Victorian drinking fountain restored on Croydon's Surrey Street
The drinking fountain, an example of Victorian craftsmanship and civic design, is made of materials of the late 19th Century, including faience - glazed terracotta, granite and cast iron.According to HOLT, the first public drinking fountain in the capital was erected at St Sepulchre Without Newgate church in the City of London in 1859. By 1900, hundreds had been installed across the city.By the time the Surrey Street fountain was installed, clean drinking water was available to a much greater proportion of the population than in 1859, but drinking fountains remained a basic, expected amenity within public spaces, HOLT said. Dr Nicola Stacey from the trust said it was 'delighted to be supporting the restoration of this historic fountain in the heart of Croydon – a source of much local pride 130 years ago'.'King' Louis, a local resident, said: "I love what you've done with this. I'm going to make sure I keep an eye on it and protect it" while another, Maggie, added: "It's so wonderful to see this looking so good and what's better - working".
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
23 minutes ago
- The Independent
Why I, as a straight woman, will be marching at Trans+ Pride
I'm not a marcher at heart. I tend to panic in crowds or really anywhere without a good mobile signal if I'm not on horseback. I don't attend parades because they're usually too hot. In short, I'm like a rather pathetic indoor plant. Nonetheless, I will be donning tabard and face mask to steward the accessibility block of London Trans+ Pride: the 'plus' is to include anyone's identity; the mask protects the disabled marchers who lead the march. I'll be there with the many other non-trans people who have attended excruciatingly comprehensive training sessions on Zoom, all wanting to show support for a community who have been made Villain of the Week by a tiny yet overexposed force desperate to stamp on someone more vulnerable than themselves. Certainly, this was why my friend Sara and I first volunteered last year; neither particularly keen joiner-inners, both requiring continuous applications of SPF50 to safely set foot outdoors in July, but rendered so cross by what was being said about trans people in our name that we did what generations have done and channelled our Inner Aunt. Certainly not in The Handmaid's Tale sense, and perhaps slightly less in the formidable Wodehosian, but in allyship; caring about people who aren't your children, and fulsomely advocating for them. I had no idea what on earth to wear to a march, or who would be there, so I wore a wonderfully pedantic T-shirt made by my friend Helen Zaltzman for her language podcast The Allusionist, highlighting that the singular use of 'they' has been in use since 1375. In the lack of a protest sunhat, I wore a cap I'd won in a competition by the, erm, Equestrian Noticeboard. Shortly after I arrived, another steward said hello. It turned out that they worked for a very popular horsey brand and had been volunteering at Trans+ Pride marches since their child came out. Offering support to this march as a straight cisgender person matters (sorry if you dislike that term – please blame academic science). The unfolding campaign against trans people is a ringingly clear repetition of Britain's appalling treatment of gay men through the 80s and 90s. The highest-profile curb on trans rights came in April, when the Supreme Court ruled the legal definition of a woman is someone born biologically female. The focus on trans women – never trans men – narrows the idea of 'What is a woman?' to one that affects anyone who doesn't fit stereotyped femininity. When I was a contestant on Only Connect in 2022, someone tweeted that they were 'supporting the trans team', presumably because I am a very tall Second Alto with my dad's jawline. I took this as both a compliment and further proof that anyone who says 'You can just tell ' where appearance is concerned is unrelentingly stupid. The trans people I know are objectively more attractive than I am, for one. The 'gender critical' crowd's nonsensical rubbishing of anyone who seems different impacts us all – not just in terms of how we are perceived, but in taking us backwards. It is rolling back our humanity. The most moving signs I saw at last year's Trans+ Pride were those held by parents, warmly offering free hugs to people whose own parents didn't accept them. It reminded me of last month's exhibition of the UK Aids Memorial Quilt at the Tate Modern and everything I have learned about the Aids epidemic when families shunned their children or banished their partners. Being 'critical' of someone's right to exist is perilously close to fascism. The United States has shown where such anti-freedom legislation can lead in the shortest time. Rolling back on trans rights is a dangerous path – and one that entirely distracts from the real issue. No man, God bless them, needs to spend years transitioning in order to attack women. Anyone with that cruelty in mind can do so by simply walking through their front door. It is important for us to stand up now, however much we feel it doesn't affect us, because, truly, it does. In the years since Section 28 was ended, I've seen relatives' views on gay people evolve from 'He must be terribly sad' to greater understanding. It hasn't 'made' any of my straight relatives gay. My own understanding has evolved, too, because a side effect of Section 28 was breeding ignorance – and that despite the work Channel 4 did to quietly educate British kids through late-night documentary strands and Eurotrash. New rules suppressing trans discussion in schools, brought in by this Labour government, won't stop young people questioning their identity. It will only make them less safe – just as it did when 'gay' rang out as an insult across BBC radio and school playing fields. The legacy of Section 28 showed us Britain that suppression only wounds; it doesn't prevent. However much their identity might frighten you – or, perhaps, society's response to this identity – you cannot stop someone being who they are, only delay it. Nor can you make anyone what they are not. The government may have forgotten the sins of the past – even, and most shamefully, those among them who themselves are gay – but I have not. I have no wish to return to being the ignorant person I was, nor letting wildly over-amplified voices overtake society's reason. Life unquestionably has particular challenges for each of us, but those of us who are heterosexual and non-trans are lucky enough to be playing in society's default mode. Standing up for the rights of our fellows under challenging circumstances is not limited to the distant past. It continues to be the most British of values – and the right thing to do.
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Newlyweds fined £150 by council for putting the bins out early to go on their honeymoon have had fine scrapped
A pair of newlyweds were hit with a £150 fine after putting their bins out early so they could head to the airport to catch a flight for their honeymoon. Leon Wright, 40, and his wife Amy, 34, returned home from their Athens cruise to find an enforcement notice had been posted through the letterbox of their flat in Twickenham, southwest London. Their property falls under the jurisdiction of Richmond Council, who say residents should leave their bins on the pavement in colour-coded bags from 8pm the night before collection. Mr Wright admits he put his rubbish out at 3:25pm - some four-and-a-half hours before the advised time - but says the fine was unjust as he had to leave for Heathrow Airport and had no other option. The marketing manager decided to challenge the fine, and his efforts have ultimately proved successful, as Richmond Council has now cancelled the notice. 'It's such a relief to have the fine cancelled,' Mr Wright said. 'I only put [the bins] out a few hours before and it was the last thing I did before we left for holiday. 'I came back from my honeymoon with a fixed penalty notice from Richmond Council. 'It said that we had to pay it within ten days, but we couldn't because we weren't even there.' He added that it was 'very surprising' to receive the fine as the couple 'had never had any problems with the council before'. Mr Wright continued: 'It's definitely not what you want to see when you come back from holiday. Especially when you are trying to do your best. 'I do my best to follow the rules but it was literally just a few hours before the collection window so I never thought they would send fines straight away. 'My neighbours couldn't believe it. They were all shocked.' Mr Wright says the fine was issued by WISE (Waste Investigations, Support and Enforcement), who are partnered with Richmond Council as a third-party enforcement agency. Initially, he carried out all communications through them - but was consistently told the fine would be 'upheld'. This was despite Mr Wright finding guidance that stated residents should only be fined if bins were put out before 2pm. Eventually, he contacted Richmond Council directly, who agreed he should not have been fined and cancelled the notice. Mr Wright said: 'WISE weren't listening to any of my complaints or legal arguments. They just stonewalled me and said the fine was upheld. 'So I complained directly through Richmond Council who said their policy means that if someone has put their bins out after 2pm they cannot be fined. 'If it had been before that, the fine would have been upheld. But it wasn't so they cancelled it.' Mr Wright put his bins out on May 27 before leaving to get a 7:10pm flight from Heathrow Airport for his honeymoon cruise from Athens. Ten days later, he and Amy returned from the trip to find the fine on their doorstep. Richmond Council said: 'We are committed to ensuring the borough's streets are kept clean. 'If it is discovered that there has been a littering offence, we may take enforcement action where appropriate. 'Residents can request a review of issued fines if they feel they have been fined unfairly or incorrectly.' Previously, a spokesperson confirmed that waste should only be put out between 8pm the night before and 6am on the day of collection. They added that enforcement action 'may be taken' when these rules are not followed. WISE have been contacted for comment.
The Guardian
10 hours ago
- The Guardian
Homes for sale with wild gardens in England and Wales
This large Victorian house, set back from the road, is true to its era, with a red-brick elevation under a mixture of pantile and flat roof. The facade is screened by mature shrubs and covered in mature wisteria and climbing roses. The main garden, to the south and east, has a wildlife pond and a decked walk that leads to another garden with fruit trees. The popular village has a railway station, a shop, a pub, a recreation ground and a primary school. Melton adjoins the riverside market town of Woodbridge, which has several sailing clubs. £855,000. Bedfords, 01728 454 505 Photograph: Bedfords Just over a mile outside the busy village of Culmstock, in the Culm Valley, is Silver Street Farm. The approach is a long drive bordered by wildflower meadows. The restored Georgian farmhouse has eight bedrooms and sits in 3.8 hectares (9.6 acres) that include a no-dig kitchen garden, open paddocks and a cottage. Behind the house is a courtyard of outbuildings covered in roses and surrounded by fruit trees. The kitchen opens on to a terrace, and a large utility room connects the main house to the events barn. The nearest town is Prescott. £2.5m. Knight Frank, 020 7590 2451 Photograph: Knight Frank Near the foothills of the Berwyn mountains and just over three miles from the nearest village, lies this secluded retreat. Until the 1960s it was a working farm; then it was split up with different sections sold off. The farmhouse that is up for sale is in a limewash under a roof of timber rafters, bordered by the original walls of local stone. A woodland shelters the buildings, with beech, oak, conifer and sycamore trees and fern, broom and dog rose. A second area is a wetland with two ponds surrounded by rowan, alder and willow. £495,000. Savills, 01952 239 500 Photograph: Chris Curl/Savills Down an old farm track, on the outskirts of a ridge-top village, is the historic French Court Farmhouse, built in about 1640, with later additions. The writer CS Lewis recorded he once lodged here. It has been restored with period features intact: the inglenook fireplace and the winder staircase. The whole plot covers one hectare (2.5 acres), and includes a wildflower front garden, woodland, paddocks, a wildlife pond and a Mediterranean courtyard. Pett sits between Winchelsea and Hastings, and it is only a six-minute drive to the nearest beach. £1.5m. Inigo, 020 3687 3071 Photograph: Suzie Gibbons/Inigo This low-slung mid-century house is Grade II-listed and has glazing on all sides, letting in plenty of light and framing views across 2.6 hectares (6.5 acres) of land. The plot consists of woods and paddocks with a leafy side garden separating the house from the road. There are perennial grasses and secluded spots, with winding paths leading to a beech wood past snowdrop and daffodil dells and the wildlife pond. Grimsby and Louth are about half an hour away, and it's about 20 minutes drive to the coast. £800,000. The Modern House, 020 3795 5920 Photograph: The Modern House
