logo
Letters: What if we assigned schools double duty?

Letters: What if we assigned schools double duty?

In the late 1960s, the West Island was experiencing rapid growth, leading to a shortage of space in high schools.
Before Pierrefonds Community High School opened in 1971, many students attended Villa Nova in Pointe-Claire, which operated on a double-shift system — whereby two groups of students are accommodated each day, the first from morning until midday, the second from midday to late afternoon.
Both groups received around five hours of teaching per day, as mandated by the Education Act. If memory serves: from 7:45 a.m. to 12:30 p.m., and from 1 p.m. to 5:45 p.m.
This structure allows schools to efficiently utilize their facilities, including classrooms, laboratories and recreational areas, ensuring they serve a larger number of students without the need for additional infrastructure.
I see no reason today why this type of teaching and learning environment cannot succeed at a time when the government is under pressure to build new schools and renovate existing ones.
Chris Eustace, Pierrefonds
Shine a light on spending
Thank you to Catherine Fournier, the courageous mayor of Longueuil, for daring to question the incredibly high cost of infrastructure projects in Quebec.
There can be no doubt that $1 million to install a traffic light is completely unreasonable and unacceptable.
Something must be done because our roads are crumbling, hospitals are inadequate to meet the needs of the population, and cuts in the education system threaten catastrophe in our schools.
It is time to hold our government accountable for where money is being spent.
Sandra Sterling, Snowdon
Heed U.S. lesson and vote
I agree wholeheartedly with my fellow citizen, who challenged Americans to stop apologizing and do something in the 2026 midterm elections.
The U.S. has basically ignored Canada and looked down on Mexico as a reservoir of cheap labour, failing to recognize either country as an invaluable friend and ally.
It's sad that U.S. voters are often being painted with one brush, but they have only themselves to blame.
We Canadians should take a hint and be sure to vote in our elections at all levels. By not voting, we are relinquishing our right to have a say in our government.
If you don't feel that your priorities are being met by any of the parties, suck it up and choose the one you think will do the least damage.
Get involved with a party that might be open to your values, or form your own party with like-minded citizens.
Do whatever you can to protect our democracy, and don't leave it up to someone else.
Iris Shestowsky, Montreal
Stunning antics in the Oval Office
There are many negative adjectives used to describe Donald Trump.
However, having just watched Wednesday's televised Oval Office meeting between Trump and South African President Cyril Ramaphosa, no words can describe the embarrassment all Americans should feel at having this man represent them on the world stage.
Michael Green, Côte-St-Luc
Submitting a letter to the editor
Letters should be sent by email to letters@montrealgazette.com
We prioritize letters that respond to, or are inspired by, articles published by The Gazette.
If you are responding to a specific article, let us know which one.
Letters should be sent uniquely to us. The shorter they are — ideally, fewer than 200 words — the greater the chance of publication.
Timing, clarity, factual accuracy and tone are all important, as is whether the writer has something new to add to the conversation.
We reserve the right to edit and condense all letters. Care is taken to preserve the core of the writer's argument.
Our policy is not to publish anonymous letters, those with pseudonyms or 'open letters' addressed to third parties.
Letters are published with the author's full name and city or neighbourhood/borough of residence. Include a phone number and address to help verify identity; these will not be published.
We will not indicate to you whether your letter will be published. If it has not been published within 10 days or so, it is not likely to be.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

GOLDBERG: Trump's 'Mission Accomplished' tariff hype is just that
GOLDBERG: Trump's 'Mission Accomplished' tariff hype is just that

Toronto Sun

time8 hours ago

  • Toronto Sun

GOLDBERG: Trump's 'Mission Accomplished' tariff hype is just that

U.S. President Donald Trump boards Air Force One on August 15, 2025 at Joint Base Andrews, Maryland. President Trump is traveling to Anchorage, Alaska, for peace talks with Russian President Vladimir Putin on the war in Ukraine. Photo by Andrew Harnik / Getty Images On May 1, 2003, George W. Bush announced, 'Major combat operations in Iraq have ended.' He was standing below a giant banner that read, 'Mission Accomplished.' At the risk of understating the matter, subsequent events didn't cooperate. However, it took some time for this to be widely accepted. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. THIS CONTENT IS RESERVED FOR SUBSCRIBERS ONLY Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. SUBSCRIBE TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. REGISTER / SIGN IN TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account. Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments. Enjoy additional articles per month. Get email updates from your favourite authors. THIS ARTICLE IS FREE TO READ REGISTER TO UNLOCK. Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments Enjoy additional articles per month Get email updates from your favourite authors Don't have an account? Create Account We're in a similar place when it comes to President Donald Trump's experiment with a new global trading order. 'Tariffs are making our country Strong and Rich!!!' proclaims Trump, making him not only the first Republican president in living memory to brag about raising taxes on Americans, but also the first to insist that raising taxes on Americans makes us richer. MAGA's mission-accomplished groupthink relies primarily on three arguments. The first is that Trump has successfully concluded a slew of beneficial trade deals. The truth is that some of those deals are simply 'frameworks' that will take a long time to be ironed out. But Trump got the headlines he wanted. The second argument is a kind of populism-infused sleight of hand. The 'experts' — their scare quotes, not mine — are wrong once again. Your noon-hour look at what's happening in Toronto and beyond. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. Please try again This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. The White House social media account crows, 'In April, 'experts' called tariffs 'the biggest policy mistake in 95 years.' By July, they generated OVER $100 BILLION in revenue. Facts expose the haters: tariffs WORK. Trust in Trump.' But the high-fivers are leaving things out. The most dire predictions of economic catastrophe were based on the scheme Trump announced on April 2, a.k.a. 'Liberation Day.' Trump quickly backed off that plan ('chickened out' in Wall Street parlance ) in response to a bond and stock market implosion. Saying the experts were wrong under those circumstances is like saying experts opposed to defenestration were wrong when they successfully convinced a man not to jump out a window. The third argument, made by the White House and many others — that tariffs are working because they're raising money — is a response to a claim no one made. To my knowledge, no expert claimed tariffs wouldn't raise money. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. The estimates of these revenues from Trump World are stratospheric. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick expects somewhere between $700 billion and $1 trillion per year. Last month, the government collected $29 billion. Likely, this number will significantly increase as more tariffs come online and businesses run down the inventory they stockpiled earlier this year in anticipation of more tariffs to come. Normally, Republicans don't exult over massive revenues from tax hikes. But Trump's defenders get around this problem by insisting that money is 'pouring' and 'flowing' into America from someplace else. Tariff revenue is indeed pouring into the Treasury, but that money is coming out of American bank accounts, because American importers pay the tariff. Even Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent cannot deny this when pressed. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. So yes, tariffs are 'working' the way they're supposed to; the problem is Trump thinks tariffs work differently than they do. It's possible some foreign exporters might lower prices to maintain market share and some American businesses might absorb the costs for now to avoid sticker shock for inflation-beleaguered consumers, but what revenue is generated still comes from Americans. Ultimately, it means higher prices paid here, reduced profits for businesses here or reduced U.S. trade overall. Sometimes, when pressed, defenders of the administration will concede the true source of the revenues, but then they say the pain is necessary to force manufacturers and other businesses to build and produce in the United States. It's a backdoor industrial policy masquerading as trade policy. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. That, too, might 'work.' But all of this will take time, no matter what. And, if it works, that will have costs, too. Manufacturing in America is more expensive and that's why we manufacture so much stuff abroad in the first place. If this 'reshoring' happens, our goods will be more expensive, and less money will 'pour in' from tariffs. It's difficult to exaggerate how well-understood all of this was on the American right until very recently. But the need to grab any argument available to declare Trump's experiment a success has a lot of people not only abandoning their previous dogma but leaping to the conclusion that the dogma was wrong all along. Maybe it was, though I don't think so. The evidence so far suggests that problems are looming. The dollar is weakening. Prices continue to rise. The job market is reeling. The stock market (an unreliable metric, according to MAGA, when it plummeted after Liberation Day) is holding on, thanks to tech stocks. The truth is, we won't have real evidence for a while. It's worth remembering that Americans don't live by headlines and press releases and they don't live in the macro economy either. Declaring 'Mission Accomplished' for the macro economy won't convince people they're better off in their own micro-economies when they're not. Crime Toronto & GTA Toronto Blue Jays Sunshine Girls Toronto Blue Jays

HUNTER: Dear Judges, 'cruel and unusual' is a young boy killed by stray bullet
HUNTER: Dear Judges, 'cruel and unusual' is a young boy killed by stray bullet

Toronto Sun

time8 hours ago

  • Toronto Sun

HUNTER: Dear Judges, 'cruel and unusual' is a young boy killed by stray bullet

Get the latest from Brad Hunter straight to your inbox MR CRUEL AND UNUSUAL: Canada's Supreme Court Chief Justice Richard Wagner has moaned that Canadians just understand the other worldly wisdom of the the court. Photo by Chris Helgren / REUTERS Canadian judges love to toss out the old 'cruel and unusual' chestnut when it suits their ideological whims. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. THIS CONTENT IS RESERVED FOR SUBSCRIBERS ONLY Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. SUBSCRIBE TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. REGISTER / SIGN IN TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account. Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments. Enjoy additional articles per month. Get email updates from your favourite authors. THIS ARTICLE IS FREE TO READ REGISTER TO UNLOCK. Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments Enjoy additional articles per month Get email updates from your favourite authors Don't have an account? Create Account The violent illegal immigrant whose deportation is iced because it might be 'cruel and unusual.' Mandatory minimum sentences for gun crimes? 'Cruel and unusual.' A killer who ONLY murdered one person has to do the full 25? Again, cruel and unusual. He should get a discount for only murdering one luckless individual. Violent youthful offenders should not feel the full weight of the law; again, because that would be 'cruel and unusual.' Tough to get bail and conditions? 'Cruel and unusual.' GIVE 'EM A BREAK: The Supreme Court of Canada in Ottawa is pictured on Friday, March 29, 2024. Photo by Ashley Fraser / Postmedia Network But the phrase 'cruel and unusual' is never, ever used when we are discussing murder victims or crime victims of any stripe. Victims like eight-year-old boy JahVai Roy, murdered by a stray bullet early Saturday morning in North York. Your noon-hour look at what's happening in Toronto and beyond. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. Please try again This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. And we have the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Canada, Richard Wagner, moaning and sobbing that his fellow Canadians just don't understand. How wise they are, how just, how exquisitely fair. How absolutely goddamn fantastic our robed great and good truly are. JahVai Roy, 8, was struck and killed by a stray bullet while sleeping in his North York home. HANDOUT Why the Chief Justice is so infallible that some generous soul sprang for a bust of this God-like figure. The shameless ego of this so-called man of law is breathtaking. But that little boy who won't see his ninth birthday? Who will never play another game of baseball, soccer or hockey? Who will never marry, have children or grow old with a lifetime of wonderful memories? Abdoul Aziz Sarr, 14, of Toronto, was stabbed to death at a McDonald's in the Beaches on Saturday, July 5, 2025. Photo by Handout / Toronto Police A few eggs sometimes need to be broken in pursuit of woke Nirvana, the Supreme Court will tell us. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. That little boy in the morgue was sleeping in his bed, a place of sanctuary, when terror struck. A stray bullet hit the little guy in the head, killing him at his apartment building at Martha Eaton Way and Trethewey Dr. near Black Creek Dr. in the city's north end. Despite heroic efforts by cops and paramedics, the boy was later pronounced dead in the hospital. Officers allegedly seized two loaded handguns with over-capacity magazines, ammunition, and an assortment of suspected cocaine, MDMA and fentanyl during a search of a Whitby home on Tuesday, June 24, 2025. Photo by Handout / Ontario Provincial Police 'It's an unimaginably tragic event that has occurred here,' Det. Sgt. Jason Davis told reporters while providing an update from the scene on Saturday morning. 'What's happened here is a cowardly, disgusting act of violence, and every resource available in the city is being allocated to this right now.' So far, cops have not released any descriptions of the killers. They did say two other units in the building were hit by bullets as well. Thankfully, there were no injuries. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. Toronto Police Chief Myron Demkiw speaks during a news conference on Wednesday, June 18, 2025. Photo by JACK BOLAND / TORONTO SUN Read More Toronto Police Chief Myron Demkiw said he was 'heartbroken by the tragic loss' and that 'no family should endure this.' The chief said every resource the cops have is committed to nabbing the killers. Believe it. In homicide parlance, this is a red ball. The killers will be in handcuffs inside a week or two, too hot even for others in the criminal milieu. And when these monsters are busted? We will likely find the answers as we suspect. It will be a combination of horrors. Soft gun laws, easy bail, hug a thug for teen terrors, easy prison time with a small army of social workers and judges to kiss it better. That eight-year-old citizen of this city, so coldly murdered, had every right to feel safe in his bed and look forward to the promise of a rich life. The killer who took his life may have squeezed the trigger, but a Canadian justice system that doesn't give a whit for murder victims, young, old, rich or poor? They provided the bullets. bhunter@ On X: @HunterTOSun RECOMMENDED VIDEO Crime Toronto & GTA Toronto Blue Jays Sunshine Girls Toronto Blue Jays

GOLDSTEIN: Canada's targets for cutting greenhouse gases fit the definition of insanity
GOLDSTEIN: Canada's targets for cutting greenhouse gases fit the definition of insanity

Toronto Sun

time9 hours ago

  • Toronto Sun

GOLDSTEIN: Canada's targets for cutting greenhouse gases fit the definition of insanity

Liberal and Conservative governments have been setting and failing to meet emission reduction targets since 1988. Photo by iStock / GETTY IMAGES After almost four decades of Canadian governments setting and failing to hit eight consecutive targets for reducing Canada's industrial greenhouse gas emissions, surely it's time to admit the targets are meaningless. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. THIS CONTENT IS RESERVED FOR SUBSCRIBERS ONLY Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. SUBSCRIBE TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. REGISTER / SIGN IN TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account. Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments. Enjoy additional articles per month. Get email updates from your favourite authors. THIS ARTICLE IS FREE TO READ REGISTER TO UNLOCK. Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments Enjoy additional articles per month Get email updates from your favourite authors Don't have an account? Create Account Far from being 'aspirational' as supporters claim, they in fact deceive Canadians about the effectiveness of federal spending of more than $200 billion of taxpayers' money on climate change (as of 2023) on 149 federal programs administered by 13 government departments, since the Liberal government came to power in 2015. In fact, Liberal and Conservative governments have been setting and failing to meet emission reduction targets since 1988. Given 37 years of ongoing failures, these targets now fit the definition of insanity — doing the same thing over and over again, expecting different results. Here's where things stand given the latest available federal government emissions data that comes from 2023. Your noon-hour look at what's happening in Toronto and beyond. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. Please try again This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. Canada's current emission reduction target was set by then prime minister Justin Trudeau in 2021 — a goal of reducing Canada's emissions to at least 40% (and, ideally, up to 45%) below 2005 levels in 2030. According to the federal government, which retroactively changes the historical data every year based, it says, on improved data-gathering methods, Canada emitted 759 million tonnes of these gases in 2005. That means the government's target is to cut Canada's emissions to 455 million tonnes (40% below 2005 levels) and, ideally, to 417 million tonnes (45% below 2005 levels) in 2030. Canada's emissions in 2023 were 694 million tonnes which is 8.5% below 2005 levels. To meet the minimum federal target of reducing emissions to 455 million tonnes in 2030 would require cutting 2023 emissions by 239 million tonnes. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. That would mean the equivalent of shutting down Canada's entire old and gas sector (208 million tonnes of annual emissions in 2023) in 2030 and still coming up short. To reach the government's interim target of reducing emissions to 20% below 2005 levels in 2026 (meaning 607 million tonnes) would require a cut of 87 million tonnes of emissions by next year, more than all emissions from Canada's buildings sector in 2023 (82.7 million tonnes). Earlier this year, the government announced another unrealistic target of reducing emissions to 45%-50% of 2005 levels by 2035. A report by federal environment commissioner Jerry DeMarco following an audit of the Liberals' Net Zero Emissions Accountability Act last year said it was still possible for the government to achieve its 2030 target, 'but now the task is much harder because there are only six years left to do essentially 20 or 30 years worth of reductions.' This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. His findings, however, provided few grounds for optimism. DeMarco said the government's lack of transparency made it impossible for the average citizen to understand, much less believe, its emission reduction targets. It claims current policies will achieve a 36.2% reduction in emissions compared to 2005 in 2030, close to its minimum target of 40%. But when DeMarco's auditors examined a sampling of 20 of the government's 149 measures to cut emissions, they found only nine were on track to achieve their goals. Of 32 additional measures the government claimed would help boost reductions from 36.2% to at least 40% in 2030, only seven were new. The audit found cases where two different programs were funding the same projects and reporting the same expected emission reductions, raising the possibility of double-counting. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. It also reported the computer modelling used to estimate the emission cuts of various government programs wasn't updated in 2023 compared to 2022 and that some of the initial calculations were overly optimistic. In addition, 'recent decreases to projected 2030 emissions were not due to climate action taken by governments, but were instead because of revisions to the data used in modelling.' Given all this, if the Liberals under Prime Minister Mark Carney won't abandon unrealistic climate targets then they should at least come clean with Canadians about where things really stand. Read More This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. This as opposed to their current practice of insisting they're on track to meet their targets when the federal government's own data tell a very different story. It's the same problem with the Liberals' policy to mandate that 20% of all new car sales must be battery-electric, plug-in hybrid or hydrogen fuel cell starting next year, rising to 60% in 2030 and 100% in 2035. The auto sector has warned that given lagging EV sales in Canada, the only way to achieve the 2026 target would be to pull a million new gas-powered vehicles off the market, limiting consumer choice, increasing delivery times and driving up costs for consumers at a time when our auto sector is under siege from Donald Trump's tariffs. RECOMMENDED VIDEO Canada Crime Toronto & GTA Toronto Blue Jays Toronto Blue Jays

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store