logo
Labour nationalises second train company

Labour nationalises second train company

Operator c2c, which runs services between London Fenchurch Street and south Essex, was taken into public ownership on Sunday.
It had been controlled by Italy's state-owned rail company Trenitalia since 2017.
DfT (Department for Transport) Operator, which manages services under public control on behalf of the UK Government, said tickets previously purchased will remain valid.
It added that fares are 'not changing as a direct result of the transfer'.
The overall passenger satisfaction rating for c2c was 89% in the most recent research by watchdog Transport Focus.
This was the joint sixth best performance out of 22 operators.
Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander said: 'Whether you're shopping in Lakeside or walking along the beach in Southend-on-Sea, from today you will be able to get there on a train service run by the public, for the public.
'Public ownership is already tackling deep-rooted problems we see on the railway that's led to spiralling costs, fragmentation and waste.
'A unified network under Great British Railways will take this further with one railway under one brand with one mission – delivering excellent services for passengers wherever they travel.'
GBR is an upcoming public sector body that will oversee Britain's rail infrastructure and train operation.
Ernesto Sicilia, managing director at Trenitalia UK, said: 'As the franchise moves to public ownership, we acknowledge both the progress made and the ongoing challenges of unifying a fragmented rail industry.
'In the meantime, we will continue to support and deliver services on the Avanti West Coast franchise until it too transitions to public ownership in 2026.
'While our role as operator is ending, our dedication to sharing knowledge, supporting innovation and fostering collaboration remains unchanged.
'We recognise that building a resilient and integrated rail network takes time and Trenitalia is determined to play a constructive part in that journey.'
South Western Railway became the first operator brought into public ownership by the Labour Government in May.
It joined Northern, TransPennine Express, Southeastern and LNER, which were nationalised under the Conservative government because of performance failings by the former owners of those franchises.
The next operator to be nationalised will be Greater Anglia on October 12.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

More trains to run between London and Hull, Newcastle and Glasgow
More trains to run between London and Hull, Newcastle and Glasgow

BBC News

time5 hours ago

  • BBC News

More trains to run between London and Hull, Newcastle and Glasgow

Additional train services will run on the East Coast Main Line from December, the rail regulator has open-access operators – Lumo, Grand Central and Hull Trains – applied to the Office of Rail and Road (ORR) to expand their timetablesThe successful proposals include additional trains between London and each of Hull, Newcastle and ORR rejected some plans, including a bid by Hull Trains to run direct services between London and Sheffield, due to concerns about insufficient capacity on the line. FirstGroup, which owns Hull Trains, said it was "disappointed" by the decision, as it would have provided Sheffield with its first regular service from London King's Cross since claimed the direct service would have served "an estimated 350,000 people".Hull Trains was given permission to run an additional service from London King's Cross to Hull on weekdays and will be allowed to extend its existing London-Edinburgh service to Glasgow, and will also put on additional services between King's Cross and Grand Central will expand its regional services with a new link to Seaham, on the County Durham coast, and additional trains between Wakefield and Bradford. 'Greater choice' Stephanie Tobyn, ORR's director of strategy, policy and reform, said: "We have ensured the approval of these services can be accommodated alongside the major service uplifts by other operators, which have been planned into the December 2025 timetable."Passengers and freight customers would benefit from "more direct connections and greater choice", she operators set their own fares, take on all revenue risk and receive no taxpayer-funded are also excluded from the government's ongoing nationalisation of the UK's train Secretary Heidi Alexander wrote to the ORR in January to highlight concerns about the open-access model causing "potential congestion" and taxpayers being "left to fill shortfalls" in maintenance approval of additional services comes after LNER, the government-owned operator that runs services on the East Coast Main Line, announced changes to timetables from December, with up to 37 daily services and quicker journeys between London King's Cross and Edinburgh. Listen to highlights from Hull and East Yorkshire on BBC Sounds, watch the latest episode of Look North or tell us about a story you think we should be covering here. Download the BBC News app from the App Store for iPhone and iPad or Google Play for Android devices

Lords accused of trying to block Labour's zero-hours contract ban for ‘bad bosses'
Lords accused of trying to block Labour's zero-hours contract ban for ‘bad bosses'

The Independent

time7 hours ago

  • The Independent

Lords accused of trying to block Labour's zero-hours contract ban for ‘bad bosses'

Peers in the House of Lords have been accused of trying to block key protections for millions of workers as they push through major changes to Labour's Employment Rights Bill. The Lords last week voted in favour of several amendments brought forward by Conservative and Liberal Democrat peers which row back on reforms to zero-hours contracts, day-one protections and more. It comes as a blow to the government – which pledged in its 2024 manifesto to end 'exploitative' zero-hours contracts – and sets up a showdown between the Lords and Commons. General secretary of the Trades Union Congress (TUC), Paul Nowak said: 'the sight of Hereditary Peers voting to block stronger workers ' rights belongs in another century. It's plain wrong.' 'They are doing the bidding of bad bosses,' he added, and encouraged the government to 'stand firm.' Under the Lords' amendments, the requirement for employers to offer zero-hours workers a contract would be changed to instead require the worker to ask for the arrangement. Protections against unfair dismissal from day one of employment were also amended, instead bringing the time up to six months. Legislation currently ensures the protections after two years of employment. There were also several amendments to trade union laws voted in, including a requirement for members to actively opt into trade union political funds, rather than opt out. This came alongside another amendment to ensure the 50 per cent turnout threshold for industrial action is not repealed in the bill. The amendments were put forward by Tory peers Lord Hunt, shadow business minister, and Lord Sharpe, alongside Liberal Democrat Lord Goddard. Ministers will address the amendments when MPs return to Commons from summer recess at the start of September. The two houses will then continue to vote on the changes in a process known as parliamentary 'ping-pong' before a finalised version of the bill is agreed upon. Responding to criticism, Lord Hunt said: 'All the evidence shows that workers value and support that flexibility and the diverse job opportunities it continues to create. The world of business – which creates the wealth we need – has repeatedly made it very plain that the Government's proposals go too far and jeopardise that vital flexibility. 'In too many respects the Government's Bill aims to give new powers to the trade unions as organisations, not to the workers themselves, but the Lords amendments would create a better balance. They will protect and create more jobs and serve the working people of Britain well.'

South Norfolk Council leader defends former HQ demolition plan
South Norfolk Council leader defends former HQ demolition plan

BBC News

time10 hours ago

  • BBC News

South Norfolk Council leader defends former HQ demolition plan

Plans to demolish a former council headquarters so the site can be used for housing have been defended by the authority's in Long Stratton had campaigned for the former South Norfolk District Council HQ to be used as a "community asset".The council sold the building to its own development company instead, and its Conservative leader Daniel Elmer said the authority had "a legal and moral duty" to get the best price for the council's planning committee is expected to approve demolition of the building on Wednesday. South Norfolk House – which is in Long Stratton – has sat empty since the council moved to a new building at the Broadland Business Park on the outskirts of Norwich in authority later agreed to sell the building to its own housing development company, Big Sky, for an undisclosed fee. However, the deal was stalled by uncertainty surrounding the site, as campaigners tried and failed to give the building protection from demolition by getting it listed town council said "it could be repurposed to provide much needed infrastructure". Long Stratton's Labour district councillor, Georgina Race, said private investors had offered to buy the building to use part of it as an arts centre, with the rest available for "community purposes".She added that 1,800 homes were already planned for the town and it did not need more said: "What we need is for somewhere for the community to go to and have a community building. "We've got a village hall built in 1906, when the residents in Long Stratton totalled about 500 people. We've now got 4,000 people."Resident Paul Rochester said the "vast majority" of people in the town wanted the building – which is 49 years old – to be used as a community space."It's a huge site [there's] so much potential within the building itself. It just beggars belief as to why it should be levelled." But Elmer said it was "a taxpayer-owned building, it belongs to all the residents of south Norfolk".He insisted the private investors' deal did not offer "proof of funds" and the council had "a legal and moral duty to get the best return for the taxpayer off of that site".Elmer added that the dispute over the future of the building had cost the authority about £250,000 a year to maintain the also said he was unsure what kind of housing the site would be used for, should the building be demolished.A report advises members of the council's planning committee go give the go-ahead to demolition. Follow Norfolk news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store