had convened Wednesday's meeting after the plaintiffs in a filing late Tuesday accused the State Department and the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development of not complying with her decision. They said that HUD had fired about 80 employees who had not completed a probationary period, which Bernie on Wednesday confirmed. But he said that agencies have broad latitude to fire probationary workers, and those terminations were not the same as the mass layoffs of tenured employees that were blocked by Illston. Probationary workers typically have less than a year or two in their current roles, though some are longtime federal employees in new positions. Illston said it was not clear to her whether the firings at HUD were covered by her injunction.