This open-source fasting app actually helped me hit my fitness goals
I was never an athletic kid, and that continued through most of my 20s. That is, until I decided to change things up, drop some weight, and focus more on my health. Intermittent fasting was a big part of that journey, and I've been following it for several years now. In fact, it's the one constant in my wellness journey that has actually stuck with me. Much as I've dabbled with workout plans, picked up the best fitness trackers, tracked macros with obsessive detail, and even experimented with sleep optimization, it's the 16:8 fasting approach that has been the most sustainable thing I've done for my health. Ironically, what hasn't been sustainable is finding a fasting app that doesn't eventually go down the usual rabbit hole of ads and subscriptions. Trust me, I've tried them all.
While most fasting and fitness apps start out helpful, the core experience very quickly gets buried under microtransactions and basic features locked behind paywalls. Curious about what fasting zone you're in? You'd better be prepared to pony up some cash. Everything from custom fasting windows to simple insights that used to be free is suddenly a premium feature. And don't get me started on the notification spam every time I open the app. Look, I just need a glorified stopwatch. I don't need your app to support a full-fledged wellness program and the accompanying fees. So I did what any self-respecting tech enthusiast would do: I looked at open-source solutions to the problem.
That's how I found FastTrack, a minimal, open-source, self-hosted, and rather excellent fasting tracker on GitHub. What it lacks in flash, it makes up for in substance. While it might not have dedicated apps on the Play Store or gamification elements to keep you on track, it has all the features you actually need. That simplicity is exactly why I've stuck with it all this time, and why you might too.
Don't want to miss the best from Android Authority? Set us as a preferred source in Google Search to support us and make sure you never miss our latest exclusive reports, expert analysis, and much more.
The right kind of minimalism
Dhruv Bhutani / Android Authority
When I first started intermittent fasting, I was already deep into my fitness journey. Between tracking workouts, counting calories, and trying to lose weight without dropping too much muscle mass, intermittent fasting was a crucial part of the equation. But I needed this done without unnecessary friction. Just a timer and a way to check how long I'd fasted, without being given advice about reaching a zen state of mind.
FastTrack keeps it simple with a timer, a log, and basic weight tracking.
FastTrack, on the other hand, is, for the most part, just a simple timer app. It opens quickly in the browser as a bookmark and gives me a single button to start or stop a fast. Yay for simplicity. The onboarding process is just as straightforward, with no wizards or welcome screens talking me through the benefits of fasting. I already know what I'm getting into. Just make an account, log in, tap a button, and get on with your day. Honestly, I wish more apps worked like that.
This simplicity impacted me in more ways than one. Without the friction of constant upselling, notifications, or convoluted interfaces, I started tracking more consistently. It's the same approach serious fitness enthusiasts take. A spreadsheet with reps, or a notepad, if you're old-school, wins out over a flashy app every single time. That lack of friction helped me reach, and even exceed, my daily goals because it's easy to lose track of time when you're not being bombarded by hourly notifications aimed at cheering you on. In my case, they just gave me anxiety over how much time was still left in my fast. Over the last few months, I haven't missed a single fast, and my feeding windows have become tighter and more consistent. This has translated directly into noticeable results. My body fat percentage is lower, I have more energy during workouts, and most importantly, I've built a routine that I stick to diligently.
Dhruv Bhutani / Android Authority
For all its simplicity, FastTrack isn't just a stopwatch with a shiny coat of paint. It maintains a proper log of all my fasts and lets me add comments, which has helped me spot patterns in my fitness journey. All data is retained locally, and I can easily glance at when I'm likely to cut a fast short or push for longer fasting windows. It's been extremely useful in optimizing my nutrition intake as well. If I'm consistently running on fumes by the end of a fast without significant physical activity, it's clear that my calorie intake is significantly lower than it should be. After particularly heavy workouts, I'd often eat earlier than planned. All of that is obvious, sure, but having that data on hand helps me see broader patterns and the bigger picture. In fact, I'd say the data-driven feedback loop has worked far better for me than any motivation I derived from commercial apps.
As someone who prefers purpose-built tools and devices, I get a strange kind of motivation from using something that doesn't try to keep nudging me. FastTrack serves no notifications. It just runs as a tool. And because of that, I opened it more often and used it more honestly. Lacking gamification parameters, I had no incentive to round off an extra 30 minutes in my daily fast. Nor was I concerned about breaking a streak or unlocking a collectible. I just remain focused on tracking my progress, which, for someone trying to hit specific goals and maintain a training plan, is exactly what I need.
Worth the effort of setup
Dhruv Bhutani / Android Authority
Look, I'm well aware that self-hosted tools aren't for everyone. As easy as FastTrack is to set up, the lack of Play Store or App Store availability, or a one-click setup, definitely increases the difficulty level. You've got to hit the command line, install Docker, and then get it up and running. You've also got to deal with — shudder — what a localhost is. If you want to access it remotely, you'll want to configure a reverse proxy. But once installed, I haven't had to touch it again. Given the simplistic feature set, the app is light on resources, so I just popped it onto my NAS. On the flip side, as I mentioned earlier, there's no cloud sync or dedicated app, so a remote proxy is a necessity if you find yourself on the move often. That said, it's easily circumvented by running a service like Tailscale.
No self-hosted app will ever be as easy to set up as downloading a cloud-based app, but the data ownership and simplicity make it worth it.
If that sounds like a lot of work to track fasts, I'll be honest, the initial setup is. Especially when there's no dearth of apps like Zero on the Play Store. But as I delve more into data ownership and deal with subscription fatigue, I'm okay with the one-time effort of setting up open-source alternatives. All those other apps come with strings attached, be it dodgy data retention policies, hidden microtransactions, or constant ad and notification spam. Some of them simply won't work if you deny internet access or want something as basic as adding personal notes to your log. That's a no-go for me. FastTrack does none of that. It gives me complete control over the experience, in exchange for a bit more effort during the setup process.
Why I'm sticking with FastTrack
I've tried all the popular fasting apps over the years. Most had beautiful, well-polished interfaces compared to FastTrack's more utilitarian offering. Others tried to combine fasting with community features, sleep tracking, or holistic wellness. But none of them helped me build the kind of consistency I've managed over the past few months with FastTrack. Not because they weren't capable, but because they all tried to do too much. FastTrack's biggest strength is that it doesn't try to be anything other than what it is. And at the end of the day, consistency is all that matters, whether you're focusing on your health or trying to stick to using an app daily.
FastTrack's simplicity and focus helped me be more consistent with my health and see tangible results.
FastTrack has also given me useful, distraction-free insights into my routine. I've got it saved as a shortcut on my home screen, allowing it to integrate seamlessly into my day without any issues. And best of all, it has helped me stick to my fasting window, which in turn helped me hit the body composition goals I'd been chasing for over a year.
There are more convenient apps out there, sure — and the best app is the one that works for you. FastTrack may not be for everyone, but for anyone serious about fasting who's tired of cluttered experiences, it might just be the last fasting app you ever need.
Follow
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
7 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Man who went blind after drinking alcohol in Laos now raising awareness
A man who went blind after drinking alcohol in Laos is working with other affected families to campaign for awareness of methanol poisoning. Calum Macdonald had a night out in Vang Vieng in November last year and the next day his vision was 'engulfed in this blinding white light', he told BBC Breakfast. Police in Laos have previously detained several people in connection with the deaths of six people who are believed to have been poisoned, including Simone White, 28, from Orpington, Kent. Methanol is sometimes used by disreputable bars as a cheaper alternative to ethanol but can cause severe poisoning or death. Mr Macdonald was at a hostel where free whisky and vodka shots were offered, and he mixed them with soft drinks, he said. He told how he was on a bus crossing into Vietnam when he noticed something was wrong. He told BBC Breakfast: 'The point at which I really started to notice some strange side effects was we briefly got off the bus to cross the border into Vietnam, and we went through the border office – we had to fill out a number of forms to get across to the other side – and at that point, sort of my entire vision was engulfed in this blinding white light. 'And I just thought, you know, this is very strange. I couldn't actually see where I was walking.' He added: 'We arrived in Hanoi, and at that point, the kind of white light in my eyes had diminished, and it wasn't until we got to our hotel room and my friends and I were sitting in the room, and I said to my friends, why are we sitting in the dark here? Let's turn on a light. And they informed me that the light was, in fact, already on.' Mr Macdonald then went to hospital and said on the journey there he 'really started to struggle to breathe' and could 'barely get my words out'. He said a number of tests were carried out initially but it was not until he got back to England when he was in hospital and they 'really sort of indicated that it was definitely related to something I'd been drinking'. Mr Macdonald is now speaking out as he wants information to be available to people about methanol poisoning, especially students who might be preparing to go on a gap year. He said: 'I think I definitely feel a sense of responsibility as someone who's been lucky enough to survive this, to try and get the message out. Because I know certainly, if I'd known about it, I wouldn't be in this situation. 'And I know I have a lot of friends that have also done similar sort of gap years in travelling around even that particular area. And so definitely, I think it's quite important. 'I've had the opportunity to speak to a number of other families that have been affected by this, and they're far more knowledgeable and have been campaigning for awareness for a lot longer than I have been involved. And what they tend to say generally is that sometimes the advice isn't put in strong enough terms. 'And so I think, I guess if I was to put out a recommendation to people, although I'm certainly not an expert or a medical professional, I would probably say that if you did want to drink alcohol in some of the affected countries, probably just to avoid spirits entirely. 'I think it would be nice, even if we could get some more information directly into universities, because I think that's the age of people that are really considering doing these kinds of trips, I think that would be a great thing.' The Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office has been approached to comment.
Android Authority
8 minutes ago
- Android Authority
5 reasons why GPT-5 is actually better than some of the older GPT models
Joe Maring / Android Authority Recently, OpenAI has come under fire for GPT-5's rocky launch. Many users have called it a step backward, citing a lack of personality and other tweaks that turned people off — sentiments echoed in our own GPT-5 review. Still, GPT-5 does improve on at least some of the previous legacy models. Before we dive in, it's important to note that GPT-5 really does have less personality. It's curt and to the point in nearly every interaction. This makes it much less useful for creative writing, personal assistance, companionship, and even editing, as it tends to strip too much personality from drafts. Still, for some tasks, this curt personality works well and is exactly what you want. If you're doing high-level work like deep research or trying to understand ethical or scientific concepts, you want answers that are honest and direct. For ChatGPT Plus users, I can't blame you if you switch back to an older model for creative work, personal assistance, or similar tasks. Don't discount it entirely, though. While the default GPT-5 relies on automatic switching to figure out the best model for your query, you always have the option to switch to GPT-5 Thinking. Let's take a closer look at a few ways in which GPT-5 Thinking actually improves on older thinking models, including 03 and 04-high-mini. For those with GPT-5 Thinking access, how do you feel about it? 0 votes I like it and feel it's a notable upgrade over other GPT thinking models. NaN % I'm mixed, but I don't use Thinking models much in general. NaN % I prefer the older thinking models or even GPT-4o over this. NaN % Other (Let us know in the comments). NaN % Ironically, GPT-5 has more personality than the legacy thinking models Andrew Grush / Android Authority Even though GPT-5 seems more blunt and less friendly compared to GPT-4o, I've found it actually shows more personality than 03, 04-mini-high, and other legacy thinking models. For example, when brainstorming alternate Byzantine history with both 03 and GPT-5, 03 dove right in with no warmth, while GPT-5 started with a conversational, though slightly sycophantic, tone: 'Love this prompt. The trick is to keep changes small, targeted, and compounding.' GPT-5 kept that conversational style throughout, while 03 was sterile and preferred to drown me in tables instead of providing a more conversational and readable breakdown. GPT-5 feels like a middle ground between 4o's personality and 03's sterility. Whether that's better or worse will depend on the user. GPT-5 feels more alive by comparison, which makes it better for exploring philosophical or scientific ideas or even for spitballing alternate reality scenarios like this nerd does in his spare time. Not every use case will benefit from this shift, but it's a notable difference. GPT-5's chain of thought is often deeper and clearer Andrew Grush / Android Authority I really love how GPT-5 Thinking handled its chain of thoughts compared to the older thinking models. In my tests, GPT-5 Thinking not only spent longer on queries, but also offered more detailed and readable chains of thought than 03. On the alt-Byzantine Empire scenario I was recently working on for a short story, 03 spent four seconds and gave a brief answer. GPT-5 Thinking took 47 seconds and returned five bullets, each nearly a full paragraph, feeling much more like an internal monologue. As for the actual results? Both gave me food for thought, even if neither was perfect. I will say that I fact-checked as many of its statements as I could, and, generally, the speculation was fairly balanced between the two models. Still, I found it easier to understand and read GPT-5's responses in most cases. It often gets the same answer faster than 03 did Calvin Wankhede / Android Authority When it comes to detailed queries, I feel that GPT-5 tends to think for longer, but direct questions are a whole other matter. If the answer is simple, GPT-5 tends to be the first to deliver a response. For example, when I asked what happened to Nintendo on January 5, 1993, both GPT-03 and GPT-5 Thinking pointed to the same court decision, but GPT-03 took over two minutes to get there, while GPT-5 answered in just 40 seconds. I admit I was actually trying to trick one of them into hallucinating, so at least that didn't happen! This is just one example, but in the week or so that I've been using GPT-5, I've found that when used side by side, GPT-03's creative thinking sometimes holds it back from answering as quickly and directly. GPT-5 trades its creativity for fewer hallucinations Andrew Grush / Android Authority Many people say that GPT-5 is less creative, and that's mostly true even in the Thinking model. I revisited some of my old chats about Stoicism and other philosophical concepts from earlier this year (which were originally generated with 03 or 04-mini-high) and asked GPT-5 the same questions. Its responses were more contained, less speculative, and more fact-based. Being less creative also means GPT-5 Thinking is less likely to make stuff up by comparison. For certain creative endeavors, I can see how GPT-5's more sterile approach might be a hindrance, but these creative bursts also lead to more incorrect answers. Taking a closer look at the same older responses for 03 and digging deep online to verify as much as I could, I found some of these creative solutions were completely based on false premises. That's been a much less common experience with GPT-5. Ultimately, at least for the kinds of tasks and questions I ask, I care more about historical and scientific accuracy than anything. I also prefer not having to fact-check every detail as vigorously. It tends to follow instructions better as well Calvin Wankhede / Android Authority At least in my experience, GPT-5 is less likely to go rogue than older models when it comes to following instructions. With GPT-03 and its legacy relatives, it was common to see it ignore or misunderstand parts of my instructions. GPT-5, on the other hand, does a much better job of doing exactly what I ask. For example, I'll often add 'be honest with me' when asking a question that could get a sycophantic or overly optimistic response. With 03, it will usually listen, but sometimes goes along with my idea even when I know it's not well-baked and makes false connections that aren't really there. With GPT-5, I usually get a tad more pushback in these situations. In a funny twist, if I don't give clear instructions or don't explicitly ask for extra critical or honest responses, GPT-5 can sometimes sweet-talk or go off-script a bit more than 03 ever did. I've had to rethink how I prompt GPT-5 compared to 03, but with clearer instructions, I get better results than 03 could produce in most scenarios. The takeaway here is that when it comes to straight-up problems like 'prove this' or 'explain this,' GPT-5 often delivers more impressive results. For more conversational or creative needs, it's a roll of the dice as to which model will provide the best answer. Don't want to miss the best from Android Authority? Set us as a preferred source in Google Search to support us and make sure you never miss our latest exclusive reports, expert analysis, and much more. Find out more here. You shouldn't give up on GPT-5 yet, even if it's not perfect Calvin Wankhede / Android Authority I won't pretend that GPT-5 wasn't a mess at launch or that it doesn't still need refinement before it's ready for primetime — especially as a replacement for GPT-4o and other legacy models. As it stands, I see GPT-5 as a complement that works well in some cases, but it's not my default. To be fair, I've never been the kind to have a default in the first place. I use different models for specific tasks, and I don't see that changing unless OpenAI removes legacy models again. Ultimately, GPT-5 was overhyped, so it was always going to feel disappointing. The fact that it seems to lose context a bit more easily than older models is also a concern, and I'm not sold on the idea of unifying everything under one automatic model. That said, don't let this turn you off completely. While it's not perfect, there are use cases where GPT-5 fits better than older models, and there are features like Agent Mode that you can't get with older models. I recommend using GPT-5 Thinking alongside other models for as long as possible. Figure out what it does well for you, as you might be surprised if you give it enough of a chance. Follow
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Barbara Palvin undergoes endometriosis surgery
Barbara Palvin has undergone surgery for endometriosis after suffering years of pain and "sleepless nights". The 31-year-old model - who is married to actor Dylan Sprouse - has revealed she spent years battling symptoms of the condition, in which tissue grows outside the uterus, but she struggled to get a diagnosis until recently and she's now undergone an operation which should help relieve her pain. In a post on Instagram, Barbara explained: "Hi guys, it's been a while! Just a little update and a few thoughts for those out there who could relate to what I'm about to share - for some years now I've been dealing with the difficulties that can come with my periods. "Fatigue, severe pain, heavy and irregular flow , sleepless nights on the bathroom floor. I thought this was just how it works for me. "But recently I've been advised to seek out an endometriosis specialist to see whether my symptoms are caused by that." The Victoria's Secret star went on to add: "I've been going to checkups to my gynecologist every year, I thought if I had endometriosis I would have known about it by now, but as it turns out, endometriosis can't be diagnosed with general examinations. "So I went, and 3 months later I got operated on. Since then I finally experienced a period that was easier, and now I know the difference." Barbara went on to encourage others to talk to doctors if they think their symptoms could be linked to the condition because goping without treatment could lead to longterm complications. She added: "If you suspect that you could have endometriosis I encourage you to find it out. It helped me a lot, and I'm grateful I did it. Early diagnosis and treatment are very important to prevent long-term complications, and now I'm more mindful about my body to act fast if needed. " The model revealed she took three months off work to allow herself to "heal" but she's now feeling good and is ready to get back to work again. She concluded: "I took the past 3 months to rest and fully heal. I'm excited about this new chapter of my life and now ready to get back to work."
