logo
Europe's top tax breaks for the rich – see how countries compare

Europe's top tax breaks for the rich – see how countries compare

Euronews07-05-2025

ADVERTISEMENT
European governments are grappling with budget constraints. Weak growth, trade shocks, and ageing populations continue to hit state coffers — while countries are also scrambling to boost defence spending.
Against this backdrop, European nations are competing to attract and retain the wealthy, hungry for the investment and tax revenue they may bring.
Euronews Business explores the tax perks on offer, along with the pushbacks against them.
An
earlier version
of this article can be found here.
Italy
Italy is a popular destination with expats not only for its culture and climate, but also because of its tax perks.
On the face of it, the country has relatively high levies on personal and corporate income, although there are tax incentives available to foreigners.
One of the most well-known is its flat tax regime, which allows wealthy individuals to pay a fixed sum on all foreign-sourced income. This is regardless of the amount earned.
The annual fixed fee has recently been increased to €200,000, from the previous €100,000.
The advantage is available for up to 15 years, and it's also only open to those who have not been tax residents in Italy for at least 9 out of the last 10 years.
Given the cost of the flat tax, it's only interesting for very high-net-worth individuals.
"Italy is very popular," tax and immigration advisor David Lesperance told Euronews Business.
"When the flat tax was €100,000, one of my clients told me that's what he paid his accountant every year. You've got to remember that, with the lump sum tax, there are no compliance costs for tax planning."
Switzerland
Switzerland also has a type of lump-sum scheme (forfait fiscal), although the Swiss state claimed last year that fewer than 0.1% of its taxpayers were charged using this method.
The way it works is that, instead of collecting fees based on income or wealth, some Swiss regions calculate a rate based on an individual's expenses.
While the lump-sum scheme can be interesting for the super rich, the state has put in place a minimum tax base.
ADVERTISEMENT
This is the higher of two figures: either seven times your annual rent or the rental value of your primary property, or higher than CHF 429,100 (around €455,000) - as of 2024.
These thresholds apply at a federal level, although specific regions can increase the minimum sum.
You're eligible for the forfait fiscal if you have no Swiss citizenship, and if you are coming to live in the country for the first time - or after an absence of 10 or more years.
Beneficiaries are also forbidden from holding employment or running a business in Switzerland.
ADVERTISEMENT
This means the scheme is intended to lure a small number of rich expats who have passive income.
Portugal
Tax perks have become a polemic topic in Portugal due to the soaring cost of living, which has been partially stoked by the arrival of wealthy foreigners.
Even so, after scaling back benefits in 2023, the Portuguese government has now reintroduced tax breaks for expats (Non-Habitual Residence 2.0).
"Portugal had the NHR regime which allowed you to live in Portugal for up to 10 years and not pay much tax on foreign income," explained Gregory Goossens, a tax lawyer at Taxpatria.
ADVERTISEMENT
In particular, this attracted a large number of retirees, who decided to relocate to Portugal and pay no income tax on their foreign pension income.
For those who were generating income in Portugal, specific activities were taxed at a favourable rate of 20%.
Related
Average salaries across Europe: Which countries have the highest pay?
Personal income tax rates in Europe: Where do workers pay the highest and lowest taxes?
As well as upsetting locals, the NHR system prompted criticism from Nordic states, who were observing an exodus of their older citizens.
Finland and Sweden notably made formal requests to change their double tax treaty rules with Portugal.
ADVERTISEMENT
This would allow them to impose levies on the pensions of their migrating expats.
In response to pressure, Portugal has now altered its tax breaks to "focus on people with an education who can really contribute something to the Portuguese economy", explained Goossens.
Under the NHR 2.0 rules, highly qualified professionals can secure a 20% personal income tax rate for 10 consecutive years, along with tax reductions on certain sources of foreign income.
Foreign pensions are excluded from this exemption, meaning they are fully taxable under standard rates.
ADVERTISEMENT
Shell companies
Another way that rich individuals can enjoy low effective tax rates is through the use of shell companies, according to the EU Tax Observatory.
The body notes that these firms are "in a grey zone between avoidance and evasion" in the sense that they are designed to avoid income tax.
Individuals sheltering assets in this way decide to place their wealth in the name of a company they control, instead of classing it as personal income. A key feature of a shell company is that it has no active business operations.
Withdrawals from the company are taxed at normal rates, although the taxpayer can harbour the excess in the holding firm.
ADVERTISEMENT
Setting up such a structure is particularly profitable in countries where the rate of corporation tax is low.
Interesting countries are therefore Ireland (12.5%), Hungary (9%), Bulgaria (10%) and Cyprus (12.5%).
While the OECD has been working with member states to introduce a global minimum corporate tax rate of 15%, this only applies to firms earning more than €750 million.
More than 140 countries have signed up to the deal, but implementation is still a work in progress.
ADVERTISEMENT
A tax haven for one isn't paradise for all
Tax planning cannot simply revolve around one or two types of rate, but rather a whole host of factors must be considered, experts told Euronews.
Fees to keep in mind include taxes on personal and corporate income, capital gains, inheritance, and wealth - as well as social security charges.
In addition to the locations listed above, countries such as Malta and Monaco can all be considered fiscally advantageous, but it all depends on the nature of someone's income.
In some cases, this means even famously high-tax areas such as Belgium can be called havens.
ADVERTISEMENT
As the OECD continues efforts to raise corporation tax, it is yet to be seen whether this will encourage conversations around other rates and diminish tax perks.
"Nations would not provide tax breaks or specialist visas to the wealthy unless they resulted in a greater overall benefit to the state than the cost," argued Jason Porter, business development director at Blevins Franks Financial Management.
"You could say whatever tax they collect will be greater than they would have without the encouragement, as the individuals concerned are unlikely to have moved there otherwise."
"It is also important to realise what the total benefit might entail, including the property market, spending in local businesses and the potential for entrepreneurial investment locally."
ADVERTISEMENT
The trade-offs of wooing wealthy foreigners is a question that continues to dominate political debates, with the push and pull set to continue.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Brussels, my love? Poles choose 'ordinary man' for President
Brussels, my love? Poles choose 'ordinary man' for President

Euronews

timean hour ago

  • Euronews

Brussels, my love? Poles choose 'ordinary man' for President

This week we are joined by Mika Aaltola, a Finnish MEP representing the centre-right European People's Party, Dorota Bawolek, a seasoned EU correspondent for Polish broadcaster TVP and Ian Lesser, Vice President of the German Marshall Fund, the transatlantic think tank. US President Donald Trump's renewed trade offensive has left Brussels rather stressed with sweeping tariffs hitting European steel, aluminium, and car exports — and threats of more to come. European Trade Commissioner Maroš Šefčovič is trying to defuse the crisis, warning that retaliatory EU measures could kick in as early as July 14. MEP Mika Aaltola blasted the US approach as 'unfair treatment'. The OECD also warned this week that Trump's tariffs are dragging global growth to its weakest levels since the COVID-19 pandemic. In a very tight presidential race, Poland elected conservative Karol Nawrocki, a nationalist and eurosceptic, narrowly defeating pro-EU candidate and Warsaw mayor Rafał Trzaskowski. The result marks a blow for Prime Minister Donald Tusk who has called for a vote of confidence in his government early next week. Nawrocki's rhetoric — emphasizing national sovereignty, anti-migrant policies, and a rejection of 'Brussels diktats' — has alarmed Europhiles. However, his nationalist platform resonated with a rather divided electorate. "He's not very presidential", Dorota Bawolek told the panel adding that history shows Poles prefer an 'ordinary guy'. Finally, the panel discuss the Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez' diplomatic setback after the EU Council rejected his proposal to make Catalan, Basque, and Galician official EU languages. The move, promised to Catalan separatists in exchange for political support, was rejected by member states over fears of a domino effect involving other regional languages. Watch the full episode in the player above. Italians will begin voting on Sunday in a referendum on whether to relax citizenship laws, but there are fears that turnout will be so low that it will invalidate the result. The two-day referendum, ending on Monday, will also ask voters if they agree with reversing a decade-old liberalisation of the labour market. The labour market questions aim to make it more difficult to dismiss some employees and increase compensation for workers who are made redundant by small businesses, reversing a law passed by a Democratic Party (PD) government around a decade ago. But it's the question about citizenship which has attracted the most attention among Italian voters. Concerns about the scale of immigration helped push Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni's far-right Brothers of Italy party to power in 2022. Italians will be asked if they support the idea of reducing the period of residence required to apply for Italian citizenship from 10 years to five. Organisers of the referendum say that, if passed, it could affect around 2.5 million foreign nationals in Italy. Italy's birth rate is in steep decline, and economists say the country needs more foreigners to boost its stagnant economy. For foreigners in Italy, the primary channel to citizenship is through naturalisation, which can occur after 10 years of continuous residence in the country. The applicant must also demonstrate that they have integrated into society, possess a minimum income, have a clean criminal record, and can speak Italian adequately. The residence prerequisite is considerably shorter for citizens of other EU member states, who have to wait just four years to apply. Riccardo Magi, secretary of the liberal Più Europa party, supports decreasing the length of time required to apply for citizenship. He calls the current rules "old and unjust" and says they have only been in force for so long because successive governments have lacked the political will for change. Magi thinks the referendum proposal is reasonable because it only reduces the residence time requirement while leaving the other requirements unchanged. He says the current law "forces hundreds of thousands of girls and boys born or raised in Italy to live as foreigners in what is also their country." Magi also believes the amendment would have indirect positive effects on many of these minors born or resident in Italy, to whom citizenship would be passed on by at least one New Italian parent. "Those are who are rooted, work, pay taxes, study... must be able to vote and participate in public votes. This is the liberal idea of citizenship," he said. But the Noi Moderati party has said its position on the referendum is a resounding no, the centrist party's vice-president Maria Chiara Fazio told Euronews. "Citizenship is the deepest link between the state and the individual," Fazio stressed. "It cannot be the subject of a referendum simplification: it is a topic that requires in-depth study, mutual listening and a serious parliamentary debate." Fazio defended the structure of the current law, but acknowledged some bureaucratic aspects need to be tightened up as they leave many candidates in limbo. But the Noi Moderati's position on the referendum is not unusual. The leaders of two of the coalition parties, Antonio Tajani of Forza Italia and Matteo Salvini of Lega or the League, have both said they will not vote on Sunday. Meloni will attend a polling station but will also not cast a ballot. That indifference to the referendum appears to have trickled down to regular voters too. A Demopolis institute poll carried out in May estimated turnout to be between 31% and 39%, well short of the threshold required to make the result binding.

Rare earths: China's magnet war threatens global industry
Rare earths: China's magnet war threatens global industry

LeMonde

time3 hours ago

  • LeMonde

Rare earths: China's magnet war threatens global industry

The problem took a few weeks to show up on production lines. In early April, China imposed restrictions on the export of certain strategic metals – specifically, heavy rare earths and the magnets made from them. This has created a bottleneck for many industries worldwide that depend on these materials. The automotive sector has already begun to feel the impact. Japanese automaker Suzuki was forced to suspend production of its Swift model on May 26 due to a shortage of certain components – rare earth derivatives, according to the business daily Nikkei. At the end of May, Ford halted production of its Explorer SUV for a week after a supplier ran out of magnets made from rare earth alloys. Meanwhile, one of India's leading manufacturers, Bajaj, stated that if nothing changes, the shortage caused by China would "heavily impact" its production of electric vehicles in July. On Wednesday, June 4, the European automotive industry also revealed its exposure to this risk. Without citing specific cases, the European Association of Automotive Suppliers, Clepa, stated that "these restrictions have led to the closure of several production lines and factories in Europe, and the impact will continue to grow in the coming weeks as stocks are depleted." BMW confirmed that some of its suppliers had been affected. "We have shifted to crisis management," said Sylvain Broux, president of the Comité de liaison des industries fournisseurs de l'automobile (CLIFA) in France, while Jean-Louis Pech, president of the Fédération des industries des équipements pour véhicules, described an "economic war in which Europe also has arguments to put forward."

EU states look to trim compensation for flight delays
EU states look to trim compensation for flight delays

France 24

time16 hours ago

  • France 24

EU states look to trim compensation for flight delays

At present, passengers in Europe have a right to between 250 and 600 euros ($285-685) in compensation, depending on flight distance, for delays of three hours or more. But airlines complain that leaves them a hefty bill, and often leads them to cancel flights rather than run them with a long delay, due to knock-on effects on flight schedules. A majority of EU states agreed late Thursday to change the rules, overcoming opposition from Germany in particular, following hours of painstaking negotiations in Luxembourg. Under the new system, the compensation threshold would increase to four hours for flights of up to 3,500 kilometres (2,175 miles), or connecting cities inside the European Union, with its amount set at 300 euros. For longer flights, the right to compensation of 500 euros would kick in after a six-hour delay. The European Consumer Organisation BEUC slammed the plan, saying the "new eligibility thresholds will deprive the majority of passengers from their compensation rights", as most delays are between two and four hours. It urged European lawmakers -- who have yet to approve the text -- to uphold passengers' rights. The compromise did not satisfy airlines either, with the umbrella group Airlines for Europe (A4E) -- which includes Air France-KLM, Lufthansa, Ryanair and easyJet -- complaining that it "introduced even more complexity" than the initial European Commission plan. But a spokesperson for the French aviation industry federation called it a "step forward" for consumers. The rules changes "clarify the law and will avoid many recurrent court disputes," said the spokesperson, Laurent Timset. Poland's infrastructure minister Dariusz Klimczak, whose country currently holds the EU presidency, meanwhile cheered the creation of "over 30 new rights" for passengers, in a statement announcing the deal. Those include a "right to be rerouted" at the earliest opportunity, including through flights operated by other carriers or alternative transport modes. The plan also creates a system for passengers to be automatically compensated for flights cancelled within 14 days of departure. And it spells out the right to assistance -- refreshments, food, accommodation -- when travel is disrupted. France's transport minister Philippe Tabarot declared himself satisfied with the compromise.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store