
Trump's $499 smartphone will likely be made in China
The Trump Organization's newly-announced smartphone will likely be made in China, experts say, despite claims that the device will be manufactured in the U.S.
Owned by U.S. President Donald Trump, the company on Monday announced the T1, a gold-colored device which it said would retail for $499. The smartphone will run Google's Android operating system.
The Trump Organization says the phone will be "built in the United States" — but experts note the phone was likely designed and would be manufactured by a Chinese firm.
"There is no way the phone was designed from scratch and there is no way it is going to be assembled in the U.S. or completely manufactured in the U.S.," Francisco Jeronimo, vice president at International Data Corporation, told CNBC on Tuesday. "That is completely impossible."
Jeronimo suggested that the phone would likely be produced by a Chinese original device manufacturer (ODM) — a type of company that designs and manufacturers products based on the specifications of another firm.
"Despite being advertised as an American-made phone, it is likely that this device will be initially produced by a Chinese ODM," Blake Przesmicki, an analyst at Counterpoint Research said in a note on Monday.
Jeff Fieldhack, research director at Counterpoint Research added that "the U.S. does not have local manufacturing capabilities readily available."
Smartphone manufacturing came into focus after Trump threatened tariffs on devices imported into the U.S. While those have yet to materialize, the American president has poured scrutiny on Apple's supply chain, urging the iPhone maker to manufacture its flagship handset in the U.S. The call is part of a broader desire from Trump to see more manufacturing of electronics be undertaken in the U.S.
Several experts have noted that manufacturing iPhones in the U.S. would be nearly impossible and would certainly raise the price of the product substantially. On top of that, getting large-scale manufacturing off the ground in the U.S. would take several years.
Even if some manufacturing of the device were done in the U.S., smartphone supply chains are global, and handset components come from several countries.
The Trump Organization's T1 is no different. While no information has been revealed on particular components, the specifications could give a hint of what to expect.
The device will have a 6.8-inch AMOLED display, a kind of screen that is made primarily by South Korean firm Samsung. LG, another South Korean firm, also produces the screen, as does Chinese firm BOE.
For comparison, Apple's top end iPhone 16 Pro Max, has a 6.9-inch display and starts at $1,199.
At T1's $499 price point, the smartphone will likely use a processor from Taiwanese firm MediaTek, which would be manufactured in Taiwan. If the device were to contain a Qualcomm chip instead, that would also likely have to be made in Taiwan.
The phone's advertised 50 megapixel camera will meanwhile require image sensing chips — a market that is dominated by Japanese firm Sony for smartphones. There are smaller players in China and elsewhere.
The device's memory is one area that could use American technology, potentially from Micron, which manufactures its components in the U.S. But other players, like South Korea's Samsung, could be potential suppliers.
"Even when there is local manufacturing available the company will have to rely on components that are being imported from outside the US," Counterpoint Research's Fieldhack said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CNBC
4 minutes ago
- CNBC
Coinbase shares rise as investors anticipate U.S. stablecoin rules: CNBC Crypto World
On today's episode of CNBC Crypto World, bitcoin and ether are little changed as investors assess the Fed's next move on interest rates and President Trump's strategy for the Israel-Iran conflict. Plus, Coinbase rises after the company shuffles its EU hub to Luxembourg and investors await U.S. stablecoin rules. And, Phil George of EarnOS discusses why brands could could look to stablecoins in the future.
Yahoo
9 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Nippon Steel completes $14.9bn acquisition of US Steel, bolstering US steel production
Nippon Steel has completed the $14.9bn (Y2.17trn) acquisition of US Steel to create a world-leading steelmaker with advanced technologies and manufacturing capabilities. The finalised transaction is in line with the merger agreement previously outlined by the companies in December 2023. This strategic partnership is expected to increase Nippon Steel Group's annual crude steel production capacity to 86 million tonnes (mt), advancing towards its strategic goal of 100mt. Additionally, this collaboration is set to protect and generate more than 100,000 jobs through significant investments in the US, impacting several states including Pennsylvania, Indiana, Arkansas, Minnesota and Alabama. Additionally, a National Security Agreement (NSA) has been established, granting the issuance of a 'golden share' to the US Government. Under the NSA, Nippon Steel has committed to investing approximately $11bn in US Steel by 2028, which includes funding for a greenfield project to be completed post-2028. The NSA outlines the maintenance of US Steel's headquarters in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, and ensuring that a majority of US Steel's board members and key management personnel, including the CEO, are US citizens. The agreement also stipulates that US Steel will preserve its capacity to produce and supply steel from its US facilities to meet domestic demand and will retain autonomy in trade actions under US law. Nippon Steel representative director chairman and CEO Eiji Hashimoto said: 'I am very pleased that the partnership between Nippon Steel and US Steel has been realised thanks to President Trump's historic and visionary decision. 'Nippon Steel is excited about opening a new chapter of US Steel's storied history. Building on our investment, the transfer of our advanced technologies, and the unwavering efforts of management and the employees of both companies, Nippon Steel is committed, together with US Steel, to solidifying its position as the world's leading steelmaker.' The US Government, through the golden share, will have rights such as appointing an independent director and consent rights on specific matters. This will include investment commitments, changes to US Steel's name and headquarters, and decisions regarding production, acquisitions and closures. US Steel CEO Dave Burritt said: 'This is a momentous day for our country, our communities and the American steel industry. Thanks to President Trump's bold leadership, American workers secured the best possible deal. US Steel will remain rooted in the US and continue to call Pittsburgh home. 'Through our partnership with Nippon Steel, we are poised to grow better and bigger, with transformative investment, cutting-edge technology and the creation of good-paying jobs across the US.' Citi, Ropes & Gray, PJT Partners and Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld served as advisors to Nippon Steel, while Barclays Capital, Goldman Sachs, Evercore, Milbank, Covington & Burling and Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz advised US Steel. Earlier this year, President Trump stated that the US will maintain control over US Steel as it enters a partnership with Nippon Steel. "Nippon Steel completes $14.9bn acquisition of US Steel, bolstering US steel production" was originally created and published by Mining Technology, a GlobalData owned brand. The information on this site has been included in good faith for general informational purposes only. It is not intended to amount to advice on which you should rely, and we give no representation, warranty or guarantee, whether express or implied as to its accuracy or completeness. You must obtain professional or specialist advice before taking, or refraining from, any action on the basis of the content on our site.


Boston Globe
13 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
Tuition increases and layoffs are coming to a broad set of universities
Students and employees from coast to coast are poised to feel the squeeze. Although the exact consequences will vary by school, administrators are warning that many students may have to pay more, professors may lose their jobs, programs could vanish and support services could shrink. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up The turmoil is not limited to any one type of university or college, or any one state. A day before Michigan State University trustees opted for tuition increases, a California State University campus minutes from the Pacific Ocean announced that it was trimming its workforce. Advertisement 'If you're a student or family looking to go to college this year, all of the numbers are going in the wrong direction,' said Ted Mitchell, president of the American Council on Education, who described the mood among higher education leaders as 'dark but resolved.' The Trump administration's efforts to reduce research funding are siphoning cash from many campuses, sometimes by hundreds of millions of dollars. But that is just one factor contributing to higher education's financial crunch. Colleges, like businesses and households, are facing greater costs for wages, supplies, utilities and other expenses. Advertisement Their income sources are not always keeping pace. In Nebraska, the state government's contribution to the university system will rise roughly 0.6%, far below the 3.5% increase that the Board of Regents had sought to account for inflation. But regents saw the increase as a modest victory. Gov. Jim Pillen, a Republican who wanted the state to have 'the courage to say no, and to focus on needs, not wants,' had originally urged a 2% reduction. 'We will need to continue to reduce spending and make increasingly difficult choices to ensure fiscal discipline,' Jeffrey P. Gold, the University of Nebraska's president, told regents before a vote Thursday to impose cuts and increase tuition. Students who enroll at the flagship campus in Lincoln are poised to pay about 5% more. In neighboring Kansas, only one of the state's six public universities did not propose a tuition increase for the coming school year. And University of Oklahoma leaders just raised tuition again, too. The White House rejected accusations from some college administrators that the federal government is partly to blame for tuition increases and other budget moves. 'Any school that scapegoats the administration's policies of cutting waste, fraud and abuse to justify raising already astronomical tuition costs is failing American students in an effort to score political points and fatten its coffers,' Harrison Fields, a White House spokesperson, said in a statement. He added: 'If these higher education institutions were serious about lowering costs, they would cut the bloated salaries of their faculty and stop wasting money on useless programs that do little to advance education.' Advertisement Some schools are more reliant than others on federal money, especially research institutions, and leaders on many of those campuses have cited the administration's tactics as they have reworked their budgets. But public institutions are also sometimes facing significant resistance in statehouses, and recent rises in inflation have put new demands on campus finances. College leaders across the country have sometimes sought to defend new tuition increases by noting correctly that their prices had stayed relatively steady in recent years. Others point to the number of scholarships and grants they offer, which routinely drive costs well south of the sticker price, and say that many students are ultimately paying less than in the past. In Minnesota, students are set to pay more for less. State leaders maintained stable support for the University of Minnesota -- a decision that university officials considered an effective budget cut, given inflation. And questions are swirling over how much additional declines in federal money could worsen the university's financial outlook. Tuition at the Twin Cities campus will rise by at least 6.5%. But the university is also pursuing cuts of 7%. Academic units have been asked to come up with millions of dollars in 'reallocations' that could lead to program changes and fewer materials in the Law Library, among other things. More than 350 jobs could be eliminated. 'Making these kinds of cuts here is new to us in Minnesota,' Rebecca Cunningham, the university's president, said during a board meeting Wednesday. 'It is unfortunate, but indeed we are not alone.' They are not. The University System of Maryland's chancellor, Jay A. Perman, bluntly told employees in a video this month that the schools would absorb a 7% cut for the coming fiscal year. Advertisement 'A 7% cut simply can't be achieved on every campus in a way that doesn't touch any of our people,' Perman said. Private universities often say far less about their finances than public institutions, but similar signs of immense strain are emerging. Duke University is seeking about $350 million in cuts, amounting to roughly 10% of its budget. In a video message this month, Duke's president, Vincent E. Price, said the university was trying to sort out proposals from the federal government 'that have quite dire implications for the university.' He added there was 'sadly, no scenario in which Duke can or will avoid incurring substantial losses of funding due to these policy changes.' The university has imposed a hiring freeze and developed buyout plans, but Price said that Duke would 'likely' resort to layoffs. The school is among the wealthy universities that could face a higher endowment tax under a Republican plan working its way through Congress. Many schools that would be hit hardest were already reeling. Harvard University, which has clashed bitterly with the Trump administration, is urgently seeking contributions from donors and has been making cuts, partly because billions of dollars in its endowment have restricted uses. And in a statement Wednesday ominously titled 'a message on financial austerity,' leaders at Cornell, which also has a substantial endowment, described a dire landscape. 'The spring semester was unlike anything ever seen in higher education,' school officials wrote, noting, among a long list of federal cuts, the burden of rising inflation along with 'rapidly escalating legal expenses.' Advertisement To manage the financial pressures, school leaders said they 'anticipate involuntary reductions in head count.' This article originally appeared in The New York Times.