logo
Asim Munir is Osama bin Laden in a suit, says ex pentagon official

Asim Munir is Osama bin Laden in a suit, says ex pentagon official

Time of India4 days ago
Live Events
(You can now subscribe to our
(You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel
A former Pentagon analyst, Michael Rubin , has delivered a scathing assessment of Pakistan's recent nuclear rhetoric, describing the country as behaving like "a rogue state" following threatening comments made by its army chief on American soil.The controversy centres on remarks attributed to Pakistan's army chief General Asim Munir , who allegedly threatened that if Pakistan "goes down, it would take half the world down" with it. The comments were reportedly made during a meeting in Tampa, Florida, with US military officials Michael Rubin, a former Pentagon official and Middle East analyst, told that Pakistan's behaviour was "completely unacceptable" and compared the army chief's rhetoric to statements previously made by ISIS and Osama bin Laden."Pakistan is raising questions in many people's minds about whether it can fulfil the responsibilities of being a state," Rubin said. "The Field Marshal's rhetoric is reminiscent of what we've heard from the Islamic State."Rubin called for immediate diplomatic consequences, including stripping Pakistan of its status as a major non-NATO ally and potentially designating it as a state sponsor of terrorism. He also suggested that General Munir should be declared persona non grata and banned from receiving US visas.The analyst expressed particular concern about the lack of immediate response from US officials present during the alleged remarks. He argued that the Pakistani army chief should have been immediately escorted from the meeting and expelled from the country."Within 30 minutes of when Asim Munir made those comments, he should have been ushered out, taken to Tampa International Airport, and flown out of the United States," Rubin stated.The former Pentagon official suggested that President Trump's continued engagement with Pakistan might be influenced by external factors.He noted that Trump's approach represents a departure from the traditionally strong bipartisan support for the US-India partnership that has developed since the George W. Bush administration.Rubin painted a broader picture of regional instability, suggesting that Pakistan's nuclear threats could provide cover for terrorist elements to "go rogue" with nuclear weapons . He argued that Pakistan represents a fundamentally different challenge from traditional diplomatic disputes."Americans look at terrorism through the lens of grievance," he explained. "They don't understand the ideological underpinnings of many terrorists. Asim Munir is Osama bin Laden in a suit."Perhaps most controversially, Rubin suggested that the international community should consider allowing Pakistan to undergo what he termed a "managed decline," potentially including recognition of breakaway regions such as Balochistan. He even raised the possibility of future military intervention to secure Pakistan's nuclear arsenal."It's coming near time when, in a future administration, other SEAL teams should enter Pakistan to secure its nuclear weapons because the alternative is simply too great to bear," he said.The interview highlighted the complex web of relationships affecting US policy in South Asia. Rubin suggested that Trump's recent tensions with India over trade and sanctions related to Russian energy purchases were not counterproductive, noting that the US itself purchases strategic materials from Russia.He predicted that US-India relations would likely improve once the current administration's approach changes, describing the current tensions as a "stress test" that would ultimately strengthen the partnership.The analyst's comments reflect growing concerns about Pakistan's stability and its nuclear capabilities. While his proposals for dealing with Pakistan appear to go well beyond current US policy, they highlight the challenges facing policymakers as they navigate relationships with nuclear-armed states in an increasingly volatile region.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump rates meeting with Putin as '10 on 10', refuses to reveal areas of disagreement
Trump rates meeting with Putin as '10 on 10', refuses to reveal areas of disagreement

First Post

time25 minutes ago

  • First Post

Trump rates meeting with Putin as '10 on 10', refuses to reveal areas of disagreement

After ending his joint press conference with Russian President Vladimir Putin, US President Donald Trump said that he rates today's Alaska talks as '10 on 10' After ending his joint press conference with Russian President Vladimir Putin, US President Donald Trump said that he rates today's as '10 on 10'. In an exclusive interview with Fox News, immediately after the presser, Trump said he had a 'very good' meeting with Putin and insisted that he just wants to see 'people stop dying'. 'We had a very good meeting today, but we'll see. You have to get a deal. We agreed on a lot of points. I want to see people stop dying,' Trump told Fox News' Sean Hannity. However, Trump reiterated the fact that 'there's no deal' until there is one. 'Look, as far as I'm concerned, there's no deal until there's a deal. But we did make a lot of progress,' Trump averred. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The American leader also noted that he was happy when he heard Putin saying, 'If he were the president, the Russia-Ukraine war would have never happened.' Despite his positive outlook towards the meeting, Trump refused to reveal the 'areas of disagreement' between him and Putin. 'No, I'd rather not. I guess somebody's gonna go public with it, they'll figure it out. But no, I don't want to do that, I want to see if we can get it done,' he told Fox News. The ball is in Zelenskyy's court While speaking to the American news outlet, the president made it clear that he is now putting the onus on Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy to negotiate a ceasefire. He emphasised that he would soon be setting up a meeting with the Ukrainian leader and his Russian counterpart. 'Now it's really up to President Zelensky to get it done,' Trump said in a Fox News interview following his sitdown with Putin in Alaska. 'They're going to set up a meeting now between President Zelensky and President Putin, and me, I guess.' 'I want to make sure it gets done,' he added. 'And we have a pretty good chance of getting it done.' Soon after the meeting, Trump boarded Air Force One and will now be heading to Washington, DC.

After meeting with Trump in Alaska, Putin makes shocking statement on Ukraine War, says if Trump were...
After meeting with Trump in Alaska, Putin makes shocking statement on Ukraine War, says if Trump were...

India.com

time25 minutes ago

  • India.com

After meeting with Trump in Alaska, Putin makes shocking statement on Ukraine War, says if Trump were...

Russian President Vladimir Putin on Friday (local time) said that if US President Donald Trump had been in power in 2022, the Russia-Ukraine conflict would likely never have happened — a claim Trump has frequently raised several times, blaming his predecessor, Joe Biden, for the war. Putin stated that in 2022, he had cautioned former US President Biden that the tensions between the two nations should not be allowed to reach a point of no return. He made this statement in a joint press conference after nearly three hours of talks with Trump. Putin stated, 'Today, when President Trump says had he been the President back then, there would have been no war, and I am quite sure it would indeed be so.' Furthermore, he added, 'During the last contact with the previous administration in 2022, I tried to convince my previous American colleague that the situation should not be brought to the point of no return when it comes to hostilities. I said it directly back then that it is a big mistake.' Putin said that on Friday's negotiations had been useful and were held in a constructive atmosphere. The Alaska summit between Trump and Putin, held at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson in Anchorage, included top officials from both sides. Putin was joined by foreign policy aide Yury Ushakov and Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov, while Trump was accompanied by Secretary of State Marco Rubio and US special envoy Steve Witkoff.

Stagnant politics, fresh chaos – Opposition's I-Day gift to the nation
Stagnant politics, fresh chaos – Opposition's I-Day gift to the nation

Hans India

time25 minutes ago

  • Hans India

Stagnant politics, fresh chaos – Opposition's I-Day gift to the nation

The Rahul Gandhi-led INDIA bloc's 'Vote Chori' storm is political theatre, masking fear of a Special Intensive Revision (SIR) that could expose fake voters, including illegal migrants. Their obstruction in Parliament, petty vendettas, intolerance to dissent, and hollow cries of 'Save Democracy' reveal a deeper aim — to pre-empt electoral defeat. While ignoring vital debates on defence, GST reforms, and governance, they chase headlines with stunts like exploiting Minta Devi without consent. The Election Commission must ignore such noise, conduct a transparent nationwide SIR, and protect electoral integrity. True democracy needs facts, not theatrics — and the voters, not politicians, will have the final say. One may like or dislike Prime Minister Narendra Modi, but there are lessons to learn from him. Ignore those unwilling to change. Give no quarter to peddlers of false narratives. And do not dignify Congress and the Rahul Gandhi-led INDIA bloc's 'Vote Chori' drama — a spectacle more about theatrics than truth — with endless rebuttals. Their posturing on electoral integrity rings hollow, given the glaring irregularities during their own 54 years in power. Modi chooses to counter the Opposition from appropriate platforms, connecting directly with people rather than indulging in endless 'Tu Tu Mein Mein.' By contrast, the Opposition shamelessly held Parliament hostage for 19 days, recycling the same accusations, staging protests inside and outside, refusing debates — and then claiming democracy is under threat. This isn't about saving democracy. It's about saving political careers. The Opposition refuses to shed its stale, failed narrative — the same approach that buried the Left — and treats Parliament as enemy territory. This obstructionism is itself becoming a threat to democracy. Consider the GST reforms bill, which could be a genuine Diwali gift to the citizens. Or the Sudarshan Chakra defence system — a multi-layered shield using advanced technology to protect strategic sites. These are serious matters worthy of debate. Instead, the Opposition fixates on the SIR (Special Intensive Revision) of electoral rolls, fearing it will expose bogus voters — particularly ahead of the Bihar elections. On Agni veers too, their politics is petty. Agni veers played a vital role in Operation Sindoor. Yet Rahul Gandhi declared in Parliament, 'We will do away with Agni veers.' Which means we will allow the enemy to get strengthened. His stance echoes Y S Jagan Mohan Reddy's destructive vendetta politics in Andhra Pradesh — undoing the good solely to spite political rivals. The Leader of Opposition in utter disregard for parliamentary practices prefers addressing fellow Opposition MPs as if at a CWC meeting, instead of addressing the Chair. True leaders refine policies for better results. But here are politicians who dismantle useful schemes, grant the government a free run, and then claim credit for 'exposing' it. Their hypocrisy is breathtaking. They allege their freedom of speech is curtailed but will not tolerate dissent within their own ranks. Rahul forced Karnataka CM Siddaramaiah to sack minister K N Rajanna for pointing out that the voter rolls Rahul questioned were prepared when Congress was in power and questioning bluntly, 'Why was everyone silent back then.' This exposed the hollowness of Rahul who alleged that over a lakh bogus voters existed in Mahadevpura, which cost the Congress the seat while the fact is that it has been a traditional BJP stronghold. Samajwadi Party chief Akhilesh Yadav showed similar intolerance by expelling MLA Pooja Pal for praising Yogi Adityanath's role in bringing mafia don Atiq Ahmed to justice for murdering her husband on the ninth day of her marriage. Unable to admit the real reason for fear of losing minority votes, Akhilesh cited a year-old whip violation. Pal's words were clear: 'I am a victim first… All people in Prayagraj disturbed by Atiq Ahmed have been given justice by the CM. I stand by my statement.' I have been saying this from day 1, even when I was in the party. I have been expelled only today, she added. She said perhaps her party could not hear the women in Prayagraj who were even more worried than her. 'But I am their voice, I have been elected as an MLA and sent to the Assembly. I am the voice of mothers and sisters who have lost their loved ones. The INDIA bloc's pettiness extends to objecting to the Operation Sindhoor logo on Independence Day invitations, and to three lady officers — Colonel Sophia Qureshi, Wing Commander Vyomika Singh, and Commander Prerna Deosthalee — appearing on Kaun Banega Crorepati. It may be a commercial show, but it violates no military ethics. These officers will inspire young Indians, especially women, just as doctors used the platform during Covid-19. For Congress, Independence Day seems to be about celebrating itself — as if only it delivered freedom. While Congress played a central and indispensable role in India's fight for independence, many groups and individuals contributed to the freedom struggle. Another example of lack of strategy is Rahul Gandhi's refusal to authenticate the so-called 'atom bomb' voter list document is telling. His excuse — that he needn't sign because he has already taken an MP's oath — is laughable. Rule 389 of the Lok Sabha's Rules of Procedure is clear: when a member quotes a document, the Speaker can demand authentication. An oath is no licence to bypass verification — just as a court wouldn't accept 'I took an oath once' instead of a signed affidavit. The Opposition fears the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) as it fears that they will lose the votes of illegal Bangladeshi migrants and the like. Fake voter entries and deletion of genuine ones are not new. The Election Commission of India (ECI) must seize this golden opportunity to rise above the political noise and conduct a transparent nationwide SIR. The process should be free from distractions, as political cry-babies will always cry, but voters deserve accuracy and integrity in the rolls that decide their future. But the opposition believes only in theaatrics. On August 12, they paraded in T-shirts reading 'Minta Devi 124 Not Out.' But Minta Devi herself spoiled the show, saying her voter details were already being corrected, and objecting to her photo being used without consent. This was political self-sabotage at its finest. Will they apologise? Unlikely. For Rahul, removing stray dogs from streets is 'inhuman' — but exploiting a poor woman for political gain is acceptable. Now the INDIA bloc plans a nationwide 'Vote Chori' agitation and signature campaign, even demanding Lok Sabha's dissolution. Yet will they explain why Sonia Gandhi's name appeared on voter rolls in 1980 when she was still an Italian citizen? Most damning, in the past 12 days, not one booth-level or block-level agent from these parties has filed a complaint with the ECI about bogus voting. They've found nothing wrong in practice — yet they howl in public. This is no longer petty politics; it's a deliberate attempt to undermine faith in India's elections so that when defeat comes — as it has repeatedly over the past decade — they can cry foul at the referee. From 'Chowkidar Chor Hai' to 'Vote Chori,' Rahul Gandhi's playbook is the same: make a headline-grabbing allegation, milk it in the media, avoid proof, and quietly drop it when facts fail to fit. In the process, they corrode the very institutions they claim to defend. The ECI must now move fast: clean the rolls, strengthen verification, ensure absolute transparency — and refuse to be distracted by political drama. This is about protecting democracy, not from imaginary 'vote thieves' but from those who cry 'Save Democracy' while undermining it. And perhaps the INDIA bloc's real panic is simpler: they can already see defeat looming in Bihar. The voters, as always, will deliver the final verdict. (The author is former Chief Editor of The Hans India)

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store