For some voters in smaller Manitoba cities, housing is a top election priority
Social Sharing
Although housing is often seen as a big-city problem, some voters in smaller Manitoba cities say housing is their focus in this federal election — from affordability to the types of homes the next government should prioritize.
Jaired Heinrichs is hoping to buy his first home, budgeting monthly to save for a down payment.
He and his wife of nearly two years recently moved into a new but "small" apartment in Winkler, a rapidly growing city in the southern Manitoba riding of Portage-Lisgar. It had a population of nearly 14,000 in 2021, according to Statistics Canada.
At his kitchen table, Heinrichs pencils in dollar figures for gas, groceries, rent and more on a spreadsheet. After essentials, he says he barely has anything left over.
"When rent is as much, or if not more, than a mortgage payment, [it] makes it very hard for a young couple like me and my wife, Laura, to save up" for a house, Heinrichs said last week.
The 25-year-old construction worker and welder acknowledges he's made mistakes when it comes to his finances but says he's frustrated about being priced out of today's housing market.
He aims to continue training to become a certified heavy-duty diesel mechanic, but he's also looking to the next federal government to help make first-time homeownership more achievable — and help put his dreams of owning an acreage and a home like his parents within reach.
"That way it gives young Canadians like myself and my wife a chance to get forward in life," he said.
"I feel like I'm really spinning my tires."
Meanwhile, Valdine Alycia, 40, is also concerned about their future housing prospects.
Alycia lives with an episodic and progressive neurological disability in Thompson, a city with a population of around 13,000 in the northern Manitoba riding of Churchill-Keewatinook Aski.
Alycia, who uses they/them pronouns, made changes to their childhood home, including having a smart home system installed, to make it easier and safer to stay there.
In the future, they might need an elevator, grab bars in the bathroom and wider hallways to continue living independently as their disability progresses, Alycia said.
However, the accessible housing they'll one day need is scarce in Thompson, they said.
"I would love to see all of the parties committing to Indigenous housing and housing for people with disabilities," said Alycia, who is Métis.
About eight million Canadians aged 15 and older live with a disability, according to Statistics Canada. With this in mind, Alycia said they're alarmed there haven't been more specific pledges for accessible housing and people with disabilities during the campaign leading up to the April 28 election.
"I believe that Thompson is completely overlooked in all of the conversations when it comes to housing," they said.
Party promises for housing
All major federal parties have announced commitments for housing.
The Conservatives have pledged to cut GST on new homes up to $1.3 million and incentivize municipalities to boost home building by at least 15 per cent each year.
The Liberals say they'll eliminate GST for first-time homebuyers of properties under $1 million and launch an agency called Build Canada Homes that will act as a developer, overseeing affordable home building in Canada.
The NDP says it would fund a $16-billion strategy to construct affordable and rent-controlled homes, prevent large corporate landlords from buying up affordable homes, and require the Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation to offer low-interest, public-backed mortgages.
University of Winnipeg urban and inner-city studies professor Shauna MacKinnon said she finds parts of the Liberal and New Democrat platforms appealing, but thinks details on social housing in the major party platforms are missing.
MacKinnon, who is also a member of the Right to Housing Coalition, says her organization is calling on the next federal government to build at least 50,000 subsidized rent-geared-to-income units each year for the next decade.
MacKinnon criticized the Liberals' national housing strategy, launched in 2017, for allocating too much to private sector housing and median market rentals.
"Housing has been built. It's just not the housing that is addressing the needs of the … lowest-income households, so we really need to shift the investment to ensure that that is the priority housing," MacKinnon said.
As for Heinrichs, he likes the Conservatives' plan and says would appreciate a GST cut on his first home, along with regulations on rent, but questions why the cost of homes are so high.
"Why are our homes costing over $1 million?" he said. "That's ludicrous."
He also questioned the helpfulness of a previous Liberal government announcement from last year that saw first-time homebuyers become eligible for 30-year mortgage amortization periods, up from the standard 25-year term.
Although the longer timeframe would reduce monthly payments, "the longer the loan, the more interest you pay," Heinrichs said.
Homes in the Pembina Valley, which includes Winkler, are going for an average $325,000, local real estate agent Dave Kasdorf told CBC News last month. New houses are selling for an average of roughly $400,000, with prices increasing three to five per cent annually, he said.
"First-time homebuyers are having a real hard time getting into the marketplace," said Kasdorf.
Heinrichs and his wife hope to purchase a below-average-priced home within five years, and he's asking for more help from Canada's next leader.
"Please just remember us bottom-of-the-barrel Canadians that are just … getting by, and just please make it affordable for us to live again — because it's not."
Manitobans casting ballots in federal election for housing priorities
6 minutes ago
Duration 3:01
Manitobans across the province say they're focused on housing in this federal election, from affordability to the types of homes the next government should prioritize.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Canada Standard
an hour ago
- Canada Standard
A First Nations Power Authority Could Transform Electricity Generation for IndigenousNations
First Nations across British Columbia have developed renewable electricity projects for decades. Yet they've experienced significant barriers to implementing, owning and managing their own electricity supply. That's because there have been few procurement policies in place that require their involvement. While municipalities are allowed to own and operate electricity utilities in B.C., First Nations are not [ pdf ], writes at team of experts and advocates at The Conversation. The Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples Act (DRIPA) in B.C. requires that First Nations are provided with opportunities for economic development without discrimination. Many First Nations in B.C. view the development of renewable electricity projects on their lands-like hydro power, solar panels, wind turbines and transmission lines-as a way to achieve social, environmental and economic goals that are important to their community. These goals may include powering buildings in the community, creating economic development and local jobs, earning revenue, improving access to affordable and reliable electricity or using less diesel. Related: First Nations Power Authorities Could Show Path to Energy Justice The study shares the story of a coalition of First Nations and organizations that advocated for changes to electricity regulations and laws to give Indigenous communities more control to develop renewable electricity projects. Interviews with knowledge holders from 14 First Nations offer insight into motivations behind their calls for regulatory changes. The coalition includes the Clean Energy Association of B.C., New Relationship Trust, Pembina Institute, First Nations Power Authority, Nuu-Chah-Nulth Tribal Council, and the First Nations Clean Energy Working Group. View our latest digests Almost all electricity customers in B.C. are served by BC Hydro, the electric utility owned by the provincial government. The coalition argues that applying DRIPA to the electricity sector should allow First Nations to form a First Nations power authority. Such an organization would provide them with control over the development of electricity infrastructure that aligns with their values and would also help B.C. meet its greenhouse gas reduction targets. In the Re-Imagining Social Energy Transitions CoLaboratory (ReSET CoLab) at the University of Victoria, the team analyzed regulatory documents from the B.C. Utilities Commission, and advocacy documents and presentations for discussion developed by the coalition. Six proposed First Nations power authority (Indigenous Utility) models were identified: A capacity building point-of-contact model streamlines the development of renewable electricity projects to sell power to the provincial utility. For example, the First Nations Power Authority in Saskatchewan was formed for this purpose by SaskPower. This would be the most conformative model. It would provide vital networks and connections to First Nations while allowing BC Hydro and the British Columbia Utilities Commission to maintain full control over the electricity sector. In the second model, called a "put" contract, a B.C. First Nations Power Authority represents First Nations wishing to develop renewable electricity projects. Whenever the province needs to build new electricity generation projects to meet growing electricity demand, a portion of the new generation is developed by the First Nations authority. In the third model, First Nations build and operate electricity transmission and distribution lines to allow remote industrial facilities and communities to connect to the electricity grid. This is called "Industrial Interconnection." For example, the Wataynikaneyap Power Transmission line in Ontario is a 1,800-kilometre line that provides an electricity grid connection for 17 previously remote nations. Twenty-four First Nations own 51 per cent of the line, while private investors own 49 per cent. In the fourth model, the B.C. First Nation Power Authority acts as the designated body for various opportunities in the electricity sector, such as the development of electricity transmission, distribution, generation or customer services. This model is referred to as "local or regional 'ticket' opportunities." Fifth, the First Nation Power Authority develops renewable electricity projects and distributes electricity from these projects to customers as a retailer, or under an agreement through the BC Hydro electricity grid. For example, Nova Scotia Power's Green Choice program procures renewable electricity from independent power producers to supply to electricity customers. Sixth, new utility is formed in B.C., owned by First Nations, that owns and operates electricity generation, transmission and distribution services and offers standard customer services in a specific region of B.C. (called a "Regional Vertically-Integrated Power Authority"). Most of these models would require changes to regulations. The sixth and most transformative model would provide First Nations with full decision-making control over electricity generation, transmission and distribution. It would also give them the ability to sell to customers and require extensive changes in electricity regulation. First Nations knowledge-holders told us that a lack of reliable power, high electricity rates, lack of control over projects on their traditional lands and the need for resilience in the face of climate events were motivations for taking electricity planning into their own hands. They also expressed that varied factors motivate community interest in renewable energy: improving the quality of life for community members; financial independence; mitigating climate change; protecting the environment; reducing diesel use and providing stable and safe power for current and future generations. First Nations are already seeking to capitalize on the benefits of renewable energy by developing their own projects within the current regulatory system. Most of those we spoke to see a First Nations power authority in B.C. as a means to provide opportunities for economic development without discrimination - and to achieve self-determination, self-reliance and reconciliation by addressing the root causes of some of the colonial injustices they face by obtaining control over the electricity sector on their lands. This article , first published at The Conversation on June 4, was co-authored by David Benton, an adopted member and Clean Energy Project Lead of Gitga'at First Nation and Kayla Klym, a BSc student in Geography at the University of Victoria. Source: The Energy Mix
Toronto Star
2 hours ago
- Toronto Star
Canada Post, union trade shots Monday as progress stalls
After talks last week aimed at paving the way for binding arbitration, Canada Post and the union representing its 55,000 employees were back trading public potshots Monday, with both sides accusing the other of not negotiating seriously. Monday afternoon, the Canadian Union of Postal Workers (CUPW) blasted the Crown corporation, saying it was counting on government action to force an end to the dispute. 'CUPW's ultimate goal in returning to the bargaining table remains new negotiated ratifiable collective agreements,' CUPW said in a written statement. 'However, Canada Post's actions suggest it does not want to negotiate. It wants to rewrite our agreements — and is seeking to use government interference to further its goals.' The union pointed to Canada Post's request to federal jobs minister Patty Hajdu late last month to order a vote on its 'final' contract offer, as well as then-federal labour minister Steven MacKinnon's decision last December to 'pause' a 32-day strike by creating an Industrial Inquiry Commission run by veteran arbitrator William Kaplan. 'The historic rights and benefits our union has gained for our members — and for Canadian society — such as maternity leave have been won through our collective bargaining rights,' CUPW added. 'The attempt to trample over them should send a chill through the labour movement. CUPW will be standing against a forced vote — and for collective bargaining rights.' In a written statement Monday, Canada Post said two days of talks last week to set the terms for arbitration didn't result in any progress. The Crown corporation also said the union still hadn't provided an official response to its final offer. It also suggested Kaplan's report should be part of the terms of reference for any arbitration. 'The final report of the Industrial Inquiry Commission clearly outlines the critical issues we face and the immediate actions that need to be taken. It should therefore be the foundational document that guides any discussions about Canada Post's path forward. The union's refusal to recognize the IIC report and its recommendations in their proposed terms of reference for arbitration is unacceptable,' Canada Post said. 'After 18 months we urgently need a fair resolution that begins to address our challenges while respecting the important role our employees play, and the voice they have in our future.' A spokesperson for Hajdu said the minister was still reviewing Canada Post's request for a vote on the 'final offer,' and urged the two sides to get back to the bargaining table. 'Last week Minister Hajdu asked the parties to return to the negotiating table with federal mediators to do two things: to seek to negotiate terms for an arbitration process to conclude this round of bargaining, and to have the union table its response to Canada Post's last global offers,' said Hajdu spokesperson Jennifer Kozelj. 'Canadians expect the parties to resolve this dispute. Both parties must meet and pursue these paths with urgency.' Labour experts say it's unclear exactly how the impasse can be resolved. Both sides, suggested University of Toronto professor Rafael Gomez, could be waiting for clearer signals from the federal government on whether it will act on Kaplan's recommendations. 'If the government hems and haws, then of course the parties aren't going to negotiate strongly,' said Gomez, director of U of T's Centre for Industrial Relations and Human Resources. 'If they said 'here's what we're doing about the report. We're implementing everything Kaplan has said,' that would move the needle.' While a full-blown strike might be another option for the union to try and force the issue, it's not clear if it would work, argued Stephanie Ross, a labour studies professor at McMaster University. The union doesn't have nearly as much leverage as it did last winter, Ross said, because it's not nearly as busy a time of year for parcels, but also because Kaplan's report was largely in line with the Crown corporation's arguments for restructuring. 'It's not clear how much pressure a walkout is going to put on the employer right now,' Ross said. Earlier this month, Canada Post rejected the union's request for binding arbitration, saying it would take too long, and could exacerbate their financial struggles. On May 28, Canada Post made what it called its 'final' contract offer, which includes a 13 per cent wage increase spread over four years, as well as a $1,000 signing bonus. Two days later, it asked Hajdu to order a vote on the offer, a request blasted by CUPW.
Vancouver Sun
6 hours ago
- Vancouver Sun
Opinion: Most Canadians don't support taxpayer subsidies for LNG
Proponents often claim that Canada's LNG will reduce global warming by displacing coal in other countries. However, we have run out of time for a 'transition fuel' if we're to meet the goals of the Paris Agreement. In this context, new LNG infrastructure isn't a climate solution, but rather a substitute for investment in clean energy. Luckily, the price of renewables has dropped dramatically, making this transition both feasible and affordable. LNG is also a bad economic bet. The International Energy Agency has projected that LNG capacity will exceed demand by the next decade, making new capital investments especially risky. This is presumably why private investors are wavering and looking to Canadian governments to subsidize their projects with public dollars. A daily roundup of Opinion pieces from the Sun and beyond. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. A welcome email is on its way. If you don't see it, please check your junk folder. The next issue of Informed Opinion will soon be in your inbox. Please try again Interested in more newsletters? Browse here. A recent poll found that 56 per cent of respondents, both in B.C. and nationally, oppose multibillion-dollar public subsidies for foreign-owned LNG projects. Only 18 per cent of Canadians, and 22 per cent of British Columbians, are supportive while the rest are unsure. In B.C., where most LNG projects are proposed and LNG Canada will soon come online, people have other priorities for their tax dollars. In fact, supporting oil-and-gas is at the bottom of a list led by health care, housing, education, renewable energy and transit. The lack of public support for subsidizing fossil fuels has been consistent for years. In 2018, two-thirds of Canadians opposed subsidizing oil-and-gas, 41 per cent strongly. More than half remained unsupportive, even after being told oil-and-gas subsidies would create jobs and economic growth. In 2021, 62 per cent of Canadians wanted the federal government to stop fossil fuel subsidies and there was mounting frustration that the government hadn't acted on a 2015 campaign promise to do so. In 2023, the majority of Canadians felt that oil companies, not taxpayers, should foot the bill for the Trans Mountain pipeline expansion. Only 30 per cent of British Columbians supported subsidies for LNG. A 2023 poll found 96 per cent of Canadians felt the federal government should disclose subsidies for fossil fuels. That year, the government of Canada signed a joint ministerial statement at the UN climate talks that committed them to do just that by the end of 2024. There is still no inventory of fossil fuel subsidies in mid-2025, undermining Canadians' ability to understand where their tax dollars are going. Canada claims to be a global leader on climate change, yet we continuously fail to meet our climate targets. The main reason is that emissions growth from oil-and-gas production has offset progress in other areas. According to the UN Environment Programme , governments around the world, including Canada, are planning for continued fossil fuel production that will result in more than double the global emissions scientists advise are consistent with limiting warming to 1.5 C. Canada, unfortunately, is one the biggest funders of the fossil fuel industry globally. That includes billions of taxpayer dollars that the federal and B.C. governments have already committed to LNG in the form of direct subsidies, lower tax and electricity rates, and public loans. Canadian taxpayers have been footing the bill for fossil fuel developments that threaten our own climate, health and economy. In this critical moment, Canada's leaders should instead use public funds to support projects that advance Canada's economy and safety, not only today but for decades to come. Kathryn Harrison is professor of political science at the University of B.C. Cara Pike is co-founder and senior adviser to at Carleton University in Ottawa.
