Letters: What if we assigned schools double duty?
In the late 1960s, the West Island was experiencing rapid growth, leading to a shortage of space in high schools.
Before Pierrefonds Community High School opened in 1971, many students attended Villa Nova in Pointe-Claire, which operated on a double-shift system — whereby two groups of students are accommodated each day, the first from morning until midday, the second from midday to late afternoon.
Both groups received around five hours of teaching per day, as mandated by the Education Act. If memory serves: from 7:45 a.m. to 12:30 p.m., and from 1 p.m. to 5:45 p.m.
This structure allows schools to efficiently utilize their facilities, including classrooms, laboratories and recreational areas, ensuring they serve a larger number of students without the need for additional infrastructure.
I see no reason today why this type of teaching and learning environment cannot succeed at a time when the government is under pressure to build new schools and renovate existing ones.
Chris Eustace, Pierrefonds
Shine a light on spending
Thank you to Catherine Fournier, the courageous mayor of Longueuil, for daring to question the incredibly high cost of infrastructure projects in Quebec.
There can be no doubt that $1 million to install a traffic light is completely unreasonable and unacceptable.
Something must be done because our roads are crumbling, hospitals are inadequate to meet the needs of the population, and cuts in the education system threaten catastrophe in our schools.
It is time to hold our government accountable for where money is being spent.
Sandra Sterling, Snowdon
Heed U.S. lesson and vote
I agree wholeheartedly with my fellow citizen, who challenged Americans to stop apologizing and do something in the 2026 midterm elections.
The U.S. has basically ignored Canada and looked down on Mexico as a reservoir of cheap labour, failing to recognize either country as an invaluable friend and ally.
It's sad that U.S. voters are often being painted with one brush, but they have only themselves to blame.
We Canadians should take a hint and be sure to vote in our elections at all levels. By not voting, we are relinquishing our right to have a say in our government.
If you don't feel that your priorities are being met by any of the parties, suck it up and choose the one you think will do the least damage.
Get involved with a party that might be open to your values, or form your own party with like-minded citizens.
Do whatever you can to protect our democracy, and don't leave it up to someone else.
Iris Shestowsky, Montreal
Stunning antics in the Oval Office
There are many negative adjectives used to describe Donald Trump.
However, having just watched Wednesday's televised Oval Office meeting between Trump and South African President Cyril Ramaphosa, no words can describe the embarrassment all Americans should feel at having this man represent them on the world stage.
Michael Green, Côte-St-Luc
Submitting a letter to the editor
Letters should be sent by email to letters@montrealgazette.com
We prioritize letters that respond to, or are inspired by, articles published by The Gazette.
If you are responding to a specific article, let us know which one.
Letters should be sent uniquely to us. The shorter they are — ideally, fewer than 200 words — the greater the chance of publication.
Timing, clarity, factual accuracy and tone are all important, as is whether the writer has something new to add to the conversation.
We reserve the right to edit and condense all letters. Care is taken to preserve the core of the writer's argument.
Our policy is not to publish anonymous letters, those with pseudonyms or 'open letters' addressed to third parties.
Letters are published with the author's full name and city or neighbourhood/borough of residence. Include a phone number and address to help verify identity; these will not be published.
We will not indicate to you whether your letter will be published. If it has not been published within 10 days or so, it is not likely to be.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
National Observer
3 hours ago
- National Observer
A new poll says Canadians are divided on whether the US is an 'ally' or 'enemy' country
Faced with a trade war they didn't start, Canadians are divided on whether they see the United States as an "enemy" or an "ally," a new poll suggests. The Leger poll, which was conducted online and can't be assigned a margin of error, surveyed more than 1,500 people between May 30 and June 1. Almost a third of respondents said they view the US as a "neutral country," while 27 per cent said they consider it an "ally" and 26 per cent see it as an "enemy country." Just over a third of men said they consider the US an ally, compared with one in five women. Almost 30 per cent of women said they view the US as an enemy, compared with 22 per cent of men. Older Canadians, those at least 55 years of age, were more likely to consider the US an enemy than younger Canadians. Regionally Albertans were most likely to consider the US an ally while Ontarians and British Columbians were most likely to see it as an enemy. The difference is starkest between political party supporters, with 44 per cent of Conservative supporters saying they view the US as an ally, compared with 17 per cent of Liberal supporters and 12 per cent of NDP supporters said the same. Comparatively 16 per cent of Conservative supporters said they view the US as an enemy country, while 36 per cent of Liberal supporters and 41 per cent of NDP supporters said the same. US President Donald Trump signed an executive order Tuesday to double his levies on steel and aluminum to 50 per cent. He claimed the measure will protect the country's national security and domestic industries. Prime Minister Mark Carney has said his government will need to take "some time" to craft a response to the increased US tariffs. The number of Canadians that report seeing the US as an enemy country has dropped by six points since mid-March. At that time, 32 per cent of survey respondents told Leger they viewed the country as an enemy. The number of Canadians that view the US as an ally also decreased by two percentage points since March, from 29 to 27 per cent, while the number that view it as a neutral country increased by six percentage points, from 24 to 30 per cent. Andrew Enns, Leger's executive vice-president for Central Canada, said that, broadly speaking, the patterns haven't changed much since the organization asked the question in February — when 27 per cent of respondents said they viewed the US as an enemy and 30 per cent said they viewed it as an ally. Enns said the decline in the number of people saying the US is an enemy likely reflects the overall sentiment on tariffs. "It's still obviously there and, you know, clearly now we're dealing with higher steel tariffs, but the commentary coming from the White House and the Trump administration seems to have dissipated a bit and that's probably helping just tone things down," he said. Enns said Canada also has a new prime minister with a mandate that might "take the edge off things." "I think that just keeps things more at a moderate level, and I think that reflects in people maybe feeling a little less threatened by the US," Enns said. Enns said political and business leaders have also sent a consistent message that the US remains an important trading partner. He said that may encourage Canadians to believe there's a way to "work things out." The polling industry's professional body, the Canadian Research Insights Council, says online surveys cannot be assigned a margin of error because they do not randomly sample the population.
National Observer
3 hours ago
- National Observer
Jobs minister urges Canada Post, workers to reach a deal
Jobs Minister Patty Hajdu on Wednesday called on Canada Post and the union representing 55,000 postal workers to return to the bargaining table and hash out terms for binding arbitration, with the two sides still far apart on key issues. In a social media statement Wednesday, the minister also asked the Crown corporation and the Canadian Union of Postal Workers (CUPW) to continue to work toward a deal outside of that process. Binding arbitration, where a third party decides the terms of the collective agreement, is "not the preferred path," she said, but suggested the stage would be set for an imposed settlement if the two sides could not find common ground themselves. "Canadians expect the parties to resolve this dispute one way or another. To do that, they must meet and pursue these two paths with urgency," Hajdu said on X, formerly known as Twitter. Federal mediators are standing by to help, she added. Canada Post said Wednesday it is ready to go back to the table to negotiate a new collective agreement. "After 18 months at an impasse, all options must be considered to address these critical priorities, including an employee-directed vote," said spokeswoman Lisa Liu in an emailed statement Wednesday. Canada Post asked the minister last week to force a union vote on its "final offers." The union came back by proposing binding arbitration. Each side rejected the other's suggestion: Union president Jan Simpson decried any compelled vote as a "government attack on our rights to free collective bargaining"; Canada Post warned that arbitration would be "long and complicated" — more than a year, it claimed — and add to its financial problems. The union said Wednesday it welcomed "the minister's recognition that negotiated settlements are best." The union president also hinted at possible rifts within the membership. "Although tensions are high, let's not forget our fight is with the employer, not one another," Simpson said in an update to members. The minister made no mention Wednesday of a vote, after saying last week she was "reviewing" Canada Post's request. Hajdu's two-pronged approach — ushering the parties toward possible arbitration as well as a voluntary deal — may be an attempt to pry an agreement out of them by using the stick of intervention. "Knowing that the minister is saying that intervention may be coming, will they be able to negotiate something and take it out of the hands of an arbitrator that potentially could give everything to one side or the other?" asked Stephanie Ross, an associate professor in the School of Labour Studies at McMaster University, stressing that "arbitration is always a bit risky." And if not, will the two sides even be able to hammer out terms for arbitration — to agree on what issues an arbitrator would rule on — she wondered. "This is just another level of the impasse." On Tuesday, the union said the government had laid down a next-day deadline to respond to the employer's latest offers, which include an end to compulsory overtime and a signing bonus of up to $1,000, among other concessions. But management stuck to its proposal for a 14 per cent cumulative wage hike over four years, a "dynamic routing" pilot that could see mail carriers' routes change daily in response to parcel volume, and part-time staff on weekend shifts — a major sticking point in the talks. Meanwhile, the Crown corporation's income statement continues to bleed. It reported nearly $1.3 billion in operating losses last year, raising further questions about its business model as letter volumes plunge and fears of a second disruption in six months persist. The union again adopted a legal strike position starting May 23, but it has opted instead to ban members from working overtime while negotiations continued. The 32-day work stoppage in November and December halted millions of letters and packages in the peak shipping season ahead of the winter holidays last year. Canada Post says parcel volumes are down 65 per cent from the same time last year due to uncertainty over the contract negotiations. Typically, unions seek negotiated deals rather than arbitration, Ross noted. But in this case, postal workers may see the latter as a gambit to avoid overhauls to an organization in crisis — particularly after a commissioner's report recommended major reforms to the 158-year-old institution. "Arbitrators tend to be reluctant to make big structural changes to the employment relationship, because it's much more preferable that the parties agree," Ross said. "The union feels this would be a good way to defend their current employment structure and defend against the rollout of part-time on the weekends." This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 4, 2025.
Winnipeg Free Press
3 hours ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
Emperor's visit to Okinawa reflects imperial family's close ties to the island. Here is why he cares
TOKYO (AP) — Japan's Emperor Naruhito and his family have visited Okinawa to honor the dead ahead of the 80th anniversary of one of the harshest battles of World War II. On what was his seventh visit to Okinawa, Naruhito was joined this week by his wife and daughter for a tour of the southern island and its history. Naruhito's father, the 91-year-old former Emperor Akihito, especially cared about Okinawa. On June 23, the island will mark the 80th anniversary of the end of the Battle of Okinawa, which led to heavy American troop presence on the island, even after the nearly 30 years of U.S. occupation ended in 1972. Here is what to know about Okinawa's history. Fierce battle U.S. troops landed on the main Okinawa island on April 1, 1945, beginning a battle in their push toward mainland Japan. The Battle of Okinawa lasted until late June, killing some 200,000 people — about 12,000 Americans and more than 188,000 Japanese, half of them Okinawan civilians. In all, the island lost about one quarter of its population. In Itoman town, where the battle ended, the remains of most of the war dead reside in an ossuary at the National War Dead Peace Mausoleum. It was the first place Naruhito and his wife Empress Masako and their 23-year-old daughter, Princess Aiko, visited on Wednesday where they laid a bouquet of white flowers each. Post-war years Okinawa remained under U.S. occupation from 1945 until the 1972 reversion to Japan. The U.S. military maintains a presence there due to Okinawa's strategic importance for security in the Pacific. Private properties were confiscated to build U.S. bases, and the base-dependent economy hampered the growth of local industry. Emperors tried to make a mends Many Okinawans feel they have been sacrificed for the mainland in the war fought in the name of Hirohito, the grandfather of Emperor Naruhito. Bitter feelings were fresh in Okinawa in the 1970s, when many people said the emperor should take responsibility. Akihito, who was almost hit by a Molotov cocktail thrown during his visit to Okinawa as crown prince in 1975, has been a regular visitor. Every year on June 23, Akihito and his family observe a moment of silence for the victims of the battle. It's one of the four key dates he said should never forget, along with the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki on Aug. 6 and Aug. 9, as well as the Aug. 15 end of the war. Naruhito's empathy for Okinawa Naruhito has pledged to follow in his father's footsteps and repeatedly expressed the importance to reflect on and remember the wartime history. In February, Naruhito stressed the importance of telling the tragedy of World War II to younger generations, promising to help promoting the understanding of history and the determination for peace. He and his family on Wednesday visited the Cornerstone of Peace Memorial, which is engraved with the names of about 250,000 war dead on Itoman's Mabuni Hill. They also visited a permanent war exhibit at the town's Okinawa Prefectural Peace Memorial Museum, where they met the survivors and bereaved families. On Thursday they laid flowers at a monument commemorating about 1,500 people including hundreds of school children killed in a U.S. torpedo attack on their evacuation ship Tsushima Maru on Aug. 1944. They visited a museum dedicated to the tragedy and met with a number of survivors. Naruhito and Masako, in a message released to Japanese media, renewed their pledge to peace and said their daughter deeply took to her heart Okinawan people's history of hardship. Modern problems Okinawa remains home to the majority of about 50,000 U.S. troops stationed in Japan under a bilateral security pact. The island, which accounts for only 0.6% of Japanese land, hosts 70% of U.S. military facilities. Resentment and frustration run deep in Okinawa because of the heavy U.S. presence. The island faces noise, pollution, aircraft accidents and crime related to American troops, Denny Tanmaki, the governor of Okinawa, has said. Following a series of alleged sexual assault cases against local women, the U.S. military and local government held a forum in May to discuss ways to improve safety and communication and agreed to regularize their meeting.
