
Letters: No matter the provocation from Hamas, the response from Israel is inhumane
One can argue that Israel had the right to use the standard military doctrine of overwhelming force to prosecute its military response and not seek or accept proportionality of casualties.
One can argue that given the urban character and high population density of Gaza, collateral damage and high civilian casualties were inevitable.
One can argue that Hamas's well-documented tactic of using schools and hospitals for command and control posts, ammunition dumps and firing points – effectively using children and the sick as human shields – could lead to these people being targeted.
One can argue that the group's tactic of firing from buildings to lure Israeli infantry before detonating mines could lead to a corresponding Israeli tactic of wholesale destruction of these buildings, rather than the normal practice of clearing house-by-house.
One can also argue that Hamas's strategy of retaining the hostages in the face of this onslaught has allowed Israel to retain the semblance of moral rectitude and given cover for its heavy-handedness.
But the deliberate collective punishment and starvation of 2.2 million people and the expulsion from one area to another within the Gaza Strip in forced evacuations is inhumane and dehumanising.
R Healy, Mullagh, Co Cavan
US should look at itself before it lectures other nations about free speech
Ian O'Doherty tells us that the United States has taken it upon itself to warn Ireland over the dangers of our proposed hate-speech legislation ('Free speech, America and the EU: we know which way our leaders will lean' – June 4).
It was a 'friendly chat', apparently, though such chats from Washington often come with a raised eyebrow and a wagging finger.
This is from a country whose president has already vowed to prosecute journalists he dislikes, has banned sections of the press from the White House briefing room and routinely refers to unfavourable coverage as 'treason', all while border agents inspect travellers' social media accounts for impure thoughts.
The First Amendment is a fine principle, but its most ardent defenders often appear oddly selective in their defence of it, especially when abroad.
Before advising sovereign nations on freedom of expression, the US might take a moment to recall the old maxim: physician, heal thyself.
Enda Cullen, Tullysaran Road, Armagh
If Adams runs for the Áras, we can't blame the electorate if he doesn't get elected
Senan Molony suggests that if former Sinn Féin leader Gerry Adams becomes our next president it will be the fault of the BBC ('If Adams becomes next president, it would be ironic the BBC paved the way' – June 4).
I wonder if Mr Adams does decide to run for the Áras and is not successful, will it then be the fault of the electorate?
I would ultimately give the electorate the respect they deserve no matter what the outcome.
Aidan Roddy, Cabinteely, Dublin 18
If you value love, not hate, stand with us at Pride marches across Ireland
I am in my 30s and have been protesting since I was six years of age. I remember going with all of the kids in my class to the local government building to campaign for them to fund our secondary school. That school opened when I was 16.
I have marched for marriage equality, for Repeal; I've protested alongside Trans and Intersex Pride; for Irish language rights; in solidarity with Palestine and much more. Marching together for a common cause is empowering to those affected and for those who love us. Pride is no different.
This year, Dublin alone has a 'Dyke March' (June 27), Pride (June 28) and Trans & Intersex Pride (July 12). Then there are all the Pride parades around the country.
All of these marches are moments of unity for us, when we stand together proudly against a world that is telling us to be quiet, to be grateful for what we have, to expect less for ourselves and for other oppressed peoples.
If you want to stand on the sidelines and support us, bring your kids, bring your grandparents. If you want to march with us, find a group or make a group and march with us in solidarity.
The rise of hatred towards minority groups in this country terrifies me. The changes in the wider world are almost incomprehensible. Take a stand, with us, for us, together against those who would oppress us.
Jess Connor, Glasnevin, Dublin 9
Times have changed, but you still can't beat having a newspaper in your hands
On Thursday, May 25, 1995, the final editions of the Irish Press and Evening Press were published.
I remember at that time fearing it might well be the tip of the iceberg and that many other papers were likely to follow. Some did, but thankfully many are still available to accompany the pint of milk back to the breakfast table.
Despite technology and the advent of various media, the 'real' newspaper is still number one in our house, as it was in the house in which I grew up in the 1950s and 60s.
With regard to this canonical matter, Flann O'Brien's assertion on the 'pint of plain' could wittingly be applied, 'the paper is your only man'.
Michael Gannon, St Thomas Square, Kilkenny
Time to draw a line under the use of pen and paper by students in State exams
That students still put pen to paper in the Leaving and Junior Certificate in our computerised world is a joke. They should leave school equipped with software development skills.
Liam Doran, Clondalkin, Dublin 22
Forget 'Winkgate' – Reds can still hold their heads high in spite of defeat
I'm sorry to see such a massive match was soured by a cynical wink from Sharks scrum-half Jaden Hendrikse in his side's win over Munster in the URC quarter-final last Saturday.
But to his credit, Jack Crowley never blinked. The Reds can still walk tall.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


RTÉ News
3 hours ago
- RTÉ News
Lebanon accuses Israel of 'flagrant' ceasefire violation
Lebanese leaders have condemned Israeli attacks on Beirut overnight, labelling them as "flagrant" violations of a ceasefire between the two countries. Israel, meanwhile, warned that it will keep striking Lebanon until Hezbollah has been disarmed. At least ten strikes hit Beirut's southern suburbs, a sprawling area known as Dahiyeh, in a wave of bombing that began about 90 minutes after the Israeli military issued evacuation warnings for four sites in the area. It was the fourth time that Dahiyeh has been bombed since a US-brokered truce in November ended a year-long war between Israel and Lebanese armed movement Hezbollah. The attack came on the eve of Eid al-Adha, one of the main religious festivals of the Muslim calendar. Lebanese President Joseph Aoun called the attack a "flagrant violation of an international accord... on the eve of a sacred religious festival". Israeli Defence Minister Israel Katz, meanwhile, said that "there will be no calm in Beirut, and no order or stability in Lebanon, without security for the State of Israel". "Agreements must be honoured and if you do not do what is required, we will continue to act, and with great force," Mr Katz said in a statement. Under the ceasefire brokered by the United States and France, Lebanon committed to disarming Hezbollah, which was once reputed to be more heavily armed than the state itself. Israel's military has continually targeted southern Lebanon and Israeli troops still occupy five hilltop positions in the south. Israel has struck Beirut's suburbs three times since the truce was agreed, mostly in response to rocket launches from Lebanon. Hezbollah denied involvement in those launches. The latest war between longtime foes Israel and Hezbollah began in October 2023, when Hezbollah launched rockets at Israeli military positions in solidarity with its Palestinian ally Hamas. Israel escalated the following year in a heavy bombing campaign that killed thousands of people. Then-Hamas secretary general Hassan Nasrallah was killed in an Israeli attack in September last year. Israel has carried out repeated strikes on south Lebanon since the truce, but strikes targeting Beirut's southern suburbs have been rare. Lebanese leaders condemn attacks Under the truce, Hezbollah fighters were to withdraw north of the Litani river, about 30 kilometres from the Israeli border, and dismantle any remaining military infrastructure to its south. Israel was to withdraw all its troops from Lebanon but it has kept some in five areas it deems "strategic". The Lebanese army has been deploying in the south and removing Hezbollah infrastructure, with Prime Minister Nawaf Salam saying that it had dismantled "more than 500 military positions and arms depots" in the area. Following the strike, Lebanon's leaders accused Israel of a "flagrant" ceasefire violation by launching strikes ahead of the Eid al-Adha holiday. President Joseph Aoun voiced "firm condemnation of the Israeli aggression" and "flagrant violation of an international accord... on the eve of a sacred religious festival". The prime minister too issued a statement condemning the strikes as a violation of Lebanese sovereignty. One resident of southern Beirut described grabbing her children and fleeing her home after receiving an ominous warning before the strikes. "I got a phone call from a stranger who said he was from the Israeli army," said the woman, Violette, who declined to give her last name. Israel also issued an evacuation warning for the Lebanese village of Ain Qana, around 20 kilometres from the border. The Israeli military then launched a strike on a building there that it alleged was a Hezbollah base, according to Lebanon's official National News Agency.

The Journal
4 hours ago
- The Journal
Israel strikes Lebanon overnight, claims it will not stop until Hezbollah is disarmed
ISRAEL HAS WARNED that it will keep striking Lebanon until militant group Hezbollah has been disarmed after it struck south Beirut in what Lebanese leaders called a major violation of a November ceasefire. An Israeli military evacuation call issued ahead of Thursday's strikes sent huge numbers of residents of the southern suburbs of the Lebanese capital, long a bastion of Iran-backed Hezbollah, fleeing for their lives. Iran condemned Israeli 'aggression' against Lebanon after its arch foe carried out air strikes against Tehran-backed militant group Hezbollah in south Beirut. Its foreign ministry spokesman Esmaeil Baqaei described last night's strikes 'as a blatant act of aggression against Lebanon's territorial integrity and sovereignty.' The attack on what the Israeli military said was Hezbollah's underground drone factories came on the eve of Eid al-Adha, one of the main religious festivals of the Muslim calendar. The strikes were launched an hour after Israel's military spokesman issued an evacuation call, and sent plumes of smoke billowing over Beirut. The attack came six months after a ceasefire agreement was sealed in a bid to end hostilities between Hezbollah and Israel. 'There will be no calm in Beirut, and no order or stability in Lebanon, without security for the State of Israel,' Israeli Defence Minister Israel Katz said in a statement. 'Agreements must be honoured and if you do not do what is required, we will continue to act, and with great force.' Under the ceasefire brokered by the United States and France, Lebanon committed to disarming Hezbollah, which was once reputed to be more heavily armed than the state itself. Hezbollah sparked months of deadly hostilities by launching cross-border attacks on northern Israel in what it described as an act of solidarity with its Palestinian ally Hamas following its 7 October, 2023 attack. Advertisement The war left Hezbollah massively weakened, with a string of top commanders including its longtime leader Hassan Nasrallah killed and weapons caches dotted around Lebanon incinerated. Israel has carried out repeated strikes on south Lebanon since the truce, but strikes targeting Beirut's southern suburbs have been rare. 'Following Hezbollah's extensive use of UAVs as a central component of its terrorist attacks on the State of Israel, the terrorist organisation is operating to increase production of UAVs for the next war,' the military said, calling the activities 'a blatant violation of the understandings between Israel and Lebanon'. Ominous warning Under the truce, Hezbollah fighters were to withdraw north of the Litani river, about 30 kilometres (20 miles) from the Israeli border, and dismantle any remaining military infrastructure to its south. Israel was to withdraw all its troops from Lebanon but it has kept some in five areas it deems 'strategic'. The Lebanese army has been deploying in the south and removing Hezbollah infrastructure, with Prime Minister Nawaf Salam saying Thursday that it had dismantled 'more than 500 military positions and arms depots' in the area. Following the strike on Thursday, Lebanon's leaders accused Israel of a 'flagrant' ceasefire violation by launching strikes ahead of the Eid al-Adha holiday. President Joseph Aoun voiced 'firm condemnation of the Israeli aggression' and 'flagrant violation of an international accord… on the eve of a sacred religious festival'. The prime minister too issued a statement condemning the strikes as a violation of Lebanese sovereignty. One resident of southern Beirut described grabbing her children and fleeing her home after receiving an ominous warning before the strikes. 'I got a phone call from a stranger who said he was from the Israeli army,' said the woman, Violette, who declined to give her last name. Israel also issued an evacuation warning for the Lebanese village of Ain Qana, around 20 kilometres (12 miles) from the border. The Israeli military then launched a strike on a building there that it alleged was a Hezbollah base, according to Lebanon's official National News Agency.

The Journal
5 hours ago
- The Journal
US judge blocks Trump's latest ban on foreign students at Harvard
A US JUDGE has put a temporary stay on Donald Trump's latest effort to stop foreign students from enrolling at Harvard, as the US president's battle with one of the world's most prestigious universities intensified. A proclamation issued by the White House late Wednesday sought to bar most new international students at Harvard from entering the country, and said existing foreign enrollees risked having their visas terminated. 'Harvard's conduct has rendered it an unsuitable destination for foreign students and researchers,' the order said. Harvard quickly amended an existing complaint filed in federal court, saying: 'This is not the Administration's first attempt to sever Harvard from its international students.' '(It) is part of a concerted and escalating campaign of retaliation by the government in clear retribution for Harvard's exercising its First Amendment rights to reject the government's demands to control Harvard's governance, curriculum, and the 'ideology' of its faculty and students.' Advertisement US District Judge Allison Burroughs ruled the government cannot enforce Trump's proclamation. Harvard had showed, she said, that without a temporary restraining order, it risked sustaining 'immediate and irreparable injury before there is an opportunity to hear from all parties.' The same judge had already blocked Trump's earlier effort to bar international students from enrolling at the storied university. 'Government vendetta' The government already cut around $3.2 billion (€2.7 billion) of federal grants and contracts benefiting Harvard and pledged to exclude the Cambridge, Massachusetts, institution from any future federal funding. Harvard has been at the forefront of Trump's campaign against top universities after it defied his calls to submit to oversight of its curriculum, staffing, student recruitment and 'viewpoint diversity.' Trump has also singled out international students at Harvard, who accounted for 27% of total enrollment in the 2024-2025 academic year and are a major source of income. In its filing, Harvard acknowledged that Trump had the authority to bar an entire class of aliens if it was deemed to be in the public interest, but stressed that was not the case in this action. Related Reads Harvard University sues Trump administration to stop federal funding freeze Trump threatens to strip Harvard's tax-exempt status after freezing university's funding Harvard University hit with $2.2 billion funding freeze after rejecting Trump's demands 'The President's actions thus are not undertaken to protect the 'interests of the United States' but instead to pursue a government vendetta against Harvard,' it said. Since returning to office Trump has targeted elite US universities which he and his allies accuse of being hotbeds of anti-Semitism, liberal bias and 'woke' ideology. Trump's education secretary also threatened to strip Columbia University of its accreditation. The Republican has targeted the New York Ivy League institution for allegedly ignoring harassment of Jewish students, throwing all of its federal funding into doubt. Unlike Harvard, several top institutions – including Columbia – have already bowed to far-reaching demands from the Trump administration. © AFP 2025