Supreme Court rules for South Carolina over bid to defund Planned Parenthood
WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court on Thursday ruled for South Carolina over its effort to defund Planned Parenthood, concluding that individual Medicaid patients cannot sue to enforce their right to pick a medical provider.
The court held in a 6-3 ruling on ideological lines with the conservative justices in the majority that the federal law in question does not allow people who are enrolled in the Medicaid program to file such claims.
The ruling authored by Justice Neil Gorsuch is a boost to the state's effort to prevented Planned Parenthood from receiving funding through Medicaid, a federal program for low-income people that is administered by the states, because it prevents individual patients to enforce their right to choose their preferred health care provider.
Federal funding for abortion is already banned, but conservatives have long targeted Planned Parenthood, which provides reproductive health services including abortions where allowed, for any funding it receives even it is for other health care-related services.
They argue that even non-abortion related funding that flows to Planned Parenthood would help it carry out its broader agenda that favors abortion rights.
The state's efforts to defund Planned Parenthood came before the Supreme Court, which has a 6-3 conservative majority, overturned the landmark Roe v. Wade abortion rights ruling in 2022.
South Carolina now has a six-week abortion ban, meaning abortions are rare in the state.
Planned Parenthood has facilities in Charleston and Columbia that provide abortion care in compliance with the new law, as well as other health care services, including contraception, cancer screenings and pregnancy testing.
In 2018, Gov. Henry McMaster issued an executive order that prohibited Planned Parenthood of South Atlantic, the local affiliate of the national group, from providing family planning services under Medicaid.
Julie Edwards, a Medicaid-eligible patient who wants to use Planned Parenthood, joined a lawsuit filed by the group, saying that under federal civil rights law she could enforce her rights in court.
A federal judge ruled in her favor, and after lengthy litigation, the Supreme Court agreed to weigh in.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Herald Scotland
2 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
Current student loan borrowers spared from Trump GOP tax bill
Lawmakers are hurrying under pressure from the White House to pass the overall Senate bill as early as this weekend with an eye on getting the entire package to the president for signature into law by a self-imposed July 4 deadline. At the moment, it's unclear if Trump and Senate GOP leaders can muster the 50 votes needed from within their own party given they cannot count on any Democratic support. Read more: Trump's 'Big, Beautiful Bill' is shrinking in the Senate Republicans are trying to move the overall Trump legislative package under Senate rules that allow a simple majority to approve the bill. But to do that, all the provisions inside the legislation must directly impact the federal budget. Enter MacDonough, who has recently ruled out a number of other items that didn't meet that criteria but were seen as sweeteners for Republicans to vote yes on the Senate's version of the measure, including proposed changes to Medicaid, efforts to curb environmental rules, attempts to restrict federal judges' powers and plans to bulk up immigration enforcement. At issue on federal student loans is a GOP proposal to slash the number of repayment plans available to borrowers. Both the Republican-led House and Senate have been working on a new framework that would include one standard plan, in which borrowers would make fixed payments for 10 to 25 years based on their loan amounts, and another "Repayment Assistance Plan" based on income. Read about the House version: Republicans propose massive overhaul of student loans, Pell Grants According to a summary from Democrats, the Senate parliamentarian said only new borrowers can be restricted to just those two plans. Big changes are still on the way for federal student loan programs. But the parliamentarian's decision means they're more likely to affect new borrowers, rather than the over 40 million Americans who already have student loan debt. Read about the Senate version: Major student loan changes just came one step closer to becoming law It also means that the roughly eight million borrowers enrolled in SAVE - President Joe Biden's signature student loan repayment plan - will remain in limbo while waiting for a judge to make a decision about the program's legality. Read more: US appeals court blocks Joe Biden's student loan relief plan The independent Congressional Budget Office estimated in May, based on the House's version of the bill, that changing the repayment terms for current student loan borrowers could have saved more than $160 billion annually. Loan forgiveness change nixed; others under review The parliamentarian axed several other provisions that could have had big implications for student loan borrowers and colleges. She scrapped a measure that would've deemed some non-U.S. citizen students ineligible for federal financial aid. She also eliminated a change that would've disqualified doctors and dentists from a type of student loan relief. And she struck down a portion of the bill meant to expand Pell Grants to weekslong career-training programs. If Republicans can get enough support from Democrats on those items to pass the 60-vote threshold in the Senate, they could still pass. MacDonough is still considering whether or not to push back on a few of the bill's other measures, including provisions to make it harder for borrowers who've been defrauded - or whose colleges abruptly closed - to get their student debt canceled. Zachary Schermele is an education reporter for USA TODAY. You can reach him by email at zschermele@ Follow him on X at @ZachSchermele and Bluesky at @
The Herald Scotland
2 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
Supreme Court is dropping the rest of its decisions in one final swoop
Most anticipated is whether the court will allow Trump to enforce his changes to birthright citizenship while his new policy is being litigated. The ruling could make it harder for judges to block any of the president's policies. Other decisions will determine if health insurers have to cover certain medicines and services, like HIV-preventive medication and cholesterol-lowering drugs, and whether a federal program that subsidizes phone and internet services through carrier fees is constitutional. The Supreme Court still has to decide the last of three cases brought this year by religious groups. The justices will say if parents should be allowed to remove their elementary school children from class when storybooks with LGBTQ+ characters are being read. The court's pending opinion on Louisiana's congressional districts could impact the 2026 elections as well as affect states' ability to consider race when drawing legislative boundaries. The court has already issued major rulings on guns, treatments for transgender minors, "reverse discrimination," South Carolina's effort to defund Planned Parenthood, and how the Americans with Disabilities Act does or doesn't protect retirees and help students who need specialized learning plans. Here's a look at what's still to come: Birthright citizenship: limiting challenges to Trump's powers Trump's executive order limiting birthright citizenship has been put on hold by judges across the country who ruled it's probably unconstitutional. During the May 15 oral arguments, none of the Supreme Court justices voiced support for the Trump administration's theory on the matter. The administration says Trump's order is consistent with the 14th Amendment's citizenship clause and past Supreme Court decisions about that provision. But several of the justices have expressed concern about the ability of one judge to block a law or presidential order from going into effect anywhere in the country while it's being challenged. It was unclear from the oral arguments how the court might find a way to limit nationwide - or "universal" - court orders and what that would mean for birthright citizenship and the many other Trump policies being challenged in court. Preventing students from reading LGBTQ+ books and minors from viewing porn The court's conservative majority sounded sympathetic in April to Maryland parents who raised religious objections to having their elementary school children read books with LGBTQ+ characters. And in a case about Texas' requirement that websites verify users are 18 or over, one justice expressed her own parental frustration over trying to control what her children see on the internet. Justice Amy Coney Barrett, who has seven children, said she knows from personal experience how difficult it is to keep up with the content-blocking devices that those challenging Texas' law offered as a better alternative. But while the justices were sympathetic to the purpose of Texas' law, they may decide a lower court didn't sufficiently review whether it violates the First Amendment rights of adults, so it must be reconsidered. Conservative challenges to Obamacare and internet subsidies The court is considering conservative challenges to Obamacare and to an $8 billion federal program that subsidizes high-speed internet and phone service for millions of Americans. The justices seemed likely to reject an argument that the telecommunications program is funded by an unconstitutional tax, a case that raised questions about how much Congress can "delegate" its legislative authority to a federal agency. The latest challenge to the Affordable Care Act takes aim at 2010 law's popular requirement that insurers cover without extra costs preventive care such as cancer screenings, cholesterol-lowering medication and diabetes tests. Two Christian-owned businesses and some people in Texas argue that the volunteer group of experts that recommends the services health insurance must cover is so powerful that, under the Constitution, its members must be appointed by the president and confirmed by the Senate. Racial gerrymandering versus Black voting power A challenge to Louisiana's congressional map by non-Black voters tests the balancing act states must strike, complying with a civil rights law that protects the voting power of a racial minority while not discriminating against other voters. The outcome will also determine if the state can keep a map that gave Democrats an advantage in the disputed district, a decision that could make a difference in what could be a close battle for control of the House in the 2026 midterm elections.
The Herald Scotland
2 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
Trump pushes Republicans to pass his big tax bill before July 4
"We hope so," the president told reporters, as he left an East Room event. The president's arrival in Washington after attending a NATO Summit in Europe capped a two-week period in which Trump's focus was on foreign affairs. But with tensions in the Middle East abating and his tax bill teetering, Trump turned his attention back to the legislation he's nicknamed the "Big Beautiful Bill." The legislation would increase the child tax credit, create investment accounts for kids, increase the estate tax exemption, boost border security and allow residents of high-tax states to write off more of their income. It would also add restrictions to Medicaid and food stamps. Trump sought to rally support for the legislation at an event with workers his administration said would benefit from measures such as no taxes on tips or overtime. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said at a daily briefing that meetings and direct conversations with senators about the bill had been taking place behind the scenes. "I saw some senators rolling out of the Oval Office the other day, and the president remains on the phones talking to his friends in the Senate when necessary," she said. "And when they call, he picks up the phone." She declined to say which senators Trump was trying to convince. But the president spoke this week with Wisconsin Sen. Ron Johnson, a key Republican holdout on the bill. Johnson said they met at the White House on June 23, which was a day before Trump left for Europe. Trump previously hosted members of the Senate Finance Committee at the White House and has met multiple times over the last month with Senate Majority Leader John Thune. Senators Mike Lee of Utah and Bernie Moreno of Ohio attended his event at the White House. Tax bill latest: GOP senators negotiate Trump budget bill in hopes of improving its polling Vice President JD Vance has also urged his former Senate colleagues to vote yes on the bill. He attended Senate Republicans' weekly luncheon last week and met with Johnson at the Capitol on June 10, a person familiar with the conversation said. The White House says it is optimistic it can get Johnson to a yes. He is one of several senators who have said they are worried the legislation, which extends tax cuts and expands breaks Trump signed into law in 2017, will add trillions to the federal deficit. Other lawmakers in the president's party say that cuts to Medicaid in the bill run too deep. Trump can only afford to lose three senators and still be able to pass the bill. Trump chides GOP 'grandstanders' The president directed Republican lawmakers to stay in town, and skip a planned recess heading into the July 4 holiday if they must, in order to get the bill to his desk on his preferred timeline. "To my friends in the Senate, lock yourself in a room if you must, don't go home, and GET THE DEAL DONE THIS WEEK. Work with the House so they can pick it up, and pass it, IMMEDIATELY. NO ONE GOES ON VACATION UNTIL IT'S DONE," he said on social media. At his afternoon event on June 26, the president spoke out at "grandstanders" who were derailing his agenda, without chiding any specific Republican lawmaker by name. "I shouldn't say this, but we don't want to have grandstanders where one or two people raise their hand, 'we'll vote no.' And they do it to grandstand," he said. "Not good people. They know who I'm talking about. We don't need grandstanders." The event was largely focused on everyday Americans the White House brought on stage to put a human face on the proposed policies. One of them was Maliki Krieski, a DoorDash driver from Ripon, Wisconsin, who works for the food delivery service to supplement her income and provide care for her son, a Type 1 diabetic. The 46-year old gift shop owner said she had previously shared her story with White House staff. "No tax on tips is huge," Krieski told USA TODAY after the event. "Being able to put that money back into our pockets and be able to help our families be able to really grow the economy is extremely important." Tax bill hits another roadblock Lawmakers are relying on a complicated budgeting mechanism to push the bill through without triggering a Democratic filibuster. Senators had to revise a House-passed version of the bill on June 26 after the chamber's parliamentarian, Elizabeth McDonough, ruled that provisions of the bill that were critical to winning over conservative hardliners in the House would have to come out. Among the provisions that were ruled out of bounds were several pertaining to Medicaid, a federal healthcare program for low-income and disabled individuals. Another roadblock: Trump, Senate GOP face big setback on tax bill's Medicaid overhaul Republicans in the lower chamber then said they would oppose the bill if areas of the bill were adjusted. "I love President Trump and I really want to vote to pass his agenda in the Big Beautiful Bill when it comes back to the House from the Senate, but between the far left Senate Parliamentarian stripping out many of our good provisions and the special interest lobbyists sneaking in dirty poison pills like 10 year state moratoriums on AI, I'm currently a NO," Republican Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia said in a post on X. House Speaker Mike Johnson told reporters that his chamber would work around the clock to meet Trump's deadline. "It doesn't make it easier, but you know me, hope springs eternal," Johnson said.
