logo
Norfolk hospitals merger spells better efficiency, says boss

Norfolk hospitals merger spells better efficiency, says boss

BBC News06-05-2025

Hospitals merge spells better efficiency, says boss
7 minutes ago
Share
Save
Helen Burchell
BBC News, Norfolk
Share
Save
Paul Moseley/BBC
Lesley Dwyer heads up the newly merged hospitals group
The new head of Norfolk's three main NHS hospitals said their merger into one group could reduce waiting lists and the need to travel outside the county for treatment.
The Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital (NNUH), The Queen Elizabeth Hospital (QEH) in King's Lynn and the James Paget University Hospital (JPH) in Gorleston operate under their own names but are now collectively called the Norfolk and Waveney University Hospitals Group.
The three hospital trusts are forecasting a £53m gap in their finances by 2029/30.
On her first day as chief executive of the group, Prof Lesley Dwyer said it was not about the money, but about working together more efficiently.
"The job is getting to understand what is important to those local hospitals and their population," Prof Dwyer said.
"The prime reason for coming together under the group formation was actually not about the money.
"It was very much about closer working together, and doing those things that matter such as tackling waiting lists, making sure people are treated quickly in an emergency - making sure though, that we do get better value for the money that we are given."
Getty Images
The NHS hopes the new hospitals group will save money and improve services
While each of the three hospitals will still have a managing director, Prof Dwyer said the "group structure is very much about trying to find those things that we can do at scale - things that we know perhaps are duplicated - but also making sure that we make some of those bigger decisions that despite our best intentions, perhaps over the last few years... that we just haven't done".
But she said it was "very much about making sure that we don't take away the identity of the things that really matter to those local hospitals".
Asked about lengthy waiting lists, Prof Dwyer said: "Currently we do have people who actually leave Norfolk to go and get treatment because we're not able to treat them.
"We're hoping by using the capacity of the three - particularly around elective waiting lists - will mean that the travel people have will actually be within the county.
"It's certainly our intention to use the capacity we have in the three hospitals, that we really do address those long waits."
PA Media
The NNUH is Norfolk's largest hospital
Peter Passingham, the Eastern regional organiser for the union, Unison, said the merger was causing "a lot of uncertainty among staff".
Asked what the point of the merger was, he said: "Well, I think it's the aspiration.
"We know that the NHS is struggling at the moment... and I think it is the hope to do something which is going to improve the situation, as opposed to something that may actually bring real changes."
Follow Norfolk news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Labour support for assisted dying law falls as more MPs switch position to oppose change over coercion fears and effect on vulnerable people
Labour support for assisted dying law falls as more MPs switch position to oppose change over coercion fears and effect on vulnerable people

Daily Mail​

time23 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Labour support for assisted dying law falls as more MPs switch position to oppose change over coercion fears and effect on vulnerable people

Labour support for legalising assisted dying appears to be falling as more MPs publicly question the law change. The Commons will next week debate changes to the plan to allow terminally ill people with less than six months to live to end their own lives, ahead of a crunch vote later this month. But fresh concerns have been raised about the The Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill that is being led through Parliament by backbencher Kim Leadbeater. Opponents have complained the Bill does not have enough protections and has been rushed through, with the criticism coming days after two royal medical colleges voiced their doubts on the legislation in its current form. And now even supporters of the principle of legalising assisted dying are questioning the process. Labour MP Markus Campbell-Savours, who voted for the bill in a preliminary vote last year, told the BBC he now planned to vote against it because in its current form it crossed his 'red lines for protecting the vulnerable'. 'I want to see safeguards that will ensure that assisted dying is not overextended to include those in situations where there are alternative ways to improve the quality of their lives,' said Campbell-Savours. 'I would also be very concerned if legislation produced a situation where people who considered themselves a burden on their families and friends felt pressured to end their life.' The Commons will next week debate changes to the law allowing terminally ill people with less than six months to live to end their own lives, ahead of a crunch vote later this month. And fellow Labour MP Josh Fenton-Glynn told the broadcaster he will vote against the bill, having abstained last year. 'We see quite a few of the amendments which are specifically aimed at stopping coercion being opposed by the supporters of the bill,' he said. 'I don't think chances to make the bill safer have been taken.' At the end of November last year, the Commons backed the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill by 330 votes to 275, a majority of 55 votes. But campaigners believe enough have changed their mind to put its chances of becoming law onto a knife-edge. The proposed legislation would allow terminally ill adults in England and Wales, with fewer than six months to live, to apply for an assisted death. This would be subject to approval by two doctors and a panel featuring a social worker, senior legal figure and psychiatrist. The terminally ill person would take an approved substance, provided by a doctor but administered only by the person themselves. The implementation period has been doubled to a maximum of four years from royal assent, rather than the initially suggested two years. If the Bill was to pass later this year that would mean it might not be until 2029, potentially coinciding with the end of this Government's parliament, that assisted dying was being offered. A Government impact assessment published last month estimated that between 164 and 647 assisted deaths could potentially take place in the first year of the service, rising to between 1,042 and 4,559 in year 10. The establishment of a Voluntary Assisted Dying Commissioner and three-member expert panels would cost an estimated average of between £10.9 million to £13.6 million per year, the document said. It had 'not been possible' to estimate the overall implementation costs at this stage of the process, it added. While noting that cutting end-of-life care costs 'is not stated as an objective of the policy', the assessment estimated that such costs could be reduced by as much as an estimated £10 million in the first year and almost £60 million after 10 years.

Mum shares urgent warning for summer beach trips with kids as pal's left in hospital following massive allergic reaction
Mum shares urgent warning for summer beach trips with kids as pal's left in hospital following massive allergic reaction

The Sun

time29 minutes ago

  • The Sun

Mum shares urgent warning for summer beach trips with kids as pal's left in hospital following massive allergic reaction

A MUM has shared an urgent warning for summer days at the beach after a friend's near-death experience. Danielle explained that between June and September there are aquatic animals called weever fish, which camouflage themselves in the sand and sea. 3 3 3 They can even "survive for quite a long time" hiding on the beach, but if you step on it with bare feet you'll end up being stung. Danielle - aka The Enchanted Nanny - said that her best friend's brother had found out the hard way about the potentially deadly fish when he stepped on one, and suffered a massive allergic reaction. "He's trodden on it in bare feet, and usually that would cause quite a hefty sting, where you would need to put the hottest water possible on the area to stop the venom from spreading and stinging," she said in a video on her TikTok page. "But he didn't even get that far because he had a massive allergic reaction, which has landed him straight in the hospital. "It's been a really, really scary time and a shock to the system." She added that it's vital to wear some kind of shoes when on the sand near the sea, so that if you did accidentally tread on a weever fish, you wouldn't get stung. "They definitely feature very heavily on our UK coastlines," she continued. "If you're going to the beach, wear beach shoes, flip-flops, jelly shoes. "Do not let your children wander around by the sea without shoes on. "It's just not worth the risk." The dangers of hard to spot Weever fish "Spoiler alert - they sting even when no longer alive, the venom is still potent!" one person warned in the comments section. "I got stung by one in Cornwall," another recalled. "It was so painful, the lifeguard hit me to put my foot in the hottest water I could stand." "I was (stung) - it's terrible and was so painful please be careful!" a third wrote. "Crazy that I have been on the beach barefoot every year for 28 years and I have never heard about or seen these until this year," someone else said. "It's important to note it's not just a little sting," another warned. How should you treat a weever fish sting? ACCORDING to Moelfre Coastguard, if you experience an intense reaction such as trouble breathing or heart palpitations after a sting, you should call 999. If your pain is less intense, the sting can be treated with hot water. The higher temperature will destroy the poison as it is protein-based. Use tweezers to remove the spines. And painkillers can also be taken to ease discomfort. "My whole leg ended up paralysed because we didn't know what it was! "Always buy jelly shoes for you and your children!"

BBC Radio's Bryan Burnett steps away from mic to treat ‘incredibly rare' cancer
BBC Radio's Bryan Burnett steps away from mic to treat ‘incredibly rare' cancer

The Independent

time33 minutes ago

  • The Independent

BBC Radio's Bryan Burnett steps away from mic to treat ‘incredibly rare' cancer

BBC Radio Scotland host Bryan Burnett announced he will be taking time off from his show, Get It On Tonight, to undergo treatment for 'incredibly rare' appendix cancer. Burnett revealed his diagnosis during his live show, explaining that a tumour was discovered when his appendix was recently removed. He will undergo complex abdominal surgery and chemotherapy, with colleague Grant Stott filling in during his absence. Burnett expressed gratitude to his team and the NHS staff, noting that his surgeon is a listener of his show and that he expects to make a full recovery and return to the air later in the year. Hayley Valentine of BBC Radio Scotland conveyed well wishes to Burnett on behalf of listeners and the station, anticipating his return to the studio after his recovery.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store