XTransfer Named Among The Top 100 Cross-Border Payments Companies for 2025 by FXC Intelligence
XTransfer Named Among The Top 100 Cross-Border Payments Companies for 2025 by FXC Intelligence
HONG KONG SAR - Media OutReach Newswire - 20 May 2025 -has been named for the first time to'slist for 2025. XTransfer's debut on this prestigious list places it among a select group of companies at the forefront of innovation, inclusion, and global financial connectivity.FXC Intelligence, a leading data and intelligence provider for the cross-border payments industry, annually recognises the most influential companies in money transfers, payment processing, e-commerce, and B2B payments. This acknowledgement highlights XTransfer's increasing significance in the global payments ecosystem and emphasises its commitment to empowering companies involved in cross-border trade through innovative financial solutions.Founded in 2017, XTransfer has rapidly emerged as a key player addressing the unique challenges SMEs face in cross-border transactions. With a strong focus on the Asia-to-global and global-to-Asia trade corridors, the company now serves over 600,000 enterprises in more than 200 markets, processing more than $10 billion in monthly transactions."Being recognised by FXC Intelligence in this prestigious list is a tremendous honour and a testament to the trust our customers place in us," said. "We remain committed to removing barriers for SMEs in cross-border trade by offering efficient, secure, and affordable international payment solutions."XTransfer's inclusion reflects its exciting global expansion over the past year. It has secured payment licenses in key U.S. states and Singapore, and has experienced significant traction in emerging markets. In Q1 2025, nearly 70% of XTransfer's platform customers were exporting to Asia, Africa, or Latin America, highlighting the platform's growing relevance in underserved regions.Recent innovations include the launch of the global mobile app and the rollout of its Local Currency Account, designed to simplify payments in emerging markets. Additionally, XTransfer has deepened its global reach through strategic partnerships with financial institutions such as Ecobank, Deutsche Bank, Terrapay and Banking Circle.Hashtag: #XTransfer #SMEs #FXC #Top100 #Crossborder #Payment
The issuer is solely responsible for the content of this announcement.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Malay Mail
24 minutes ago
- Malay Mail
Singapore's Great Eastern proposes delisting with OCBC's S$700m offer
SINGAPORE, June 6 — Great Eastern is proposing to delist from the Singapore bourse by way of its largest shareholder Oversea-Chinese Banking Corp offering S$900 million (RM3 billion) to buy the rest of the insurer it does not already own, according to joint statement and filings today. Trading in Singapore-based Great Eastern's shares was suspended on July 15, 2024, after its free float fell below 10 per cent following an offer by OCBC to acquire an 11.56 per cent stake at S$25.60 apiece in May 2024. OCBC, Singapore's second-largest lender, had obtained acceptance from some shareholders and currently owns 93.72 per cent of Great Eastern. Under the new proposal, it is offering S$30.15 a share for the 6.28 per cent of the insurer's stock that it does not own. The latest offer is 17.8 per cent higher than last year's offer and values Great Eastern at S$14.27 billion. Independent financial adviser EY has assessed the offer is fair and reasonable and OCBC does not intend to revise it, according to the statement. It is OCBC's fourth attempt to fully acquire Great Eastern, following three bids since 2004. OCBC owns 93.72 per cent of the insurer, but that stake still falls short of the threshold needed to delist the company or launch a compulsory acquisition. Two companies controlled by Lee Thor Seng and his sons —members of the founding family behind OCBC — own nearly 2 per cent of Great Eastern, making them the second-largest shareholders, according to the insurer's annual report. Wong Hong Sun and Wong Hong Yen hold about 1 per cent, while Palliser Capital, which has criticised the latest takeover bid as unfair to shareholders, owns a 0.27 per cent stake, the report showed. Great Eastern proposed the delisting after assessing options available to resolve its shares trading suspension. The delisting offer is conditional upon at least 75 per cent backing from minority shareholders. OCBC will not be able to vote. If delisting cannot be achieved, Great Eastern would seek shareholders' approval on a second proposal to restore its free float by way of a one-for-one bonus issue comprising new listed shares with voting rights, and new non-listed shares without voting rights. According to the statement, OCBC intends to vote in favour of the bonus issue if the delisting proposal is not approved. OCBC would opt to receive the non-voting shares, which would dilute the bank's shareholding in Great Eastern to 88.19 per cent to help restore the free float and a resumption in trading. — Reuters
The Star
40 minutes ago
- The Star
Is Labubu the next Hello Kitty? Analysts debate Pop Mart's limits
Pop Mart, the company behind the hit collectible character Labubu, was virtually unknown outside mainland China before 2024, but now some analysts are comparing its success to that of Sanrio and its Hello Kitty property, suggesting that the Beijing toymaker could have created a new playbook for cultural exports. Labubu, a sharp-fanged but cute little monster that is often sold as a plush clip-on charm for handbags, has attracted high-profile fans including the family of football star David Beckham. Its popularity pushed Pop Mart's Hong Kong-listed shares to a record high of HK$234 last week, after the company's market capitalisation topped HK$300 billion (US$38 billion) the week before. The rally followed the April debut of the Labubu 3.0 series, which drew long queues in London, New York, and Dubai. 'For years, there's been a push [for Chinese companies] to 'go global' by exporting heritage and storytelling,' said Chris Pereira, founder and CEO at iMpact, a brand consulting company in Singapore. 'But Labubu flips that script. It's not trying to explain China, it's just trying to be lovable.' The sustained hype around Labubu had 'great similarities' to Hello Kitty, which turned 50 last year, according to JPMorgan Chase. The US bank said that beyond common traits in character design and business model, Labubu was also catching up with Hello Kitty in areas such as merchandising, licensing and Google Trends search interest. With international sales surging more than 480 per cent year on year in the first quarter, led by increases of 900 per cent in the US and 600 per cent in Europe, Pop Mart has become a new favourite among investors. Pereira said the popularity of the intellectual property (IP) opens the door for a wave of Chinese brands to succeed not because they are about China, but because they tap into universal emotions through strong design and clever marketing. 'They are telling a successful Chinese story without ever mentioning China,' he said. JPMorgan Chase initiated coverage of Pop Mart last week with a rating of overweight, and set its price target at HK$250 – the most bullish prediction among 43 analysts covering the toymaker. 'Labubu's meteoric rise is driven by a combination of factors,' said Richard Lin, chief consumer analyst at SPDB International, a Hong Kong-based investment bank. 'This includes the scarcity of the product itself, which has fuelled spontaneous social-media promotion by those lucky enough to get their hands on the toy' – a form of conspicuous consumption, he noted. Moreover, the character appeals to global consumers with its 'mischievous, cheeky image' that fans find irresistible, he said. 'I think this kind of vibe stands out more compared to something like Hello Kitty,' Lin added. 'In today's context, Hello Kitty might not resonate as much with younger audiences, who tend to look for characters with more individuality and edge.' With Pop Mart's shares rising nearly tenfold over the past year following Labubu's surge in popularity across Southeast Asia, JPMorgan is bullish on the company's long-term growth prospects. The bank identified 'multiple potential sources of incremental earnings,' ranging from new super IP launches and licensing to stationery, jewellery and even theme parks. 'Labubu's success is really a reflection of Pop Mart's own strengths in operations, marketing and product development,' said SPDB International's Lin. 'So what people can have confidence in is that even if Labubu cools down today, there will be new IPs coming tomorrow.' That sentiment is not universal, however. As stunning as Labubu's success has been, it has decades to go to match Hello Kitty's staying power, and whether the company can nurture other hit products is an open question. 'We think the biggest uncertainty lies in the relevance of Pop Mart's IPs, as they may become less popular among global pop-toy fans over the next few years,' said Jeff Zhang, an equity analyst who covers Pop Mart for Morningstar. 'Additionally, Pop Mart might overexpand in regions where demand for its products is weaker and see less operating leverage as a result.' Sanrio, the Japanese company that owns the Hello Kitty and Kuromi IPs, has returned investors a total 646 per cent, including share price gains and dividend payouts, since its listing in 1982. Pop Mart has returned 488 per cent so far. Additional reporting by Zhang Shidong - SOUTH CHINA MORNING POST
Free Malaysia Today
an hour ago
- Free Malaysia Today
I was silent at Sapura board meetings, Shahriman tells court
Shahriman Shamsuddin (left) is petitioning to wind-up Sapura Holdings Sdn Bhd, the parent of the Sapura group valued at RM832 million, on account of an alleged breakdown of mutual trust and confidence with elder brother Shahril. KUALA LUMPUR : Sapura Holdings Sdn Bhd director Shahriman Shamsuddin told the High Court here that he did not oppose proposals made by elder brother Shahril to the Sapura Resources Bhd (SRB) board, citing a 'conflict' on account of them being siblings. In cross-examination, lawyer S Rabindra, representing Shahril, questioned Shahriman about complaints contained in his petition to wind-up Sapura Holdings due to an alleged breakdown of mutual trust between the brothers. In the petition, Shahriman had claimed that Shahril was 'effectively cornering' SRB into accepting either a RM100 million loan offered in September 2022, which involved a rights issue, or a RM40 million bridging loan offered by the Sapura group, failing which the company stood to lose its collateralised properties. 'The petitioner (Shahriman) was not consulted on this matter at Sapura Holdings level,' the document said further. Rabindra: Your point here is that Shahril is saying to SRB: 'You have to pay back the RM40 million that was previously advanced (by the Sapura group) unless you agree to carry out a rights issue based on the September 2022 terms and conditions.' Is that a fair summary of what you're saying? Shahriman: Pay immediately or do the rights issue. Another of Shahriman's complaints was that Shahril had written on behalf of Sapura Holdings to SRB, undertaking to provide financial assistance of up to RM152 million without consulting him. He also claimed Shahril had offered to personally underwrite any rights issue by SRB that was not taken up, to a value of RM113 million. Shahriman said this would dilute his position in both SHSB and SRB and break the 'equal joint holdings spirit' laid down by their parents. Rabindra: You mentioned earlier the distinction between Shahril's personal position and that of the company. As a director of Sapura Resources, during the time when letters were being exchanged, did you ever raise the question: 'Was this a private initiative (by Shahril), or an SRB initiative?' Shahriman: I did not raise it because I would have been conflicted. I am his brother and also a shareholder of the holdings. So I had to keep quiet. Rabindra: You sat on the Sapura Resources board with your brother, correct? Shahriman: Yes. Rabindra: You've disagreed with your brother during board meetings before, haven't you? Shahriman: Sometimes, yes, about this matter, too. Rabindra: So, in your capacity as a director of Sapura Resources, you could have raised the question: 'Why are we entertaining a personal proposal by Shahril?' Shahriman: Shahril is my brother. I'm not allowed to say anything at the board (meeting). Rabindra: I put it to you that that is far from the truth. You could have spoken up, you simply chose not to. Do you agree or disagree? Shahriman, however, chose not to respond. Sapura Holdings is the parent entity of over 40 subsidiaries valued at RM832 million, including the publicly-listed SRB. Both Shahril and Shahriman hold a 48% stake each in Sapura Holdings, with the remaining 4% owned by Rameli Musa. In the petition filed last September, Shahriman claims that an irreparable breakdown of mutual trust and confidence between him and Shahril necessitated the dissolution of Sapura Holdings. However, Sapura Holdings, Shahril and Rameli, all named as respondents, oppose the petition, contending that the company was never intended to be a family business and that dissolution would be neither just nor equitable. The hearing before Justice Leong Wai Hong will continue on June 13.
