logo
Ban the bomb: No nukes is GOOD nukes for the world

Ban the bomb: No nukes is GOOD nukes for the world

Well, that was a 'close one'…huh?
Over the past two weeks, the world held its breath as we witnessed what could ostensibly be compared to a modern-day Cuban Missile Crisis.
In case you were wondering, as many military and political analysts are telling us, this provocation by Israel and the US is not about Iran's non-existent nuclear weapons programme. It's about the R-word: regime change. Again.
However, some of those same analysts have dismissed the recent strikes by the US on Iran's (empty and evacuated) 'nuclear facilities' as largely ceremonial 'war theatre'. Others are saying this was just a way for Trump to get Bedlam Bibi and AIPAC off his back – at least for a while.
In response to the US/Israel strikes, Iran reciprocated with drones and hypersonic missiles that turned parts of Tel Aviv into Gaza. (How about that for a big fat dose of righteous karmic retribution?)
If Iran were not planning to build a nuke before (and according to multiple credible sources they weren't), but are considering it now…can you blame them? After the antagonism and attacks Iran has faced from Israel in the past few weeks alone, I wouldn't be at all surprised to hear Iran is now putting their nuclear armament programme into maximum overdrive.
Besides…have you seen what happens to countries that capitulate to US/Israel pressure and abandon their nukes and other WMDs?
After Gulf War 1 in 1991, Iraq destroyed its chemical weapons stockpile and halted its biological and nuclear weapon programs. Look what happened to them – and Saddam Hussein.
Libya's Gaddafi gave up his nukes…look how that worked out for him, and Libya.
Syria also ended their chemical weapons stockpile and nuclear ambitions, guess what became of Assad?
North Korea, however, refused to give up their nukes, and…guess what? No one f**ks with North Korea.
What's the moral of the story? Well, with genocidal, terrorist, rogue states – like Israel and the US – in the world, DO NOT give up your nukes or WMDs.
Oh, you know who else gave up their nukes? Us. S'Africa. (Watch this space..?)
Look, don't get me wrong. If it were up to me, in my perfect world, there'd be NO fkn nukes on this planet. No nukes, WMDs, MOABs, RPGs, LMGs, Daisy BBs, or any weapons of any kind. Not even hunting rifles or pistols. Not even a pellet gun. (You can have paintball guns, that's it.)
But I'm not in charge. They are. And it's not a perfect, peaceful world.
And since just about EVERYONE else on the planetary playground gets to have nukes…why not Iran? Isn't that a bit like a high school where every white kid in the class gets to carry tasers, switchblades and catapults…but the sole, lonesome, Arab kid sitting in the corner at the back of the class is not allowed to possess so much as a pea shooter?
(Btw, why do we keep calling them WMDs – Weapons of Mass Destruction? To gloss it over? To tone it down? Let's just call them what they are – WMMs: Weapons of Mass Murder. And I say f***ing ban them all.)
Did you know…there are currently more than 12 000 nuclear warheads on this planet?
And, did you know it only takes less than 100 to destroy the whole world?
Back in late 2018, in an interview with RT's Crosstalk , nuclear analyst, Ted Seay, senior policy consultant from BASIC (British American Security Information Council) said, 'We're looking at a world where arms control may not be enough. We're looking at a need for declaring, first, that nuclear weapons are unlawful – and having all of the powers sign on to that. And then…do something about reducing the thousands of active nuclear weapons that are still out there.'
'We're down to under 20 000 now,' he said. 'That's not good enough. We have to bring it down to the low hundreds, and then we have to get rid of them entirely. And that's not going to be an easy process and it's not going to be a quick one.'
He added, 'We know it only takes about 100 Hiroshima-sized weapons – and that's nothing (compared to today's nukes). If we pop that off…we end civilisation as we know it.'
Do you remember when, back in July 2018 during Donald Trump's first term, there was a concerted effort by Trump and Putin to reduce the nukes? It was at a meeting called…the Helsinki summit.
Two months earlier, on 8 May, Trump had torn up the JCPOA (Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action) nuclear deal with Iran. Top of the Helsinki agenda for Trump and Putin was the subject of reducing the nukes around the planet from 14 000 warheads to around 1500.
Did you know that? Most of the world's population probably does NOT know that. Do you know why they don't know that?
Because the corporate-owned, government-controlled stenographers known as the Western mainstream media didn't really cover it. No, they were too busy screaming themselves hoarse and purple at the unbearable thought of Trump making peace with Putin.
So, you'd think, scaling back on those numbers of nukes would be a GOOD thing. Right?
But it never happened. Can you guess why..?
Because the usual hawkish, neocon, psychopathic, mass-murdering war pigs in the US, Israel and Western political establishment fought very hard against it – and won. Maybe that's why Trump wanted to meet Putin alone in Helsinki, without his deep state handlers in the room because they would only torpedo any chance of detente between the leaders.
Which they did. Turns out, the deep-state handlers got their way.
A few months after the Helsinki Summit, Trump announced that instead of scaling back the nukes – as he and Putin intended – the US would instead be spending more than a trillion on upgrading the country's nuclear arsenal.
Then, on 2 August 2019, Trump pulled the US out of the 1987 INF nuclear treaty…with Russia. (I wonder who got to him…and how?)
By pulling out of the INF treaty, Trump basically triggered a whole new arms race and cold war.
In early February this year, Trump made another half-hearted, half-assed 'proposal' to Putin and Jinping to slash the military budgets of their three countries in half and revive nuclear arms control. By late February Trump had walked all that back, and by May approved a massive record military budget – which includes an upgrade to the US nuke arsenal.
Are we learning yet..?
Have you ever asked yourself…who actually benefits from stuffing the world full of planet-killing nuclear weapons?
Well, there's a very telling and revealing scene in the movie, Hail Caesar! , by those cinematic genius siblings, the Coen brothers.
And the scene goes something like this…
Hollywood studio executive Eddie Mannix (James Brolin) is lunching in a Chinese restaurant with a fat-cat corporate executive, Cuddahy (Ian Blackman). Cuddahy is trying to seduce and head-hunt Eddie away from the studio, and bring him into 'the company'.
During their conversation, Cuddahy reaches into his breast pocket and pulls out a photo.
CUDDAHY: 'Ever heard of the Bikini Atoll?'
EDDIE: 'What?'
CUDDAHY: 'A test site, couple of rocks in the South Pacific – till a few weeks ago. Then we blew the Aitcherino . Not supposed to be telling you this.'
He hands Eddie the photo, of a mushroom cloud.
CUDDAHY: 'The real world. Hydrogen bomb. Fusion device. '
EDDIE: (mumbles) 'Armageddon'.
CUDDAHY: (leaning in) 'And Lockheed was there'.
Did you catch that last part? 'Lockheed was there.'
That's right. The guy works for Lockheed Martin …one of the world's major arms dealers. And decades later, they're still going strong. So, that's who's been getting obscenely wealthy manufacturing these weapons of mass and planetary destruction, for decades. And Lockheed …are not the only ones.
Of course, as usual, their stock value has just surged during this latest Israel-Iran crisis.
Maybe we, the people, could pick up from where Trump (and Putin) left off?
Back in 2016, Noam Chomsky warned us: 'The two greatest existential threats facing humanity today are global warming…and nuclear war.'
While the jury's still out on whether Daisy the cow's flatulence is to blame for the former, there's no denying the imminent threat of the latter.
Here's a good, sane, rational idea…
Instead of the US, Israel and the rest of their Western NATO lapdogs pressuring Iran to abandon any aspiration of acquiring ONE nuclear weapon? How about we, the people of the planet, rise up – again – and put massive pressure on our 'leaders' and governments to roll back the nukes…until there's not a single warhead left?
Sound good? No..? (If your answer to that is genuinely 'no' then you're either a psychopath, retarded, evil…or all of the above.)
Isn't it about time we revived that anti-war cry that we haven't heard in decades which practically defined the sixties?
And that anti-war cry is…
Back in the mid-50s to 60s, when the CND (Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament) movement was rocking, the anti-war cry, Ban the Bomb was everywhere. Protests. Flags. T-shirts. Graffiti. Everywhere.
Don't you think it's long overdue time for the global public to start chanting that anti-war cry again?
What can you do…to help abolish nuclear weapons?
Well, for starters…
Check out the artwork in this article's header. It's by a veteran, renowned, anti (nuclear) war artist named Peter Kennard. If you want to contribute to the new anti-nuke movement we're about to kick off, go to Kennard's website and browse the montage or poster pages. Pick an image, or two, or several, whack 'em on your social media…and then share far and wide.
(According to the British Journal of Photography, all of Kennard's anti-war artworks are free for non-commercial use by NGOs, charities and demonstrations).
Add a caption or comment to your image calling on governments and public to push for global multilateral nuclear disarmament.
You can also join organisations like ICAN (International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons).
And you can write, email, campaign, protest and generally just badger and harass your public reps and politicians into doing their jobs – for once – on this one, crucial, critical, existential issue:
An outright, universal, multilateral, worldwide ban on nuclear weapons.
And let's get this new, global, nuclear disarmament party started.
Let us know by leaving a comment below or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1.
Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X, and Bluesky for the latest news.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Scores of South Africans retrenched by NGO processing Trump's Afrikaner ‘refugees'
Scores of South Africans retrenched by NGO processing Trump's Afrikaner ‘refugees'

Daily Maverick

time5 hours ago

  • Daily Maverick

Scores of South Africans retrenched by NGO processing Trump's Afrikaner ‘refugees'

The organisation that aims to bring Kenyan workers to South Africa to process Afrikaner 'refugees' bound for the US laid off more than 100 South Africans last year. Church World Service (CWS), the organisation tasked by the US State Department with processing Afrikaner 'refugees' for resettlement in the USA, retrenched about 100 workers in Pretoria in June last year. CWS is now applying for 'volunteer' visas from the Department of Home Affairs for about 30 Kenyan workers to come to South Africa to work on the Afrikaner resettlement project — raising the question of why it is not attempting instead to re-employ the locals it made redundant last year. Daily Maverick understands that the staffers, most of whom were South Africans, were retrenched when CWS closed its Resettlement Support Centre sub-office in Pretoria at the end of June 2024. CWS did not respond to Daily Maverick's repeated requests for comment. Office was in place from 2015 to 2024 'A new office in Pretoria, South Africa, enhances refugee support and programs to cover eight countries,' stated the CWS annual report in 2015. 'Working with the U.S. Department of State, we continue to increase the number of refugee cases in process each year, serving more than 40 countries in sub-Saharan Africa.' An old job ad confirmed that the office was based in Pretoria, and stated that it was tasked with 'the preparation of refugee case files for adjudication by US Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) officers, as well as the out-processing and cultural orientation of all approved cases'. The office's address was listed elsewhere as occupying premises on Fehrsen Street in Brooklyn, Pretoria. Daily Maverick understands that staff were informed midway through last year that the volumes of refugees being processed from sub-Saharan Africa were no longer high enough to warrant a permanent office presence in South Africa. That was, of course, when President Donald Trump's Afrikaner 'refugee' plan was not yet even a glimmer on the horizon. Tens of thousands of Afrikaners to be brought over Now, CWS finds itself in need of staff numbers to process the Afrikaner 'refugees' to be resettled — and a Reuters exclusive from last week makes it clear why it would need as many as 30 workers for the task. Reuters, through interviews with US officials, has determined that the Trump administration ultimately aims to bring potentially 30,000 Afrikaners for resettlement in the US. As far as is publicly known, only two groups of Afrikaner 'refugees' have thus far left for the US, with numbers probably not totalling more than 100. This means that the scale of the task ahead for CWS is considerable. Reuters also reported that the Trump administration looked set to admit only 40,000 refugees in total for the year ahead — meaning that fully 75% of the available US refugee spots would be reserved for Afrikaners. This news comes at a time when the US State Department has announced a stop to all visitor visas for individuals from Gaza — which had previously been used for emergency purposes to treat injured children — on the grounds that they could be used by Palestinian refugees. Afrikaner 'refugees' facing difficulties As Daily Maverick has reported, the Afrikaner 'refugees' in the first two resettlement groups have not always found the grass on the other side to be as green as they may have hoped. The Reuters exclusive fleshed out the picture, pointing out that after taking office, Trump slashed refugee benefits. Refugees had been eligible for cash and healthcare assistance for one year, but under Trump this has been reduced to four months. Reuters reported on an email sent by one Afrikaner family to the Department of Health and Human Services, which is responsible for the refugee programme on US soil. The family said they had found it impossible to secure a job without being issued a social security number, and that they had already spent $4,000 (more than R70,000) on food, transport and communications. Adults expected to take low-level menial jobs US public broadcaster NPR previously had sight of the documents given to the Afrikaner 'refugees' upon arrival. In it, they were told: 'You are expected to support yourself quickly in finding work.' It continued: 'Adults are expected to accept entry level employment in fields like warehousing, manufacturing, and customer service. You can work toward higher level employment over time.' DM

Maduro says mobilizing millions of militia after US 'threats'
Maduro says mobilizing millions of militia after US 'threats'

eNCA

time8 hours ago

  • eNCA

Maduro says mobilizing millions of militia after US 'threats'

Venezuela's Nicolas Maduro on Monday said he would deploy 4.5 million militia members in response to US "threats," after Washington raised the bounty for his arrest and launched anti-drug operations in the Caribbean. "This week, I will activate a special plan with more than 4.5 million militiamen to ensure coverage of the entire national territory -- militias that are prepared, activated and armed," Maduro announced on state television. Official figures say the Venezuelan militia, founded by Maduro's predecessor Hugo Chavez, contains about 5 million people -- though the actual number is believed to be smaller. Venezuela's total population is around 30 million. Maduro lambasted "the renewal of extravagant, bizarre, and outlandish threats" from the United States. The administration of US President Donald Trump earlier this month doubled its bounty to $50 million for the arrest of Maduro, who faces drug trafficking charges. Washington, which does not recognize Maduro's past two election victories, accuses the Venezuelan of leading a cocaine trafficking gang called Cartel de los Soles. The Trump administration announced sanctions against the group and Maduro's administration last month. The US military has also reportedly deployed several vessels to the southern Caribbean, as part of Trump's crackdown on Latin American drug cartels. "We are also deployed throughout the our sea, our property, Venezuelan territory," Interior Minister Diosdado Cabello said. Although he did not mention the recent US actions specifically, Maduro thanked those who expressed their support in the face of what he called "rotten refrain" of threats. Maduro called on his government's political base to move forward with the formation of peasant and worker militias "in all industries."

Zelensky says Russia must end war, after Trump pressures Ukraine
Zelensky says Russia must end war, after Trump pressures Ukraine

Eyewitness News

time16 hours ago

  • Eyewitness News

Zelensky says Russia must end war, after Trump pressures Ukraine

WASHINGTON - Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky said it was up to Russia to end its invasion, ahead of high-stakes talks on Monday with US counterpart Donald Trump, who is pressuring Ukraine to give up Crimea and abandon its NATO ambitions. The comments came hours before Zelensky and European leaders were scheduled to meet Trump in Washington, a follow-up to a summit between Trump and Putin in Alaska on Friday that failed to produce a ceasefire. Trump, who dropped his insistence on a ceasefire in favor of a final peace deal after meeting Putin, said late Sunday that Zelensky could end the three-and-a-half-year war "almost immediately, if he wants to." "Remember how it started. No getting back Obama given Crimea (12 years ago, without a shot being fired!), and NO GOING INTO NATO BY UKRAINE. Some things never change!!!", Trump wrote on Truth Social. Announcing that he had landed in Washington, Zelensky wrote later: "Russia must end this war, which it itself started." "Ukrainians are fighting for their land, their independence," he said, adding that he hoped "that our joint strength with America, with our European friends, will force Russia into a real peace." Trump and Zelensky are expected to meet one-on-one before being joined by the leaders of Britain, France, Germany, Italy and Finland, as well as NATO chief Mark Rutte and European Commission chief Ursula von der Leyen, according to the White House. Ahead of Monday's meeting, China called for "all parties" to agree to peace "as soon as possible." It will be the first time Zelensky visits Washington since a bust-up with Trump and Vice President JD Vance in February, when the two men berated the Ukrainian leader for being "ungrateful." Russia kept up its attacks on Ukraine ahead of the new talks, firing at least 140 drones and four ballistic missiles at the country between late Sunday and early Monday, the Ukrainian air force said. A Russian drone attack on a five-story apartment block in the Ukrainian city of Kharkiv just before dawn killed at least seven people, authorities said. Ukrainian shelling attacks in the Russian-occupied parts of the Kherson and Donetsk regions meanwhile killed two people, Moscow-installed authorities said. SECURITY GUARANTEES Since the Oval Office row with Zelensky in February, Trump has grown more critical of Putin and shown some signs of frustration as Russia repeatedly stalled on peace talks. But Washington has not placed extra sanctions on Moscow, and the lavish welcome offered to Putin in Alaska on his first visit to the West since he invaded Ukraine in 2022 was seen as a diplomatic coup for Russia. Speaking in Brussels on the eve of his visit to the United States, Zelensky said he was keen to hear more about what Putin and Trump discussed in Alaska. He also hailed Washington's offer of security guarantees to Ukraine as "historic." Trump said he spoke to Putin about the possibility of a collective defense guarantee for Ukraine similar to the one in place for NATO members. The promise would be outside of the framework of the Western military alliance that Ukraine wants to join and which is seen as an existential threat by Russia. DISCUSSION ON LAND Trump envoy Steve Witkoff said Moscow had made "some concessions" regarding five Ukrainian regions that Russia now fully or partially controls, and that there was an "important discussion with regard to Donetsk and what would happen there." "That discussion is going to specifically be detailed on Monday," he told CNN, without giving details. Russia annexed Crimea in 2014 following a referendum denounced as a sham by Kyiv and the West, and did the same in 2022 in four Ukrainian regions - Donetsk, Kherson, Lugansk and Zaporizhzhia - even though its forces have not fully captured them. A source briefed on a phone call between Trump and European leaders on Saturday told AFP that the US leader was "inclined to support" a Russian demand to be given territory it had not yet captured in the Donbas, an area that includes the Donetsk and Lugansk regions and that has seen the deadliest battles of the war. In exchange, Moscow would agree to "freeze" the front line in Kherson and Zaporizhzhia, regions where Russian forces hold swathes of territory but not the regional capitals, the source cited Trump as saying. Russia had until now insisted that Ukraine pull its forces from all four regions as a precondition to any deal. Zelensky has said he is constitutionally bound not to give away any Ukrainian territory.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store