logo
HS2 staff ordered to come to office more

HS2 staff ordered to come to office more

Telegraph3 hours ago

HS2 has ordered staff back into the office three days a week as it comes under fire over yet more delays and spiralling costs.
The beleaguered high speed railway line has told employees they must come into work more often, saying the change will aid 'faster decision-making'.
The Transport Secretary last week branded the project an 'appalling mess' as she revealed its completion has been pushed back beyond 2033.
HS2 has lagged behind other parts of the public sector on working from home even as its costs have spiralled out of control to an estimated £66 billion.
Right up until last month it still only required employees to attend work - either at an office or on site - for a minimum of two days a week.
Staff were finally informed on May 1 that they would now have to come in for at least three days, matching the standard set across Whitehall.
A spokesman for HS2 said: 'We recently increased our office and site working requirements to a minimum of three days a week. This is in line with many other parts of the public sector and we believe it supports collaboration, communication and faster decision-making.
'We recognise the continued benefits that hybrid working policies bring to employees such as promoting work life balance and enhancing employee wellbeing.'
The company insisted that compliance with attendance requirements is 'closely monitored' using swipe card data.
Staff who refuse to return to the office for the new three day minimum standard without a reasonable excuse could face disciplinary action.
HS2 has been blighted by repeated delays and soaring costs, despite the scope of the project being repeatedly scaled back by ministers.
It was originally meant to run on one main line from London to Birmingham, before splitting into separate branches destined for Manchester and Leeds.
When it was first announced by Gordon Brown in 2009, the rail line had an estimated price tag of £37.5 billion and was due to open in 2026.
Amid alarm over the rising costs and delays, Rishi Sunak significantly curtailed the project in 2023, meaning that it will now only run as far as Birmingham.
There have also been doubts over whether the London terminus will be Euston as planned, or if it will be moved to Old Oak Common to save money.
The surging costs of the project have largely been blamed on the need to tunnel under the Chilterns, an area of outstanding national beauty.
It has also been blighted by green regulations, including the requirement to build a £100 million bat tunnel, which has been criticised by Sir Keir Starmer.
Heidi Alexander, the Transport Secretary, told the Commons last week that HS2 was 'an appalling mess' but 'it is one we will sort out'.
Announcing the delay beyond 2033, she said: 'We need to set targets which we can confidently deliver, that the public can trust and that will take time.
'But rest assured, where there are inefficiencies we will root them out. Where further ministerial interventions are needed, I will make them without fear or favour. HS2 will finally start delivering on our watch.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

EU rules that push up car insurance to be scrapped in Brexit bonus
EU rules that push up car insurance to be scrapped in Brexit bonus

Telegraph

time20 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

EU rules that push up car insurance to be scrapped in Brexit bonus

EU rules that force law-abiding British motorists to stump up for compensation claims made by uninsured drivers will be scrapped by ministers. Heidi Alexander, the Transport Secretary, will use Brexit powers to rip up the Brussels regulations and return to a 'common-sense' approach. The UK was forced to apply the law by Eurocrats, despite ministers branding it 'morally questionable' and warning it rewarded criminal behaviour. Car insurance firms pay into a pot, known as the fund of last resort, which pays out to drivers who have been hit by an uninsured or unidentified driver. The cash pot means that, where costs cannot be reclaimed from the driver at fault, victims of crashes are still compensated for damage to their vehicle. Originally, the fund was not open to claims from uninsured drivers, but in 2017, ministers were warned that their exclusion was illegal under EU rules. As a result, the Government said it 'had no choice' but to change the law or run the risk of facing limitless daily fines from the EU Commission. Since then, uninsured drivers who are either hit by another uninsured motorist or involved in a hit-and-run have been eligible for compensation. The money for the fund of last resort is raised by a levy on insurance firms, which pass the cost onto their customers in higher premiums. A Government source told The Telegraph: 'We are reintroducing the exclusion of property damage compensation for uninsured drivers. 'Uninsured drivers should not be able to benefit in the same way as those driving lawfully. 'The Transport Secretary will restore this common-sense agreement because this Labour government is tackling criminal behaviour and backing all road users to the hilt.' Plans to repeal the EU law were drawn up by the last Tory government, which launched a consultation just before Rishi Sunak called the general election. At the time, Guy Opperman, the then roads minister, said the EU rule was 'morally questionable at best, and a cost carried by all legal motorists'. 'When we were members of the European Union, we were obliged to allow this. Now we have left, we can determine our own course of action,' he said. It has now been picked up by Labour, which will introduce the change. The feedback showed there was 'overwhelming support' for changing the rules to demonstrate that 'uninsured driving is unacceptable'. 'The vast majority of law-abiding motorists pay for claims from uninsured drivers for property damage through their motor insurance premiums,' the Government said. 'Removing this right for uninsured drivers demonstrates that the government is focused on tackling criminal behaviour and sensitive to regulations that impact negatively on the general public. 'It will send a message that uninsured drivers should not benefit from being compensated by the fund of last resort for property damage.' The Motor Insurers' Bureau, which oversees the fund of last resort, said it had been 'working closely' with ministers to reintroduce the exclusion. 'This will ensure uninsured drivers aren't able to claim compensation for property damage following collisions involving other uninsured or hit-and-run drivers,' it said. 'Uninsured drivers are not just breaking the law, but they make roads more dangerous and increase the cost of motor insurance for the honest majority.' The change can be introduced quickly because it does not require new legislation. Instead, the requirement to compensate uninsured drivers can be removed by amending agreements between Ms Alexander and the MIB.

Premier League club set to get green light for £130million stadium expansion that will boost capacity by thousands
Premier League club set to get green light for £130million stadium expansion that will boost capacity by thousands

The Sun

time21 minutes ago

  • The Sun

Premier League club set to get green light for £130million stadium expansion that will boost capacity by thousands

A PREMIER LEAGUE club have been given a huge boost after getting the green light for their £130million stadium expansion. The club moved into their current home ground all the way back in 1898 - 127 years ago. 3 3 3 And now Nottingham Forest are preparing to make their latest improvements to the historic stadium. The City Ground was updated in 1957, 1965, 1980, 1993 and 1996. But no major work has been done on the venue for almost 30 years. Now, though, Forest have taken a big step closer to moderning and expanding their home. Plans to bulldoze and rebuild the Peter Taylor stand will be put forward to the Rushcliffe Borough Council on June 26. And the planning committee will consider the application after the council planning department "recommended that planning permission be granted subject to a series of planning conditions". Should it get through as expected, Forest can start making progress with the update. The plans will see a new 10,000-seater stand built. It would also be the tallest of the stands at the stadium at 38m tall. The new main stand's opening should take the City Ground capacity from 30,404 to an initial 35,000. Premier League club unveil 'beautiful' new-look training ground with games room, ice baths and state-of-the-art kitchen When first proposed in 2019, the estimated cost was £94m. However, that has now risen to £130m. The longer-term plan is then to develop the Bridgford end and increase the number of seats to 40,000 while a 169-apartment block of flats is also in the works. A Forest and council joint statement said: 'Nottingham Forest has been in regular dialogue with Rushcliffe Borough Council, Nottingham City Council and Nottinghamshire County Council regarding the redevelopment of the City Ground. 'The parties can confirm they are working towards the Rushcliffe Borough Council Planning Committee date of Thursday, 26 June to consider the application. "There will be no further comment other than as required by the relevant legal process.' It is thought the final administration will be through in 2026, with Forest set to start construction work as soon as possible after that.

Watchdog opens case into British charity amid concerns funds end up with Hamas
Watchdog opens case into British charity amid concerns funds end up with Hamas

Telegraph

time36 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

Watchdog opens case into British charity amid concerns funds end up with Hamas

The charities watchdog has opened a compliance case into a British charity over 'serious allegations' that the money it raises for families in Gaza ends up with Hamas. The Charity Commission is examining the way that Save One Life UK distributes the money it collects in the UK. The London-based charity is already being investigated by counter-terror police over claims the cash it distributes for children and their families may end up in the coffers of the banned terror group. The Telegraph revealed earlier this year that concerns have been raised about an alleged lack of control over the way the funds raised are spent. But the Charity Commission, which regulates all charities operating in Britain, has now opened a preliminary investigation – known as a regulatory compliance case – following allegations made about Save One Life UK. A spokesman for the watchdog said: 'We are aware of serious allegations made about Save One Life, which the charity also promptly reported to us. As a result, we have opened a regulatory compliance case to allow us to gather more information. 'As part of this, we have engaged with the charity's trustees and are currently assessing both the charity's activities and the trustees' oversight, particularly in relation to the application of its funds overseas.' The charity has raised more than £5 million in the past five years, with most of its aid directed to Gaza since the start of Israel's military retaliation to the Oct 7 attacks by Hamas in 2023. A complaint about Save One Life UK's activities was submitted to the Metropolitan Police in April, via the Government's online system for reporting material promoting terrorism or extremism. Scotland Yard sources said the complaint was 'passed on to the counter-terrorism internet referral unit for investigation'. Cash for 'those most in need' Save One Life tells potential donors on its website that it is 'working with the Ministry of Social Development in Gaza' (MoSD) to deliver cash to 'those most in need'. Hamas, which governs Gaza and is banned as a terror group by the UK government, has exercised effective control over the MoSD in Gaza for several years. Save One Life has said: 'Beneficiaries are pre-vetted and approved for assistance by the ministry, and the financial assistance is directly distributed, accounted for and audited and is distributed strictly in line with the principles of Zakat [Islamic system of charitable giving].' The Telegraph previously reported that publicity photographs submitted to police appeared to show charity workers handing over envelopes allegedly thought to contain cash to children in Gaza In other footage, one of Save One Life UK's workers describes giving cash to families bombed out of their homes and living in temporary shelters amid the ruins. That has raised the fear that the charity has little control over where the funds it has raised in Britain ultimately end up in an area that is governed by Hamas. 'Unknown broker in Turkey' The complainant told police: 'Save One Life UK is a registered charity that is sending money to Gaza via an unknown broker in Turkey. 'A charity can be investigated if it is suspected of transferring money for non-charitable purposes, including political activity and support of terrorism, which would include allegations that the charity may provide material support for a proscribed terrorist group like Hamas.' Among the charity's trustees is Addeel Khan, the director of equity, inclusion and culture at University College London (UCL) and a former senior executive with the British Red Cross, who is a leading figure in the field of diversity, equity, and inclusion policy. In a live-streamed video posted on Facebook in April 2021, Mr Khan said the charity works with the MoSD to vet beneficiaries. He said: 'They make sure they're vetted and the money is checked, ID is provided, to make sure the right people are receiving it – and there is clear transparency in terms of where the money goes.' Save One Life UK launched an appeal for Gaza just hours after Hamas had carried out its deadly Oct 7 attacks on Israel, which killed more than 1,200 people, the single biggest loss of Jewish life since the Holocaust. Its Gaza Under Attack appeal appeared to come before Israel had launched any significant military response to the Hamas attacks. In one image posed on social media on 10.16am on Oct 7, Save One Life UK stated: 'Our brothers and sisters in Palestine are under attack again.' In another poster, published on the first anniversary of the attacks, and after months of bombardment by Israel on Gaza, Save One Life UK declared: 'Years of resistance. Palestine stands strong: 12 months of brutal violence. Decades of resilient resistance.' 'False allegations' A spokesman for Save One Life said: 'We stand robustly behind our cash aid programme in Gaza to support the innocent civilians of Gaza suffering from the ongoing blockade and violence being committed by Israel. 'Cash aid is provided to Palestinians in the West Bank and Gaza by a number of organisations, including the UN and the IFRC. 'We have taken our own steps to notify the required bodies and are working with them transparently to address these false allegations.' The spokesman added: 'At a time when thousands have been killed through starvation and lack of funds to purchase bare essentials, we need the world and specifically the British public and media to support charitable efforts for the innocent victims. 'We always operate in full compliance with all applicable laws and regulations. For the avoidance of doubt, we do not work with Hamas or any proscribed terrorist organisation.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store