
New Orleans archbishop fires food bank leaders for refusing to fund abuse settlement
The archbishop of New Orleans' bankrupt Roman Catholic archdiocese on Thursday abruptly fired and replaced top leaders at a church-affiliated food bank, with those dismissed saying it was because the non-profit refused to contribute to paying survivors of child sexual abuse by clergymen.
The ousted members of Second Harvest's board of directors say the changes 'follow months of increasingly aggressive pressure placed on Second Harvest to contribute as much as $16m toward helping to resolve victims' claims related to the church's sexual abuse-related bankruptcy', which has been pending since May 2020.
Second Harvest is what's called an apostolate of New Orleans' archdiocese, meaning it is owned by the church. But Second Harvest also has a non-profit governing board. And its former chairperson, Bert Wilson, says the grants they get from Feeding America and other non-profits specifically say the money cannot be used for religious purposes.
Archbishop Gregory Aymond announced Thursday in a letter that Wilson and two other board members had been replaced. Meanwhile, Aymond also said Second Harvest's longtime president and chief executive officer Natalie Jayroe was out after 19 years at the anti-hunger organization.
Aymond sent a letter today to the Second Harvest board members announcing the dismissals, but it doesn't mention why he fired those affected. He does promise that the changes will not cause any interruption in services for feeding the hungry in southeast Louisiana.
Because Second Harvest is a 501(c)3 non-profit organization, donations it receives must be used for the organization's stated purpose, which is feeding the hungry. Several people who have been affiliated with Second Harvest tell Guardian reporting partner WWL Louisiana they are worried the archbishop's actions Thursday could jeopardize millions of dollars in funding for Second Harvest, including a recent $25m donation from the foundation run by novelist and billionaire philanthropist MacKenzie Scott.
What's more, James Adams, former chairperson of a committee advocating for the interests of abuse survivors in the church's bankruptcy case, said he and his fellow survivors argued that Second Harvest should not be among the church affiliates responsible for paying settlements to survivors because it didn't provide a point of access to children for clergy.
Adams added that – to his knowledge – no claims of abuse were attributed to Second Harvest.
The New Orleans archdiocese decided to file for bankruptcy in an attempt to dispense with more than 500 abuse claims against more than 300 of the church's priests and deacons, along with other personnel.
Revelations in the bankruptcy that were exposed by the Guardian and WWL Louisiana prompted retired priest Lawrence Hecker, 93, to plead guilty in December to child rape charges dating back to 1975, before he died days into serving a mandatory life sentence. The revelations also spurred a Louisiana state police investigation in which authorities alleged under oath that they have probable cause to suspect that the archdiocese ran a child sex-trafficking ring responsible for the 'widespread … abuse of minors dating back decades'. That abuse was 'covered up and not reported to authorities', state police have said.
The archdiocese and clergy abuse survivors remained hundreds of millions of dollars apart in settlement negotiations prior to Thursday's firings from Second Harvest. The judge overseeing the bankruptcy case, Meredith Grabill, recently appointed the third of three mediators whom she has tasked with trying to help resolve the matter.
The latest mediator appointed by Grabill is retired federal bankruptcy judge Christopher Sontchi, who oversaw the sale of the movie studio run by Harvey Weinstein in 2018 as disgraced media mogul grappled with allegation of serial sexual assault.
Ramon Antonio Vargas contributed reporting

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Metro
2 days ago
- Metro
Harvey Weinstein found guilty of sexual assault after bombshell retrial
Harvey Weinstein has been found guilty of one charge in his sex crimes retrial, after lengthy proceedings in New York. The disgraced film mogul was initially convicted of a criminal sexual act in the first degree and rape in the third degree, in February 2020. However, his 23-year sentence was overturned last year, sparking a three-week retrial in Manhattan. After a second round of hearings, the 73-year-old was convicted of sexually assaulting Miriam Haley. He was also acquitted of a second charge stemming from sexual assault accusations made by Kaja Sokola, with the jury struggling to reach a unanimous verdict on a third count involving Jessica Mann. According to the Guardian, Judge Curtis Farber encouraged them to continue deliberating in the hopes they can find a verdict. Deadline reports that each count of first-degree criminal sexual act carries a maximum sentence of 25 years. Weinstein's previous conviction for sex crimes in New York was overturned last April by the Court of Appeal, after it was ruled that he didn't receive a fair trial in 2020. In September, he was then indicted on new sexual assault charges – but has denied all accusations against him. Earlier today, Weinstein addressed Judge Farber to plead for a mistrial, but was quickly denied. 'This is my life that's on the line, this is not fair,' the former movie producer said. 'I'm not getting a fair trial.' Although the sentencing hearing has not yet taken place, the conviction will be in addition to a 16-year sentence he is yet to serve in LA. Weinstein has been at the center of rape or sexual misconduct allegations from more than 100 people, with some claims dating back to the 1970s. More Trending The allegations sparked the Me Too movement, which highlighted sexual violence in the film industry, as well as worldwide. He has been behind bars for the last few years, and filed a lawsuit against Rikers Island at the end of 2024, calling out the conditions and services at the prison facility after suffering a number of health problems. In documents obtained by Deadline, his legal team confirmed they were seeking 'no less than $5,000,000', and demanding 'monetary damages arising from negligence, carelessness, recklessness, gross negligence, medical malpractice, intentional and/or reckless and/or negligent deprivation of medical treatment, deprivation of civil and constitutional rights, and negligent and intentional torts' that he claimed have been 'committed by officers, agents, and employees of the New York City Department of Correction'. They also named New York City Health & Hospitals Corporation, Rikers Island Correctional Facility, and New York City Health & Hospitals Corporation/Bellevue.' Got a story? If you've got a celebrity story, video or pictures get in touch with the entertainment team by emailing us celebtips@ calling 020 3615 2145 or by visiting our Submit Stuff page – we'd love to hear from you. MORE: Beach Boys co-founder Brian Wilson dies aged 82 MORE: Brooke Shields podcast episode criticising Meghan Markle quietly removed from platforms MORE: Reality TV legend's husband 'deported from US after being detained for 4 months'


The Guardian
2 days ago
- The Guardian
Defenders of the Amazon: inside the 13 June Guardian Weekly
It's three years since the murders of the journalist Dom Phillips and the Indigenous activist Bruno Pereira, who were both killed on a visit to the remote Javari valley in the Brazilian Amazon. Dom was a Guardian contributor based in Brazil, whose reporting often appeared in the Guardian Weekly. Last week his widow, Alessandra Sampaio, came to visit our London offices along with Beto Marubo, an Indigenous leader from the Brazilian Amazon. From the other side of the world it's easy to feel far removed from the activities of criminal gangs that threaten the Amazon's Indigenous people and plunder its natural resources. But hearing Beto and Alessandra speak so powerfully about the impact of Dom and Bruno's work reminded me why we need to stay focused on a region that defies easy scrutiny. With that in mind, for this week's big story, Tom Phillips (no relation), our Latin America correspondent who worked closely with Dom and Bruno, made a perilous return to the Javari valley to learn how Indigenous defenders are continuing to try to protect their communities and environment. I'd also like to draw your attention to two other projects that continue Dom and Bruno's legacy. First is the Guardian's new audio podcast investigation series Missing in the Amazon, in which Tom for the first time tells the full story of what happened to Dom and Bruno. The second is the book Dom was working on at the time of his death, How to Save the Amazon, which has since been completed by a team including writers and editors at the Guardian. (In this extract, published in the Weekly last month, Dom explains why protecting the Amazon and its people is so important.) Reporting from the Amazon is a costly and dangerous business, but subscribing to the Guardian Weekly magazine is a great way to support our investigative journalism. For more details and to give the Weekly a try, click here. Get the Guardian Weekly delivered to your home address Spotlight | The story of a Gaza mother killed in search of foodA family is reeling from the killing of a woman who walked for hours to an Israeli-backed distribution point with her son and daughter. Malak A Tantesh and Emma Graham-Harrison report Science | How the 'evil twin' of the climate crisis is threatening our oceansIn seas around the world, pH levels are falling. Scientists fear the problem is not being taken seriously enough, as Lisa Bachelor finds at a seawater testing station Interview | Bernie Sanders on Biden, billionaires – and why the Democrats failedThe senator and former Democratic presidential hopeful talks to Zoe Williams about why he and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez are trying to build a new progressive movement Opinion | Want to live to 100? It's not just diet and exercise that will helpEvery time her mind goes down the 'optimisation' route, Devi Sridhar is reminded of her job as a public health scientist, looking into the factors that affect how long we will live Culture | CMAT: pop's gobbiest, gaudiest starThe Irish singer-songwriter is going supernova – and whether opining on trans rights, body shaming or capitalism, she's more forthright than ever, as Alexis Petridis found This evocative picture essay had everything to whet my appetite: decaying buildings beautifully photographed by Oscar Espinosa and a story about the aftermath of the fall of the Soviet Union that took me back to a 1990 trip along the Abkhazian Black Sea coast when the guide proudly named all the sanatoria visible from the boat and which Soviet workers they were designated for. Isobel Montgomery, deputy editor Streaming fraud is a growing concern, undermining fairness and transparency in the creative industry. Technology plays both sides — enabling fraud but also offering tools to fight it. As trust, safety and privacy become more critical in the industry, we must guide it in the right direction, because how we use technology ultimately defines what it becomes. Hyunmu Lee, CRM executive Audio | Inside Australia's mushroom murder trial Video | The Bone Hunter: unearthing the horror of war in Okinawa - documentary Gallery | Pigeons, hats and naps: the best photos from the French Open We'd love to hear your thoughts on the magazine: for submissions to our letters page, please email For anything else, it's Facebook Instagram Get the Guardian Weekly magazine delivered to your home address


BreakingNews.ie
2 days ago
- BreakingNews.ie
Diesel clothing advert banned for objectifying Katie Price
An ad for clothing brand Diesel featuring the model Katie Price was irresponsible and likely to cause serious offence by objectifying and sexualising women, a watchdog has ruled. The ad, which appeared on the Guardian news website on March 26th, included an image of Price wearing a bikini and holding a handbag in front of her chest. Advertisement The UK Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) received 13 complaints that the ad objectified and sexualised women and featured a model who appeared to be unhealthily thin. The banned Diesel ad featuring Katie Price (ASA/PA) Diesel said the ad was part of a brand campaign called 'The Houseguests', which was designed to challenge stereotypes and support diversity and inclusion in the fashion industry by reflecting a wide range of body types. It believed the ad was compliant with the advertising rules but said it removed the ad from the Guardian website. The brand said Price was 46 years old and had a body type that was not usually included in high fashion campaigns, explaining that the average age for editorial models was between 16 and 23. Advertisement Diesel believed the image was a 'celebration of Ms Price's sexuality and empowerment and was not objectifying, degrading or sexualising', and 'showed Ms Price clearly in control in an active and dynamic pose where she proudly showed off her body and the handbag'. Diesel added that Price was 'well-known for her exaggerated appearance and larger-than-life personality and her large lips and breasts formed part of her curated public image', and this 'exaggerated, eccentric and altered appearance' formed part of the creativity of the campaign. Finally, Diesel said although Price was slender, she had excellent muscle tone and was not unhealthily underweight. The Guardian said it received a complaint directly about the ad on April 4th and blocked it from appearing again because it did not consider it complied with their policies. Advertisement Partly upholding the complaints, the ASA said the bikini only partially covered Price's breasts, and it considered the positioning of the handbag, in front of her stomach with the handle framing her chest, drew viewers' attention to, and emphasised, that part of her body. The ASA said: 'While we acknowledged that Ms Price was shown in a confident and self-assured pose and in control, we considered that because of the positioning of the handbag, which had the effect of emphasising and drawing attention to her breasts, the ad sexualised her in a way that objectified her. 'We therefore considered the ad was likely to cause serious offence, was irresponsible and breached the Code.' The ASA did not uphold complaints about Price appearing to be unhealthily thin, and concluded that the ad was not irresponsible on that basis. Advertisement The watchdog ruled that the ad must not appear again, adding: 'We told Diesel to ensure their future ads were socially responsible and did not cause serious or widespread offence.' Diesel said: 'Diesel's latest Houseguests campaign continues its tradition of challenging norms and embracing individuality. A key image features model Katie Price, 46, showcasing a body type rarely seen in high fashion, proving that women of all shapes and ages deserve representation. The photo celebrates confidence and empowerment without objectification. 'Shared in over 100 countries, it has not received any regulatory complaints, highlighting Diesel's commitment to respectful, inclusive storytelling.'