logo
Loss of flights another blow for Wānaka patients

Loss of flights another blow for Wānaka patients

Photo: Sounds Air Travel and Tourism Limited
The loss of two popular regional flights is a blow to tourism and people needing treatment at Christchurch Hospital.
Sounds Air will stop its flights from Blenheim to Christchurch and Christchurch to Wānaka from the end of September due to what has been described as 'out of control' costs.
Are you affected by the loss of flights between Wānaka and Christchurch? Email reporters@odt.co.nz
Sounds Air managing director Andrew Crawford said the airline was flying more passengers than ever but could not keep up with the costs that have remained high since the pandemic, engineer shortages and the weak New Zealand dollar.
Sounds Air said it was going back to basics, canning the two routes, selling five smaller aircraft, and expanding its Cessna Caravan fleet for Cook Strait services.
Ten staff will lose their jobs.
That was after cancelling its services from Wellington to Taupō and Wellington to Westport last December and selling an aircraft.
The Minister for the South Island and Associate Minister for Transport, James Meager, told RNZhe had spoken with Andrew Crawford recently to reassure him the issue was a high priority.
But Crawford said they had reached out to the government numerous times to no avail, and passing the buck on to customers to cover costs was not an option.
The airline's fares had gone up by more than 20 percent since Covid - they could go up another 20 percent and it would still not be enough to cover its costs, he said.
Marlborough Mayor Nadine Taylor said the council had raised the issue with government, and was told market forces would take care of it.
It was gutting for the region as the Blenheim-Christchurch route was a critical part of the region's economic recovery, she said.
"I am frustrated that Sounds Air was unsuccessful in securing support from central government as regional connectivity is also important for economic growth, particularly tourism," she said.
"There is often talk of the regions being our country's powerhouses - to be that we need infrastructure, services, and connectivity."
Christchurch Hospital provided a lot of primary care for cancer patients, and Taylor had already been contacted by some of the patients who regularly used the service.
"They're just sort of saying 'it's just such a devastating loss for them'. They're back to four or five hours on the road. They need family to transport them and take them rather than just dropping them at the airport," she said.
Wānaka local and Queenstown Lakes Deputy Mayor Quentin Smith was disappointed the service was being cut.
So instead of being able to take a short flight that was less than an hour, it meant an hours-long drive.
"The alternative of either driving, which is about five-and-a-half hours each way or going to Queenstown, where you've got to drive over an hour each way plus you've got to be there a lot earlier for your flights than you do for Sounds Air," he said.
His daughter used the service a few weeks ago, and he said it was well used by travellers for business, holidays and appointments.
It also presented a problem for healthcare, especially for people coming from Wānaka or Blenheim who need to travel to Christchurch Hospital for treatment.
"Healthcare, I think, is a big one because people will fly up to Christchurch and back for a specialist appointment ... we know that access to healthcare out of Wānaka is particularly challenging so that's an issue that concerns me," Smith said.
Smith remembered when Air New Zealand used to fly the same route before the service was cut more than a decade ago.
"There's been a bit of a history of the offering and loss of this type of service. We've just got to find something that's sustainable that matches the needs. It was disappointing that a service that is really well-patronised isn't successful and there's obviously other reasons for that," he said.
Christchurch Airport chief executive Justin Watson was sad to see the flights go.
"A number of the regional airlines have been facing big challenges so ultimately it wasn't a complete surprise. We were hoping that they could work through those challenges and that they could find a way to continue to operate. But unfortunately they haven't been able to do that," he said.
Both services carried about 10,000 passengers a year.
Watson would like to see a collective approach to ensure the wings of important regional services were not clipped.
"There's a reality there that says every region can't be connected or it's going to cost so much that people just won't fly on it because it's too expensive," he said.
"In some countries, there is support through the likes of government for ensuring connectivity remains."
South Island Minister James Meager said the government had already taken action in a variety of ways - including providing investment in regional airport infrastructure, commencing the release of regional on-time flight performance data - and would soon release an aviation action plan.
He understood the conditions were tough in the aviation industry and airlines were under pressure - and that the government was actively considering several options to address regional connectivity concerns and improve competition in the sector.
Destination Marlborough general manager Tracey Green said Christchurch was a key visitor market for Marlborough.
"Recent challenges with Air New Zealand and ferry services have compromised our connectivity and losing Christchurch as a direct link is a significant blow," she said.
"The full impact of this loss in connectivity may not be immediately clear, but it's a real shame this is happening just ahead of the summer season, when we rely on those connections the most," Green said.
With a renewed focus on the Cook Strait services, Andrew Crawford said he was confident about the future of the business.
"We are not alone in this, Air New Zealand and other regional carriers in New Zealand, and world-wide, have been hit by the same cost increases, and the irony is that our passenger demand has never been stronger," he said.
"However, aviation is a very price sensitive market and demand would dry up if we tried to pass all of the cost increases to our customers."
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Big international stadium tours are cannibalising local music
Big international stadium tours are cannibalising local music

The Spinoff

time2 hours ago

  • The Spinoff

Big international stadium tours are cannibalising local music

The calls are growing louder and more desperate for the world's biggest pop stars to include Aotearoa on their global tours. We ought to be careful what we wish for, writes Ben Howe. Recently, many have been asking why so many global blockbuster music acts venture no further south than Australia. Major artists such as Taylor Swift, Oasis and Billie Eilish have caused much fan angst – how could they pass us by? This has coincided with much discussion on large-scale events, among them competing stadium proposals for Auckland's Western Springs and Green MP Tamatha Paul advocating for an arena venue in Wellington. Music journalist Chris Schulz has been a zealous voice, writing passionately on the perceived shortage of global hitmakers visiting our shores. An arena show can be a memorable experience. I still recall, as a child, attending Bob Marley's legendary 1978 Western Springs show with my parents. However, too many international events coming down here can also have a hidden cost for local music, one which is not healthy for our industry and the overall economy. But, let's begin with one thing arena event campaigners and myself do agree on; that live music is important. A recent study by my colleagues at Massey University, Measuring and Articulating the Value of Live Performance in Aotearoa, found that live events benefit individual and community well-being. It estimates the economic, social and cultural value of the live performance sector at a hefty $17.3 billion. The research, however, also identifies that cost is the primary barrier preventing people from attending more live events. Simply put, individuals have limited disposable income. Gigs are expensive and we can't go to everything. A big night out, including parking, dinner, babysitters, stopping off at a bar in Kingsland before Coldplay, for example, means those same dollars can't be spent at a different restaurant, in another town, on a different day. This is why regions around Aotearoa seek to capture a greater share of the events market. They compete internally by subsidising various fixtures, hoping to encourage domestic tourism and boost local businesses. Crucially though, this substitution of the dollar also affects local music. If fans don't blow their entertainment budget on an epic rock night with Pearl Jam, then they'll get sweaty with Wellington's DARTZ instead. Hirsute metalheads might appreciate swords and sorcery with Auckland's Princess Chelsea, in place of Metallica. Imaginative perhaps, but my overall point is we know these sort of exchanges do happen. When the borders were closed (but we could still attend events) during Covid, people tried different things; local live music thrived. International arena events also don't grow the overall entertainment dollar, because they don't bring in overseas fans. In the 2024/5 financial year the international tourism spend was $12.2 billion, of which 9% was on 'entertainment'. Only 6.2% of visitors to this country said an event brought them here, but this includes personal occasions such as weddings. In this study, sport captures 2.5% and music isn't even mentioned. Instead, if we bring in more big arena shows, this will capture a greater share of our finite live music market. Most of these shows are promoted by the major multinational companies such as Live Nation and TEG. These businesses' primary focus is maximising market share. In order to achieve this, they consolidate vertical integration and venue ownership – clipping your dollar from the ticketing fees to the beer at the bar, along with everything in between. Among the live music infrastructure controlled or owned by these companies is Ticketek (TEG), Ticketmaster (Live Nation), Spark Arena (very convoluted but ultimately Live Nation), Laneway Festival (TEG), Rhythm & Vines (Live Nation) and many others. Overseas, this market dominance has resulted in accusations of anti-competitive behaviour. In addition to stadium tours cannibalising local music, a large proportion of the income and profits generated from stadium events in Aotearoa flows offshore. This extraction can happen via the sizeable artist fees, the international promoter's cut, ticketing companies and in many other ways. In contrast, with local artist shows and events, most economic benefits circulate internally. Riding this recent wave of arena show flag waving – or possibly generating it – some major international music promoters have started calling for tax incentives and government support. They say help is needed to assuage the challenges landing the desirable but slippery big fish. Apparently, we need to start pumping more megastars through the pipeline. How else will we fill all the stadiums we've built or are building? While public funding and support for arts, culture, and music is important, it must be used in ways that generate value for the local music community and economy – ones that support grass roots music and develop our own global success stories. We could also learn from our cousins across the ditch. They are developing intelligent ways to safeguard Australian music. One of these is called 'Michael's Rule', a self-regulating system where all international tours must have a local support artist. While international mega-gigs do have their place, to ensure things are fair for local artists, we need to cultivate more policies such as 'Michael's Rule'. In the arena show discussion, it is important to consider the interests of the Aotearoa music community.

‘Perfect Storm' Of Global Crises Drove Years Of Food Price Surges: FAO
‘Perfect Storm' Of Global Crises Drove Years Of Food Price Surges: FAO

Scoop

time6 hours ago

  • Scoop

‘Perfect Storm' Of Global Crises Drove Years Of Food Price Surges: FAO

22 July 2025 The report, to be released later this month, reveals how between 2020 and 2024, the world experienced a dramatic increase in food prices driven by a combination of COVID-19 inflation, the war in Ukraine restricting movements on food and commodities, and increasing climate shocks. 'The episodes described in this publication bring up what we call a perfect storm,' said Mr. Torero Cullen. Máximo Torero Cullen speaks to journalists at the UN HQs via video link. First, he explained that during the COVID-19 pandemic, governments launched fiscal stimulus and relief packages, which increased demand and, thus, global inflation. Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine compounded this crisis. Before the war began in 2022, Ukraine was a key exporter of wheat, sunflower oil and fertilisers. The war not only restricted these exports but disrupted trade routes and pushed up fuel and input costs, which amplified inflation across the world. Additionally, increasingly frequent and intense climate shocks in major producing regions – such as droughts, floods and heat waves – further aggravated food inflation. Worldwide impacts Only in 2024 did prices return to pre-COVID levels, meaning that households struggled for multiple years to afford food, with major consequences. As real wages fell while food prices increased, household purchasing power was eroded. Households responded by buying cheaper and less nutritious food, reducing meal frequency, and often prioritising meals for certain family members and reducing intake for women and children. Mr. Torero Cullen also explained that an increase in food prices directly correlates to an increase in moderate and severe food insecurity. The impacts of this were particularly harsh in Africa and Western Asia, where food imports, dependence and currency depreciation made food even more expensive. Moreover, as food prices increased, nutrition outcomes among children under five worsened. The SOFI report illustrated that a 10 per cent food price increase led to a 2.7 to 6.1 per cent increase in moderate to severe wasting, which has long-lasting effects on child development and public health systems. Notably, these grave impacts were uneven, mostly affecting low-income and African countries – many of which are still seeing worsening figures. During the peak of the crisis in January 2023, some low-income countries experienced food price inflation of up to 30 per cent, compared to 13.6 per cent globally. Policy recommendations Mr. Torero Cullen finished his briefing by outlining the policy prescriptions detailed in the SOFI report. He first underscored targeted fiscal support. 'Social protection measures are the most effective response to food price spikes,' he explained. 'This will protect vulnerable populations without creating long-term fiscal risk or market distortions.' He also highlighted avoiding trade disruptions, coordinating monetary and fiscal policies, improving market transparency, and institutional preparedness as essential components for avoiding future crises. 'This SOFI underscores that inflation can undermine progress. It underlines our vulnerabilities, and it also brings the importance of strengthening resilience, inclusiveness and transparency to be able to avoid and minimize the risk of these problems,' he concluded.

Inside Economics: Why inflation is back and why the Reserve Bank can probably ignore it
Inside Economics: Why inflation is back and why the Reserve Bank can probably ignore it

NZ Herald

time7 hours ago

  • NZ Herald

Inside Economics: Why inflation is back and why the Reserve Bank can probably ignore it

The reason I ask is that the discretionary spend in New Zealand is very subdued (who would be in retail at the moment?) and is likely to be so for another 12 months. Everyone is struggling, yet the RBNZ uses 'inflation' per se as a prerequisite to interest rate movement. I and virtually everyone I know have children, are ostensibly doing well, ie good jobs, own houses (with mortgages but not over-leveraged), but all seem to be doing it tough, even though in the scheme of things they would be considered to be in a relatively sound position. I'm not convinced it's demand which is fuelling inflation as such, so why can't the RBNZ release the brakes? Interested in your thoughts. Kind regards, Simon A: Good question, Simon, thanks for that, although I have to say I didn't really want to be back here explaining the nuances of inflation so soon after the last big spike. Here we are, though, with inflation back in the headlines and tipped to exceed the upper limit of the Reserve Bank's (RBNZ) 1-3% target band in this current quarter. The short answer to your question is yes – there definitely is supply side (or cost-push) inflation and demand side (demand-pull) inflation. It's the demand side that the central banks can control by tightening or loosening the money supply with higher or lower interest rates. When there's too much money in the system – as was the case after all the Covid stimulus – demand in the economy starts to exceed the capacity of the economy to produce goods and provide services. This causes prices to rise and produces inflation. The reason economists remain relatively relaxed about the longer-term inflation outlook is that despite the current spike in demand, we currently have the opposite conditions in the economy. The recessionary trend means demand is sitting well below the capacity of the economy, so at its core, inflation is easing and some prices are actually falling. Building costs fell in the June quarter and there was annual deflation for furniture, furnishings and floor coverings, household textiles and household appliances. So you are right in your assumption that it is a supply-side problem causing inflation right now. That is, it is very specific cost increases that are driving the current spike in inflation. On the tradeable inflation side (ie the side where the prices are determined by international pricing), we've seen a big rise in commodity prices for proteins such as dairy and beef. That (as regular readers will be sick of hearing from me) is a net win for New Zealand as an exporting nation. Where would the economy be without those extra billions of export earnings rolling in? In a deep hole is the answer. Unfortunately, though, while prices are the headline grabber, the current inflation situation has been exacerbated by some non-tradeable (ie domestically priced) costs that have continued to rise. Economists describe them as 'administered costs' and the culprits are specifically council rates, power prices and insurance premiums. We might want to throw a round of increases for streaming services into the mix, as they rose 9% in the last quarter. Interest rate outlook So, to answer the second part of your question, people are doing it tough, and it's not demand that is fuelling inflation (well, not domestic demand anyway, international demand for protein is a factor). That limits the control the Reserve Bank has over it. So it should be able to look through the latest rise and start cutting rates again soon. And expectations are that it will. Acting Reserve Bank Governor Christian Hawkesby is expected to announce at least one more Official Cash Rate cut this year. Photo / Mark Mitchell I guess the RBNZ felt it was important to pause this month just to be sure that the inflation wasn't becoming more deeply embedded in the core of the economy. But Monday's CPI numbers weren't as bad as some feared and revealed that demand-side inflation continues to fall. Economists now see a 25-basis-point rate cut as a near certainty when the RBNZ delivers its next Monetary Policy Statement on August 20. After that, it depends on who you talk to, but most economists expect at least one more cut (probably in November) to take the Official Cash Rate to 2.75%. Some – such as Kiwibank and ANZ – feel another one might be needed, taking it to 2.5%. Meanwhile, most expect the supply-side inflation will play through by the fourth quarter as food commodity prices tail off. And nobody is expecting the demand side to pick up much until next year. Social media vs reality (or, what I did in my holidays) I've been immersed in US politics this year, thanks to Donald Trump's tariffs and the various economic implications for New Zealand. So it was a relief to take a two-week break from all the American political madness over the recent school holidays. Ironically, I spent those two weeks in America, where real life seemed to be carrying on with a much greater sense of normalcy than you might expect if you rely – as most Kiwis do – on headlines and social media posts. I'm not saying there aren't big, unprecedented things happening in American politics. There are and many of them are very worrying. But what struck me was that the media takes I've been getting from the left and the right had created a distorted picture of what things are really like on the ground. From the left, I had the impression that the US would feel considerably more authoritarian than it did. Almost every New Zealander I told I was heading to the US asked me if I was scrubbing my social media of political content – some suggested taking a 'burner' phone. I didn't, but felt acutely aware that most of my criticism of Trump and US foreign policy is there for anyone to read on the Herald website. Some commentators talk about the rise of American fascism. Taken at face value, I'd begun to think that taking my family to New York in 2025 might be akin to visiting Germany in 1936. Meanwhile, from the right, I was given the impression that big liberal US cities – such as New York – had descended into third-world chaos. There is a particular strain of social media content that seeks to show cities such as New York (and London and Paris) as overrun by immigrants and with infrastructure crumbling after years of ineffectual, woke, bureaucratic management. Anyway, I'm happy to report that all of it was nonsense. Media takes from the left and the right create a distorted picture of what things are really like on the ground in New York. Photo / Getty Images Border control was friendly and uninterested in my politics or who I was. New York was buzzing with hot summer energy. Our mid-Town location landed us in the thick of the annual Pride Parade – a typically colourful and fabulous event. There were no visible signs of politics. The city was highly functional and felt exceedingly safe. On the subway and in Harlem, Brooklyn, the Bronx and Queens, things were lively and people were loud, but nobody was aggressive. The level of homelessness seemed surprisingly low – certainly on a per capita basis compared to what I've become used to in Auckland. Public transport was cheap and easy to use. The only big change I noticed from my last visit a decade ago was that the volume of traffic in Manhattan was much lower because of congestion charging. That just made the place more pleasant, to be honest. Apart from getting this off my chest, what does it all mean for economy watching? Well, not too much perhaps. But I do worry that anxiety about the state of the world is a contributing factor to the lack of business and consumer confidence in New Zealand. We need to get over that. It's the nature of media – both social and legacy – to amplify conflict and disruption. Unfortunately, as a nation tucked away in the far corner of the world, it is hard not to let our views be shaped by the grim content on our news feeds. I'm still concerned about tariff fallout and global conflict, and AI-driven social revolutions. But I feel less acutely anxious about it all. Perhaps I just needed the break. China focus With this comforting anecdotal evidence tucked away to inform my coverage of US economic issues, my attention now turns to China. I'm heading up to China in September on a work trip with the New Zealand China Council. Given how much I've written about the economic downturn in China, I'm hopeful (and fairly confident) that I get a timely reminder of the scale of its economy and how epic that is, regardless of consumer sentiment. China's GDP landed at an annual rate of 5.3% for the June quarter, beating expectations and only marginally down on the 5.4% of the previous quarter. That suggests little fallout from US tariffs, so far at least. The big issue remains the domestic property market. Falling property prices are undermining consumer confidence. That's making consumers less likely to splash out on big luxury items – like a holiday in New Zealand. ANZ China chief economist Raymond Yeung says the process is well understood by the leadership and Beijing. Speaking at last week's China Summit in Auckland, Yeung said the leadership in Beijing is reluctant to provide support for the property market as it seeks to shift the investment mindset of Chinese consumers away from property. There was a determination to wait it out while the market naturally rebalanced, but it was still about 18-24 months away from hitting bottom, Yeung said. That suggests we shouldn't be holding our breath for a Chinese-led recovery in our tourism sector any time soon. Yeung, on stage with China foreign policy expert Andrew Browne, provided a fascinating session at the summit. I'll use it for the basis of a feature-length look at China's economy later this week. Liam Dann is business editor-at-large for the New Zealand Herald. He is a senior writer and columnist, and also presents and produces videos and podcasts. He joined the Herald in 2003. To sign up to his weekly newsletter, click on your user profile at and select 'My newsletters'. For a step-by-step guide, click here. If you have a burning question about the quirks or intricacies of economics send it to or leave a message in the comments section.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store