Alliance Renews Call For Bottom Trawling Ban In Hauraki Gulf
Members of the Hauraki Gulf Alliance have deployed a massive 'Ban Bottom Trawling' banner on the deck of the Rainbow Warrior, demanding an end to destructive bottom trawling in the Hauraki Gulf Marine Park. The Alliance, which includes Forest & Bird, LegaSea and Greenpeace, has a long-running campaign to remove trawling from Hauraki Gulf and the renewed call comes as bottom trawling faces increased public scrutiny.
Speaking from the Rainbow Warrior, in the Gulf, 'Heal the Hauraki' documentary producer Mandy Kupenga says: 'For too long, the practice of bottom trawling has bulldozed the rich and fragile ecosystems beneath the surface of the Hauraki Gulf. Entire ocean communities have been devastated. What happens beneath the waves doesn't stay there-when we lose biodiversity in the sea, we lose part of what sustains life on land as well.
'We cannot continue turning a blind eye. It's time to restore the mauri-the life force-of the Gulf, and honour our responsibility to future generations. Ending bottom trawling in and around the Hauraki Gulf isn't just a conservation decision. It's a moral one.'
Gulf advocate Shaun Lee says the Minister of Oceans and Fisheries 'needs to listen to 97.2% of 8,909 submitters who have asked for a full ban on bottom impact fishing in the Gulf'. LegaSea spokesperson Benn Winlove says he is disappointed the Minister for Oceans and Fisheries is willing to ignore such strong public sentiment against bottom trawling.
'Public opposition to environmental destruction is growing and it's incredible that a Minister in charge of ensuring sustainability of fish populations and their habitat is willing to let bottom trawling continue in the Gulf, let alone in the Marine Park.'
Bianca Ranson, campaigner from Forest & Bird, says:
'97% of submitters have called for a complete ban of bottom impact fishing in the Hauraki Gulf yet the Minister of Oceans and Fisheries, Shane Jones, mocks Tīkapa Moana calling it 'just a mud-stained bottom'. That is an insult to every living thing that depends on this ocean and to future generations who deserve thriving ecosystems abundant with life. Trawling rips up the seafloor turning vibrant thriving ecosystems into lifeless mud. Every year, massive weighted nets are dragged across the seafloor of Tīkapa Moana, killing all life in its path, destroying nurseries for fish, and choking the seabed in suffocating plumes of sedimentation. It's time to end bottom trawling.'
Bottom trawling is a fishing method that involves dragging heavy nets over the seafloor to catch fish, stirring up sediment, releasing carbon and indiscriminately killing marine life.
This is not the first time the massive banner has been used. Hundreds of people turned out to a flotilla in Auckland in 2023 to call for an end to trawling in the Gulf, while that same year a petition calling for a ban signed by nearly 37,000 people was handed into parliament.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scoop
2 days ago
- Scoop
What The Heck Winston? Greenpeace Queries NZ First Support For Seymour's Overseas Investment Bill
Greenpeace is asking NZ First leader Winston Peters what the heck his party is doing supporting an amendment Bill which could lead to greater corporate control of Aotearoa. NZ First has supported ACT leader David Seymour's amendment Bill to the Overseas Investment Act, through its first reading. Submissions on the Bill closed this week. Greenpeace spokesperson Gen Toop says: "ACT is trying to change the Overseas Investment law to make it easier for multinational corporations to buy up and exploit conservation land, lakebeds, coastal zones, wāhi tapu sites and other sensitive land across Aotearoa." "Shockingly, ACT is even trying to remove the mandatory requirement that the Government check whether a corporation has been involved in serious criminal activity before giving them access to New Zealand's sensitive land and natural resources." The Act currently mandates that the Government apply the Benefit to New Zealand test and Investor Test before giving consent to the sale of land that is classified as "sensitive" and allows them to decline consent if either of these tests are failed. Sensitive land is outlined in the Act and includes conservation areas, lake beds, marine and coastal zones, offshore islands, wāhi tapu and other culturally significant sites, as well as land adjoining these areas. The Bill proposes that instead of applying a public benefit and investor test, the Government applies a narrower "national interest" test which Greenpeace says completely fails to guarantee any meaningful consideration of environmental, cultural, or public interest values. "NZ First currently supports a Bill that would make it easier for multinational corporations to loot and destroy Aotearoa and funnel the profits to offshore shareholders leaving New Zealanders to deal with the mess - polluted rivers, drained aquifers and degraded ecosystems," Toop says. The Bill also scraps the requirement that water quality and sustainability be assessed before allowing overseas interests to extract, bottle and sell New Zealand's freshwater. "NZ First claims to put New Zealand first. But this ACT party Bill firmly puts offshore corporations first and New Zealanders last. Winston Peters should withdraw his party's support for the Bill before it's too late."
Scoop
4 days ago
- Scoop
Greenpeace Vandals Must Lose Charitable Status
Federated Farmers is renewing its call for Greenpeace to be stripped of its charitable status immediately, following the extreme activist group's latest illegal publicity stunt. "Greenpeace need to be held accountable for their repeated illegal activity and the spread of harmful misinformation," Southland Federated Farmers president Jason Herrick says. "How can they be recognised as a charity when they're breaking all kinds of laws trespassing on private property, vandalising public property, and intimidating the community? "Last night's vandalism of the world-famous trout statue in Gore reinforces why these activists need to lose their status as a charity. I think it's a total abuse of charitable status." Herrick says Greenpeace's vandalism of the statue and welcome sign is a shameless attempt to divide the small rural community and spread anti-farming propaganda. "These activists are total cowards who are slinking around in the shadows vandalising property under the cover of darkness," Herrick says. "There's a reason they've done this at night. They knew it was dodgy behaviour - and that they'd never get away with it in Gore during daylight hours. "We're a tight-knit community down here in Southland. Farming plays a huge role in not only our local economy, but in our social fabric too. "There's no way we're going to put up with this nonsense. Greenpeace should hang their heads in shame." In April, Federated Farmers called for the Government to immediately strip Greenpeace of its charitable status after the group's illegal occupation of Port Taranaki. Charitable status in New Zealand is intended to support organisations that advance public benefit through education, relief of poverty, and other recognised charitable purposes. Under the Charities Act, organisations must operate for the public good and not primarily serve political or advocacy purposes. Herrick says he sees Greenpeace's ongoing illegal activity as clear evidence that it no longer meets these criteria for charitable status. "There are plenty of amazing, honest charities doing fantastic work out there - but Greenpeace is not one of them. "It's become little more than an extreme activist group that's disrupting legitimate businesses and spreading harmful misinformation - repeatedly and deliberately." Federated Farmers lodged a formal complaint with Charities Services in April, requesting a formal inquiry into Greenpeace's conduct and eligibility for charitable status. A copy was also sent to Community and Voluntary Sector Minister Hon Louise Upston and Minister of Internal Affairs Hon Brooke van Velden. The complaint focuses on Greenpeace's repeated involvement in premeditated unlawful protest activity. That includes the 2024 protest at Fonterra's Te Rapa dairy factory where seven individuals were arrested, and last year's occupation of Straterra's Wellington office, where five were arrested during a staged lockdown. "We urge Charities Services to act decisively on our existing complaint and strip Greenpeace of its charitable status quickly," Herrick says. "I can't see any way they meet the requirements for registration under the Charities Act 2005. "Hardworking Kiwi taxpayers should not be forced to subsidise their illegal attacks and extremist political agendas through tax breaks for their donors. "Law-breaking groups cannot hide behind charitable privileges while threatening livelihoods with misinformation about farming." Herrick says it's not just Greenpeace that needs to be held accountable for how it's operating as a charity. "I think Charities Services and the Government need to be held accountable too and answer some tough, but fair, questions about how this rort of the rules is being allowed to continue. "There is absolutely no way Greenpeace should be allowed to constantly break the law and still be recognised as a charity."
Scoop
6 days ago
- Scoop
Minister Proud Of Potshots In Seabed Mine ‘Culture War'
The oceans and fisheries minister says Supreme Court judges and local body politicians have been cowed by fear in a culture war over seabed mining. Minister Shane Jones was in New Plymouth on Friday to deliver a stump speech for New Zealand First. Afterwards he said confrontation and fear had led to court rulings that blocked would-be seabed miners, and votes by local councils against the mine. 'The Supreme Court, when it got involved, it was confronted with a highly charged atmosphere which is still prevailing, which is what's driving fear in your local government to stand up against this belligerent, well-organised, rowdy bunch of activists,' said Jones. 'I think these natural resource debates have turned into a culture war.' Jones freely admitted taking shots from one side of the battle lines – including calling South Taranaki mana whenua 'pixie-like hapūs'. 'I am never, ever going to take a backward step to the well-drilled, highly-orchestrated, Greenpeace-orientated campaigners who probably operate out of the local iwi office anyway, such is the level of cross-contamination.' Opponents have fought the proposal to mine the seabed off Pātea since before the first official application in 2013, winning in the High Court, Court of Appeal and finally the Supreme Court in 2021. Spearheaded by Ngāti Ruanui, opposition spread to neighbouring Ngaa Rauru Kiitahi and hapū of Ngāruahine. In the Supreme Court tribes were joined by the Taranaki-Whanganui Conservation Board, the government's Environmental Protection Authority, Kiwis Against Seabed Mining, Greenpeace and Forest & Bird. Also party to the court challenge were Fisheries Inshore New Zealand, the New Zealand Federation of Commercial Fishermen, Southern Inshore Fisheries, Talley's Group, Cloudy Bay Clams and Te Ohu Kaimoana. Jones himself chaired Te Ohu Kaimoana before entering Parliament, controversially continuing to earn an annual fee of $70,000 as a director despite being an MP. Taranaki's eight Crown-mandated iwi agencies have collectively declared against the mine. District councils of South Taranaki, Whanganui and New Plymouth voted to oppose seabed mining after hearing from the miners and from community opponents. Jones claimed 'an enormous amount of brouhaha driven by misinformation' and couldn't think why councillors would stand against the mine – except out of fear as local elections loom. As during his last Taranaki visit, the Minister of Oceans and Fisheries, of Resources and of Regional Development demonstrated a loose grip on details – in spite of his repeated vocal support for the mine. He told his party's public meeting seabed mining was like dredging Port Taranaki – an argument made last month by New Plymouth councillor and former NZ First candidate Murray Chong, who was in the audience. 'Where do you put all the dredgings?' asked Jones. 'I'll tell you where you put them: You put them back into the host environment otherwise known as the coastline of Taranaki.' Over the past four years some three million tonnes of blacksand dredgings from Port Taranaki have been dumped in two approved zones near the shoreline, to keep the harbour clear and restore sand drift to New Plymouth beaches reduced by the port's breakwaters. The ongoing port dredging is less than two percent of the proposed seabed mine's waste: every four years Trans-Tasman Resources would discharge 180 million tonnes of seabed sediment – a recognised pollutant – into the abundant waters of the Pātea Shoals. Trans-Tasman's mining ship would take just 18 days to match four years of port dredging, and continue to do so for at least 20 years at the boundary of the 12-mile territorial limit. The subsidiary of Australian company Manuka Resources wants Fast-track approval to suck up 50 million tonnes of blacksand annually to extract iron, titanium and vanadium and then dump 45 million tonnes back into the marine environment. More mining ships are likely if the application sets a Fast-track precedent, with a second bid by Trans-Tasman's former chief financial officer on hold pending the results. Jones challenged the half-dozen journalists probing him about the mine. 'Don't you find this debate amongst yourselves tiresome?" he asked. 'I mean, haven't you got anything to talk about beyond this?'
