President Trump's newspeak threatens us all
Some 2,500 years ago, Confucius was reportedly asked what he would do first if granted absolute power. 'I would rectify the names of things,' he replied. Changing the language used, he suggested, would enable him to guide 'affairs' and ensure that 'punishments and rewards' were 'appropriate.' Confucius understood that language is not merely descriptive, but prescriptive: by shaping thought and discourse, it determines actions and outcomes.
Now, US President Donald Trump is attempting to leverage language to his own ends. Since his return to the White House, he has issued a wave of executive orders aimed at 'rectifying' the language of governance in America. This includes barring the federal government from using terms like 'diversity,' 'equity,' 'inclusion,' 'climate crisis, 'gender identity,' and other terms related to gender and racial identity, which he argues perpetuate a damaging 'woke' ideology.
With these Orwellian orders, Trump is directing outcomes by reshaping narratives, shifting priorities, erasing inconvenient truths. Banning the term 'sustainability' banishes environmental concerns. Prohibiting all mention of 'diversity' obscures systemic inequities.
While some of Trump's decrees align with public opinion – for example, a 2023 survey showed that a majority of Americans reject the idea that there are more than two genders – the overall impact is to undermine, politicise, and discredit existing concepts and valuable lines of intellectual and scientific inquiry. In other words, Trump is constraining Americans' ability to analyse, learn, improve and engage in the kind of open and informed discourse that a well-functioning democracy requires.
Already, Trump's linguistic crackdown has enabled the Department of Government Efficiency, led by Elon Musk, to terminate 85 government contracts, collectively worth an estimated $1 billion, tied to diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI), as well as accessibility, often on the basis of AI-conducted word searches. All references to climate change have been purged from government websites. Research grants that mention 'climate' or 'racial disparities' have been frozen. Museums that promote inclusive narratives, such as the Smithsonian, have been threatened with funding cuts.
As Confucius predicted, these changes have ripple effects. Corporations like Walmart, Meta, and McDonald's have scaled back DEI programmes, fearing retaliation from the Trump administration.
BlackRock CEO Larry Fink used to be a vocal advocate for incorporating environmental, social, and governance (ESG) considerations into investments. In his 2020 letter to CEOs, he stated that 'climate risk is investment risk,' noting that 'sustainability- and climate-integrated portfolios can provide better risk-adjusted returns to investors.' In 2021, he mentioned ESG four times, highlighting the 'sustainability premium' enjoyed by companies with 'better ESG profiles.' But Fink's recently published letter to investors included nothing about ESG or sustainability, focusing instead on 'energy pragmatism.'
This mirrors a broader trend: major banks and funds, from Goldman Sachs to JP Morgan, have distanced themselves from sustainability commitments, wary of the political and legal backlash. The Dow Jones Sustainability Index – which long set a global standard for corporate environmental and social responsibility – has been rebranded by its owner, S&P Global, as the 'Best-in-Class Index.'
These changes are not merely cosmetic; they signal to investors that sustainability is no longer a priority. And their impact is likely to reverberate well beyond the US, affecting institutions, corporations, and academic research worldwide. After all, America's economic dominance grants it outsize power to influence linguistic norms in English, the lingua franca of global discourse.
Already, Europe's extreme right – exemplified by Germany's Alternative für Deutschland (AfD), France's National Rally, and Spain's Vox – is echoing Trump's rhetoric, disparaging 'woke' concepts like diversity and sustainability. The AfD is known for dismissing sustainability policies as symptoms of a 'hysteria' that is burdening German industry – a sentiment that resonates with its growing base.
Trump's linguistic campaign may also influence European companies and research as a result of direct pressure. US embassies across Europe sent letters to firms and other entities that do business with the US government, demanding that they certify that they are not running DEI programmes.
The English language is a shared tool, but it bends to America's political will, which means that Trump's linguistic warfare threatens the entire international community, which must preserve the integrity of essential concepts. The key is not to find new ways to discuss them, but rather to reclaim their names and position them as universal ideas whose meanings transcend partisan political agendas.
The European Union – which loves nothing if not naming things – is the obvious candidate to take the lead. But the European Commission has remained silent so far. Not a single high-ranking EU official has issued a strong response to Trump's attacks on language. This is a major missed opportunity for Europe to show principled global leadership at a time when it is seeking to bolster its 'strategic autonomy,' and to ensure that the concepts it is defending are not empty.
As its seemingly endless proclamations on 'green transitions' and 'inclusive growth' attest, the EU talks often and effusively about sustainability and inclusion. But it often lacks the resolve needed to turn talk into action. To reclaim the words that Trump is trying to erase requires substantive policies, such as a binding EU sustainability framework that enforces corporate ESG compliance.
Just as Trump's lack of commitment to Nato has prompted a long-overdue political awakening in Europe, his attacks on the language of sustainability and inclusion should catalyze Europe's efforts in both areas – and its assertion of global leadership more broadly. The alternative – allowing Europe's future to be shaped by internal populist forces and external manipulation – is a formula for deepening vulnerability and greater fragmentation. After all, when words lose their meaning, they lose their power to inspire and unite. @Project Syndicate, 2025
Ana Palacio
The writer is a former minister of foreign affairs of Spain and former senior vice-president and general counsel of the World Bank Group, is a visiting lecturer at Georgetown University
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Muscat Daily
18 minutes ago
- Muscat Daily
Trump withdraws NASA nomination of Musk associate
Washington, D.C., US – President Donald Trump has withdrawn the NASA nomination of Jared Isaacman, a billionaire tech entrepreneur and private astronaut who has commanded and funded two SpaceX missions to Earth orbit, the White House has confirmed. Isaacman's removal comes just days after Elon Musk's official departure from the White House, where the SpaceX CEO was serving in the role of a 'special government employee' leading the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). Trump said he would announce a new candidate soon. 'After a thorough review of prior associations, I am hereby withdrawing the nomination of Jared Isaacman to head NASA,' the US president posted on his Truth Social platform on Saturday. 'I will soon announce a new nominee who will be mission aligned and put America first in space,' he said. The move came just days before the Senate was scheduled to vote on his confirmation, where he was widely expected to be approved. According to The New York Times , President Donald Trump had concerns about Isaacman's political loyalty. The news outlet reported that Trump was informed of Isaacman's donations to Democrats in the past two campaign cycles. 'The Administrator of NASA will help lead humanity into space and execute President Trump's bold mission of planting the American flag on the planet Mars,' White House Assistant Press Secretary Liz Huston told Fox News Digital on Saturday. Isaacman, 42, said he was 'incredibly grateful' to Trump and 'all those who supported me throughout this journey'. 'I have gained a much deeper appreciation for the complexities of government and the weight our political leaders carry,' he posted on X. 'It may not always be obvious through the discourse and turbulence, but there are many competent, dedicated people who love this country and care deeply about the mission.' Meanwhile, Musk also took to X to post: 'It is rare to find someone so competent and good-hearted.' Trump announced his choice of Jared Isaacman in December, before the president's inauguration, and the nominee seemed poised to be confirmed by the US Congress. A US Congress Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation voted this April to advance his nomination to the full Senate for confirmation. Issacman had, in September last year, become the first private astronaut to perform a spacewalk after launching on a SpaceX rocket. Meanwhile, on May 30, the White House released its NASA budget request for the 2026 fiscal year. The documents propose a US$6bn budget cut for the agency, from US$24.8bn to US$18.8bn, with funding for NASA's science programmes slashed by 47 per cent. It indicated that NASA's workforce would be reduced by nearly a third, for example, and dozens of the agency's science missions – including the Juno Jupiter orbiter, New Horizons Pluto probe and a number of other spacecraft that are currently gathering data in deep space – would be cancelled. ANI
Muscat Daily
a day ago
- Muscat Daily
Shangri-La Dialogue: US Defence Secretary warns of ‘imminent' China threat
Singapore – United States Secretary of Defence Pete Hegseth on Saturday cautioned that China was 'credibly preparing to potentially use military force' in a bid to reorder the balance of power in the Indo-Pacific. Hegseth was speaking at the Shangri-La Dialogue, Asia's premier defence forum, being held in Singapore. China's army is 'rehearsing for the real deal', the Pentagon chief said, highlighting how the Indo-Pacific region was a priority for President Donald Trump's administration. 'We are not going to sugarcoat it – the threat China poses is real. And it could be imminent,' he said. Call to boost defence spending Hegseth reassured Washington's allies in the Indo-Pacific region that they would not be abandoned to tackle the growing military and economic pressures from Beijing. He called on the Asian allies to bolster their own defence spending, adding that 'deterrence doesn't come on the cheap'. 'It's hard to believe a little bit… that I'm saying this, but thanks to President Trump, Asian allies should look to countries in Europe for a newfound example,' said Hegseth, pointing to pledges by NATO members including Germany to move toward Trump's spending target of 5% of GDP, which is a higher percentage of GDP than the US currently spends on defence. Hegseth on China's ambitions Hegseth on Saturday said any attempt by China to invade Taiwan 'would result in devastating consequences for the Indo-Pacific and the world'. Chinese President Xi Jinping has ordered the People's Liberation Army to be able to take Taiwan by 2027, a deadline which experts view more as an aspirational goal than a hard war deadline. Beijing claims self-ruled Taiwan as its own territory. The US defence secretary reiterated Trump's remark that China would not conquer Taiwan under Trump's watch. Hegseth also called out China for its power designs in Latin America, particularly its efforts to step up its influence around the Panama Canal. No top Chinese official at summit Beijing, which sends its defence minister to the annual conference, put forth a lower-level delegation this year, snubbing Washington over Trump's tariff war. 'We are here this morning. And somebody else isn't,' Hegseth remarked, with the US delegation saying that they intended to capitalise on China's absence. The Chinese delegation, which was composed of lower-level officers from the National Defence University, asked the US Defence Secretary how committed his country would be to regional alliances. China has a stronger influence in some nations of the region. Hegseth said the US was open to engaging with nations willing to work with it. 'We are not going to look only inside the confines of how previous administrations looked at this region,' he said. 'We're opening our arms to countries across the spectrum – traditional allies, non-traditional allies.' DW
Times of Oman
a day ago
- Times of Oman
Trump bids farewell to Musk, assures DOGE will remain functional
Washington DC: US President Donald Trump on Friday praised Elon Musk for doing a "fantastic job" as head of the DOGE (Department of Government Efficiency) and assured that the department, founded by Musk to cut unnecessary funding and boost the US economy, will remain functional. Addressing the press at the Oval Office with Elon Musk on his last day, Trump said. "Elon has worked tirelessly helping lead the most sweeping and consequential government reforms in generations." Trump also assured that many of the DOGE employees are staying behind and suggested that Musk will remain integral in the project. "Many of the DOGE people are staying behind, too, so they're not leaving, Elon is really not leaving. He's gonna be back and forth. I want to thank Elon for his time as a special government employee for coming and helping us." The President also listed the contracts that were terminated after DOGE recommendations to help boost the economy. "We have terminated many-many contracts and many contracts are being looked at and it may be six months or maybe a year or something in some cases. We are going through procedures, we are going through courts and we'll remember you (Elon Musk). DOGE cancelled USD 101 million for DEI contracts at the Department of Education. USD 59 million for illegal alien hotel rooms in New York City. USD 45 million for diversity, equity and inclusion scholarships in Burma. USD 42 million for social and behavioural change in Uganda, USD 40 million to improve the social and economic inclusion of migrants. USD 8 million for mice transgenders," Trump said. Tesla CEO Musk reaffirmed that this is just the beginning of DOGE, and that the department's influence would only grow stronger with time. "This is not the end of DOGE but really the beginning. My time as a special government employee really had to end. It was a limited time. The DOGE will only grow stronger with time. The DOGE influence will go stronger. Musk added that he intends to give the president advice even as he closes out his time in the administration. "I expect to continue to provide advice whenever the president would like advice," Musk said in response to a question from a reporter. "I hope so," Trump chimed in. "I expect to remain a friend and an adviser and certainly, if there's anything the president wants me to do, I'm at the president's service," Musk added. Musk on Thursday announced his decision to step down as a 'Special Government Employee.' In a post on X, he wrote, "As my scheduled time as a Special Government Employee comes to an end, I would like to thank President Donald Trump for the opportunity to reduce wasteful spending. The DOGE mission will only strengthen over time as it becomes a way of life throughout the government." Earlier, Musk has criticised Trump's 'One Big Beautiful Bill', saying "I was disappointed to see the massive spending bill, frankly, which increases the budget deficit, not just decreases it, and undermines the work that the DOGE team is doing."
