Kids 'may end up with smaller brains' after spending time in front of TVs
Youngsters glued to TV screens could end up with smaller brains and lower intelligence, scientists say. Parents are being warned to limit children's screen time after a study found children who watched television and used smartphones, tablets and computers, had lower IQs.
While children who exercised in their spare time were likely to be more intelligent and had a larger brain volume, according to the research.
'Although certain digital activities (educational games) may yield cognitive benefits, overall evidence indicates that excessive passive and multitasking screen behaviours undermine cognitive development,' the study in the journal Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, said.
The study used databases from across Europe that contained information from thousands of children on IQ, screen use and physical exercise.
They analysed the data to find the link between leisure time habits, intelligence and intracranial volume (ICV) - a marker for brain size. Larger ICV has been linked to superior intelligence.
Children's screen time use has rocketed in recent years with the average amount of time British children aged five to 15 spend on screens rising from nine hours a week in 2009 to 15 hours a week in 2018.
According to the World Health Organization, children need to sit less and play more. They believe there should be no screen time for children under one year of age.
For those aged two years, screen time should be no more than one hour a day and 'less is better'. The researchers looking at the IQ link, who are based in China, said their results provide further evidence that excessive screen time has a lifelong impact on children's brain development.
'These findings highlight the critical need to manage and regulate children's media use while also promoting increased physical activity,' they wrote in the journal Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience.
While there can be benefits, including building friendships and improving learning, negative effects include online bullying, exposure to violence and pornography, lower levels of physical activity and eye strain.
Sir Cary Cooper, a psychology professor at the University of Manchester, told the Mail on Sunday: "Children are using these devices and they are not learning social and non-verbal skills that we pick up from interacting, face-to-face, with other people."
The NHS suggests no screen time, except for video calling caregivers and family for babies, while they say there should be a limit of one hour a day for those aged two to five.
For school children aged six to 12 years they say up to two hours of screen time per day and for teenagers aged 13 plus, no more than two hours per day.
The NHS advice is: 'Limit the amount of time your child spends on inactive pastimes such as watching television, playing video games and playing on electronic devices.
'There's no hard and fast advice on how much is too much, but experts say children should have no more than 2 hours of screen time each day.
'And remove all screens (including mobile phones) from their bedroom at night.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scottish Sun
2 hours ago
- Scottish Sun
I'm A Celeb winner admits using fat jab Mounjaro in candid interview – before issuing warning to other users
Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) ACTOR Christopher Biggins has revealed he is using weight loss jab Mounjaro after having surgery on his knee. The panto star, 76, said: "I'm on Mounjaro… and I think it's good. Sign up for the Entertainment newsletter Sign up 1 Christopher Biggins has revealed he is using weight loss jab Mounjaro after having surgery on his knee Credit: Getty "I mean, I had a new knee put in, and I needed to lose weight because of the pressure on the knee." Biggins also claimed that "they're now finding out that this drug can cure a lot of other things" and added that "we don't know the side effects" of it yet. Weight loss jabs have been hailed as transformative by health leaders. The phased NHS roll-out of Mounjaro to patients in England started in June for people with a body mass index (BMI) over 40 and at least four co-morbidities. Over the next three years, about 240,000 patients are expected to be eligible for the treatment. A number of celebrities have used medication, such as Ozempic, in a bid to control their weight, including former X Factor judge Sharon Osbourne. Wegovy and Ozempic are semaglutide drugs, while Mounjaro is another weight loss treatment called tirzepatide. Chef Heston Blumenthal recently warned that weight loss drugs will have a negative effect on the food industry.
The Guardian
2 hours ago
- The Guardian
The Guardian view on Britain's AI strategy: the risk is that it is dependency dressed up in digital hype
There was a time when Britain aspired to be a leader in technology. These days, it seems content to be a willing supplicant – handing over its data, infrastructure and public services to US tech giants in exchange for the promise of a few percentage points of efficiency gains. Worryingly, the artificial intelligence strategy of Sir Keir Starmer's government appears long on rhetoric, short on sovereignty and built on techno-utopian assumptions. Last week Peter Kyle, the technology secretary, was promoting the use of AI-generated discharge letters in the NHS. The tech, he said, will process complex conversations between doctors and patients, slashing paperwork and streamlining services. Ministers say that by applying AI across the public sector, the government can save £45bn. But step back and a more familiar pattern emerges. As Cecilia Rikap, a researcher at University College London, told the Politics Theory Other podcast, Britain risks becoming a satellite of the US tech industry – a nation whose public infrastructure serves primarily as a testing ground and data source for American AI models hosted on US-owned cloud computing networks. She warned that the UK should not become a site of 'extractivism', in which value – whether in the form of knowledge, labour or electricity – is supplied by Britain but monetised in the US. It's not just that the UK lacks a domestic cloud ecosystem. It's that the government's strategy does nothing to build one. The concern is that public data, much of it drawn from the NHS and local authorities, will be shovelled into models built and trained abroad. The value captured from that data – whether in the form of model refinement or product development – will accrue not to the British public, but to US shareholders. Even the promise of job creation appears shaky. Datacentres, the physical backbone of AI, are capital-intensive, energy-hungry, and each one employs only about 50 people. Meanwhile, Daron Acemoglu, the MIT economist and Nobel laureate, offers a still more sobering view: far from ushering in a golden age of labour augmentation, today's AI rollout is geared almost entirely toward labour displacement. Prof Acemoglu sees a fork: AI can empower workers – or replace them. Right now, it is doing the latter. Ministerial pledges of productivity gains may just mean fewer jobs – not better services. The deeper problem is one of imagination. A government serious about digital sovereignty might build a public cloud, fund open-source AI models and create institutions capable of steering technological development toward social ends. Instead, we are offered efficiency-by-outsourcing – an AI strategy where Britain provides the inputs and America reaps the returns. In a 2024 paper, Prof Acemoglu challenged Goldman Sachs' 10-year forecast that AI would lead to global growth of 7% – about $7tn – and estimated instead under $1tn in gains. Much of this would be captured by US big tech. There's nothing wrong with harnessing new technologies. But their deployment must not be structured in a way that entrenches dependency and hollows out public capacity. The Online Safety Act shows digital sovereignty can enforce national rules on global platforms, notably on porn sites. But current turmoil at the Alan Turing Institute suggests a deeper truth: the UK government is dazzled by American AI and has no clear plan of its own. Britain risks becoming not a tech pioneer, but a well-governed client state in someone else's digital empire. Do you have an opinion on the issues raised in this article? If you would like to submit a response of up to 300 words by email to be considered for publication in our letters section, please click here.
The Independent
2 hours ago
- The Independent
Nurse needed for UK's most remote inhabited island with just 50 residents
The most remote inhabited island of the UK is searching for a new nurse – the only medical expert there. The current nurse on Fair Isle, which has around 50 residents, is leaving later this month, and NHS Shetland is advertising for a replacement. 'A high degree of personal resilience is required to undertake this remote island post,' the advert warns. Fair Isle, which is halfway between the Shetland mainland and Orkney, is only three miles long and a mile-and-a-half wide, with just one shop but no pubs. Owned by the National Trust for Scotland, Fair Isle is known for its 'amazing resident and migratory birdlife, dramatic landscapes and equally dramatic weather, as well as world-famous knitwear'. A two-bedroom traditional stone-build house is available for the new nurse to rent, and ferries and planes to and from the mainland are both weather-dependent, the job advert says. Four years ago, Fair Isle advertised for a headteacher for its primary school, which had just three pupils. The full-time post has a salary range of £41,608 - £50,702, with a 'distant island allowance' of £2,482. A relocation assistance of up to £8,000 is also available, the advert shows. The successful candidate will be responsible for the entire population, from newborns to people up to the age of 90, and may have to provide some personal care as there is no island-based social care provision. NHS Shetland describes the role as a 'unique opportunity to become a truly integral part of a forward-thinking, determined, resilient and hardworking remote island community'. The Sumburgh Coastguard helicopter serves as the island's ambulance, but the nurse is the only medical professional on Fair Isle. Clinical support and supervision is available from the community nursing team and GPs at Levenwick on the mainland. Applications are open until the end of the month. One island resident, Eileen Thomson, told the BBC's Good Morning Scotland: 'I think it could be the most amazing opportunity for the right kind of person. 'It's always a bit of a concern not having somebody here as we're the remotest inhabited island in the country,' she said. "We're lucky we've had some amazing nurses over the last few years, we always love to welcome new people into the community.' She said island life did not suit everyone. 'We're in the far north, the weather isn't that great in the winter, transport isn't that easy, and you do have to be a really confident clinician. You are the person looking after everything, you are the man on the ground, so to speak. 'For someone who's experienced, for someone who is looking for a challenge - but a wonderful challenge - I think it could really be the perfect role.' Fair Isle has more puffins than people, although numbers of the black-and-white birds have fallen. The latest estimate was between 10,000 and 20,000.
