logo
Trump prevents cash-strapped councils from cutting gold-plated pensions

Trump prevents cash-strapped councils from cutting gold-plated pensions

Telegraph17-04-2025

Cash-strapped councils are facing new seven-figure shortfalls after their hopes of cutting pension costs were dashed by Donald Trump.
Local authorities currently spend almost a quarter of council tax revenue on funding the generous schemes, but many were banking on slashing contributions from 2026.
Some councils could have saved around £3m a year with a 2pc cut, but John Ralfe, a pensions consultant, said a combination of poor investment decisions and market losses from Donald Trump's tariff war may have ended their chances.
It comes as households across the country face an average 5pc council tax hike, with thousands now facing bills in excess of £5,000.
Council workers are part of the Local Government Pension Scheme, which provides retirees with an inflation-linked income for life. Local authorities pay in a fixed percentage of employees' salaries, set independently by their scheme's three-yearly valuation.
Currently, they contribute an average of 21.1pc, costing almost £7bn a year.
There are 19 councils that paid in more than £50m last year alone, and three that contributed over £100m.
Overall, the Local Government Pension Scheme had £22.1bn surplus at its 2022 valuation, which rose to £85bn this year, according to pension consultants Isio – fuelling hope that contributions could be reduced during valuations this year.
The move could have saved some councils millions of pounds a year, but Mr Ralfe said Donald Trump's global tariffs and the ensuing market chaos may now have ended their chances.
He said: 'The Local Government Pension Scheme has around £400bn in assets, three quarters of which are in equities. These are subject to market volatility, but strong recent performance meant many funds were heading for a very promising surplus this year.
'However, that was the time to move from equities to something less volatile and lock those surpluses in. The fall in equity markets of the last few days, especially in the US where the majority of the scheme's equities are held, will have hit them hard.
'As a result, most funds will now be back in deficit and the chance has gone.
'This isn't just 'bean counting'. Some local councils were relying on a long term surplus to reduce their annual pension contributions, which is now much less likely to happen.'
Clare Moffat, of Royal London, said: 'At the last valuation, many schemes were in surplus and where that was still the case, one of the options would have been to reduce employer contributions.
'However, in the aftermath of Donald Trump's tariff war and its effect on the stock market, the chances of that could now be slimmer depending on the type of investments they have.
'A reduction in pension contributions would have been helpful for struggling councils, but this is only one of the options available when there is a surplus and it can never be relied upon.'
A spokesman from the Local Government Pension Scheme said: 'In recent years investment returns have been very directly impacted by a number of global political and economic factors.
'Despite that, over the longer term investors have consistently managed to outperform inflation and meet their investment goals. They do so by taking a long-term view and maintaining an appropriately diversified portfolio of assets.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Eva Longoria complains about ICE deportations and LA raids from her Spanish home after quitting 'dystopian' US
Eva Longoria complains about ICE deportations and LA raids from her Spanish home after quitting 'dystopian' US

Daily Mail​

time36 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Eva Longoria complains about ICE deportations and LA raids from her Spanish home after quitting 'dystopian' US

Eva Longoria went on a passionate message about the ongoing violence stemming from the demonstrations in Southern California - from what appeared to be the comfort of her Spanish mansion. Longoria, 50, spoke about the issue to her 10.6 million Instagram followers in an extended clip on Tuesday, admitting that while she was not physically in Los Angeles, her heart was with everyone impacted by the ongoing events. The stunning star - who played the role of Gabrielle Solis over 180 episodes of the popular ABC series Desperate Housewives from 2004–2012 - was seated in a room that appeared to be from her Spain home. Longoria said the unfolding events were 'hard to witness from afar. 'I can't imagine what it's like to be in Los Angeles right now,' the Corpus Christi, Texas-born star added. 'I can't believe it's happening in Austin, Texas. I can't believe it's happening all over the country. 'And the comments and people's reactions to it is really so surprising to me because it is un-American.' The Mexican-American actress said she was in the state of shock watching the events unfold, saying it went against the basic tenets America's forefathers laid out. 'We all can agree nobody wants criminals in our country, nobody wants rapists, nobody wants drug dealers, nobody wants bad actors in our country - that's not what's happening,' said the Golden Globe-nominated actress. Longoria said that President Donald Trump was overreaching in his actions, and had not stayed true to his campaign promise to deport only criminals. 'These roundups are happening in birthday parties, in elementary graduations, Home Depots - those are not criminals,' she said.

Unhinged LA rioter dressed in makeshift tactical gear becomes laughing stock of protests
Unhinged LA rioter dressed in makeshift tactical gear becomes laughing stock of protests

Daily Mail​

time36 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Unhinged LA rioter dressed in makeshift tactical gear becomes laughing stock of protests

A protester in Los Angeles was taunted after storming the streets in makeshift tactical gear as she encouraged others to use a 'wind blower' as protection against tear gas. Other protesters caught the interaction on video and the clip circulated online, with many poking fun at the unidentified rioter's DIY gear. 'Why is she doing a bad cosplay of a minion from Despicable Me?' one commented on X. 'We need leaf-blower control legislation. Now!' another joked. 'Omg this has to be a satire protester lol,' a third said. The protester was asked on camera why she took to the streets and replied, 'This is our city and this was Mexico. You can't kick us out of the land that was ours.' When asked what the wind blower was for, she replied, 'That's for the f***ing tear gas. That's for the f***ing tear gas to blow it back at those motherf***ers. If you have a f***in blower bring it out. Push them back!' The protester then directed her attention to Donald Trump, and told the camera, 'You're just mad because Selma Hayek wouldn't give you the time of day b***h.' Los Angeles has been embroiled in protests since Friday as a political feud has broken out between Governor Gavin Newsom and President Trump (Pictured: Protesters come face to face during the protests on the 101 Freeway on Sunday) The video footage was taken as the California city has been embroiled in protests in response to Immigration and Customs Enforcement raids. The protests have become a political flashpoint as Trump deployed the National Guard to provide additional resources to law enforcement. Typically, the guard is only deployed at the request of the state's governor, and California officials are accusing the administration of an illegal maneuver. California officials have also claimed that Trump's use of the National Guard will heighten tensions in the streets. 'If I didn't 'SEND IN THE TROOPS' to Los Angeles the last three nights, that once beautiful and great City would be burning to the ground right now, much like 25,000 houses burned to the ground in L.A. due to an incompetent Governor and Mayor,' Trump wrote on Truth Social on Tuesday morning. Governor Gavin Newsom then filed an emergency motion in court to block military troops from infiltrating the city, arguing that the federal government was 'turning the military against American citizens.' A federal judge denied the state's request to prohibit Trump's administration from using the Marines and National Guard. 'This is unprecedented and threatens the very core of our democracy,' Newsom wrote about the filing on X. The administration announced the deployment of 700 Marines and 2,000 National Guard troops to break up the protests. The protests entered their fifth day on Tuesday with demonstrators sparking the days-long controversy with a gathering outside the Los Angeles Federal Building. The demonstrations heightened on Saturday with officials deploying tear gas against rioters. Some demonstrations across the city turned violent, with images emerging of cars on fire and police firing rubber bullets at rioters. LAPD Chief Jim McDonnell said over the weekend that some rioters arrived at the demonstrations with hammers, cinder blocks, and rocks. The violence prompted Trump to call for all demonstrators in face masks to be arrested on Truth Social. As protests continued to break out in California, 300 members of the state's guard responded with Homeland Security officers at the city's detention center. Federal officials formed a line outside the Metropolitan Detention Center to block protesters as demonstrators were hit with tear gas and pepper balls. Protests have spread to other cities, including San Francisco and New York, as Trump continues to defend the deployment of additional troops (Pictured: Police fire off rounds on protesters in front of the Federal Building in Los Angeles on Monday) Protesters even blocked Highway 101, which created chaotic scenes as officers fired munitions into the crowd. Over the course of the demonstration, at least 160 people were arrested, with a majority facing charges for failure to disperse. The demonstrations have spread throughout the US to other major cities, including San Francisco, where authorities said 154 arrests occurred. US District Judge Charles R. Breyer set a hearing for Thursday on the legality of the administration's deployment of the National Guard.

Trump can abolish national monuments, US Justice Department says
Trump can abolish national monuments, US Justice Department says

Reuters

time38 minutes ago

  • Reuters

Trump can abolish national monuments, US Justice Department says

June 10 (Reuters) - President Donald Trump has the power to abolish two national monuments in California established by his Democratic predecessor Joe Biden, as well as any others created by past presidents, according to a newly released legal opinion from a key adviser within the U.S. Department of Justice. The May 27 document, opens new tab, which was released on Tuesday, reversed a 1938 legal opinion and sets the stage for the Republican president to eliminate federal protections for potentially millions of acres of land previously designated as national monuments. National monuments are created by presidents in recognition of a site's cultural, historical or scientific importance, while national parks are created by Congress largely to protect outstanding scenic features or natural phenomena. Lanora Pettit, who heads the Justice Department's Office of Legal Counsel, was asked by the White House to provide a new opinion as Trump considered whether to reverse Biden's decision in January in his final days in office to designate two California sites that hold significance to Native American tribes as national monuments. The Chuckwalla National Monument preserves more than 624,000 acres just south of Joshua Tree National Park. The Sattitla Highlands National Monument protects 224,000 acres where the dormant Medicine Lake volcano carved craters and lava tubes. Biden had relied on the Antiquities Act of 1906, a law that has been invoked by numerous presidents to designate over 100 national monuments. A 1938 opinion by Attorney General Homer Cummings, who served under Democratic President Franklin Roosevelt, has been long cited as constraining the ability of presidents to undo past designations. But in a 50-page legal opinion, Pettit concluded that the Antiquities Act gives presidents not only the power to establish national monuments on federal lands but also to determine that they never were or no longer are deserving of those protections. The White House has also asked Pettit to consider whether the Justice Department should disavow Cummings' prior opinion. She said it should, writing that the law's silence about whether a president could revoke a predecessor's designation of a monument should be understood as meaning he has such authority. "Thus, for the Antiquities Act, the power to declare carries with it the power to revoke," Pettit wrote. The legal opinion did note that since the earliest days of the Antiquities Act, presidents have 'from time to time diminished' the land set aside to protect monuments. Trump, in his first term, had reduced the size of the Bears Ears National Monument by 85% and the Grand Staircase-Escalante monument by half, both in Utah. Biden restored both monuments to their former size. But no president has abolished a national monument. It was unclear if and when Trump would revoke the monument status for the two California sites or any other monuments. Asked about the new legal opinion, White House spokesperson Harrison Fields in a statement cited the need to "liberate our federal lands and waters to oil, gas, coal, geothermal, and mineral leasing."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store