logo
Lawmakers look to ban legacy admissions in Maine, but some colleges are pushing back

Lawmakers look to ban legacy admissions in Maine, but some colleges are pushing back

Yahoo14-04-2025

Apr. 14—Maine could soon prohibit legacy and donor-based admissions at both public and private colleges under a bill discussed Thursday in the Education and Cultural Affairs Committee, although higher education leaders in the state asked that lawmakers leave the decision up to each institution.
The bill, sponsored by Sen. Michael Tipping, D-Penobscot, and co-sponsored by seven other Democrats, would prohibit Maine colleges and universities from considering whether an applicant's parents attended or donated to that college in their admissions process.
Passage of this bill would make Maine the sixth state to ban legacy admissions; Colorado, Virginia and Illinois prohibit the practice at public universities, while Maryland and California also ban it at private colleges.
All of those laws were passed after the U.S. Supreme Court struck down race-conscious college admissions in 2023. Since then, many institutions and states have looked to eliminate the practice of prioritizing legacy students, which they say favors wealthy and white students. Three-quarters of Americans believe legacy should not be a factor in college admissions, according to a 2022 Pew Research study.
Maine is home to dozens of higher education institutions, including three highly selective liberal arts colleges: Bowdoin, Bates and Colby. All three colleges have said they consider legacy status in some capacity as part of a holistic review process, and a Bates spokesperson said last week that legacy status is a "minor consideration" in the application review process.
The editorial board of the Bowdoin Orient, the college's student newspaper, has repeatedly called on the school to end the practice. In recent years, some comparable schools like Amherst College in Massachusetts and Wesleyan University in Connecticut have eliminated legacy admissions.
'MERIT AND HARD WORK'
Tipping presented his bill at a hearing Thursday afternoon, where he quoted Virginia Republican Gov. Glenn Youngkin and California Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom, both of whom signed legacy ban policies into law.
"It shows the broad understanding across the country, and across all ideologies, that access to the most important opportunity for advancement in life, a college education, should be based on merit and hard work, not money and family connections," Tipping said.
In response to questions about enforcement, Tipping said his bill does not include any penalties, which is consistent with similar legislation in other states. He said the committee has the option of introducing enforcement measures if they choose.
Under the proposed law, colleges could still collect data from students about whether their parents are alumni or donors, and students would still be able to write about their relationships with those individuals in essays.
Shawn Jimenez, a Bowdoin student and organizer with the national nonprofit Class Action, testified in support of the bill.
"I oppose the unfair advantages that legacy status affords individuals," Jimenez said. "Being a legacy applicant at a private institution with a selective nature increases your likelihood of admission by up to four times, even when compared to non-legacies with the same test scores and the same grades." That data comes from an analysis conducted by a Harvard research group in 2023.
Jimenez said other states that have adopted similar laws do have enforcement measures, like California's system that requires colleges to report their admissions data to the state to show compliance.
HIGHER ED PUSHES BACK
Spokespeople for Bowdoin and Colby either did not respond to requests for comment or declined to comment for this story, and none of the three colleges directly provided testimony on the bill Thursday.
However, Dan Walker, a Preti Flaherty attorney representing the Maine Independent Colleges Association, said the association is categorically opposed to any attempt to legislate admissions policies. MICA represents 11 private colleges in Maine, including Bowdoin, Bates and Colby.
"While most of our schools do not utilize legacy and donor preferences, some schools use these preferences to not only maintain traditions, but to foster a sense of community and continuity with the institution," Walker said. "These legacy students help build a student body consistent with the institution's history, mission, values, and culture, which enhances the overall campus experience for all the students. These policies help bond alumni to current and prospective students and institution, making a family-like environment."
Walker said legacy admissions encourage alumni to donate money for scholarships and research, which in turn support low-income students. He said many schools within MICA are having their own internal discussions about moving away from legacy admissions, but asked that the Legislature allow the colleges to make that decision on their own.
Bates affirmed Walker's testimony in a statement.
"While legacy students represent a small fraction of our entering classes, we support the principle as put forth by (MICA) that the Legislature should not control or influence the admission process, especially for private institutions," the statement said.
Samantha Warren, spokesperson for the University of Maine System, said no Maine public universities ever give legacy or donor-based admissions preference, but argued the bill would be an overreach.
"Nevertheless, we oppose this bill, because we don't think it's appropriate for the Legislature to dictate the conditions of student admissions of any institution in the state, public or private," Warren said. "Well-intended, to be sure, but giving any political body including this one say over admissions at our institutions undermines the authority of our respective independent governing boards, and the expertise of our enrollment management experts."
Copy the Story Link

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Read: Newsom demands Trump pull National Guard from LA protests
Read: Newsom demands Trump pull National Guard from LA protests

Axios

timean hour ago

  • Axios

Read: Newsom demands Trump pull National Guard from LA protests

California Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) on Sunday formally that requested President Trump's administration withdraw the National Guard from Los Angeles County, where troops are responding to immigration raid protests. Why it matters: Trump in a Saturday memorandum that authorized the action in response to the LA unrest cited a rarely used provision in federal law that enables presidents to deploy national National Guard troops, but Newsom called the action "unlawful." The big picture: Newsom and other Californian Democratic leaders criticized Trump and his administration on Sunday for the action, as tensions remained heightened between authorities and protesters in a weekend that's seen tear gas deployed. Driving the news: Trump in his memo said that to the "extent that protests or acts of violence directly inhibit the execution of the laws, they constitute a form of rebellion against the authority of the Government of the United States." However, David Sapp, the California governor's legal affairs secretary, said in a letter to Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth that local law enforcement resources were "sufficient to maintain order." What they're saying: Newsom said the action was "a serious breach of state sovereignty" that inflamed tensions "while pulling resources from where they're actually needed," as he posted copies of Sapp's letter to his social media accounts on Sunday.

Live Updates: Tensions Flare Between Protesters and Law Enforcement in L.A.
Live Updates: Tensions Flare Between Protesters and Law Enforcement in L.A.

New York Times

timean hour ago

  • New York Times

Live Updates: Tensions Flare Between Protesters and Law Enforcement in L.A.

News Analysis National Guard troops in Los Angeles on Sunday. Gov. Gavin Newsom of California has formally asked the Trump administration to remove them. It is the fight President Trump had been waiting for, a showdown with a top political rival in a deep blue state over an issue core to his political agenda. In bypassing the authority of Gov. Gavin Newsom of California, a Democrat, to call in the National Guard to quell protests in the Los Angeles area over his administration's efforts to deport more migrants, Mr. Trump is now pushing the boundaries of presidential authority and stoking criticism that he is inflaming the situation for political gain. Local and state authorities had not sought help in dealing with the scattered protests that erupted after an immigration raid on Friday in the garment district. But Mr. Trump and his top aides leaned into the confrontation with California leaders on Sunday, portraying the demonstrations as an existential threat to the country — setting in motion an aggressive federal response that in turn sparked new protests across the city. As more demonstrators took to the streets, the president wrote on social media that Los Angeles was being 'invaded and occupied' by 'violent, insurrectionist mobs,' and directed three of his top cabinet officials to take any actions necessary to 'liberate Los Angeles from the Migrant Invasion.' 'Nobody's going to spit on our police officers. Nobody's going to spit on our military,' Mr. Trump told reporters as he headed to Camp David on Sunday, although it was unclear whether any such incidents had occurred. 'That happens, they get hit very hard.' The president declined to say whether he planned to invoke the 1807 Insurrection Act, which allows for the use of federal troops on domestic soil to quell a rebellion. But either way, he added, 'we're going to have troops everywhere.' Stephen Miller, the White House deputy chief of staff, posted on social media that 'this is a fight to save civilization.' Mr. Trump's decision to deploy at least 2,000 members of the California National Guard is the latest example of his willingness and, at times, an eagerness to shatter norms to pursue his political goals and bypass limits on presidential power. The last president to send in the National Guard for a domestic operation without a request from the state's governor, Lyndon B. Johnson, did so in 1965, to protect civil rights demonstrators in Alabama. Image President Donald Trump in New Jersey on Sunday. On social media, he, his aides and allies have sought to frame the demonstrations against immigration officials on their own terms. Credit... Haiyun Jiang for The New York Times But aides and allies of the president say the events unfolding in Los Angeles provide an almost perfect distillation of why Mr. Trump was elected in November. 'It could not be clearer,' said Newt Gingrich, the former Republican House speaker and ally of the president who noted that Mr. Trump had been focused on immigration enforcement since 2015. 'One side is for enforcing the law and protecting Americans, and the other side is for defending illegals and being on the side of the people who break the law.' Sporadic protests have occurred across the country in recent days as federal agents have descended on Los Angeles and other cities searching workplaces for undocumented immigrants, part of an expanded effort by the administration to ramp up the number of daily deportations. On social media, Mr. Trump, his aides and allies have sought to frame the demonstrations against immigration officials on their own terms. They have shared images and videos of the most violent episodes — focusing particularly on examples of protesters lashing out at federal agents — even as many remained peaceful. Officials also zeroed in on demonstrators waving flags of other countries, including Mexico and El Salvador, as evidence of a foreign invasion. 'Illegal criminal aliens and violent mobs have been committing arson, throwing rocks at vehicles, and attacking federal law enforcement for days,' wrote Karoline Leavitt, the White House press secretary. Mr. Newsom, whom the president refers to as 'Newscum,' has long been a foil for Mr. Trump, who has repeatedly targeted California and its leader as emblematic of failures of the Democratic Party. 'We expected this, we prepared for this,' Mr. Newsom said in a statement to The New York Times. 'This is not surprising — for them to succeed, California must fail, and so they're going to try everything in their tired playbook despite the evidence against them.' Image Law enforcement officers and members of the California National Guard engaged protesters in downtown Los Angeles on Sunday. Credit... Gabriela Bhaskar/The New York Times On Sunday, the governor sent a letter to Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth formally requesting that Mr. Trump rescind the call-up of the National Guard, saying federal actions were inflaming the situation. He was echoed by other Democratic officials, who said the mounting demonstrations were the result of Mr. Trump's own actions. The president and his aides 'are masters of misinformation and disinformation,' Senator Alex Padilla of California, a Democrat, said in an interview. 'They create a crisis of their own making and come in with all the theatrics and cruelty of immigration enforcement. They should not be surprised in a community like Los Angeles they will be met by demonstrators who are very passionate about standing up for fundamental rights and due process.' Republicans defended Mr. Trump's moves, saying he was rightfully exercising his power to protect public safety. 'The president is extremely concerned about the safety of federal officials in L.A. right now who have been subject to acts of violence and harassment and obstruction,' Representative Kevin Kiley, Republican of California, said in an interview. He added: 'We are in this moment because of a series of reckless decisions by California's political leaders, the aiding and abetting the open-border policies of President Biden.' Trump officials said on Sunday that they were ready to escalate their response even more, if necessary. Tom Homan, the president's border czar, suggested in an interview with NBC News that the administration would arrest anyone, including public officials, who interfered with immigration enforcement activities, which he said would continue in California and across the country. Image Protesters in Pasadena, Calif., on Sunday. Credit... Alex Welsh for The New York Times Mr. Trump appears to be deploying against California a similar playbook that he has used to punish universities, law firms and other institutions and individuals that he views as political adversaries. Last month, he threatened to strip 'large scale' federal funding from California 'maybe permanently' over the inclusion of transgender athletes in women's sports. And in recent days, his administration said it would pull roughly $4 billion in federal funding for California's high-speed train, which would further delay a project that has long been plagued by delays and funding shortages. 'Everything he's done to attack California or anybody he fears isn't supportive of him is going to continue to be an obsession of his,' Mr. Padilla said. 'He may think it plays smart for his base, but it's actually been bad for the country.' White House officials said there was a different common denominator that explains Mr. Trump's actions both against institutions like Harvard and immigration protests in Los Angeles. 'For years Democrat-run cities and institutions have failed the American people, by both choice and incompetence,' Abigail Jackson, a White House spokeswoman, said in a statement. 'In each instance,' she added, 'the president took necessary action to protect Americans when Democrats refused.'

DNC chair on leaked call says Hogg ‘essentially destroyed' initial credibility
DNC chair on leaked call says Hogg ‘essentially destroyed' initial credibility

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

DNC chair on leaked call says Hogg ‘essentially destroyed' initial credibility

Democratic National Committee (DNC) Chair Ken Martin said in a recent party meeting that Vice Chair David Hogg has 'essentially destroyed' his chances of leading the DNC successfully, according to leaked audio obtained by Politico. Martin seemed to get choked up as he addressed Hogg, who rose to national prominence as a gun control activist and has pledged to primary Democrats he sees as ineffective in pushing back against President Trump and the GOP. 'No one knows who the hell I am, right? I'm trying to get my sea legs underneath of me and actually develop any amount of credibility so I can go out there and raise the money and do the job I need to, to put ourselves in a position to win,' Martin told other DNC leaders on the call. 'And again, I don't think you intended this, but you essentially destroyed any chance I have to show the leadership what I need to. It's really frustrating,' Martin said. Politico reported that the conversation took place on a Zoom meeting of DNC officers on May 15, a few days after the DNC recommended new elections on procedural grounds for seats held by Hogg and one other vice chair. Members will decide on Monday whether to hold new elections. In the recording, Martin told Hogg that he respected the progressive activist but said the intraparty drama has led him to question whether it's worth continuing in the post. 'I'll say, look, it has plenty of warts, and we're all trying to change those, for sure, but the longer we continue this fight, the harder it is for us to actually do what we all want to do, which is make a difference in this country again,' Martin said in the meeting. 'So I deeply respect you, David. I, too, was looking forward to working with you, but this has created a situation, and I'll be very honest with you, for the first time in my 100 days on this job … the other night, I said to myself, for the first time, I don't know if I want to do this anymore.' In a statement to The Hill, Martin said, 'I'm not going anywhere.' 'I took this job to fight Republicans, not Democrats. As I said when I was elected, our fight is not within the Democratic Party, our fight is and has to be solely focused on Donald Trump and the disastrous Republican agenda,' he said. 'That's the work that I will continue to do every day.' Symone Sanders Townsend, an MSNBC host and former Democratic adviser, came to Martin's defense in a post on the social platform X on Sunday. 'Ken Martin had a vulnerable moment w/his vice chairs & other leaders on a call. Someone recorded it + shared it. Seems to me THAT anonymous person has no business anywhere near the DNC,' she wrote. 'As a former DNC member, it's quite clear there are too many people currently in roles for the wrong reasons. From the outside looking in, I don't think Ken Martin is one of them.' Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store