Almost 50 white Afrikaners on board flight to US as part of resettlement programme
JOHANNESBURG - A group of 49 white Afrikaners now classified as refugees are currently on board a flight destined for the United States (US) as part of Washington's resettlement programme.
Their move to the US follows an executive order by President Donald Trump giving a small group of South Africans a lifeline amid false claims they are being persecuted in the country.
Although Trump halted virtually all other refugee programmes at the start of his presidency, his administration established the refugee resettlement programme to accommodate Afrikaners that claim to be fleeing South Africa.
The South African government has vehemently denied claims peddled by the US and some South African lobby groups about minority groups being targeted.
The Department of Transport spent hours on site facilitating the process to get the small group of Afrikaners up in the air.
Department spokesperson Collen Msibi said an application was lodged by Texas-based Omni Airways requesting permission for a private charter flight to operate in South Africa's domestic airspace.
The application was then taken to the International Air Services Council for consideration.
Msibi explained what the application entails, 'In the application, they then have to state the routes, how many flights, as well as the crew it has to be mentioned there.'
He said the application was approved on Friday, with the flight set to land at the Dulles Airport in Washington.
It's unclear at this stage where exactly in the US they will be settled once the administrative process is finalised.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Citizen
31 minutes ago
- The Citizen
Trump sanctions of ICC judges sets 'dangerous precedent' Dirco says
The sanctions imposed on the judges will see their US-based property and assets blocked. The International Relations Department (Dirco) says a decision by President Donald Trump's administration to sanction officials on the International Criminal Court (ICC) 'undermines' the independence of the UN's top court. The Trump administration last week followed through with a threat to sanction officials on the ICC, naming four judges whom it accused of taking 'illegitimate and baseless actions' against the US and its allies. Judges sanctioned US Secretary of State Marco Rubio announced the sanctions in a sharply worded written statement. Rubio named Solomy Balungi Bossa of Uganda, Luz del Carmen Ibáñez Carranza of Peru, Reine Adelaide Sophie Alapini Gansou of Benin, and Beti Hohler in the statement. 'The ICC is politicised and falsely claims unfettered discretion to investigate, charge, and prosecute nationals of the United States and our allies,' Rubio wrote. 'This dangerous assertion and abuse of power infringes upon the sovereignty and national security of the United States and our allies, including Israel'. ALSO READ: SA welcomes ICC announcement seeking arrest warrants for Netanyahu and others Concern Dirco spokesperson Chrispin Phiri said the South Africa government is 'deep concerned' about the sanctions against the judges. 'These measures, in addition to those imposed earlier on the prosecutor, represent a direct affront to the principles of international justice and the rule of law. 'Such punitive actions against judicial officers performing their mandated duties are regrettable. They undermine the independence of the ICC and threaten the integrity of international legal institutions. They furthermore hinder the Court and its personnel in the exercise of their independent judicial functions,' Phiri said. Rome Statute Phiri added that South Africa, as a founding member of the ICC, views these sanctions and previous threats as an attempt to intimidate and obstruct the Court's efforts to hold perpetrators of the most serious crimes accountable. 'The ICC operates under the Rome Statute, to which 125 states are parties, and its mandate is to prosecute individuals for genocide, crimes against humanity, war crimes, and the crime of aggression when national jurisdictions are unwilling or unable to do so. 'The imposition of sanctions on ICC judges sets a dangerous precedent that could embolden those who seek to evade accountability for egregious violations of human rights and international humanitarian law. It also poses a significant challenge to the global fight against impunity and the enforcement of international norms,' Phiri said. 'Pursuit of justice' Phiri stressed that Pretoria reaffirmed its commitment to the principles enshrined in the Rome Statute and will continue to work with like-minded nations to safeguard the integrity of international legal institutions. 'The pursuit of justice for victims of the gravest crimes must not be compromised by political considerations. 'Upholding the rule of law and ensuring accountability are essential for the maintenance of international peace and security as well as a rules-based international order based on international law,' Phiri said. ICC responds The sanctions imposed on the judges will see their US-based property and assets blocked. US-based entities are also forbidden from engaging in transactions with them, including through the 'provision of funds, goods or services'. The ICC said it stood behind its judges and 'deplores' the Trump administration's decision. 'These measures are a clear attempt to undermine the independence of an international judicial institution which operates under the mandate from 125 States Parties from all corners of the globe,' the statement said. 'Targeting those working for accountability does nothing to help civilians trapped in conflict. It only emboldens those who believe they can act with impunity.' ALSO READ: Israeli forces seize Gaza-bound Madleen with aid and Greta Thunberg [VIDEO]
Daily Maverick
an hour ago
- Daily Maverick
UN nuclear watchdog says Iran in breach of obligations, Iran announces counter-measures
The U.N. nuclear watchdog's board of governors declared Iran in breach of its non-proliferation obligations on Thursday and Tehran announced counter-measures, as an Iranian official said a "friendly country" had warned it of a potential Israeli attack. U.S. and Iranian officials will hold a sixth round of talks on Tehran's accelerating uranium enrichment programme in Oman on Sunday, the Omani foreign minister said on Thursday. But security fears have risen since U.S. President Donald Trump said on Wednesday American personnel were being moved out of the region because 'it could be a dangerous place' and that Tehran would not be allowed to develop a nuclear weapon. Trump has threatened to bomb Iran if the nuclear talks do not progress, and in an interview released on Wednesday said he had become less confident that Tehran would agree to stop enriching uranium. The Islamic Republic wants a lifting of the U.S. sanctions imposed on the country since 2018. The International Atomic Energy Agency's policy-making Board of Governors declared Iran in breach of its non-proliferation obligations for the first time in almost 20 years, raising the prospect of reporting it to the U.N. Security Council. The step is the culmination of several stand-offs between the Vienna-based IAEA and Iran since Trump pulled the U.S. out of a nuclear deal between Tehran and major powers in 2018 during his first term, after which that accord unravelled. An IAEA official said Iran had responded by informing the nuclear watchdog that it plans to open a new uranium enrichment facility. After the IAEA decision, the Israeli Foreign Ministry said Tehran's actions undermine the global Non-Proliferation Treaty and posed an imminent threat to regional and international security and stability. Iran is a signatory to the NPT while Israel is not and is believed to have the Middle East's sole nuclear arsenal. MARKET REACTION Markets absorbed the developments in a volatile Middle East. Oil prices eased on Thursday as the market assessed the situation, having surged more than 4% on Wednesday to their highest since early April. But shares in European airlines, travel companies and hotel chains were among the biggest fallers in morning trade as investors worried the heightened tensions would knock demand for travel and higher oil prices would add to costs. 'Clearly it is Iran that is at the centre of this and the possibility that you see a strike from the U.S. or Israel,' said Paul McNamara, a director of emerging market debt for investment firm GAM. 'There is a lot of scope for things to get a whole lot worse if we do see a military strike and a sustained attack.' Iran's response to the IAEA resolution was among several countermeasures being taken, Iranian state TV said. The IAEA official, who spoke on condition of anonymity, said Tehran had given no further details on the planned new enrichment sites, such as its location to enable monitoring by U.N. nuclear inspectors. Behrouz Kamalvandi, spokesperson for Iran's atomic energy organisation, told state TV that Tehran had informed the IAEA of two countermeasures including 'the upgrading of centrifuges in Fordow (enrichment plant) from first to sixth generation, which will significantly boost the production of enriched uranium'. Enrichment can be used to produce uranium for reactor fuel or, at higher levels of refinement, for atomic bombs. Iran says its nuclear energy programme is only for peaceful purposes. Reiterating Iran's stance that it will not abandon the right to enrichment as an NPT member, a senior Iranian official told Reuters that rising Middle East tensions served to 'influence Tehran to change its position about its nuclear rights'. 'POTENTIAL ISRAELI STRIKE' The Iranian official said a 'friendly' country had alerted Tehran to a potential strike on its nuclear sites by arch-adversary Israel and reiterated that the Islamic Republic would not abandon its commitment to enrichment. 'We don't want tensions and prefer diplomacy to resolve the (nuclear) issue, but our armed forces are fully ready to respond to any military strike,' the official said. Iranian state media reported that Iran's military had begun drills earlier than planned to focus on 'enemy movements'. Israeli Strategic Affairs Minister Ron Dermer and Mossad head David Barnea will travel to Oman to meet U.S. Special Envoy Steve Witkoff ahead of the U.S.-Iranian talks in another bid to clarify Israel's position, Israeli media reported on Thursday. The decision by Trump to remove some personnel from the region comes at a brittle and highly sensitive juncture in the oil-producing Middle East, where security has already been destabilised by the Gaza war between Israel and Palestinian militant group Hamas that began in October 2023. Oil prices initially rose after Trump's announcement but later eased. Foreign energy companies were continuing their operations as usual, a senior Iraqi official overseeing operations in southern oilfields told Reuters on Thursday. The U.S. Embassy in Baghdad advised American citizens on Thursday against travelling to Iraq, Iran's western neighbour. Foreign energy firms continue to operate normally in Iraq, a senior Iraqi official told Reuters. Bahrain's state oil firm Bapco Energies is monitoring the situation in the region and its operations are unaffected, it said on Thursday, after dependents of U.S. military personnel were advised to leave the country because of regional tensions.
Daily Maverick
an hour ago
- Daily Maverick
Climate and development finance in a post-aid world — the case for country platforms
Country platforms, one of the most promising innovations in climate and development finance architecture, offer African countries the opportunity to take ownership of their climate and development futures – on their own terms. Anyone who has visited Cape Town may well have noticed the strange and mystifying sight of its unfinished, raised freeway. As you head towards the popular tourist destination at the Waterfront, one blunt end is clearly visible above you. Half a kilometre away, the other end hangs teasingly against the famous Table Mountain backdrop. These two ends, which were clearly badly askew and never going to meet – and hence the abandonment of the project – represent the perfect metaphor for international climate finance. The supply side lacks volume and the demand is too weak. They need a buckle to pull them together – and one that convinces asset managers and institutional investors throughout the world to pay attention to African investment opportunities. Talk of the town With the Trump administration slashing US Agency for International Development budgets and European nations shifting overseas development aid budgets to bolster defence spending, the world has entered a ' post-aid era '. But there is an opportunity to recast development finance as strategic investment: ' country platforms.' Country platforms are government-led, nationally owned mechanisms that bring together a country's climate priorities, investment needs and reform agenda, and align them with the interests of development partners, private investors and implementing agencies. They function as a strategic hub: convening actors, coordinating funding and curating pipelines of projects for investment. Think of them as the opposite of donor-driven fragmentation. Instead of dozens of disconnected projects driven by external priorities, a country platform enables governments to set the agenda and direct finance to where it is needed most. That could be renewable energy, climate-smart agriculture, resilient infrastructure or nature-based solutions. Country platforms are a current fad. They were the talk of the town at the 2025 Spring meetings of multilateral development banks in Washington, DC. Will they quickly fade as the next big new idea comes into view? Or can they escape the limitations and failings of the finance and development aid ecosystem? The Independent High Level Expert Group on Climate Finance, on which I serve, is striving to find new ways to ramp up finance – both public and private – in quality and quantity. I agree with those who argue that country platforms could be the innovation that unlocks the capital urgently needed to tackle climate overshoot and buttress economic development. The model is already being tested. More than 10 countries have launched their platforms, and more are in the pipeline. For African countries, the opportunity could not be more timely. African governments are racing to deliver their Nationally Determined Contributions. These are the commitments they've made to reduce their greenhouse gas emissions as part of climate change mitigation targets set out in the Paris Agreement. Implementing these plans is often being done under severe fiscal constraints. At the same time global capital is looking for investment opportunities. But it needs to be convinced that the rewards will outweigh the risks. Where it's being tested In Africa, South Africa's Just Energy Transition Partnership has demonstrated both the potential and the complexity of a country platform. Egypt and Senegal also have country platforms at different stages of implementation. Kenya and Nigeria are exploring similar mechanisms. The African Union's Climate Change and Resilient Development Strategy calls for country platforms across the continent. New entrants can learn from countries that started first. But country platforms come in different shapes and sizes according to the context. Another promising example is emerging through Mission 300, an initiative of the World Bank and African Development Bank, working with partners like the Rockefeller Foundation, Global Energy Alliance for People and Planet, and Sustainable Energy for All. It aims to connect 300 million people to clean electricity by 2030. Central to this initiative are Compact Delivery and Monitoring Units. These are essentially country platforms anchored in electrification. They reflect how a well-structured country platform can make an impact. Twelve African countries are already moving in this direction. All announced their Mission 300 compacts at the Africa Heads of State Summit in Tanzania. This growing cohort reflects a continental commitment to putting energy-driven country platforms at the heart of Africa's development architecture. Why now – and why Africa? A well-functioning country platform can help in a number of ways. First, it can give the political and economic leadership a clear goal. The platform can survive elections and show stability, certainty and transparency to the investment world. Second, national ownership and strategic alignment can reduce risk and build confidence. That would encourage investment. Third, it builds trust among development partners and investors through clear priorities, transparency and national ownership. Fourth, it moves beyond isolated pilot projects to system-level transformation – meaning structural change. The transition in one sector, energy for example, creates new value chains that create more, better and safer jobs. Country platforms put African governments in charge of their own economic development, not as passive recipients of climate finance. The country sets its investment priorities and then the match-making with international climate finance can begin. Making it work: what's needed Developing the data on which a country bases its investment and development plans, and blending those with the fiscal, climate and nature data, is complex. For this reason country platforms require investment in institutional capacity, cross-ministerial collaboration and strong coordination between finance ministries, environment agencies and economic planners. And especially, in leadership capability. African countries must take charge of this capacity and capability acceleration. Second, development partners can respond by providing money as well as supporting African leadership, aligning with national strategies, and being willing to co-design mechanisms that meet both investor expectations and local realities. Capacity is especially crucial given the scale of Africa's needs. According to the African Development Bank, Africa will require more than $200-billion annually by 2030 to meet its climate goals. Donor aid will provide only a fraction of this. It will require smart, coordinated investment and careful debt management. Country platforms provide the structure to govern the process. Seizing the opportunity Country platforms represent one of the most promising innovations in climate and development finance architecture. Properly designed and led, they offer African countries the opportunity to take ownership of their climate and development futures – on their own terms. Country platforms could be the 'buckle' that finally enables the supply and demand sides of climate finance to come together. It will require commitment, strategic and technical capability, and, above all, smart leadership. DM
