This was the best place on Earth to see great white sharks—then they vanished
A new study in Frontiers in Marine Science shows what happens when sharks vanish. Seal Island, off South Africa's False Bay was once a great white hotspot—one of the few places on Earth where the sharks could be seen surging out of the water to capture prey.
'It was air Jaws,' says marine ecologist Neil Hammerschlag, executive director of the Shark Research Foundation Inc. and a coauthor on the new study. 'I don't think there's anything more remarkable in nature than seeing a 2,000-pound great white flying out of the air with a seal in its mouth.'
When the predators disappeared, researchers and conservationists pointed fingers at both encroaching orcas and humans as the culprit. But Hammerschlag and his colleagues, who began studying the ecosystem around the island in 2000 long before the vanishing, saw some surprising changes.
Twenty years ago, Seal Island was 'the greatest place on earth to see great whites,' recalls Hammerschlag, who also serves as president of Atlantic Shark Expeditions. Around 2010, white shark numbers around False Bay started dropping off, and the decline got steeper from 2015 on. By 2018, the great whites were gone.
Exactly why the sharks vanished remains a mystery. 'The departure of the white shark is really open to discussion,' says Greg Skomal, a shark biologist with Massachusetts Division of Marine Fisheries who wasn't involved in the study.
Some suggest the animals fled because killer whales moved in. Orcas can kill a shark in minutes by precisely carving out its nutrient-rich liver.
Hammerschlag thinks humans could also be to blame, as nearby shark nets kill 'somewhere between 25 and 30 great whites a year.' Even a small loss can drive the population into decline, he says, because great whites become sexually mature late in life—males in their 20s and females in their 30s—and have small litters of up to 12 pups.
(A baby great white shark led scientists to a huge nursery near NYC.)
Sharks are thought to keep marine habitats healthy by removing weak and sick animals from the food chain and keeping things in balance. But proving these impacts in a real-world habitat this is challenging.
'These kinds of ecosystem effects are very difficult for us to tease out because they require long-term data sets,' says Skomal.
In False Bay, Hammerschlag's and his colleagues partnered with an ecotourism company, allowing them to spend 'full days on the water, 200 days a year.' The team collected over 20 years of data, from before, during and after the great whites' disappearance.
'We saw things happen that we'd never expect,' Hammerschlag says.
Broadnose sevengill sharks (Notorynchus cepedianus) suddenly appeared—sometimes as many as 15 in one day. These animals usually hang out several kilometers away in kelp beds, which offer protection from great white attacks. 'From nothing to double digits. It's just mind blowing,' he says.
The Cape fur seal (Arctocephalus pusillus pusillus) population also increased. Safe from the threat of sharks, seals were rafting—floating in groups, like a living raft—and going after the cage divers' bait. 'That would have been suicide just a few years earlier,' he says.
Both seals and sevengills were on the menu for great whites, so it made sense to see their numbers rise. But Hammerschlag and his colleagues also wanted to find out if the populations of animals that seals and sevengills eat had changed, too.
Luckily, scientist Lauren De Vos had installed cameras in 2012 to get a snapshot of fish populations at the time for another study. Hammerschlag's team followed the same method—even down to borrowing the same equipment. As expected, the new data showed a decline in seal prey like anchovies and Cape horse mackerel and sevengill prey, such as smoothhound sharks and pyjama catsharks.
This zigzag of impacts—white sharks vanish, their prey increases and, in turn, the animals they eat declines—suggests this isn't caused by problems like pollution or development.
'If habitat destruction was occurring, you would think everything would go down,' rather than some species declining and some increasing, Hammerschlag says. But the study numbers don't reflect that.
The small area of False Bay, with relatively few species, made figuring out some of these food chain impacts easier. 'Hammerschlag has that connectivity mapped out because he knows what eats what,' says Skomal. The more species in an ecosystem, the more difficult it is to map the food chain and track the impacts when an animal is lost. Establishing the relationships between animals in a broader area, like the Gulf of Maine, which has hundreds of species, would be much harder, he says.
(Cape Cod may have the highest density of great white sharks in the world.)
Scientists in South Africa have noticed great white shark population changes in other ecosystems, too, and researchers believe the factors driving these changes are similar to the ones cited in False Bay. Shark behavioral ecologist Lacey Williams has seen 'pretty significant changes' in Mossel Bay and Plettenberg Bay, or 'Plett.'
In Plett, shark appearances used to be 'random,' she says. Then around 2022, locals started noticing the sharks 'in a very predictable spot' around Robberg Peninsula. Before long, the sharks started arriving later in the season and then sightings dwindled.
In Mossel Bay, great white sightings stayed relative steady until around 2021 but have declined since then. In May 2022, drone footage emerged of two orcas killing a white shark. 'That was really the beginning of the significant changes of white sharks in Mossel Bay,' she says. Last year, the cage diving company that Williams works with saw 'less than one handful' of sightings between April and December, she says.
South Africa's white shark population had already been declining 'prior to the arrival of these two very famous, sexy scapegoats,' Williams says. 'The orcas are like pouring kerosene on an already burning bonfire.'
Human have driven the broader declines too, she says. Long line fisheries have targeted demersal sharks—that live just above the seabed, like critically endangered soupfin sharks (Galeorhinus galeus) and smooth-hound sharks—for decades. These species are a key food source for white sharks so removing them has a ripple effect.
As in False Bay, shark nets are another concern. Many people mistakenly believe that these form a barrier to protect swimmers from sharks. 'It doesn't really protect people from anything,' says Williams. 'The only thing it really does is kill wildlife indiscriminately.'
Although there's no silver bullet, potential solutions include Shark Spotters, drones, and SharkSafe BarrierTM technology. This magnetic device, which imitates kelp forests, seems to deter white sharks. These systems are expensive, but the investment is worth it, says Williams. 'If we don't have an ecosystem, we're going to lose tourism.'
It currently seems too early to tell how the decline in white sharks in Mossel Bay and Plettenberg might impact the wider ecosystem. 'It's worth looking into, though,' Williams says. 'I think it's safe to say we'll see changes.'
Back in False Bay, one possible outcome of all of these shifts is that seals and sevengills might run out of animals to eat. Could the ecosystem collapse? It's too early to know. 'That would be the next question,' says Skomal. 'Is it too many seals?'
Today, great whites' incredible aerial displays are a thing of the past at Seal Island. 'You'd never know this was a great white hotspot,' Hammerschlag says.
For him, seeing how the whole ecosystem has changed shows the importance of enforcing shark protections and using non-lethal methods to protect beachgoers from shark bites.
'We can't change the orcas' behavior,' he says, 'But we can stop the netting program. That's kind of archaic.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Scientists stunned by 'lethal' discovery made while studying popular swamp: 'We wonder what else is being affected'
Scientists stunned by 'lethal' discovery made while studying popular swamp: 'We wonder what else is being affected' Although swamps have garnered a reputation for being formidable locations with dangerous species and spooky visuals, they play a pivotal role in an ecosystem. That is why a recent discovery made in some swamps of Georgia and South Carolina has researchers worried. What's happening? According to a recent study published in Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, elevated levels of mercury have been detected in several swamps throughout the Deep South. The discovery was made when a team of researchers was conducting a study on alligators in the region. They selected Jekyll Island and the Okefenokee Swamp in Georgia as well as the Yawkey Wildlife Center in South Carolina as their primary locations. While speaking to UGA Today, Kristen Zemaitis, lead author of the study and a graduate of the University of Georgia, noted the importance of alligators. "Alligators are very ancient creatures, and we can look at them in these areas as an indicator of what else might be happening in the ecosystem," Zemaitis said. "Studying them can relate to many different things in the food web." This is why the team of researchers was stunned when they began measuring mercury levels at the three research sites. Mercury exists naturally in the Earth's crust and can be released into the environment through natural processes. However, as noted in the study, mercury is a "potent neurotoxin, commonly assessed in contaminant body burdens." Why are elevated levels of mercury in swamps important? Oftentimes, human activities such as industrial pollution and urbanization can result in regional "hot spots" with elevated mercury concentrations. With this in mind, the research team spent several months analyzing blood samples from more than 100 alligators across the Okefenokee Swamp, Jekyll Island, and the Yawkey Wildlife Center. Their findings revealed that mercury concentrations were around eight times higher in alligators inhabiting the Okefenokee Swamp than at any of the other sites. "That's one of the results from the study that was most striking to me," said Jeb Byers, co-author of the study. "Mercury is a neurotoxin that is very lethal to organisms. If it builds up, it moves through the food web and creates the perfect storm. That's what we have in the Okefenokee," added Byers, a UGA professor. The researchers determined that mercury is perhaps moving up through the food chain at a faster rate than previously thought. When mercury enters marine environments from various sources, it can be absorbed by small organisms in the food chain. As larger species eat these smaller organisms, it can lead to higher levels in larger predators, such as alligators. What's being done about these high levels of mercury? High levels of mercury can prove to be problematic for local communities that rely on fishing industries for their food supply. "Mercury contamination can be a high concern for the people who can be consuming a lot of fish or game species from the rivers, swamps or oceans that have high mercury," Zemaitis noted. While the study has revealed alarming results, Zemaitis said that this can potentially help us learn more about which species are most affected in our environment. "Now that we know this about one of the apex predators in these systems, we wonder what else is being affected?" added Zemaitis. The researcher explained that further studies could better explain where the excess mercury levels are coming from and how prominent the neurotoxin is in the ecosystem. Do you worry about having toxic forever chemicals in your home? Majorly Sometimes Not really I don't know enough about them Click your choice to see results and speak your mind. Join our free newsletter for good news and useful tips, and don't miss this cool list of easy ways to help yourself while helping the planet. Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
4 days ago
- Yahoo
Largest Great White Shark Ever Recorded Spotted Swimming Near Popular New England Beach Destination
A record-breaking great white shark was spotted swimming off the coast of Nantucket, Mass., on July 18. The shark, named Contender, was tagged by the marine research nonprofit OCEARCH. Contender measures an impressive 13 feet, 9 inches long and weighs a whopping 1,653 pounds. Researchers referred to the shark as 'the ultimate ocean warrior," per MassLive. Contender's latest satellite ping placed the massive shark in waters east of Massachusetts, specifically between Nantucket Shoals and Georges Bank, per the outlet. OCEARCH originally tagged the male shark in January off the coast of Georgia, approximately 45 miles offshore. Contender then made the journey to Florida, before turning back up north. Before the ping off the coast of Massachusetts, there was a ping off the coast of North Carolina's Cape Hatteras, OCEARCH shared on Instagram on June 10. "The SPOT tag deployed on Contender will provide valuable real-time data for approximately five years, helping us track his movements and understand his migration patterns," the research group said in a statement. "Additionally, we've collected important biological samples, including urogenital material, which are currently being analyzed." The group also revealed how they chose the shark's name. Contender is named after Contender Boats, "a longtime OCEARCH partner, whose industry-leading sport fishing and pleasure boats enable our research missions." Never miss a story — sign up for to stay up-to-date on the best of what PEOPLE has to offer, from celebrity news to compelling human interest stories. Another great white shark was spotted in Cape Cod on July 4 by two paddleboarders, roughly 100 yards offshore from Stony Beach. The Atlantic White Shark Conservancy determined that there were an estimated 800 great white sharks in the waters around Massachusetts from 2015 to 2018, per WBZ News. OCEARCH has shared an interactive travel log of Contender's migration journey on their official website. Read the original article on People


New York Times
4 days ago
- New York Times
There's Fungus Among Us. But Where Exactly?
The world's biological riches are not evenly distributed. Instead, much of Earth's plant and animal life is concentrated in a small number of biodiversity hot spots — from the tropical rainforests of the Amazon to the alpine meadows of the Himalayas — that have earned enormous scientific and conservation attention. Now, new research suggests that more of these critical hot spots could be hiding beneath our feet — undocumented and largely unprotected. On Wednesday, an international team of scientists unveiled a global underground atlas, mapping the biodiversity of organisms known as mycorrhizal fungi. The fungi, which live in and on plant roots, form vast underground networks and perform critical ecosystem services, transporting nutrients to plants, storing carbon, bolstering soil health and helping crops survive environmental shocks and stresses. Using machine learning models, the scientists predicted that rich reservoirs of these fungi lie hidden in some unexpected places, including the Alaskan tundra and Mediterranean woodlands and scrublands. The dense Amazonian jungle did not stand out as a fungal biodiversity hot spot, but the neighboring savanna, the Brazilian Cerrado, did. 'The Amazon of the underground is not actually in the Amazon rainforest,' said Michael Van Nuland, the lead data scientist at the Society for the Protection of Underground Networks, a research organization that led the mapping effort. 'These patterns of diversity that we're seeing are unique.' Alarmingly, they found, relatively few of these critical hot spots are in ecologically protected areas. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.