logo
Tapirs top roadkill list in Malaysia

Tapirs top roadkill list in Malaysia

Straits Times20-05-2025
According to the Wild life and National Parks Department of Malaysia, 112 Malayan tapirs were struck down by vehicles between 2020 and 2024. PHOTO: THE STAR/ASIA NEWS NETWORK
PETALING JAYA - The Malayan tapir tops the list of large mammals most frequently killed in road accidents in Malaysia .
According to the Wildlife and National Parks Department (Perhilitan), 112 Malayan tapirs were struck down by vehicles from 2020 to 2024.
Sun bears and black panthers were second with nine deaths each.
They are followed by Asian elephants (six deaths) and Malayan tigers (four deaths).
Each of the five types of large mammals - the Malayan tapir, sun bear, lack panther, Asian elephant and Malayan tiger - is considered an endangered species in Malaysia.
'Many of these incidents are linked to recent deforestation or land-use change that leads to habitat fragmentation.
'The reduction in habitat size compels wildlife to encroach into adjacent human-modified landscapes.
'This fragmentation forces wildlife to cross roads to reach other patches to access essential resources such as food, water, shelter, and mating opportunities,' the department told The Star.
An incident on Mothers' Day, where a mother elephant was seen grieving by her fatally injured calf in the Malaysian state of Perak , along the Gerik-Jeli Highway, touched many people.
It led to growing calls to better protect the country's wildlife.
In April, Natural Resources and Environmental Sustainability Minister Nik Nazmi Nik Ahmad said that only around 700 to 800 Malayan tapirs remain in their natural habitats.
Perhilitan said 2,336 wild animals were killed by vehicles nationwide from 2020 to 2024, with 522 wildlife roadkill incidents recorded in 2024 .
The department said that in terms of species, the most affected by roadkill incidents over the five year-period are monitor lizards, with 548 struck down.
Second were macaques (487), followed by wild boar (329), civet species (326), and cat species (118).
Perhilitan said ecological factors also contribute to wildlife crossing roads.
'Wildlife may cross roads to escape areas with high human activity, noise, or pollution.
'The presence of roads may alter their behaviour, leading them to seek new, less disturbed habitats even if they have to risk their lives crossing busy roads.'
While there is no consistent pattern of roadkill incidents across specific months or wildlife breeding seasons, the time of day does play a significant role.
Most wildlife-vehicle collisions occur at night or in areas with poor visibility, such as sharp bends or winding roads, the department said.
This is attributed to the nocturnal behaviour of most wildlife, making them less visible and more challenging for motorists to detect during night-time driving conditions.
'These incidents are largely preventable,' the department said.
It urged drivers to adhere strictly to speed limits, especially when passing through known wildlife hotspots.
Slower speeds can significantly reduce collision risk and give motorists more reaction time when animals suddenly appear on the road.
Perhilitan said it has implemented measures to reduce wildlife roadkill incidents.
They include installing wildlife crossing warning signs, solar-powered amber lights, and transverse bars on roads to slow vehicles.
The department rescues and relocates wildlife to more suitable habitats and has built wildlife crossing viaducts in selected locations in collaboration with the Public Works Department. THE STAR/ASIA NEWS NETWORK
Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Jail for man who scammed at least 5 people over illegal cross-border taxi services
Jail for man who scammed at least 5 people over illegal cross-border taxi services

Straits Times

time8 hours ago

  • Straits Times

Jail for man who scammed at least 5 people over illegal cross-border taxi services

Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox Pretending he would provide them with cross-border transport services, Tan Wei Yap took deposits from potential customers, then cut off contact. SINGAPORE – A driver who provided illegal cross-border taxi services between Singapore and Malaysia decided to flout the law further by cheating his customers. Pretending he would provide them with such transport services, Tan Wei Yap took deposits from them, then cut off contact. On Aug 13, the 32-year-old Malaysian was sentenced to seven months' jail after he pleaded guilty to three cheating charges. Five similar charges were taken into consideration for his sentencing. The court heard that Tan, also known as 'Sky', was a driver at a Malaysian company providing illegal cross-border taxi services across the Causeway. He earned about RM1,000 (S$305) to RM5,000 monthly, but turned to cheating customers when he experienced financial difficulties. Over about nine months from April 16, 2024, to Jan 8, 2025, Tan scammed at least five victims of about $1,862. He monitored social media platforms for cross-border taxi services requests and privately messaged potential victims. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore NEL, SPLRT disruption: Electricity surge shut down backup power switchboard, says LTA Singapore HSA seeks Kpod investigators to arrest abusers, conduct anti-trafficking ops Opinion The 30s are heavy: Understanding suicide in Singapore's young adults Singapore Lawyer who sent misleading letters to 22 doctors fails in bid to quash $18,000 penalty Singapore 4 taken to hospital after accident near Sports Hub, including 2 rescued with hydraulic tools Asia Malaysia's anti-graft agency busts arms smuggling ring masterminded by senior military officers Singapore SG60: Many hands behind Singapore's success story To appear credible, he told them he was from a firm named 'Sky Ye Transport' and collected deposits from them. Once the victims had made the deposits, he confirmed the bookings and sent them photos of a vehicle and an individual, who was actually his former boss. On the scheduled pickup day, Tan did not appear and became uncontactable when the victims sent him messages. One of the victims was recommended to Tan's company by a colleague when she was planning a trip to Cameron Highlands with her friends and family. When she decided to engage Tan's services, he told her to pay a deposit of RM2,500 and said that another RM2,500 would be payable after the trips were completed. But after she paid the initial deposit, he kept asking her to transfer more money, ostensibly to purchase 'mandatory travel insurance'. The victim refused and asked him for receipts, upon which Tan added his 'secretary' to a group chat with the victim. Investigations revealed later that this second mobile number belonged to Tan. Sensing something was amiss, the victim asked him to refund the deposit. But Tan assured her that his company was licensed and that she had to pay a 30 per cent penalty if she insisted on a refund. The victim later said she would report the matter to the police, prompting Tan and his 'secretary' to leave the group chat. Following a police report lodged by another victim on Jan 23, Tan was placed on an immigration stop list. He was stopped on Jan 30 when he tried to enter Singapore via Woodlands Checkpoint by car at about 8am. The Immigration and Checkpoints Authority (ICA) alerted the police, and told Tan to report to a police investigation officer (IO) the next day. They also informed him that he was not allowed to leave Singapore until he did so, which Tan acknowledged. However, he tried to leave Singapore for Johor Bahru at 8.20pm on the same day and was stopped again. Deputy Public Prosecutor Colin Ng said: 'The accused claimed that he wanted to return to (Johor Bahru) for a meal before reporting to the IO in Singapore the next day.' Tan was arrested on Jan 31 and charged in court the next day. He did not make any restitution to the victims. Asking for Tan to be jailed for between 26 and 30 weeks, DPP Ng highlighted the premeditation and planning behind his offences. The authorities have lately been clamping down on illegal cross-border passenger transport services, with 19 drivers caught in a combined operation on Aug 5 by ICA and the Land Transport Authority (LTA). According to LTA, 136 drivers have been caught providing such services since 2022, and their foreign-registered vehicles were impounded. Those who have been charged and convicted so far have been fined up to $2,600 and had the vehicles forfeited.

Malaysia's top court allows jailed ex-PM Najib to pursue legal bid for house arrest
Malaysia's top court allows jailed ex-PM Najib to pursue legal bid for house arrest

Straits Times

time10 hours ago

  • Straits Times

Malaysia's top court allows jailed ex-PM Najib to pursue legal bid for house arrest

Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox A supporter of former Malaysian prime minister Najib Razak outside the Federal Court in Putrajaya, on Aug 13. KUALA LUMPUR - Jailed former Malaysian prime minister Najib Razak won a major court battle on Aug 13 that took him a step closer to being able to serve out at home a years-long jail term over the multibillion-dollar 1MDB scandal. Najib, imprisoned since August 2022 in one of several cases related to state investor 1Malaysia Development Berhad, has been seeking a judicial review to compel the authorities to confirm the existence of and execute a royal order issued by the former king, Sultan Abdullah Ahmad Shah, entitling him to serve the remainder of his jail sentence under house arrest. In a unanimous decision, the Federal Court, Malaysia's top tribunal, said on Aug 13 it accepted that there was a royal document related to granting house arrest for Najib but it was not in a position to determine its authenticity. Najib has said that an addendum order accompanied a pardon by Sultan Abdullah in January 2024 halved his sentence from 12 years to six. The case has stirred intrigue in Malaysia, with multiple government authorities, including members of the pardons board, for months denying knowledge of the royal document despite the former king's office confirming it had been issued. The Federal Court's three-member panel said that while it accepted the order's existence, it could not determine whether it was truly issued as part of the pardon. The court declined a request by Najib's lawyer to hear further arguments, referring the case back to a lower tribunal. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Business Singapore banks face headwinds in rest of 2025, but DBS is pulling ahead: Analysts Singapore Yishun man admits to making etomidate-laced pods for vaporisers; first Kpod case conviction Singapore HSA seeks Kpod investigators to arrest abusers, conduct anti-trafficking ops Asia Malaysia's anti-graft agency busts arms smuggling ring masterminded by senior military officers Asia Mixed reactions among Malaysia drivers on S'pore move to clamp down on illegal ride-hailing services Singapore Allianz insures Singapore's first fully driverless bus amid challenges posed by autonomous vehicles Business Singapore life insurance sales surges in first half, led by boost in investment-linked plans Singapore SG60: Many hands behind Singapore's success story 'We remit the case to the High Court for the hearing of the substantive judicial review proceedings before a new judge,' said Federal Court judge Zabariah Mohd Yusof. Najib was found guilty in 2020 of criminal breach of trust and abuse of power for illegally receiving funds misappropriated from a unit of 1MDB. Although some 1MDB-linked charges against him have been dropped, he is still awaiting a verdict in the biggest trial he faces over the scandal, with the court expected to hear closing arguments in October. Najib has denied all the charges brought against him. Addendum's existence undisputed The Aug 13 decision is expected to boost calls by Najib's party Umno for him to be granted house arrest. Umno campaigned against current Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim, but joined Datuk Seri Anwar's coalition in government following a 2022 election that resulted in a hung Parliament. More than 100 people gathered outside the court complex on Aug 13 to support Najib, who lost the 2018 General Election amid public anger over 1MDB. Najib initiated his judicial review in April 2024. The bid was initially dismissed by the Kuala Lumpur High Court, but was overturned on appeal in January, after Najib's lawyers produced a letter from the former king's palace saying there was an addendum. The Attorney-General's office appealed against the decision questioning the document's admissibility. A lawyer acting on behalf of the Attorney-General told the court in July that he did not dispute the document's existence, but was challenging the way in which it was being submitted as evidence. The Federal Court said the concession by the Attorney-General that the order existed had a significant impact on its decision on Aug 13. 'As of now, the addendum order exists and its status vis-a-vis its validity or whether it is true needs to be ascertained at a substantive hearing,' Judge Zabariah said. The court fixed Aug 18 for the case to be heard at the High Court. REUTERS

Malaysia's top court allows jailed ex-PM Najib to pursue legal bid for house arrest
Malaysia's top court allows jailed ex-PM Najib to pursue legal bid for house arrest

Business Times

time11 hours ago

  • Business Times

Malaysia's top court allows jailed ex-PM Najib to pursue legal bid for house arrest

[KUALA LUMPUR] Jailed former Malaysian Prime Minister Najib Razak won a major court battle on Wednesday (Aug 13) that took him a step closer to being able to serve out a years-long jail term over the multi-billion dollar 1MDB scandal at home. Najib, imprisoned since August 2022 in one of several cases related to 1MDB, has been seeking a judicial review to compel authorities to confirm the existence of and execute a royal order issued by former King Al-Sultan Abdullah entitling him to serve the remainder of his jail sentence under house arrest. In a unanimous decision, the Federal Court, Malaysia's top tribunal, said on Wednesday it accepted that there was a royal document related to granting house arrest for Najib but it was not in a position to determine its authenticity. Najib has said an addendum order accompanied a pardon by Al-Sultan Abdullah in January last year that halved his sentence from 12 years to six. The case has stirred intrigue in Malaysia, with multiple government authorities, including members of the pardons board, for months denying knowledge of the document despite the former king's office saying an addendum had been issued. The Federal Court's three-member panel said while it accepted the order's existence, it could not determine whether it was truly issued as part of the pardon. A NEWSLETTER FOR YOU Friday, 8.30 am Asean Business Business insights centering on South-east Asia's fast-growing economies. Sign Up Sign Up The court declined a request by Najib's lawyer to hear further arguments, referring the case back to a lower tribunal. 'We remit the case to the High Court for the hearing of the substantive judicial review proceedings before a new judge,' said Federal Court judge Zabariah Mohd Yusof. Najib was found guilty in 2020 of criminal breach of trust and abuse of power for illegally receiving funds misappropriated from a unit of state investor 1Malaysia Development Berhad (1MDB). Although some 1MDB-linked charges against him have been dropped, Najib is still awaiting a verdict in the biggest trial he faces over the scandal, with the court expected to hear closing arguments in October. He has denied all the charges against him. Wednesday's decision is expected to boost calls by Najib's party, the United Malays National Organisation (Umno), for him to be granted house arrest. Umno campaigned against current Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim, but joined Anwar's coalition in government following a 2022 election that resulted in a hung parliament. More than 100 people gathered outside the court complex on Wednesday to support Najib, who lost the 2018 election amid public anger over 1MDB. Najib initiated his judicial review in April last year. The bid was initially dismissed by the Kuala Lumpur High Court, but was overturned on appeal in January, after Najib's lawyers produced a letter from the former king's palace saying there was an addendum. The attorney-general's office appealed the decision questioning the document's admissibility. A lawyer acting on behalf of the attorney-general told the court in July he did not dispute the document's existence, but was challenging the way in which it was being submitted as evidence. The Federal Court said the concession by the attorney-general that the order existed had a significant impact on its decision on Wednesday. 'As of now, the addendum order exists and its status vis-a-vis its validity or whether it is true needs to be ascertained at a substantive hearing,' judge Zabariah said. The court fixed August 18 for the case to be heard at the High Court. REUTERS

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store