logo
STEPHEN DAISLEY: Forbes was the voice of moderate SNP politics...but they treated her like an embarrassment

STEPHEN DAISLEY: Forbes was the voice of moderate SNP politics...but they treated her like an embarrassment

Daily Mail​12 hours ago
The decision by to stand down at next year's Holyrood elections is a personal one and reflects her wishes for her family life.
But it also marks the final nail in the coffin of SNP centrism. The Deputy First Minister was the last woman standing for anyone who hoped the Nationalists could cut a more moderate path on the economy, social issues and the constitution.
Forbes entered the Scottish Parliament just nine years ago, young and idealistic about independence. Yet she brought a maturity that many political old-timers in the SNP could not match.
When she spoke, she understood that her audience was not the flag-waving faithful but the electorate at large, with its doubters and undecideds and people far too busy to have given much consideration to the great issues of the day.
Nothing demonstrated that maturity like her handling of the 2020 Budget.
With just hours to go before the annual costs were placed before Holyrood, finance secretary Derek Mackay abruptly resigned over text messages to a 16 year old.
Forbes, his deputy, stepped up instantly and won plaudits for the aplomb with which she delivered a speech she had barely had a chance to read.
Taking over for Mackay, she proved herself to be disciplined, rigorous and determined to strike a balance between growing the economy and redistributing resources to alleviate poverty.
For this sensible, middle-ground approach to politics, she was branded a right-winger, an indication of just how out of touch the Scottish parliament is with the nation it theoretically represents.
But what truly put Forbes beyond the pale were her devoutly held Christian beliefs. In an age in which tolerance is on everyone's lips, there was little shown for Forbes's Free Presbyterian faith. When she contested the leadership in 2023, following the abrupt resignation of Nicola Sturgeon, there was a concerted effort to make the entire contest about her suitability for office given her Christian principles.
It was an outrageous exercise in bias and prejudice that, had it been applied to any other religion, would have been readily acknowledged as such. Christians, however, are fair game, especially if they believe in such heresies as biological sex.
The Deputy First Minister signalled early on that she disbelieved in the gender identity ideology, and even though she was on maternity leave when Holyrood was voting through the Gender Recognition Reform Bill, she made clear during her joust with Humza Yousaf for the Nationalist crown that she rejected the notion that a man could 'self-identify' himself as a woman and that the law should change to reflect this.
She was right, as a series of legal cases, culminating in the Supreme Court judgment in For Women Scotland, would go on to verify.
Had Sturgeon and Yousaf listened to her, a great deal of division could have been avoided, not to mention costly legal fees.
As well as canny discernment, she earned a reputation for cutting putdowns that lingered on opponents. She branded Yousaf the 'continuity candidate' and told him during one TV debate: 'You were a transport minister and the trains were never on time, when you were justice secretary the police were stretched to breaking point, and now as health minister we've got record high waiting times.'
Yousaf may have defeated her for the leadership, but he wasn't able to emerge from the shadow of those barbs.
That John Swinney chose her as his deputy first minister speaks volumes about her significance as a voice of moderate SNP politics.
She stressed that wealth redistribution was only possible if first there was wealth generation. She urged fellow Nationalists to stop hectoring the public on independence and try to persuade them instead.
Neither counsel was taken on board and the SNP remains distant from the aspirational, sceptical voters it would need to secure and make a success of independence.
For advocating for Scotland in Europe and for Scotland to be in Europe, Winnie Ewing, an earlier figure on the mainstream wing of the SNP, was dubbed 'Madame Ecosse'.
Forbes, who advocated for the Nationalists among the Don't Knows, the Unionists and even the Tories, is the SNP's Ms Middle Scotland.
An opportunity to bring in voters who would never before have considered a vote for the Nationalists. Voters who might even be willing to listen on independence. And they treated her as an embarrassment, that is when some weren't trying to push her out of the party altogether. Sometimes — oftentimes — politicians are the most clueless practitioners of politics.
Forbes's exit clears the way for Stephen Flynn, the SNP's Westminster leader, to become John Swinney's heir apparent.
A blokey, lefty, loudmouth who would drag Scotland back to rancorous divisions over independence. With Forbes going, he will be the future now.
She would have made the better first minister for Scotland, he would push all the right buttons to get the party faithful cheering. Was there ever any doubt which would prosper in the SNP?
Forbes says she is standing down because she wants to see her children grow up. We should also think about that.
If our politics makes it impossible to be a parent and a parliamentarian, then our politics are broken.
Do we want a Holyrood stuffed with MSPs who have no first-hand knowledge of raising children?
Because that's the way we're heading unless things change. Kate Forbes's choice should be a wake-up call for the SNP, but not only the SNP.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Conor McGregor invites Donald Trump to try 'the best Coke in Ireland'
Conor McGregor invites Donald Trump to try 'the best Coke in Ireland'

Daily Mail​

time11 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Conor McGregor invites Donald Trump to try 'the best Coke in Ireland'

Troubled ex-UFC star bizarrely invited Donald Trump to visit his Dublin pub to try the 'best Coke in Ireland.' McGregor, who has recently been embroiled in a string of scandals, including a civil rape case, was invited to the White House earlier this year and now he wants to return the favor and give the president a 'unique, true, IRISH EXPERIENCE!' at the Black Forge Inn. On X the fighter wrote: 'See you in November Donald, at Irelands greatest public house, the multi time award winning, @blackforgeinn!' McGregor wrote on X. SCROLL DOWN FOR VIDEO See you in November Donald, at Irelands greatest public house, the multi time award winning, @blackforgeinn! We look very forward! 🥘🥤 Ireland's friend @realDonaldTrump, we have the best Coke in all Ireland for you to try! Sparkly fizzy, and on the rocks. With Irish lemon… — Conor McGregor (@TheNotoriousMMA) August 4, 2025 Conor continued: 'We look very forward! Ireland's friend @realDonaldTrump, we have the best Coke in all Ireland for you to try! Sparkly fizzy, and on the rocks. With Irish lemon and lime, also! For adding. ICE COLD! 'Our Coca Cola factory is just 5 minutes away on the long mile road, walking distance, from the black forge inn! ''GIVE THAT BOY A CAN OF COKE!' You are going to LOVE IT! The unique, true, IRISH EXPERIENCE!' Alongside the social media message, Conor included an AI image of himself and Trump dressed as medieval knights around a table of meat and potatoes. In the image, Trump is drinking a can of Coca Cola. The fighter's pub was recently set on fire, with authorities treating the blaze as criminal damage. Meanwhile last week the ex-MMA star lost his attempt to overturn a jury's order that he compensate a woman who accused him of raping her. The court rejected the appeal in its entirety. Nikita Hand alleged that Conor sexually assaulted her on December 9, 2018. He was found liable in November and three Dublin judges rejected all five grounds of the MMA fighter's appeal. Conor was ordered to pay nearly €250,000 ($290,000), plus costs after Hand accused him of raping her at a hotel in Dublin in 2018. He denied the allegation and said he had 'fully consensual sex'. He also denied causing bruising to the plaintiff. Conor was not present for last week's decision, with Hand claiming she had been 'retraumatized' by the appeal. She said: 'To every survivor out there, I know how hard it is but please don't be silenced. You deserve to be heard. You also deserve justice.' Trump hosted the Irish MMA star and his family in the Oval Office on St Patrick's Day, with McGregor even vowing to raise concerns over immigration in Ireland with the president. The star, who also attended Trump's inauguration in January, praised the president's 'inspiring' work ethic.

'More transparency' needed on immigration status of suspects, says Cooper
'More transparency' needed on immigration status of suspects, says Cooper

BBC News

time11 minutes ago

  • BBC News

'More transparency' needed on immigration status of suspects, says Cooper

There should be "greater transparency" around the immigration status and ethnicity of crime suspects, and guidance for police forces on when to disclose this information "needs to change", the home secretary has said. Reform UK leader Nigel Farage has called on police to release details of two men arrested in connection with the alleged rape of a 12-year-old girl in Warwickshire. The men are reportedly Afghan nationals but police have not confirmed if she believed that kind of information should be in the public domain, Yvette Cooper told the BBC: "We do want to see more transparency in cases, we think local people do need to have more information." On Monday, Farage said he "absolutely" believed that such details should be Police has previously said once someone is charged with an offence, the force follows national guidance that does not include sharing ethnicity or immigration status. Speaking to BBC Breakfast on Tuesday, Cooper said: "It is an operational decision about how much information can be revealed in the middle of a live investigation but we do want to see greater transparency."She later told BBC Radio 4's Today programme: "We do think the guidance needs to change".She said the government had asked the Law Commission - an independent body which reviews laws in England and Wales - to speed up a review into "what the rules are" around what information can be released and when during a legal case."We're also working with the College of Policing on strengthening and changing their guidance," she two men accused of the offence in Warwickshire are: Ahmad Mulakhil, who has been charged with two counts of rape; Mohammad Kabir, who has been accused of kidnap, strangulation and aiding and abetting the rape of a girl aged under Mulakhil, 23, appeared before magistrates in Coventry on 28 July, and Mr Kabir, also 23, appeared in court on were remanded in custody. In a statement, Warwickshire Police and Crime Commissioner Philip Seccombe said: "It is essential to state that policing decisions - such as whether to release details about a suspect - must follow national guidance and legal requirements."He added that he would not speculate on the personal circumstances of those involved while court proceedings were Law Commission is conducting a review into what information or opinions someone should lawfully be able to publish after a suspect has been a government request, it has agreed to speed up its reporting on the parts of the review that relate to what the government and law enforcement can do to counter misinformation, including where there are possible public order consequences of failing to do independent watchdog concluded in March that failure to share basic facts about the Southport killer led to "dangerous fictions" which helped spark rioting. Jonathan Hall KC, the UK's independent reviewer of terrorism legislation, said it would have been "far better" for the authorities to share more accurate detail on the arrest of Axel Rudakubana on 29 July last said the "ineffectual near silence" from police, prosecutors and the government after the attacks led to disinformation that sparked widespread rioting in the days after the attack.

If you come to Britain and can't support yourself, you must leave
If you come to Britain and can't support yourself, you must leave

Telegraph

time11 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

If you come to Britain and can't support yourself, you must leave

For the 25 years up to 1997, according to the Centre for Policy Studies, net migration was 68,000. In the 25 years that followed, however, that figure shot up to nearly 6 million. Our immigration system is out of control. It isn't just about the number of people who've come here, unsustainable though that is. Our migration system has also been highly un-selective. The vast majority of those who've arrived in the last few years haven't come to work, and didn't need to be earning a particular salary – or often anything at all – to get their visa. Even those who did come here to work are often employed in low-paid jobs, and won't be paying enough in tax to account for the pressure that they put on public services, or the costs that they'll incur later in life. According to the researcher Karl Williams, 72 per cent of those who came as 'skilled workers' in 2022-23 earned below the UK average salary, with 54 percent likely earning less than half of that average. But after just five years here, most of these people will qualify for Indefinite Leave to Remain, or ILR. With ILR, migrants can access welfare, social housing, and free healthcare, as well as stay permanently in the UK and apply for citizenship. On average, the Government spends £34,000 looking after somebody in the last year of their life. Only a small minority of recent migrants will pay enough in tax to cover those costs over the entire time that they're here – let alone to cover the cost of the benefits and services that they and their family will use over their lifetimes. It's going to cost us hundreds of billions of pounds. We simply can't afford it. But it can be fixed. Earlier this year, the Conservatives proposed a plan to reform our immigration system, including by introducing a hard cap on visas and stopping ILR from entitling people to state support. We also proposed extending the qualifying period from five years to ten. This wouldn't just mean that it takes longer for migrants to be eligible for ILR status. It would also give us an opportunity to review the visas of those who are already here. Those who come to Britain from abroad must be able to support themselves, and must be earning enough to contribute more in tax than they will cost over their lifetime. If they can't, their visa must not be renewed, and they must leave. The Government voted against that plan, but they've committed to a consultation on ILR in the autumn. We must use that opportunity to push them not just to extend the qualifying period for ILR, including for those who are already here, but also to refuse to reissue visas to those who won't end up contributing enough. The era of mass migration has been a disaster. People can see it in their rising rents, in the pressure on their public services, and in their increasingly divided communities. Most disgracefully of all, the British people have voted to avert that disaster, time and time again. Government after government has failed to heed their warning. It's a complete scandal, and it's probably the single biggest reason why trust in our political system is in such short supply. Rebuilding that trust means building a migration system that's limited and selective – but it also means undoing the harm that has already been done. We can still avert the coming disaster around ILR, and we must.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store