Civil Society must have a voice in the National Dialogue
Image: The Presidency
Siphamandla Zondi
PRESIDENT Cyril Ramaphosa has finally confirmed the start of the national dialogue in South Africa in mid-August.
He has explained that it will be a people-centred dialogue and in an open letter the former President Thabo Mbeki has called it a citizen-led exercise.
Both are noble ways of thinking about it but several realities will have to be tackled to realise these ideals. This opinion piece is inspired by initial discussions within the Devoted Citizen NGO preparing for this opportunity. Academics like myself who are committed to research through community engagement are duty-bound to assist drive active citizenship based on evidence.
First, it is important to note that the need for South Africans to engage about the current state of the country and what must be done to fix it, has long been talked about.
Civil society activists have decried the state of our country, the manner in which its economy functions, in particular the fact that it breeds more poverty than shared prosperity, the fact that its public infrastructure is in disarray, and social services including education and health are also falling apart.
Activists have said none of these crises are natural in any way but they result from leadership and governance failures. They know that therefore these problems can be reversed when collective will is used to say no further. We cannot allow our country to be run down, our cities to become infested with preventable problems and our villages and townships to become unliveable.
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Advertisement
Next
Stay
Close ✕
Ad loading
Activists have long pointed out that we need change in leadership, both in persons and in form. So, there must not just be new leaders but there must be new leaders with a renewed sense of purpose, leaders with a new attitude to their task, leaders with greater desire to leave a lasting social legacy. We need a new type of leading, one that includes all, one that organises the best of talent and skills we have to tackle mammoth problems.
Activists have said we have to rethink how we see ourselves. We cannot allow what we see around us to become the way of life.
We must reject the idea that when Africans take over, things fall into pieces, they say. These agents of change believe we have to believe that we can build a country of our dreams.
But we know exactly what dreams we have for this country. It is clear that such a dream must be repeated to leave behind a country far greater, far more excellent, far more functional, and far more prosperous than the one we inherit.
Activists have long said maybe we need a CODESA Two but one that is sharply focused on real outcomes. Some of those are to end the era of deadwood running at public institutions.
It must end the error of corruption. It must completely reject incompetence in any public office. It must reject nepotism that robs this country of the benefit of the best skills it already has.
It must reject narrow party political agendas and embarrass an inclusive forward-looking agenda. Parties have to transcend their narrow focus on what is in the interest of their party, their ideology or their constituencies only, and focus on what South Africa needs.
A citizen-led national dialogue should not be political party driven. We should therefore be concerned about the DA-ANC contests at the moment as they signal a fight for the control of the national conversation. Together they constitute only about 60% of the voting public which in itself is not a whole public. Political parties must be encouraged to focus on parliament where they are mandated to pursue positive change. They have not been that successful in doing it. They must let the dialogue take place on the basis of open persuasions and inputs from all who wish too.
Organisations like Citizens Coalition, Devoted Citizen NGO, Abahlali BaseMjondolo, etc must be encouraged to drive the process of garnering views that may be silenced by the nature of process and limited time available or even lack of information.
Faith-based NGOs such Devoted Citizen, Economic Justice Network, AFRODAD, People Matter Foundation, and so forth have a duty to serve, a responsibility to contribute to building a better country. Since they are driven by hope, they ought to translate that hope into reality working with others to build the country we want.
Civil society is a diverse body of people, divided by ideas and ideology, by constituencies and styles of engagement, attitude and passions. But it is the beauty of that diversity joined by a shared commitment to place the country's destiny in the hands of citizens that make them the ideal participants in the national dialogue.
Civil society formations must in their individual and collective forms prepare ways of garnering views to represent at the National Dialogue.
Professor Zondi is a Volunteer Convenor at Devoted Citizen NGO.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Star
an hour ago
- The Star
President, you did what you had to do
Faced with deepening public distrust, political decay, and mounting pressure from both civil society and the global community, you made a long overdue move. Whether it was the appointment of new leadership in a critical institution, the announcement of a fresh inquiry, or an attempt to reform failing systems, you didn't have much of a choice. But the question now is: can this effort gain traction in time? South Africans are not short on patience. We waited through the painstaking revelations of the Zondo Commission. We watched damning evidence pile up, expecting swift justice and systemic reform. Yet years later, we still ask: where are the arrests? Where is the action? Where is the transformation? The announcement, though necessary, is not enough. Not anymore. The timelines between political will and actual change in this country have become alarmingly wide. For every new committee or task force, there's a growing list of unfinished business recommendations unimplemented, whistleblowers unprotected, and citizens left in the dark. While your intentions may be genuine, Mr President, history has taught us to be cautious with our optimism. The country is weary. Corruption has not only stolen billions it has also stolen hope. It has left our institutions fragile and our faith in leadership fractured. So, yes, you've made the right move. But now, every delay, every excuse, every silence will be a choice. A choice to let rot continue, to let impunity flourish, and to watch yet another reform effort lose steam. Real leadership requires more than commissions and declarations. It requires follow-through, transparency, and the courage to upset the political apple cart even if it means confronting those within your own house. We are running out of time. If we want to rebuild trust in our institutions, we need bold execution, not bureaucratic theatre. We need urgency, not ambiguity. And above all, we need to know that when leaders speak, they mean business, not just business as usual. The window to act is closing. And this time, the country is watching with clear eyes and tired hearts. I had written an article with the hope that the Zondo Commission recommendations would be implemented, and for a while, we saw no follow-through. That hope, shared by millions of South Africans, was slowly replaced by frustration. The gap between revelation and justice widened. It became clear that exposing the truth was only the beginning and that the real test would be in the making. In closing, Mr President, let us use this period to act. Nyaniso Qwesha
IOL News
3 hours ago
- IOL News
President, you did what you had to do
Former Chief Justice and State Capture Commission Chair Raymond Zondo hands over the Commission's final report report to President Cyril Ramaphosa on June 22, 2022. We waited through the painstaking revelations of the Zondo Commission. We watched damning evidence pile up, expecting swift justice and systemic reform. Yet years later, we still ask: where are the arrests? Where is the action? Where is the transformation? Faced with deepening public distrust, political decay, and mounting pressure from both civil society and the global community, you made a long overdue move. Whether it was the appointment of new leadership in a critical institution, the announcement of a fresh inquiry, or an attempt to reform failing systems, you didn't have much of a choice. But the question now is: can this effort gain traction in time? South Africans are not short on patience. We waited through the painstaking revelations of the Zondo Commission. We watched damning evidence pile up, expecting swift justice and systemic reform. Yet years later, we still ask: where are the arrests? Where is the action? Where is the transformation? The announcement, though necessary, is not enough. Not anymore. The timelines between political will and actual change in this country have become alarmingly wide. For every new committee or task force, there's a growing list of unfinished business recommendations unimplemented, whistleblowers unprotected, and citizens left in the dark. While your intentions may be genuine, Mr President, history has taught us to be cautious with our optimism. The country is weary. Corruption has not only stolen billions it has also stolen hope. It has left our institutions fragile and our faith in leadership fractured. So, yes, you've made the right move. But now, every delay, every excuse, every silence will be a choice. A choice to let rot continue, to let impunity flourish, and to watch yet another reform effort lose steam. Real leadership requires more than commissions and declarations. It requires follow-through, transparency, and the courage to upset the political apple cart even if it means confronting those within your own house. We are running out of time. If we want to rebuild trust in our institutions, we need bold execution, not bureaucratic theatre. We need urgency, not ambiguity. And above all, we need to know that when leaders speak, they mean business, not just business as usual. The window to act is closing. And this time, the country is watching with clear eyes and tired hearts. I had written an article with the hope that the Zondo Commission recommendations would be implemented, and for a while, we saw no follow-through. That hope, shared by millions of South Africans, was slowly replaced by frustration. The gap between revelation and justice widened. It became clear that exposing the truth was only the beginning and that the real test would be in the making. In closing, Mr President, let us use this period to act. Nyaniso Qwesha
The Star
5 hours ago
- The Star
Ramaphosa establishes commission of inquiry to investigate serious claims by top cop Lt-Gen Mkhwanazi
President Cyril Ramaphosa on Sunday announced the establishment of a judicial commission of inquiry to investigate serious corruption allegations made by KwaZulu-Natal Police Commissioner Lieutenant-General Nhlanhla Mkhwanazi. 'These allegations, if proven true, threaten to undermine public confidence in the ability of the South African Police Service to protect citizens and combat crime and corruption,' Ramaphosa said. Ramaphosa's address, delayed by 30 minutes, came a week after Mkhwanazi publicly accused Police Minister Senzo Mchunu of interfering in criminal investigations and protecting corrupt networks within law enforcement. Ramaphosa emphasised the need to safeguard the integrity of law enforcement as South Africans grapple with rising crime, including kidnappings, gender-based violence, and gang activity. Ramaphosa appointed Acting Deputy Chief Justice Mbuyiseli Madlanga to lead the inquiry, assisted by senior counsels Sesi Baloyi and Sandile Khumalo. He said the commission will investigate claims that criminal networks have infiltrated law enforcement, intelligence agencies, and other elements of the justice system. Areas of focus include the facilitation of organised crime, manipulation of investigations, and targeting of whistleblowers and officials. Ramaphosa said the commission will also investigate the possible involvement of current or former senior officials across SA Police Service (SAPS), the National Prosecuting Authority, the State Security Agency, the judiciary, and metro police departments in Johannesburg, Ekurhuleni and Tshwane. Mkhwanazi alleged that Mchunu disbanded the Political Killings Task Team in KwaZulu-Natal in March, effectively shutting down 121 active dockets, many linked to politically motivated murders. He also claimed that investigations had exposed links between criminal syndicates and politicians, law enforcement officials, prosecutors, members of the judiciary, and businesspeople. Mkhwanazi, during his media briefing last week, presented WhatsApp messages, SAPS documents, and cellphone records that he said demonstrated coordinated efforts to dismantle the KZN task team. He implicated Mchunu's 'comrade' Brown Mogotsi in communicating with businessman Vusimuzi 'Cat' Matlala, who had received a R360 million SAPS contract that has since been canceled. According to Mkhwanazi, the disbandment was 'a calculated move to shield a criminal syndicate embedded in law enforcement and politics.'
