
Mexico's president slams sanctions on Mexican banks by Trump administration
MEXICO CITY (AP) — Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum responded sharply Thursday to U.S. government sanctions blocking transfers from three Mexican financial institutions, saying Washington hasn't shown evidence of its allegations of money laundering.
The U.S. Treasury Department announced the sanctions Wednesday on the banks CIBanco and Intercam Banco and the brokerage Vector Casa de Bolsa, alleging that they had facilitated millions of dollars in money transfers for Mexican drug cartels.
Sheinbaum said during her morning news briefing Thursday that the administration of U.S. President Donald Trump had showed no evidence proving that the institutions carried out any money laundering, despite repeated requests for such evidence.
'The Treasury Department hasn't provided a single piece of evidence to show that any money laundering was taking place," she said. 'We aren't going to cover for anyone, there isn't impunity here. They have to be able to demonstrate that there was actually money laundering, not with words, but with strong evidence."
The accused banks also fired back on the orders, rejecting the allegations and similarly citing a lack of evidence.
Brokerage firm Vector said Wednesday night in a statement that it 'categorically rejects any allegation that compromises its institutional integrity" while Intercam said in a statement it denies being involved in any 'illegal practice.' Vector is owned by entrepreneur Alfonso Romo, who served as chief of staff to ex-President Andrés Manuel López Obrador early in his presidency.
Manuel Somoza, president of strategies of CIBanco, told local press that they only heard about the order the same time it was made public, and noted that it wasn't a formal legal accusation, but rather an investigation.
'Our books are open," he said. 'Rumors are clearly damaging, whether they're true or not. So, what we want is for (American authorities) to come and investigate."
Sheinbaum said they were notified by American officials of the accusations ahead of the Wednesday announcement, and that Mexican financial regulators carried out their own investigations into the institutions.
They found "administrative infractions," she said, but nothing close to the accusations being levied by Treasury officials.
In the orders blocking transactions between the three institutions and American banks, the Trump administration alleged that the three companies facilitated millions of dollars in transfers with Chinese companies, which it said were used to buy chemicals to produce fentanyl. The Treasury Department said the institutions had facilitated transfers to U.S. banks, but officials would not name which U.S. institutions were implicated nor provide more details.
Sheinbaum countered that their own investigation simply showed that institutions had strong relationships with Chinese clients and banks, which she said was more of an indicator that the two countries share a robust trade relationship. China has been the main source of chemical precursors to produce fentanyl in Mexico, according to U.S. authorities. At the same time, the U.S. has increasingly sought to block growing Chinese influence and investment in Latin America.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CNBC
11 minutes ago
- CNBC
Ron Insana: Trump would imperil more than just the Fed's independence by naming a ‘shadow chair'
The saying, "No, no, a thousand times no" remains a relevant cry as a news report suggests President Donald Trump may preemptively name a new Federal Reserve chairman nearly a year before Jerome Powell 's term expires. The Wall Street Journal reported on Wednesday that the president has already narrowed his choices down to several candidates to replace Powell, who he has referred to as a " dummy " or " stupid " for not having already cut interest rates as the president wants him to do. Naming a new Fed chief this early, effectively creating a so-called "shadow" chair who can criticize the existing central bank leader, would have long-lasting consequences for the prized independence of the Fed. Packing the Fed, just as several presidents have tried to pack the Supreme Court, reduces the central bank to just another politicized arm of the executive branch. By statute, this was never intended to occur. The Fed's dual mandates and its impartiality If a president were to pressure the Fed to bend to their will, it would lead to legitimate questions about the central bank's ability to meet its statutory dual mandates of maximum sustainable employment and stable prices. Since the end of the era of Richard Nixon– a president who, in secret, tried to pressure then-Fed chief Arthur Burns to soften up on policy ahead of the 1972 election – his successors have all supported an independent Fed so that the central bank can keep the economy on an even keel. No doubt, all presidents – and most people – would love to see lower rates bring down the cost of borrowing, but at what price? Is the president willing to tolerate resurgent inflation? Are the American people, who elected President Trump to bring down prices, willing to risk the Fed's independence only to end up in the place where they started in 2024 – when they were upset and unsettled by the high cost of living? Time will tell. The erosion of trust in Treasurys and the U.S. dollar More important is whether a politicized central bank that cuts rates irrespective of economic conditions will be trusted by domestic and foreign bond market investors to maintain the safety and security of U.S. Treasury bonds, as well as the purchasing power and reserve currency status of the U.S. dollar. The answer is a resounding no, as the dollar is broadly weaker against foreign currencies, reflecting a clear protest to the Fed challenge being presented by the president. Several names have been floated as a possible early replacement for Powell. They include Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent – who raised the idea of a shadow Fed chair last year – National Economic Council Director Kevin Hassett and former Fed Governor Kevin Warsh. The Journal also suggested that former World Bank President David Malpass could be in the running. While I'll leave my out my opinions about their respective qualifications, the issue is not about who will be the new leader of the Fed. This is about the process and the policy of subverting a sitting Fed chair – and that's what bothers me most. This should bother all Americans who value the absolute and relative stability of the U.S. economy, when compared to the rest of the world. We know that whether in Turkey, Venezuela or any other nation that has a dependent central bank, the results are always less than optimal. Currency debasement, inflation and unpredictable economic cycles dominate those countries while nations with independent central banks, be they New Zealand or the U.S., enjoy relative stability and prosperity. While I have long maintained that the U.S. economy is the envy of the world, my feelings would abruptly change if the Fed were to become a politicized tool influenced by executive expediency rather than economic necessity. If the day comes that a preemptive nominee emerges from the shadows, I would run for cover. The safety and soundness of the dollar and U.S. bonds would be suspect with a very long shadow cast over the nation's creditworthiness. Again, I say, "No, no, a thousand times no." —Ron Insana is a CNBC contributor.
Yahoo
13 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Wall Street Goes All-In on Risky Stocks
(Bloomberg) — Investors are piling into speculative and volatile edges of the stock market, throwing caution to the wind as the S&P 500 Index closes in on an all-time high. US Renters Face Storm of Rising Costs Philadelphia Transit System Votes to Cut Service by 45%, Hike Fares Mapping the Architectural History of New York's Chinatown Squeezed by Crowds, the Roads of Central Park Are Being Reimagined US State Budget Wounds Intensify From Trump, DOGE Policy Shifts The risks remain: President Donald Trump's tariff pause is scheduled to end in two weeks, signs of a slowing economy and weakening consumer sentiment are mounting, and war is rumbling in the background. Wall Street strategists are encouraging everyone to buy stocks with strong balance sheets that can withstand any sudden shock. But investors appear to be ignoring all of it. The Invesco S&P 500 High Beta ETF, an exchange-traded fund that tracks highly volatile stocks, is on track for its best quarter since 2020 relative to the Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF. Meanwhile, a Goldman Sachs gauge of stocks with weak balance sheets is eyeing the best month relative to the S&P 500 since January. 'This is the very beginning of a period of FOMO that happens in the late stages of every structural bull market — every single one,' said Julian Emanuel, chief equity and quantitative strategist at Evercore ISI. 'What we are surprised by is the speed at which speculation has been embraced given the record bearishness just a little over two months ago and also in light of what continues to be significant economic and policy uncertainty.' The key is individual investors, who favor momentum plays like big tech stocks and speculative names. They kept buying even in early April when the S&P 500 teetered on the brink of a bear market and institutional money managers sold out during the depths of the tariff-fueled market meltdown. Buying Dips Works 'Let's go back to the various dips that we've seen in the market, starting with Covid,' said Paul Nolte, market strategist and senior wealth adviser at Murphy & Sylvest Wealth Management. 'Every time that the market declined in a very short fashion, investors have learned: Buy the dip and buy the higher-beta type stocks.' Large-cap technology behemoths have been the main drivers of the markets in the past two years. They had a brief hiatus earlier this year when the rise of Chinese artificial intelligence startup DeepSeek raised concerns about who will dominate AI, but tech giants are back in the driver's seat, leading the sharp recovery in the S&P 500 since the tariff selloff. 'Once the tariffs kind of de-escalated, investors came back to the dominant theme, which is AI,' said Keith Lerner, co-chief investment officer at Truist Advisory Services. This strong focus on big tech is even holding back one risky corner of the market — small-cap stocks. The small-capitalization Russell 2000 Index and the S&P 600 Index, which unlike the Russell only includes profitable smaller companies, are both lagging the S&P 500 this year and quarter. Strategists point out that technology has a relatively lighter weight in these small-cap gauges. Information technology and communication services together have a nearly 43% weight in the S&P 500, but just 13% in the Russell 2000 and and about 16% in the S&P 600. The strength of tech firms is also driving profit growth at the index level. The S&P 500's earnings this year are estimated to grow about 8% from last year, with information technology the strongest anticipated gainer at nearly 21%. Expectations for other sectors pale in comparison. 'In a time of uncertainty around earnings, investors are gravitating towards areas that have more of a secular theme,' Truist's Lerner said. (Updates Goldman Sachs gauge performance in third paragraph.) How to Steal a House Inside Gap's Last-Ditch, Tariff-Addled Turnaround Push America's Top Consumer-Sentiment Economist Is Worried Apple Test-Drives Big-Screen Movie Strategy With F1 Luxury Counterfeiters Keep Outsmarting the Makers of $10,000 Handbags ©2025 Bloomberg L.P. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
15 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trumps drop 'Made in the USA' label for new phone and a debate ensues: How to define 'made'?
NEW YORK (AP) — When the Trump family unveiled a new phone before a giant American flag at its headquarters earlier this month, the pitch was simple and succinct, packed with pure patriotism: 'Made in the U.S.A.' The Trumps are apparently having second thoughts. How about 'proudly American'? Those are the two words that have replaced the 'Made in the USA' pitch that just a few days ago appeared on the website where customers can pre-order the so-called T-1 gold-toned phones with an American flag etched on the back. Elsewhere on the site, other vague terms are now being used, describing the $499 phone as boasting an 'American-Proud Design' and 'brought to life right here in the U.S.A.' The Federal Trade Commission requires that items labeled 'Made in USA' be 'all or virtually all' produced in the U.S. and several firms have been sued over misusing the term. The Trump Organization has not explained the change and has not responded to a request for comment. Neither did an outside public relations firm handling the Trumps' mobile phone business, including a request to confirm a statement made to another media outlet. 'T1 phones are proudly being made in America,' said Trump Mobile spokesman Chris Walker, according to USA Today. 'Speculation to the contrary is simply inaccurate.' The language change on the website was first reported by the news site The Verge. An expert on cell phone technology, IDC analyst Francisco Jeronimo, said he's not surprised the Trump family has dropped the 'Made in the USA' label because it's nearly impossible to build one here given the higher cost and lack of infrastructure to do so. But, of course, you can claim to do it. 'Whether it is possible or not to build this phone in the US depends on what you consider 'build,'" Jeronimo said. 'If it's a question of assembling components and targeting small volumes, I suppose it's somehow possible. You can always get the components from China and assemble them by hand somewhere.' 'You're going to have phones that are made right here in the United States of America,' said Trump's son Eric to Fox News recently, adding, 'It's about time we bring products back to our great country.' The Trump family has flown the American flag before with Trump-branded products of suspicious origin, including its 'God Bless the USA' Bibles, which an Associated Press investigation last year showed were printed in China. The Trump phone is part of a bigger family mobile business plan designed to tap into MAGA enthusiasm for the president. The two sons running the business, Eric and Don Jr., announced earlier this month that they would offer mobile phone plans for $47.45 a month, a reference to their father's status as the 45th and 47th president. The call center, they said, will be in the U.S., too. 'You're not calling up call centers in Bangladesh,' Eric Trump said on Fox News. 'We're doing it out of St. Louis, Missouri.' The new service has been blasted by government ethics experts for a conflict of interest, given that President Donald Trump oversees the Federal Communications Commission that regulates the business and is investigating phone service companies that are now Trump Mobile rivals. Trump has also threatened to punish cell phone maker Apple, now a direct competitor, threatening to slap 25% tariffs on devices because of its plans to make most of its U.S. iPhones in India. ___