Government says water company investigations have increased
It said in a statement the Environment Agency was looking at dozens of alleged offences which included releasing excessive pollution and not carrying out adequate water quality monitoring.
The government said the regulator had launched 81 criminal probes since last July's election after hiring 400 more staff for the purpose and that it had initiated proceedings against seven companies.
Water UK, which represents water companies, said in a statement that firms should be investigated and held to account when necessary.
The announcement comes amid public anger over pollution in rivers and seas. The number of pollution incidents recorded by water companies in England is at a 10-year high, according to data released by campaigners last month.
The increase in Environment Agency inspectors is partly due to a recruitment drive from the previous Conservative government.
In February 2024 the Conservatives said they planned to quadruple water inspections and hire an additional 500 staff for inspections and enforcement.
None of the 81 investigations have so far led to convictions, which often take years to work their way through the court systems. But the government said they could lead to water companies being fined hundreds of millions of pounds.
"This Labour Government is cleaning up the foul mess the Tories left behind with a record number of criminal investigations into law-breaking water companies - which could see bosses behind bars," said Environment Secretary Steve Reed.
The Conservative Party defended its record in response, with a spokesman saying that while it was in government it had begun the process of reforming water and sewage systems and taken action to ban bonuses for bosses of water companies that committed criminal breaches.
"The Labour Government made big promises on water, and we will continue to hold them to account to ensure they continue the work of the previous Conservative Government to improve our water and sewage systems for billpayers," the spokesman said.
"It's good to see the Government finally taking water pollution seriously," said CEO of campaigners River Action, James Wallace.
But he pointed out that water bosses could only serve jail time for obstructing investigations, not for pollution itself.
"Jail time for water bosses remains highly unlikely," he said. "The law only applies to cover-ups — and there's no need to hide what's already happening in plain sight, week in, week out."
Southern Water was hit with a record £126m punishment in 2019 for spills of wastewater into the environment from its sewage plants and for deliberately misreporting its performance.
Greenpeace UK head of politics Ami McCarthy said: "Water firms have got away with flouting rules and pumping sewage into our rivers for far too long, so it's good to see ministers finally throwing the book at these serial polluters."
She also urged the government to ensure that consumers did not foot the bill of any fines issued to water companies.
"It is right that water companies are investigated and held to account when things go wrong," Water UK said in a statement.
"Almost 99% of sewage and water treatment works meet their [pollution limit] permits and we are focused on getting to 100%."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
9 hours ago
- Yahoo
North Sea giant looks overseas as tax rate hits 111pc
Britain's biggest oil and gas producer is axing investment in the UK and diverting cash to countries including Norway after Labour's windfall taxes left it with an 111pc tax rate. Harbour Energy plans to wind down its North Sea investments and has already announced 250 job losses in Aberdeen, a city once regarded as the oil and gas capital of Europe. On Thursday, a spokesman said the company would consider offering jobs in its overseas operations to suitable workers but most of the Aberdeen staff marked for redundancy would be leaving the company. It came as Harbour report half-year results that made clear the impact of the energy profits levy, or windfall tax, which was initially imposed by the Conservatives and increased under Labour. Harbour made a profit before tax of $1.6bn (£1.2bn) but faced a tax bill of $1.8bn, resulting in a post tax loss of $174m. This was largely down to UK windfall levies plus foreign exchange transactions. The report said: 'The effective tax rate for the six months ending on June 30 2025 was 111pc, compared to 85pc for the same period in 2024.' The company said the increase was 'primarily' down to a deferred tax charge resulting from Labour's decision to extend windfall taxes to 2030. Linda Cook, Harbour's chief executive, said: '[The UK] remains a challenging environment for us... the fiscal regime means investment here just finds itself hard to compete with the opportunities we have in other countries. 'Going forward, we do expect investment to decline in the UK, given the fiscal and regulatory conditions. We will still have some high return opportunities, but overall investment is likely to decline and will be replaced by investment in Norway, Argentina and, over time, Mexico. 'The UK is one of our highest countries for unit operating costs ... and it's one of our highest tax environments as well. So that [UK] production will get replaced over time with production from other countries, and that's a good thing for us overall.' Last week, Donald Trump said Britain was wasting a 'treasure chest' of oil and gas. He wrote on his Truth Social site: 'The taxes are so high, however, that it makes no sense. They have essentially told drillers and oil companies that, 'We don't want you.'' The US president said reopening the North Sea could deliver a 'vast fortune' for the UK and 'far lower energy costs for the people!' Harbour was a primarily UK-focused oil and gas producer but has shifted its focus as successive governments imposed ever-tougher windfall taxes and climate-related drilling restrictions. Last year the company acquired the upstream operations of Germany's Wintershall Dea, giving it production centres in Norway, Argentina, Germany and Mexico. The move tripled output to 475,000 barrels of oil a day compared to the 159,000 seen in the first half of 2024, with reserves also tripled at an estimated 1.3 billion barrels. The company still operates several oil and gas production hubs in UK waters. Investment is focused on two of them, J-Area and Greater Britannia Area, in the central North Sea. However, Ashley Kelty, an analyst at Panmure Liberum investment bank, said Harbour had permanently shifted its focus from the UK to other parts of the world. Harbour also published an 'adjusted profits' figure discounting the impacts of windfall taxes, showing underlying profits of $410m, and announced a $100m share buyback programme alongside a $455m dividend for shareholders. Dan Slater, an analyst at Zeus Capital, said Harbour had shown a strong underlying performance, despite the tax hits. Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Yahoo
12 hours ago
- Yahoo
Poilievre says of B.C. Premier Eby that 'one man can't block' pipeline proposal
CALGARY — Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre says Canadians, including British Columbians, want a new oil pipeline and Premier David Eby can't be allowed as one man to block the project. Poilievre says the country can't wait for complete agreement on the idea, calling it a "basic fact" that a new pipeline is needed. Eby has repeatedly said there's no point discussing or supporting a pipeline that is being pushed by Alberta Premier Danielle Smith and others, until there is a proponent for such a project. Poilievre, speaking in Calgary, says that's a "chicken and egg problem," because the reason there's no proponent is there has been inadequate government support. Eby could not immediately be reached for comment, but deputy premier Niki Sharma says in a statement that there is still no prospective buyer for the existing TMX pipeline, which is owned by Canadian taxpayers. She says provinces across Canada have shovel-ready projects with proponents and funding already in place, "real projects that we can all support." "In B.C., we have major projects that will grow our economy, support trade between provinces and help protect workers and businesses from the harmful tariffs imposed by the Trump administration," Sharma said in the statement Thursday. Poilievre said he had nothing against Eby but "one man can't block a project." "British Columbians want a pipeline, Albertans want a pipeline, Canadians want a pipeline. We can't wait till everybody's onside," he said. "There are some people out there who don't think Elvis is dead. We can't get everybody to agree on any basic fact, even the basic fact that we need a pipeline. So, you're going to need national leadership," he said. Poilievre was speaking at a news conference to announce that the Opposition Conservatives will introduce a bill in Parliament called the Canadian Sovereignty Act, which would repeal "Liberal growth-blocking laws." Poilievre, who lost his Ottawa riding in the general election, is seeking to return to Parliament via a byelection in the rural Alberta seat of Battle River-Crowfoot. Advance polls in the Aug. 18 byelection open on Friday. This report by The Canadian Press was first published Aug. 7, 2025. The Canadian Press
Yahoo
12 hours ago
- Yahoo
Advance polls open in Alberta byelection with 214 candidates, historic blank ballots
CAMROSE — Advance polls in a historic federal byelection for Alberta's Battle River-Crowfoot open today. For the first time ever, Elections Canada says voters must fill out a blank ballot. The agency lists a record 214 candidates running in the rural riding, with voting day on Aug. 18. The majority are part of the Longest Ballot Committee, a protest group calling for various changes to Canada's electoral system. Prime Minister Mark Carney called the byelection in June after Conservative Damien Kurek, who handily won the seat in the April general election, stepped down so Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre could run. Poilievre lost his long-held Ottawa seat of Carleton. The byelection also features Liberal candidate Darcy Spady, the NDP's Katherine Swampy and Independent Bonnie Critchley. Elections Canada says there have been some exceptions to its regular ballot. Adapted ballots with two columns have been used in elections with a higher-than-usual number of candidates. In this byelection, it's not just marking an x. Voters must handwrite the name of their preferred candidate in a blank space. "Their vote will be counted, even if they misspell the candidate's name," said agency spokesperson Matthew McKenna. "They can also include the name of the political party. However, if they write only the name of a political party, their ballot cannot be counted. The candidate's name has to be there." A list of all candidates in large-print will be at polling stations for electors to refer to, he added. The agency's website also said magnifiers and large-grip pencils will be available. Poll workers have been given extra training. McKenna said there are ways they can assist electors with ballots, and the counting process will be different. Poilievre repeated his frustration Thursday with the longest ballot initiative. More than 90 candidates were on the ballot when he ran in Carleton. "I don't have a problem with anyone who wants to run for office, even if they're not known or not wealthy," he said at an unrelated news conference in Calgary. "But that's not what these people are doing ... they just want to inundate the ballot to confuse the situation, make it harder for people to vote. People with vision problems, the elderly, others who have difficulty now will have a harder time voting." This report by The Canadian Press was first published Aug. 8, 2025. Fakiha Baig, The Canadian Press
