FIFA security funding isn't a liberal ‘slush fund'
Send tips | Subscribe | Email Sophia | Email Irie | Email Ben
President DONALD TRUMP in April issued an executive order warning local jurisdictions that they could lose federal funds if they enforce sanctuary policies for undocumented immigrants.
Yet Congress allocated $625 million for security at next year's World Cup games in 11 U.S. cities, including five that appear on the administration's list of sanctuary cities that the Justice Department released last week.
Those include Los Angeles, San Francisco, Seattle, Philadelphia and Boston — which are going to host a combined 28 World Cup matches next year. New York City, which will be sending NYPD officers to the MetLife Stadium games, including the World Cup final, is also on the list of sanctuary cities.
Trump has taken a significant interest in hosting major international events like the World Cup, and, in an illustration of how important the host role is to him, he has signed off on security funding even when it clashes with his stance against sanctuary cities. That conflict is likely to surface again as the White House plans for America's 250th birthday and the 2028 Olympics in LA, both of which Trump frequently mentions publicly.
ANDREW GIULIANI, 2026 FIFA Taskforce head, in a sit-down interview with West Wing Playbook at the Department of Homeland Security, is making clear that the money is for local law enforcement for things like police overtime and security equipment for the World Cup.
'This is not going to be a slush fund that a leftist politician can use for whatever they'd like. This is going to be for our local law enforcement. It passed through Congress clear, cut and dry,' said Giuliani, adding that the taskforce plans to present to the host committees a plan for how they can submit receipts for reimbursement. 'We are making sure that we trust but verify.'
He emphasized that the money is not going directly to cities and states; it's going to the host committee — private entities — that will then settle the bill with local officials.
'Because so much of it is going to come down to the state and local resources when you're talking about 78 teams over the course of 39 days — and we only have so many federal resources — that's why there is the $625 million through the Big Beautiful Bill,' he said.
Giuliani, who sees his role as helping to ensure the tournament is safe and secure, has visited and held security meetings with eight of the 11 host cities.
'We're here to make sure that that intelligence sharing is happening from the federal government to the state and locals and across the state and locals as necessary, and also that we're plugging gaps where needed, whether it's potentially with canine teams or counter' unmanned aerial systems such as drones, Giuliani said.
The FIFA Taskforce views the Club World Cup this summer as an important opportunity to develop relationships with the local police commissioners and local elected leaders ahead of the nation's semiquincentennial next year.
'Between our state, our locals, and then us, we are going to be stressed to the max next year, between June 11 on kickoff to July 19,' Giuliani said. 'Because not just FIFA, it's America 250 and July 4th.'
The White House declined to comment.
MESSAGE US — West Wing Playbook is obsessively covering the Trump administration's reshaping of the federal government. Are you a federal worker? A DOGE staffer? Have you picked up on any upcoming DOGE moves? We want to hear from you on how this is playing out. Email us at westwingtips@politico.com.
Did someone forward this email to you? Subscribe!
POTUS PUZZLER
What was RUTHERFORD B. HAYES' telephone number at the White House?
(Answer at bottom.)
Agenda Setting
THE LIFE OF KARI: The Government Accountability Office launched an investigation into potential violations of the Antideficiency Act — which prohibits government officials from using funding before congressional approval — by the U.S. Agency for Global Media and U.S. Agency for International Development, a GAO spokesperson confirmed to West Wing Playbook. The person said that the investigation followed a request from the Senate Appropriations Subcommittee on State and Foreign Operations, and that its timeframe for completion is still unclear.
In a text to West Wing Playbook, acting USAGM CEO and Trump senior adviser KARI LAKE said GAO and Democrats 'are angry that President Trump is rightsizing the bloated federal government, so they are teaming up to try to stop him,' adding that USAGM is 'highly corrupt and wastes hundreds-of-millions of dollars broadcasting 90s-style news around the globe — often spreading an anti-American message.'
The move from the government watchdog comes a day after fresh court documents were released in the case between Lake and Voice of America employees fired by the Trump administration earlier this year. In the court filing, Lake provided updates on USAGM's personnel structure, which employs 135 full-time staffers 'responsible for the execution of USAGM's inherent executive duties.' VOA staffs 74 full-time employees, according to Lake.
Since March, 145 USAGM employees have been recalled from administrative leave.
Lake also notably wrote that USAGM is in negotiations with the conservative cable news network Newsmax to obtain the legal rights to use and disseminate its content. In May, USAGM struck a similar agreement with One America News Network, another staunchly pro-Trump network.
'The goal is to share content of these other networks, which reflect different perspectives and tones, with the populations to which we are statutorily required to broadcast,' she wrote, adding that the plan is for USAGM to pursue similar agreements with more networks.
In a statement to West Wing Playbook, named plaintiffs in VOA's lawsuit against Lake — PATSY WIDAKUSWARA, JESSICA JERREAT and KATE NEEPER — said the plan to partner with Newsmax 'is contrary to the law and VOA's mandate to serve as a reliable and authoritative source of news.'
THIS SHOULD BE FUN: The federal government will soon allow its employees to try out popular artificial intelligence tools, Sophia and our GABBY MILLER report. The U.S. General Services Administration said today that it will launch USAi, a secure platform designed to let employees test out popular AI models made by OpenAI, Anthropic, Google and Meta.
The website is part of a Trump administration effort to accelerate AI adoption across the government and will deliver 'a competitive advantage to the American people,' GSA Deputy Administrator STEPHEN EHIKIAN said in a statement.
IT'S JUST BUSINESS … RIGHT? Two of the law firms that cut deals with Trump this year to avoid punitive executive orders connected in recent months with the Commerce Department about working on trade deals, NYT's MICHAEL S. SCHMIDT and MAGGIE HABERMAN report. Trump's personal lawyer, BORIS EPSHTEYN, connected Kirkland & Ellis and Skadden Arps with Commerce in the first publicly known instance of a firm that settled with the president doing work for the administration.
Epshteyn also played a direct role in brokering the initial deals between Trump and the firms, according to several people the Times spoke with.
WHO'S IN, WHO'S OUT
WHO NEEDS SAFE PLANES ANYWAYS? An array of advisory committees that help create safety rules for aviation, railroads and more have been dissolved or their membership rolls purged, with a Department of Transportation official saying the bodies need a 'refresh' in part because they had been 'overrun' with diversity, equity and inclusion and climate activists, our ORIANA PAWLYK and PAVAN ACHARYA report.
According to a document viewed by POLITICO, 25 federal advisory committees involving DOT have been affected. Those cuts include a committee composed of a wide swath of the aviation industry and unions that advises the Federal Aviation Administration on issues, such as the safety of aircraft certifications, airplane evacuation standards, drone flights, accessibility concerns and more.
GOT YOUR BACK: White House chief of staff SUSIE WILES intervened to rehire a vaccine regulator, VINAY PRASAD, who was fired at the urging of far-right influencer LAURA LOOMER, our DAVID LIM, DASHA BURNS and TIM RÖHN report.
Wiles' intervention came following pleas from both Prasad's boss, FDA Commissioner MARTY MAKARY, and HHS Secretary ROBERT F. KENNEDY JR., who insisted Prasad is a part of Kennedy's broader 'Make America Healthy Again' movement. Trump had forced Prasad out of his FDA job less than two weeks earlier after the pharmaceutical manufacturer Sarepta Therapeutics, joined by GOP allies and Loomer, sought his ouster.
What We're Reading
How Can the Government 'Take Back' a City It largely Controls? (NYT's Emily Badger and Amy Fan)
Trump's answer to numbers he doesn't like: Change them or throw them away (WaPo's Cat Zakrzewski, David Ovalle, Scott Dance and Laura Meckler)
Congress is lukewarm on RFK Jr.'s plans. In the states, they're catching fire. (POLITICO's Amanda Chu)
The Auctioneer and the Treasury Chief: Billy Long's Quick Fall at the I.R.S. (NYT's Andrew Duehren and Maggie Haberman)
POTUS PUZZLER ANSWER
As Hayes was the first president to install a telephone in the White House, his phone number was '1,' according to our ANDY GLASS. It initially could only be reached from the Treasury Department, which was at the time across from the now-closed East Executive Ave from the presidential residence. More than 50 years passed before President HERBERT HOOVER had the first telephone line installed at the Oval Office.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CNBC
11 minutes ago
- CNBC
Trump says no imminent plans to penalize China for buying Russian oil
U.S. President Donald Trump said on Friday he did not immediately need to consider retaliatory tariffs on countries such as China for buying Russian oil but might have to "in two or three weeks." Trump has threatened sanctions on Moscow and secondary sanctions on countries that buy its oil if no moves are made to end the war in Ukraine. China and India are the top two buyers of Russian oil. The president last week imposed an additional 25% tariff on Indian goods, citing its continued imports of Russian oil. However, Trump has not taken similar action against China. He was asked by Fox News' Sean Hannity if he was now considering such action against Beijing after he and Russian President Vladimir Putin failed to produce an agreement to resolve or pause Moscow's war in Ukraine. "Well, because of what happened today, I think I don't have to think about that," Trump said after his summit with Putin in Alaska. "Now, I may have to think about it in two weeks or three weeks or something, but we don't have to think about that right now. I think, you know, the meeting went very well." Chinese President Xi Jinping's slowing economy will suffer if Trump follows through on a promise to ramp up Russia-related sanctions and tariffs. Xi and Trump are working on a trade deal that could lower tensions - and import taxes - between the world's two biggest economies. But China could be the biggest remaining target, outside of Russia, if Trump ramps up punitive measures.


CNN
11 minutes ago
- CNN
Trump-Putin End Summit With Talk Of Progress But No Deal - Laura Coates Live - Podcast on CNN Podcasts
Trump-Putin End Summit With Talk Of Progress But No Deal Laura Coates Live 45 mins US President Donald Trump said he and Russian President Vladimir Putin made 'great progress' but did not emerge from today's summit with a deal on the war in Ukraine.


San Francisco Chronicle
40 minutes ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Trump's aggressive push to take over DC policing may be a template for an approach in other cities
WASHINGTON (AP) — The left sees President Donald Trump's attempted takeover of Washington law enforcement as part of a multifront march to autocracy — 'vindictive authoritarian rule,' as one activist put it — and as an extraordinary thing to do in rather ordinary times on the streets of the capital. To the right, it's a bold move to fracture the crust of Democratic urban bureaucracy and make D.C. a better place to live. Where that debate settles — if it ever does — may determine whether Washington, a symbol for America in all its granite glory, history, achievement, inequality and dysfunction, becomes a model under the imprint of Trump for how cities are policed, cleaned up and run, or ruined. Under the name of his Making D.C. Safe and Beautiful Task Force, Trump put some 800 National Guard troops on Washington streets this past week, declaring at the outset, 'Our capital city has been overtaken by violent gangs and bloodthirsty criminals.' Grunge was also on his mind. 'If our capital is dirty, our whole country is dirty, and they don't respect us.' He then upped the stakes by declaring federal control of the district's police department and naming an emergency chief. That set off alarms and prompted local officials to sue to stop the effort. 'I have never seen a single government action that would cause a greater threat to law and order than this dangerous directive,' Police Chief Pamela Smith said. On Friday, the Trump administration partially retreated from its effort to seize control of the Metropolitan Police Department when a judge, skeptical that the president had the authority to do what he tried to do, urged both sides to reach a compromise, which they did — at least for now. Trump's Justice Department agreed to leave Smith in control, while still intending to instruct her department on law enforcement practices. In a new memo, Attorney General Pam Bondi directed the force to cooperate with federal immigration enforcement regardless of any city law. In this heavily Democratic city, local officials and many citizens did not like the National Guard deployment. At the same time, they acknowledged the Republican president had the right to order it because of the federal government's unique powers in the district. But Trump's attempt to seize formal control of the police department, for the first time since D.C. gained a partial measure of autonomy in the Home Rule Act of 1973, was their red line. When the feds stepped in For sure, there have been times when the U.S. military has been deployed to American streets, but almost always in the face of a riot or a calamitous event like the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks. Trump's use of force was born of an emergency that he saw and city officials — and many others — did not. A stranger to nuance, Trump has used the language of emergency to justify much of what he's done: his deportations of foreigners, his tariffs, his short-term deployment of National Guard troops to Los Angeles, and now his aggressive intervention into Washington policing. Washington does have crime and endemic homelessness, like every city in the country. But there was nothing like an urban fire that the masses thought needed to be quelled. Violent crime is down, as it is in many U.S. cities. Washington is also a city about which most Americans feel ownership — or at least that they have a stake. More than 25 million of them visited in 2024, a record year, plus over 2 million people from abroad. It's where middle schoolers on field trips get to see what they learn about in class — and perhaps to dance to pop tunes with the man with the music player so often in front of the White House. Washington is part federal theme park, with its historic buildings and museums, and part downtown, where restaurants and lobbyists outnumber any corporate presence. Neighborhoods range from the places where Jeff Bezos set a record for a home purchase price to destitute streets in economically depressed areas that are also magnets for drugs and crime. In 1968, the capital was a city on fire with riots. Twenty years later, a murder spree and crack epidemic fed the sense of a place out of control. But over the last 30 years, the city's population and its collective wealth have swelled. A cooked-up emergency? Against that backdrop, Philadelphia's top prosecutor, District Attorney Larry Krasner, a Democrat, assailed Trump's moves in Washington. 'You're talking about an emergency, really?' Krasner said, as if speaking with the president. 'Or is it that you're talking about an emergency because you want to pretend everything is an emergency so that you can roll tanks?" In Washington, a coalition of activists called Not Above the Law denounced what they saw as just the latest step by Trump to seize levers of power he has no business grasping. 'The onslaught of lawlessness and autocratic activities has escalated,' said Lisa Gilbert, co-chair of the group and co-president of Public Citizen. 'The last two weeks should have crystallized for all Americans that Donald Trump will not stop until democracy is replaced by vindictive authoritarian rule.' Fifty miles northeast, in the nearest major city, Baltimore's Democratic mayor criticized what he saw as Trump's effort to distract the public from economic pain and 'America's falling standing in the world.' 'Every mayor and police chief in America works with our local federal agents to do great work — to go after gun traffickers, to go after violent organizations,' Brandon Scott said. 'How is taking them off of that job, sending them out to just patrol the street, making our country safer?' But the leader of the D.C. Police Union, Gregg Pemberton, endorsed Trump's intervention — while saying it should not become permanent. 'We stand with the president in recognizing that Washington, D.C., cannot continue on this trajectory,' Pemberton said. From his vantage point, 'Crime is out of control, and our officers are stretched beyond their limits.' The Home Rule Act lets a president invoke certain emergency powers over the police department for 30 days, after which Congress must decide whether to extend the period. Trump's attempt to use that provision stirred interest among some Republicans in Congress in giving him an even freer hand. Among them, Rep. Andy Ogles of Tennessee drafted a resolution that would eliminate the time limit on federal control. This, he told Fox News Digital, would 'give the president all the time and authority he needs to crush lawlessness, restore order, and reclaim our capital once and for all.' Which raises a question that Trump has robustly hinted at and others are wondering, too: If there is success in the district — at least, success in the president's eyes — what might that mean for other American cities he thinks need to be fixed? Where does — where could — the federal government go next?