Costa sneakily slaps another price hike onto hot drinks as customers slam ‘sickness tax'
We reveal below how much prices have gone up at some major branches
UNHAPPY MEAL Costa sneakily slaps another price hike onto hot drinks as customers slam 'sickness tax'
Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window)
Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
COSTA Coffee has slapped increases of as much as 15p on brew prices with hospital branches hit the worst thanks to a 20p 'sickness surcharge' - just four months since the last hike.
The cost of caffeine blow means coffee fans working, visiting or laid up in hospital could end up shelling out upwards for £4 a pop for their favourite tipple this summer.
Sign up for Scottish Sun
newsletter
Sign up
1
Costa has hiked the price of some of its drinks for the second time this year
Credit: Reuters
The increases have been dubbed 'outrageous' and a 'sickness surcharge' by critics and comes as brassic staff and patients are already battling surging parking charges at hospitals while visiting poorly loved ones.
Dozens of popular drinks are being sold at prices 5% more expensive at hospital branches than those just a few hundred yards from high street outlets, according to new research for The Sun.
An audit by our investigators found a small latte or cappuccino costs £3.90 and a medium £4.10 at Medivest's Royal Victoria Infirmary's Costa Coffee outlet in Newcastle.
That's a 10p increase on February 2025 prices and a 20p more compared with high street prices just yards down the road.
The same drinks at Costa's nearby Northumberland Street branch sell for just £3.70 and £3.90.
Similarly, down south at Medivest's St Richard's Hospital Costa café in Chichester a small and medium latte or cappuccino costs £3.90 and £4.10 respectively – also a 10p hike on prices since our last survey in February.
That compares to just £3.70 and £3.90 down the road at the city's East Street branch.
In addition, a flat white is priced at £4.05 in the hospital versus just £3.85 on the high street in Chichester.
While a small Americano is now £3.20 in the hospital – a 15p hike - but just £2.99 down the road on East Street – a 9p increase since February.
We found other examples of NHS price mark ups at Costa outlets around the country.
Five ways to save money at costa
At Costa's Medivest Sheffield Children's Hospital outlet we spotted a small Americano on sale for £3.20, a small latte or cappuccino for £3.90, or £4.10 for a medium of each and a flat white for £4.05.
That equates to a 10p increase on all drinks since February with Americano's up 15p.
While down the road at Sheffield's Broomhill outlet prices have also been hiked on the same drinks but these are still 10p cheaper than hospital rates.
And in the capital, we found the same story at Costa's Medivest Croydon University Hospital in south London where prices are identical to those at Sheffield Children's Hospital.
Following the same trend just a few hundred yards away at the Thornton Heath Costa café all the same drinks are on sale for 10p less meaning NHS staff and patients are yet again being asked to fork out more.
In December we revealed Costa had been hit by shortages of popular menu items such as toasties, cakes, and breakfast baps due to supply issues.
While in February it was reported the chain had started serving tea from its 7,000 self-serve Express machines situated in shops, supermarkets, travel hubs and petrol stations in a move welcomed by customers.
However, last night critics blasted the coffee giant who have more than 2,800 outlets around the UK including 80 in hospitals, for charging patients and visitors more.
Dennis Reed, of over 60's campaign group, Silver Voices, said: 'Costa Coffee is still putting a sickness surcharge on patients and visitors, because they are seen as a captive audience with nowhere else to go for a beverage.
'People visiting the hospital are there because they are seeing sick relatives or friends, and may be tired and worried themselves, probably in dire need of a pick-up.
'Hospital managers have the responsibility to ensure patients and their visitors are not blatantly ripped off in this way".
Martyn James, Sun Squeeze Team member and independent consumer champion, added: 'It is high time these outrageous hospital hikes in prices were banned.
'No one should have to pay more for coffee at potentially one of the worst times in their life.
'These costs can be spread over all outlets - and maybe even cut for those who need cheering up the most.'
The chain has blamed inflation and rising costs for the increases.
Costa said: 'We collaborate with various partners across the UK to offer Costa Coffee in a range of settings, including hospitals.
'As each partner sets their own pricing, some items may vary in cost due to the operating expenses of those locations.
'We regularly review pricing with our partners to ensure it remains competitive within the relevant retail environment, while maintaining our focus on quality and value.
'Earlier this year, we made the difficult decision to adjust the prices of our beverages, extras (excluding alternative milks), and packaged drinks, with increases ranging from 5p to 15p.
'Like many retailers, we continue to navigate inflationary pressures and rising costs.
"Despite this, we remain committed to delivering value for our customers through our everyday deals, including breakfast, lunch, and afternoon bundles.
'In addition, our Costa Club app offers members exclusive discounts and rewards through features such as Treat Drop and Swaps.'
Costa Coffee loyalty scheme perks
COSTA Club members can get early access to new menus among other perks.
To join download the Costa Coffee app, it's free to download via the Apple app store or Google Play store.
Stamps can be collected in any of the chain's 2,800 coffee shops, as well as around 12,000 machines in petrol stations and convenience stores.
You can get stamps for spending in store and using a reusable cup.
You get a free drink after collecting ten stamps, or beans as they are called. You also get free cake on your birthday.
Do you have a money problem that needs sorting? Get in touch by emailing money-sm@news.co.uk.
Plus, you can join our Sun Money Chats and Tips Facebook group to share your tips and stories
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
43 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Four reasons why Labour will betray leaseholders
In a bid to win last year's election, the Labour party made a series of ambitious promises: build 1.5 million homes, slash NHS waiting times and crack down on antisocial behaviour. But arguably, the pledge that the Government will find hardest to deliver on is the vow to overturn Britain's centuries-old (and tremendously complex) leasehold system. Homeowners on these contracts have found themselves locked in crippling contracts that include uncapped service charges. By the time Britain went to the polls last July, Labour had already dropped an initial pledge to ban the practice within the first 100 days of taking office. The party's manifesto instead said it would 'bring the feudal leasehold system to an end'. Almost a year in, it is becoming increasingly clear that it won't happen any time soon – if indeed during this Parliament. In addition to banning new leasehold flats, the Government has promised to strengthen leaseholders' rights to buy their freehold, make commonhold the default tenure for homeownership, reduce ground rents to peppercorn and remove the threat of forfeiture – which can see leaseholders removed from a property if they do not pay ground rent. Some reforms were made as part of the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act (2024) by the Conservatives – but a ban on leasehold only applies to new houses, meaning it brings no value to the almost five million people who already own leasehold homes. The move has been criticised as little more than lip service by critics. With property rights deeply entrenched in age-old legislation, has Labour bitten off far more than it can chew? Developers don't like commonhold – and the Government needs them to build flats Labour's plan to deliver 1.5 million new homes is already being derailed by a shortage of construction workers. If it axes new leasehold properties, it may remove an incentive for developers to build, explains Angelina Arora, a property solicitor for legal firm Osbornes. 'For developers, leasehold properties have been a reliable income stream – they know they can charge ground rent and have some kind of control. Commonhold will remove all those incentives, so what will motivate them to keep building?' Commonhold, with which the Government intends to replace leasehold on new and eventually existing properties, gives homeowners the freehold title to their units, and joint ownership of shared rights. The Government's white paper on leasehold reform suggests that for commonholds to become the standard, there must be market confidence in it first. However, this creates a vicious cycle, explains Harry Scoffin, founder of campaign group, Free Leaseholders. 'If you take that approach, commonholds will never have market confidence, as developers will always choose leasehold. You just need to bite the bullet and implement it.' As well as developers, lenders are very sceptical of commonhold, says Reema Chugh, a partner at law firm Hodge Jones and Allen. 'Lenders are conservative by nature – they like precedent and risk modelling. There are fewer than 20 commonhold developments in the UK – there is no established market, there are very few commonhold sales, so there is no reliable resale value meaning a higher lending risk.' Ms Churgh adds: 'With leasehold, lenders can step in if leases are forfeited due to a breach. Commonhold has no equivalent backstop. Lenders have less control in recovery scenarios. 'Until commonhold becomes mainstream, lenders will see it as risky, but it won't become mainstream until lenders support it – so it's a chicken and egg situation.' Scoffin points out that if only new properties are required to be commonhold, this could create a two-tier system, with the gap between the prices of flats and houses at its highest level in 30 years. 'Everybody will rush towards new flats, and nobody will want to touch existing leasehold ones. So existing leaseholders will be even more disadvantaged by the reforms,' he says. Removing marriage value and ground rents is incredibly controversial Marriage value is the increase in a property's worth when a leaseholder buys the freehold, or extends its lease once there are fewer than 80 years left on it. This makes extending a lease or purchasing the freehold much more expensive when there are fewer than 80 years left, with leaseholders paying 50pc of the increase in the value of their property to the freeholder – this can be tens of thousands of pounds, in some instances. The Government has pledged to abolish marriage value, which would make it significantly cheaper to extend short leases – but to do so is incredibly complicated. Some freeholders have argued that it is incompatible with their private property rights as laid out in the Human Rights Act 1998, with a judicial review set to take place later in the summer. 'The 80-year rule creates a ticking time bomb – it causes stress, erodes property value, encourages predatory behaviour and hinders market function. It makes it harder to sell and remortgage flats with short leases, which creates market stagnation. '[Abolishing marriage value] would represent a major power shift, which is why it's hotly contested. Reforming it is essential to making the system fairer,' says Chugh. Almost a million leases have escalating ground rents, according to the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) regulator. This means the annual charge increases over time and experts have warned that these clauses are turning flat owners into 'mortgage prisoners'. The Government has also made the ambitious pledge to cap ground rents – but in doing so may have offered millions of leaseholders false hope. As with marriage value, freeholders are fighting ground rent changes on human rights grounds – and modifying rights enshrined in law is likely to be no easy or speedy feat, adds Chugh. 'Retrospectively removing contractual rights is likely to be very challenging… the mechanisms to do it are really unclear. 'Ground rents are also often tied up in investment products [such as pensions]. If they retrospectively remove it, compensation schemes could be required, at a huge cost to taxpayers.' Samuel Hughes, of think tank Centre for Policy Studies, is critical of the plan to retroactively change contracts. '[This is an attempt to] let leaseholders buy freeholds for less than they are worth. Some freeholders are charities, so you're giving people the right to buy charity assets at below market values,' adds Samuel Hughes of think tank Centre for Policy Studies. 'There is such a lack of clarity from the Government – it hasn't been well thought out' Legal professionals bemoan a lack of guidance and clarity around what would constitute a seismic change to the foundations of property law in this country. 'So many people are affected – leaseholders, developers, lenders, freeholders, legal practitioners,' says Arora of law firm Osbornes. 'When people come to us, we just don't know the answers. Rather than advising our clients, in order to protect ourselves we can only give them the information we have and tell them they need to take a view. Ultimately, we just don't know. 'Regardless of the Government [in power], this is not something that can change overnight. There are so many practical things to think about before anything can come into effect. All UK Finance lending regulations will have to change. We deal with lease extensions on a daily basis – what's going to happen when leases effectively don't exist? There's such a lack of clarity. 'Normally there are seminars held with legal practitioners to assist with reforms, discussing what is potentially going to happen. We've had nothing. How long can people wait?' Another of the Government's many leasehold reform promises is to ban forfeiture, which gives freeholders the right to evict a leaseholder if they break a condition of the lease, such as not paying ground rent. 'Forfeiture is deeply embedded in leasehold,' adds Chugh. 'There is no clear legal remedy which allows freeholders to take a flat back over minor arrears – so it will require a longstanding rewrite of landlord rights.' 'Is there the political will from Number 10 to make these changes?' Scoffin, a leasehold reform campaigner, is sceptical of the political drive to make this happen. He points out that Labour promised leasehold reform in 1995 in a document called 'The End to Feudalism'. Yet there has been little progress since. Scoffin says: 'The history of leasehold reform is that if there isn't a strong steer from Number 10, it's not going to happen. The Conservatives made some promises to leaseholders in 2019, but then it was dragged through the whole of the course of the Parliament. 'We're really concerned that we're going to have a repeat of where we were with the Conservatives, where there are a lot of great announcements, and then there isn't the progress that we need – and then suddenly we're at the end of the parliament, and they haven't got it through. 'The [Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government] says there is a bill coming later this year, but that's not strictly correct – it's a draft piece of legislation. The Government could sit here for a year or two analysing responses, and then we're back here at the general election. 'Is Number 10 really giving [housing secretary] Matthew Pennycook full backing? Are they bringing in more brilliant brains and getting a crack team assembled to bring this through? 'Successive Governments haven't prioritised this – they leave it too long to bring in major reforms, and it falls on the next Government. Leaseholders cannot wait until the next election to stop being looted in their homes – if they do, voters will not thank [Labour].' Arora concurs that leaseholders may be waiting some time before any meaningful changes occur. 'We're looking at late 2025 for the draft Bill, but that doesn't mean it will come into force – it will still need to become a fully fledged bill. I don't think the commonhold will come into effect for another few years. 'It just hasn't been well thought out. I think these issues are coming up, and they're realising they're way over their heads.'
Scottish Sun
an hour ago
- Scottish Sun
Kids snack brand launches two new flavours costing just 33p each – and they're perfect for lunch boxes
Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) A POPULAR kids snack brand has launched two brand new flavours, with each lunchbox treat costing just 33p. With pressures from the cost-of-living crisis remaining high, many parents are finding it hard to provide their kids with well-earned treats. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up 2 A kids' snack brand has launched a new treat, perfect for lunchboxes Credit: Paul Tonge - The Sun 2 The snacks cost just 33p each Credit: Whaoo! And although food prices are skyrocketing, thankfully there are still some budget-friendly options for money conscious parents. Kids' snack brand Whaoo! has launched two new delicious treats for chocolate fans. Snack lovers can now get their hands on Chocolate and Banana Filled Crêpes and bite-sized Mini Chocolate Chip Brioche Buns. The two products come in packs of six, costing £1.95 at Tesco and Asda, making each snack just 33p. The tiny tasty treats are perfect for popping into kids lunchboxes, and can be enjoyed on the go on extra busy days. Whaoo! said: "Whether it's a snack for after school activities, a companion for weekend adventures or a delightful lunchbox surprise, both newly launched products are individually wrapped for convivence and parents can trust the sweet treats to provide a delicious quick fix when tummies start to rumble." 'We're thrilled to be expanding our range with two new snacks", said ean-Pascal Allemand, Managing Director at Whaoo! "Our Chocolate & Banana Filed Crêpes put a sweet spin on our much-loved original, and we're especially excited to introduce our Mini Chocolate Chip Brioche Bun – a brand-new style of snack that's just as convenient and delicious. "Whether it's for the school run, sports club, or weekend outings, Whaoo! has families covered with snacks that parents trust, and kids love.' This comes after a major supermarket began selling viral "angel hair" chocolate, which left some shoppers disgusted. Mum's Viral Lunchboxes for 11 Kids: Netizens React! The Viele Angel Hair Strawberry Flavour Chocolate is now available at Morrisons, and the unusual looking snack is dividing customers. The pink Turkish chocolate bar is filled with pistachio cream and green cotton candy, with the inside resembling human hair. Morrisons posted a video of the new product to its Instagram page this week, writing: "The viral Angel Hair chocolate bar has officially landed in stores... have you tried it yet?" But many customers appeared to be revolted by the sweet treat, with one responding: "Eww are you meant to eat that?" What the NHS recommends children have for lunch: The NHS gives a number of suggestions and guidelines on their Chnage4Life website. Base the lunchbox on foods like bread, rice, pasta and potatoes - wholegrain ideally - too keep kids fuller for longer If your child isn't keen on wholegrain, try making sandwiches with one slice of white and one slice of wholemeal bread Try to keep lunchboxes interesting by using a variety of shapes like bagels, pittas and wraps Make food fun as lunches can be more exciting if the child has to put them together, like having foods for dipping and makes a change from sandwiches every day. Opt for low fat foods, like lean meats or fish. Cut down on the amount of spreads you put into sandwiches Always add a bit of salad and vegetables to the meal Cut down on the crisps Chop up some fruit or peal satsuamas and add those instead of sweets Cheese can be high in fat and salt so pick strong tasting ones or go for low-fat varieties Get the kids involved in making the lunch - they'll be more likely to eat it if they helped make it Another said it looked "vile", while one shopper asked: "Is that supposed to be edible? It looks awful?" The Sun recently revealed Cadbury is launching a new Dairy Milk Iced Latte bar this summer. The new bar blends its classic Dairy Milk chocolate with a creamy coffee filling and crunchy biscuit pieces. The chocolate brand is also introducing four limited-edition Dairy Milk Summer Edition bars, complete with unique packaging designed for the 53% of Brits who, according to the brand's survey, enjoy their chocolate chilled. This packaging changes its appearance when cooled, thanks to special thermochromic technology, revealing bright, summery designs. The new chocolate bars will hit the shelves this month and will be available throughout the summer period for £2 a piece.
The Herald Scotland
8 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
Scottish Government faces union warning over spending measures
Public finance minister Ivan McKee will this afternoon (Thursday) unveil details of the crackdown which aims to reduce "wasteful" spending by the state amid major financial pressures. It is understood the proposals will increase the amount of cash saved over the following five years so that by 2029/30 the government will be saving by up to £1 billion annually on backroom operations. The strategy is expected to set out how substantial savings can be made through collaborative working across organisations focusing on reducing demand for services such as the NHS through preventation such as policies to reduce diseases and social harms caused by poverty. READ MORE: But the government's proposals will also seek to reduce waste through more efficient procurement, cutting the cost of managing estates and buildings, the removal of duplication and the enhanced use of automation while aiming to improve the delivery of frontline services such as health and education. A major review of civil service is not being ruled out with the Scottish Government's 55 directorates potentially facing a restructure and a reduction in their number. It is expected that the cash-saving proposals will highlight too a possible need to "consolidate" Scotland's 130 quangos with cost-cutting mergers between bodies potentially being undertaken. However, in comments which could raise the prospect of future battles between trade unions and public sector employers, Ms Foyer warned: "You can't fix public services by cutting the people who deliver them." STUC general secretary Roz Foyer (Image: Newsquest) She told The Herald: 'It's illogical to talk about reducing headcount while NHS waiting times, A&E delays and social care backlogs are at crisis levels all while local government is all but being cleared out. 'Scotland deserves high-quality public services that are fully funded, resilient and responsive. That means investing in the workforce, not undermining it. We aren't against reform, far from it." She went on to say that while there was much public debate around artificial intelligence (AI) and technological change, "an ageing population will require greater investment in services delivered by people, not machines". Public finance minister Ivan McKee (Image: Scottish Government) First Minister John Swinney discussed the thinking behind the strategy when he addressed public sector leaders in Glasgow on Monday telling his audience the sector will shrink as services look to innovations like AI and his government plans to embark on a 'renewal' of public services by harnessing new technologies. Mr Swinney also noted the findings of the Commission on the Future Delivery of Public Services in Scotland, chaired by Dr Campbell Christie in 2011, which had been tasked with examining the long-term challenges facing public services—including budget pressures, demographic change, rising demand and persistent inequalities. The Commission's report called for community-driven, preventative and collaborative approaches to address systemic challenges. Key recommendations included prioritising prevention to reduce long-term costs, enhancing performance through technology, and closer working across sectors. And in his speech on Monday, Mr Swinney referred to the creation of Police Scotland, where the country's eight police forces were amalgamated into one organisation, as one of the "key successes" from the Christie report noting the restructure had "led to over £200m in savings". But Ms Foyer told The Herald workers had paid a price to previous public sector changes. "Ministers must learn from the Christie Commission and the harsh lessons of the pandemic, whereby workers were thrown to the wolves, because of under-resourced services," she said. 'Before charging ahead, the Scottish Government must engage meaningfully with trade unions. We have made it clear to ministers that we will not support any plan that puts public services or public service workers at risk. "Politicians across the political spectrum need to face up to the fact that total tax revenues will have to rise in the coming years. The real question the Scottish Government and others are ducking is how they will do that fairly, using Scotland's devolved tax powers, to support our public sector workers. Mr McKee's strategy comes a week ahead of the Scottish Government's publication of its medium term fiscal strategy and follows warnings of a challenging financial landscape for the administration. In its latest five-year outlook last month the fiscal watchdog, the Scottish Fiscal Commission, forecast that the country's public finances will come under increasing strain over the next five years, due to rising welfare costs, sluggish economic growth and an £851 million income tax black hole. Public Finance Minister Ivan McKee pledged that Scotland's approach to public service reform will help deliver the fairer future that people in Scotland want. Mr McKee said: 'The strategy for public service reform that I have developed and will present to Parliament is all about doing things better, not doing less. It will enable Scotland to lead our own agenda on reform, not follow that of others. 'One of this government's key priorities is to improve public services. 'We are clear that everyone in Scotland should have access to services that are efficient, good quality and effective. We are also clear that this is about putting more funding into frontline services and investing in and empowering public service workers to deliver what people need. 'A key aim will be to identify systemic barriers that have prevented progress and to shift where and how investments are made, to take a more preventative approach – optimising the impact of our funding, making services more sustainable in the long term and making a real difference to people's lives.'
