
Business, union divisions threaten to derail PM summit
Business groups and unions are on a collision course over priorities for a planned productivity summit despite the prime minister's optimism they can find common ground.
Anthony Albanese has dismissed suggestions the roundtable, which will take place in August and is aimed at finding ways to lift the nation's economic output, would amount to little more than a Canberra talkfest.
"It is not unreasonable to bring people together ... business and unions have common interests, we have a national interest in boosting productivity," he told ABC Radio on Wednesday.
But Australian Industry Group chief executive Innes Willox said it was disappointing the union movement had taken the view that "there's nothing to see here and that is all about cutting jobs and cutting wages and it demonstrably isn't".
"One of the frustrating conversations to have with unions is to hear them say: 'Yes, of course there'll be AI but everyone's job will stay the same," he told Sky News.
"Unfortunately it won't but we have to prepare people for that - and that will be a massive exercise in reskilling and retraining ... that's where this productivity summit is going to be so important."
Experts are concerned about Australia's lagging growth in productivity - a key economic measure of efficiency and long-term driver of improved living standards.
Working Australians must be at the centre of the summit, ACTU secretary Sally McManus said.
"We need to leave behind the idea that productivity is equated with cutting pay and making people work harder for less," she said.
Australian Chamber of Commerce and Industry chief executive Andrew McKellar said he was realistic about the potential for tangible outcomes at the roundtable.
"If it was easy, it would have been done already," he told AAP.
The scope of the Fair Work Act had grown significantly in recent years, which had a "significant impact" on small businesses trying to hire staff, Mr McKellar said.
Planned payday superannuation reforms also needed to be implemented in a way that didn't "create a significant additional burden for small business", he added.
"We don't expect (the government) to revisit all of the industrial relations changes, but … let's make some practical changes that make it easier for small business to create jobs and employ more people to promote productivity," Mr McKellar said.
Tax changes, cutting the regulatory burden and encouraging the uptake of digital technology would all be priorities for the business lobby, which singled out AI as a field that could make a big difference to productivity.
Productivity Commission chair Danielle Wood said it was important to be clear the target was "not about working longer hours".
"When we're talking about labour productivity, all it means is producing more for each hour worked," she told ABC TV.
"This is about making sure Australians have the skills, that they have access to the technology, that we have great business processes that allow all of us to get more out of each hour that we put in."
Higher productivity was ultimately what drove improvements in incomes and living standards, and technological change was the most important driver of growth, Ms Wood said.
"Australia is lagging in the adoption of AI ... so that's certainly one of the areas of opportunity that we will be looking to," she said.
The commission's most recent report showed labour productivity fell 0.1 per cent in the December quarter and dropped 1.2 per cent in the past year.
Shadow treasurer Ted O'Brien said the opposition gave the government some credit for calling the summit.
"A round table. Yay!" Mr O'Brien joked during an interview on Nine's Today program.
"But look ... to be fair, at least they're recognising the problem ... so let's take that as a partial tick."
Business groups and unions are on a collision course over priorities for a planned productivity summit despite the prime minister's optimism they can find common ground.
Anthony Albanese has dismissed suggestions the roundtable, which will take place in August and is aimed at finding ways to lift the nation's economic output, would amount to little more than a Canberra talkfest.
"It is not unreasonable to bring people together ... business and unions have common interests, we have a national interest in boosting productivity," he told ABC Radio on Wednesday.
But Australian Industry Group chief executive Innes Willox said it was disappointing the union movement had taken the view that "there's nothing to see here and that is all about cutting jobs and cutting wages and it demonstrably isn't".
"One of the frustrating conversations to have with unions is to hear them say: 'Yes, of course there'll be AI but everyone's job will stay the same," he told Sky News.
"Unfortunately it won't but we have to prepare people for that - and that will be a massive exercise in reskilling and retraining ... that's where this productivity summit is going to be so important."
Experts are concerned about Australia's lagging growth in productivity - a key economic measure of efficiency and long-term driver of improved living standards.
Working Australians must be at the centre of the summit, ACTU secretary Sally McManus said.
"We need to leave behind the idea that productivity is equated with cutting pay and making people work harder for less," she said.
Australian Chamber of Commerce and Industry chief executive Andrew McKellar said he was realistic about the potential for tangible outcomes at the roundtable.
"If it was easy, it would have been done already," he told AAP.
The scope of the Fair Work Act had grown significantly in recent years, which had a "significant impact" on small businesses trying to hire staff, Mr McKellar said.
Planned payday superannuation reforms also needed to be implemented in a way that didn't "create a significant additional burden for small business", he added.
"We don't expect (the government) to revisit all of the industrial relations changes, but … let's make some practical changes that make it easier for small business to create jobs and employ more people to promote productivity," Mr McKellar said.
Tax changes, cutting the regulatory burden and encouraging the uptake of digital technology would all be priorities for the business lobby, which singled out AI as a field that could make a big difference to productivity.
Productivity Commission chair Danielle Wood said it was important to be clear the target was "not about working longer hours".
"When we're talking about labour productivity, all it means is producing more for each hour worked," she told ABC TV.
"This is about making sure Australians have the skills, that they have access to the technology, that we have great business processes that allow all of us to get more out of each hour that we put in."
Higher productivity was ultimately what drove improvements in incomes and living standards, and technological change was the most important driver of growth, Ms Wood said.
"Australia is lagging in the adoption of AI ... so that's certainly one of the areas of opportunity that we will be looking to," she said.
The commission's most recent report showed labour productivity fell 0.1 per cent in the December quarter and dropped 1.2 per cent in the past year.
Shadow treasurer Ted O'Brien said the opposition gave the government some credit for calling the summit.
"A round table. Yay!" Mr O'Brien joked during an interview on Nine's Today program.
"But look ... to be fair, at least they're recognising the problem ... so let's take that as a partial tick."
Business groups and unions are on a collision course over priorities for a planned productivity summit despite the prime minister's optimism they can find common ground.
Anthony Albanese has dismissed suggestions the roundtable, which will take place in August and is aimed at finding ways to lift the nation's economic output, would amount to little more than a Canberra talkfest.
"It is not unreasonable to bring people together ... business and unions have common interests, we have a national interest in boosting productivity," he told ABC Radio on Wednesday.
But Australian Industry Group chief executive Innes Willox said it was disappointing the union movement had taken the view that "there's nothing to see here and that is all about cutting jobs and cutting wages and it demonstrably isn't".
"One of the frustrating conversations to have with unions is to hear them say: 'Yes, of course there'll be AI but everyone's job will stay the same," he told Sky News.
"Unfortunately it won't but we have to prepare people for that - and that will be a massive exercise in reskilling and retraining ... that's where this productivity summit is going to be so important."
Experts are concerned about Australia's lagging growth in productivity - a key economic measure of efficiency and long-term driver of improved living standards.
Working Australians must be at the centre of the summit, ACTU secretary Sally McManus said.
"We need to leave behind the idea that productivity is equated with cutting pay and making people work harder for less," she said.
Australian Chamber of Commerce and Industry chief executive Andrew McKellar said he was realistic about the potential for tangible outcomes at the roundtable.
"If it was easy, it would have been done already," he told AAP.
The scope of the Fair Work Act had grown significantly in recent years, which had a "significant impact" on small businesses trying to hire staff, Mr McKellar said.
Planned payday superannuation reforms also needed to be implemented in a way that didn't "create a significant additional burden for small business", he added.
"We don't expect (the government) to revisit all of the industrial relations changes, but … let's make some practical changes that make it easier for small business to create jobs and employ more people to promote productivity," Mr McKellar said.
Tax changes, cutting the regulatory burden and encouraging the uptake of digital technology would all be priorities for the business lobby, which singled out AI as a field that could make a big difference to productivity.
Productivity Commission chair Danielle Wood said it was important to be clear the target was "not about working longer hours".
"When we're talking about labour productivity, all it means is producing more for each hour worked," she told ABC TV.
"This is about making sure Australians have the skills, that they have access to the technology, that we have great business processes that allow all of us to get more out of each hour that we put in."
Higher productivity was ultimately what drove improvements in incomes and living standards, and technological change was the most important driver of growth, Ms Wood said.
"Australia is lagging in the adoption of AI ... so that's certainly one of the areas of opportunity that we will be looking to," she said.
The commission's most recent report showed labour productivity fell 0.1 per cent in the December quarter and dropped 1.2 per cent in the past year.
Shadow treasurer Ted O'Brien said the opposition gave the government some credit for calling the summit.
"A round table. Yay!" Mr O'Brien joked during an interview on Nine's Today program.
"But look ... to be fair, at least they're recognising the problem ... so let's take that as a partial tick."
Business groups and unions are on a collision course over priorities for a planned productivity summit despite the prime minister's optimism they can find common ground.
Anthony Albanese has dismissed suggestions the roundtable, which will take place in August and is aimed at finding ways to lift the nation's economic output, would amount to little more than a Canberra talkfest.
"It is not unreasonable to bring people together ... business and unions have common interests, we have a national interest in boosting productivity," he told ABC Radio on Wednesday.
But Australian Industry Group chief executive Innes Willox said it was disappointing the union movement had taken the view that "there's nothing to see here and that is all about cutting jobs and cutting wages and it demonstrably isn't".
"One of the frustrating conversations to have with unions is to hear them say: 'Yes, of course there'll be AI but everyone's job will stay the same," he told Sky News.
"Unfortunately it won't but we have to prepare people for that - and that will be a massive exercise in reskilling and retraining ... that's where this productivity summit is going to be so important."
Experts are concerned about Australia's lagging growth in productivity - a key economic measure of efficiency and long-term driver of improved living standards.
Working Australians must be at the centre of the summit, ACTU secretary Sally McManus said.
"We need to leave behind the idea that productivity is equated with cutting pay and making people work harder for less," she said.
Australian Chamber of Commerce and Industry chief executive Andrew McKellar said he was realistic about the potential for tangible outcomes at the roundtable.
"If it was easy, it would have been done already," he told AAP.
The scope of the Fair Work Act had grown significantly in recent years, which had a "significant impact" on small businesses trying to hire staff, Mr McKellar said.
Planned payday superannuation reforms also needed to be implemented in a way that didn't "create a significant additional burden for small business", he added.
"We don't expect (the government) to revisit all of the industrial relations changes, but … let's make some practical changes that make it easier for small business to create jobs and employ more people to promote productivity," Mr McKellar said.
Tax changes, cutting the regulatory burden and encouraging the uptake of digital technology would all be priorities for the business lobby, which singled out AI as a field that could make a big difference to productivity.
Productivity Commission chair Danielle Wood said it was important to be clear the target was "not about working longer hours".
"When we're talking about labour productivity, all it means is producing more for each hour worked," she told ABC TV.
"This is about making sure Australians have the skills, that they have access to the technology, that we have great business processes that allow all of us to get more out of each hour that we put in."
Higher productivity was ultimately what drove improvements in incomes and living standards, and technological change was the most important driver of growth, Ms Wood said.
"Australia is lagging in the adoption of AI ... so that's certainly one of the areas of opportunity that we will be looking to," she said.
The commission's most recent report showed labour productivity fell 0.1 per cent in the December quarter and dropped 1.2 per cent in the past year.
Shadow treasurer Ted O'Brien said the opposition gave the government some credit for calling the summit.
"A round table. Yay!" Mr O'Brien joked during an interview on Nine's Today program.
"But look ... to be fair, at least they're recognising the problem ... so let's take that as a partial tick."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

News.com.au
15 minutes ago
- News.com.au
Mitsubishi Australia boss: Why PHEV is the hybrid worth having
As CEO of Mitsubishi Motors Australia, I have the privilege of speaking to people both inside and outside the automotive industry every day. Unsurprisingly, the conversation almost always turns to vehicles and EV technology. As Australia works toward our 2030 and 2050 emissions targets, these conversations are more important than ever. The path to Net Zero will be driven by technology – and there is more than one way to get there. Battery Electric Vehicles (BEVs) are often seen as the ultimate solution – and we're proudly launching a new one next year – but they are not the only answer. In the race toward a cleaner, greener transport future, Plug-In Hybrid Electric Vehicles (PHEVs) represent a smart and practical choice for many Australians. When people hear the word hybrid, they often think of traditional hybrid vehicles – cars powered primarily by a petrol engine, supported by a small battery and electric motor. These batteries charge through regenerative braking and the internal combustion engine, with no need to plug in. While the petrol engine in a hybrid vehicle is always in use, it will produce lower fuel emissions than a standard vehicle with an internal combustion engine. PHEVs, in contrast, can be plugged in – combining a significantly larger battery than a standard hybrid, while still retaining an on-board generator that can recharge the battery when needed. And that's the key distinction between PHEVs and hybrids: with a hybrid you are never travelling in pure electric mode – there is always reliance on petrol. But with a PHEV, you can drive in 100 per cent electric mode and for many Australians, use zero fuel on daily commutes. In Australia, the average daily commute is just 35km – often to drop the kids at school, drive to work, and stop at the shops on the way home. The Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV delivers up to 84km of EV range – easily covering most people's daily needs without using a drop of petrol. In fact, our customer surveys show that 81 per cent of trips in a PHEV are completed in electric mode. Personally, I drive on battery 98 per cent of the time – thanks to solar panels at home and at work. Unlike fully-electric vehicles, PHEVs don't need expensive chargers. You can plug them into a regular socket overnight – just like your mobile phone. And when a longer journey is required – whether a family trip interstate or to the outback in search of adventure – the on-board generator takes over without the anxiety of trying to find a charger. This is why we believe PHEVs are perfectly suited to the Australian landscape and lifestyle. PHEV technology is the best of both worlds: benefits of electric driving with the flexibility of an on-board generator when you need it. Think of them as electric cars with a built-in safety net. This is important, because only 15 per cent of Australians agree with the statement: 'It's easy to find a place to plug in and recharge my vehicle'. At Mitsubishi, we're proud to offer vehicles that support adventure and sustainability. Our PHEVs give drivers the freedom to go anywhere, anytime – while immediately reducing fuel emissions. They also help overcome one of the biggest barriers to electric vehicle adoption: charging anxiety. It's a challenge that won't be fully addressed until public charging infrastructure is more widely available. They're also future-ready. Mitsubishi PHEVs come with bi-directional charging – meaning your vehicle can power your home or even feed energy back to the grid. You don't need to invest in a separate home battery – you already have one in your driveway with a Mitsubishi badge on the front! Although this technology is just beginning to roll out across Australia, early adoption has been strong. The Australian Renewable Energy Agency predicts bi-directional charging could be as widespread as rooftop solar, with up to 2.6 million residential installations by 2040. With solar, if you don't use it, you lose it – and PHEVs can store the energy for you until you need it. As a side-note, Mitsubishi was the first manufacturer to bring a PHEV SUV to market. The Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV launched in 2013, became a global bestseller, and the nameplate was one of the top-two best-selling PHEVs in Australia last year. So if you're in the market for a new vehicle – one that reduces your fuel costs, removes range anxiety, and can even power your home – make sure you consider our PHEV EOFY offers!


7NEWS
an hour ago
- 7NEWS
Hunt for mystery Sydney winner of $100m Powerball jackpot
The hunt is on for the lucky winner of Thursday night's $100m Powerball draw with the mystery player not registering the winning ticket. One player managed to snag the entire jackpot, Powerball's richest for 2025. Know the news with the 7NEWS app: Download today The winning numbers for Powerball draw 1517 are: 28, 10, 3, 16, 31, 14 and 21. The Powerball is 6. However Australia's newest millionaire remains a mystery, potentially completely oblivious to his or her newfound fortune. The winning ticket was bought in Sydney's eastern suburbs, so residents of the area or anyone who may have visited and purchased an entry into the draw while there, have been urged to check their tickets. 'If you discover you're holding the division one winning entry, hold on tight to that ticket and phone 131 868 as soon as possible so that we can start the prize claim process,' officials from The Lott said. In addition to the jackpot winner, six players took home $282,000 each in division two, while 187 players scored $11,200 in division three. Thursday's winner instantly rockets to equal third in terms of most lucrative individual lottery wins in Australian history. The last time Powerball reached $100m heights was in November. Just six Australians know exactly how it feels to win a Powerball prize of $100 million or more.


9 News
an hour ago
- 9 News
PM heads off to G7 meeting
The pressure is on Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and a potential sit-down with Donald Trump as the former heads to the G7 summit today.