
Red tape stops SA kids from getting ADHD meds
Attention deficit and hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) affects between 5% and 7% of schoolgoing children, but because doctors can only prescribe treatment for a month at a time, many kids in South Africa, especially those who can't afford monthly doctor's visits, don't access medication regularly.
Methylphenidate, a central nervous system stimulant that can significantly reduce symptoms in about 70% of users with the condition and that the World Health Organisation (WHO) recommends for the treatment of ADHD, helps people with ADHD to concentrate better, and to be less impulsive and overactive.
Gold standard
Studies have shown that when the methylphenidate - the gold standard for ADHD treatment - is used correctly, children's school marks improve and they become better equipped to develop social skills. In other words, effective ADHD treatment doesn't just help schoolgoers with ADHD to sit still and focus in class, but it also supports them to learn and socialise - outcomes which form the foundation of a healthy and productive adulthood.
Methylphenidate is, however, classified as a schedule six drug in South Africa, placing it in the same regulatory category as medicines with a high potential for abuse. Pharmacies are, therefore only allowed to dispense the medicine to people with doctors' prescriptions, and by law, physicians can only prescribe 30 days' worth of methylphenidate treatment at a time.
This means patients need to visit their doctor each month for a new prescription. In the private sector, they'd need to pay for a doctor's visit each month, in addition to paying for the medication. In the public sector, patients would need to take a day each month to queue up at their local clinic - and they'd have to make sure a doctor, as opposed to only nurses, is available at their health facility.
The current scheduling, as a result, creates huge administrative and financial difficulties for patients and caregivers when they try to get treated, especially for those navigating ADHD's very symptoms: executive dysfunction, forgetfulness and inattention.
Daily realities
As a psychiatrist working in both the public and private healthcare sector, I've seen first-hand the toll that untreated ADHD takes on children, adults and families - from fractured educational journeys to unemployment, depression, addiction and even suicide.
These are not theoretical risks but daily realities for many South Africans. Yet, one of the biggest obstacles that lock people out of treatment - our own healthcare policies - remains unchanged.
LISTEN | LISTEN | Do ADHD meds work to cram during exams?
It's time for us to change that script.
A 2024 qualitative study with 23 South African stakeholders, which included healthcare professionals, pharmacists, regulators, patients and caregivers, revealed they did not see the current scheduling as an effective way to prevent misuse and illegal use. Instead, participants said, classifying methylphenidate a schedule 6 drug ' negatively impacts on treatment adherence '.
Our medicines regulator, the South African Health Products Regulatory Authority (Sahpra) must urgently review the scheduling of methylphenidate to consider rescheduling it to a schedule five drug, which will allow doctors to prescribe six-monthly scripts. Schedule 5 medicines are medications with a low to moderate potential for abuse or dependence.
Here are four reasons why methylphenidate should be a schedule 5 medication.
More people with ADHD will get treated
ADHD is not rare - a review of 53 research studies shows it affects 7.6% of children between 3 and 12 years and 5.6% of teens between 12 and 18.
In 65% of cases, children's ADHD persists, at least partially, into adulthood.
While we rightly invest in treating chronic conditions like diabetes and hypertension, we continue to overlook the profound, lifelong impact of untreated ADHD. Studies have confirmed that people with ADHD have a higher chance to also develop other psychiatric disorders such as anxiety or depression, they're far more likely to suffer from substance use disorders, to have accidental injuries, underachieve in school, be unemployed, become gamblers, fall pregnant as teenagers, die by suicide or die early.
These factors contribute to the burden of disease and consequent stress on the health system - but most importantly, they reduce the quality of life of people with ADHD and their families.
Medication can change this, yet access is limited. In many poorer communities, virtually no children who need treatment are receiving it.
Although stigma and the cost of methylphenidate (on average, in today's terms, between R700 and R1 000 for a month's treatment in the private sector) play a role in making treatment harder to get, having it classified as a schedule 6 drug plays a big part in making the medication inaccessible - and it affects people in rural areas, the unemployed, and those without medical aid the most, which further widens the treatment gap between public and private healthcare sectors.
Current scheduling does not prevent abuse
Opponents of rescheduling often cite concerns about misuse - especially among tertiary students using methylphenidate for academic enhancement. Although these concerns are valid, evidence suggests that the current schedule 6 classification does little to prevent non-medical use.
In fact, studies show that 28.1% of medical students have used methylphenidate without a prescription. This raises an uncomfortable truth: those determined to misuse the drug will find ways to do so, regardless of scheduling.
One South African study, showed that of the 11.3% of students who reported having used methylphenidate in the past year, only 27.3% had been diagnosed with ADHD. Despite this, two-thirds obtained their medication through doctors' prescriptions, just under a third got it from friends and 6.1% bought it illegally.
Meanwhile, genuine patients - particularly children and teenagers - are penalised by overly restrictive policies that reduce access to the very tools designed to help them succeed.
We must ask ourselves: is the current scheduling preventing abuse, or is it merely restricting access for those who need it most? If the answer is the latter, then we have an ethical obligation to change course.
Rescheduling does not mean deregulation. It means creating a more nuanced, risk-based framework - one that acknowledges both the need for control and the realities of living with a chronic disorder.
More people will take their medication correctly
How well someone adheres to their medication determines, to a large extent, how well the medicine works for them.
But studies show between 13% to 64% of people with ADHD and who often use methylphenidate, don't use their medication as prescribed.
For people with ADHD - with symptoms that impair their ability to organise, plan and follow through - the monthly schedule 6 script requirement can become a self-defeating cycle. The very condition we are trying to treat creates challenges in adhering to its treatment.
LISTEN | ADHD cases are genetic. Can you outgrow it?
Unsurprisingly, participants in the 2024 stakeholder study mentioned earlier in this article, viewed the current scheduling as counterproductive, and 'expressed their support for the convenience of six-monthly scripts for obtaining treatment'. Stakeholders argued that overall adherence would improve by reducing administrative challenges such as the need to take time off work and arrange monthly doctors' visits.
Moreover, research shows, people with ADHD who use their medication correctly, are also more likely to adhere to medication for other conditions, for instance diabetes or HIV infection, that they may have. Improving adherence to ADHD medication therefore does not only improve the quality of patients' lives, but also lessens the burden on our health system overall.
The state is doing same thing for antidepressants and anti-anxiety meds
ADHD medication is not the only psychiatric medicine that needs rescheduling. South Africa's current HIV plan for 2023–2028 recommends that certain antidepressants and anti-anxiety medications are descheduled from schedule five drugs - which only doctors can prescribe - to schedule 4 drugs, so that specially trained nurses are able to prescribe them.
Research has shown that there's a high chance for someone with HIV to develop depression or anxiety; these conditions are associated with people with HIV taking their medicine less regularly.
But South Africa's government health system - which most HIV-positive people in the country use to get their treatment - doesn't have nearly enough doctors to staff clinics full-time. Instead, nurses run such clinics, with doctors only doing shifts once or twice a week.
Getting nurses to diagnose mental health conditions and to prescribe treatment, will mean that patients won't have to return for doctors' appointments to get treated.
Policy is never value neutral. It reflects what we, as a society, choose to prioritise. In the case of ADHD, we must choose inclusion over exclusion, access over fear, and healing over harm. Rescheduling methylphenidate is not about giving up control; it's about restoring agency to patients, families and clinicians alike.
Sahpra response from CEO Boitumelo Semete-Makokotlela: Sahpra is open to the rescheduling of scheduled substances. For this to happen, either the manufacturer of a medicine or anyone in the scientific community who has data for us to consider has to submit a request for rescheduling, along with the required scientific and clinical data. We'll have our names and scheduling committee, as well as our clinical committee, review the submissions. We would also consider additional data, outside of what would have been provided, and then make a decision. This process takes about 120 days.
- Professor Renata Schoeman is a Cape Town-based psychiatrist and the co-author of South Africa's ADHD management guidelines and chairs the SA Society of Psychiatrists special interest group for ADHD. She serves on the ministerial advisory committee for mental health and heads up the healthcare leadership MBA specialisation stream at Stellenbosch University.
- This story was produced by the Bhekisisa Centre for Health Journalis m. Sign up for the newsletter.
Disclaimer: News24 encourages freedom of speech and the expression of diverse views. The views of columnists published on News24 are therefore their own and do not necessarily represent the views of News24.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Washington Post
12 hours ago
- Washington Post
Carolyn Hax: Parent balks at teen's pursuit of career credential in high school
Adapted from an online discussion. Dear Carolyn: Our daughter's high school has a technical program that would allow her to take classes toward becoming a Patient Care Technician by graduation. Her goal is to become a pediatric nurse. The problem is that it would require her to drop an elective (chorus) that I know brings her much joy and I think is very beneficial to her mental health. Most of her friends are from her various choral activities. She just seems so young to be making decisions on a career path already. Full disclosure: I was a chorus kid and it was one of the few positive things for me in high school, so I realize this is coloring my view a bit. I also KNEW I wanted to become a teacher — until I actually pursued that track in college and realized it was NOT for me. The pressure put on these kids is immense. I just want her to enjoy her high school experience. She will have time to pursue her degree and certifications after graduation. But is it our call to make? I worry about her resenting us if we deny her this track, but worry more about her mental health if she no longer has chorus as an outlet and bringer-of-joy. — Worried Worried: First, drop the chorus rope. You're too invested. She can decide its value to her, and knows where to find it again if she regrets quitting. Second, lose the 'too soon' inflexibility, because there are unicorn kids who really do know what they want. Third, she could love this program for its inherent value — and it could, paradoxically, take pressure off her and be better for her mental health if it's a good group of kids, gives her a clear set of standards and sense of purpose, and aligns with her interests. Fourth: It could rule out more than chorus, though, so look carefully. If 'core' courses get squeezed out, then she may need to pick them up later if she changes to a more liberal arts path. It's not insurmountable, but it's still better to know going in. Fifth, can she enter this track late? Leave it early? Where have its graduates gone next? Have you asked the school these things? Sixth, err on the side of trusting your kid. You do have the parental last word, but at her age it's time to save that for emergencies. So gather all the intel you can, primarily about what SHE wants, then proceed as if it's a schedule, not a destiny. Readers' thoughts:
Yahoo
14 hours ago
- Yahoo
Jim Cramer on UnitedHealth: 'It Could Come Back'
UnitedHealth Group Incorporated (NYSE:UNH) is one of the stocks Jim Cramer shed light on. Cramer showed a slight bit of optimism toward the company as he said: 'I think UnitedHealth's going to work here… I think it's going to work. I really do. Look, I'm not a believer. I don't like the fact that they had shenanigans, but I will say this: I think that the company is run by a very good CEO. It could come back.' Ken Wolter/ UnitedHealth Group Incorporated (NYSE:UNH) provides health benefits, pharmacy care, care delivery, and health management services. In addition, the company offers data analytics and technology-driven solutions for individuals, employers, governments, and health systems. During the August 7 episode, when a caller inquired about the company stock, Cramer responded: 'I have long known, this is something I learned probably in my second decade of trading or investing: You do not buy or sell something where you have no idea what is really happening. And at UnitedHealth, there isn't anyone other than the CEO and probably 52,000 lawyers who has any idea what's going on.' While we acknowledge the potential of UNH as an investment, we believe certain AI stocks offer greater upside potential and carry less downside risk. If you're looking for an extremely undervalued AI stock that also stands to benefit significantly from Trump-era tariffs and the onshoring trend, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. READ NEXT: 30 Stocks That Should Double in 3 Years and 11 Hidden AI Stocks to Buy Right Now. Disclosure: None. This article is originally published at Insider Monkey. Error al recuperar los datos Inicia sesión para acceder a tu cartera de valores Error al recuperar los datos Error al recuperar los datos Error al recuperar los datos Error al recuperar los datos
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
14-Year-Old Girl Died After Being Left Alone on Hospital's Psychiatric Ward for 15 Minutes: 'A Gaping Hole in Our Family'
Admitted to a psychiatric care unit for an eating disorder, Ruth Szymankiewicz was allegedly supposed to be under round-the-clock care NEED TO KNOW Teen Ruth Szymankiewicz died after being left alone for 15 minutes on a psychiatric ward, according to reports The 14-year-old was admitted to the ward at the now-closed Huntercombe Hospital in the U.K. for an eating disorder Szymankiewicz, who reportedly self-harmed, was allegedly supposed to be under round-the-clock care at the hospital A 14-year-old girl died after she was left alone to self-harm at a mental health hospital in England where she was allegedly supposed to be under round-the-clock care, according to reports. Ruth Szymankiewicz was found fatally injured in her room at Huntercombe Hospital, near the U.K. town of Maidenhead, on Feb. 12, 2022, per outlets including the BBC, Sky News and The Guardian. She died two days later at John Radcliffe Hospital in Oxford. The facility, which was run by Active Care Group, is now permanently closed. According to the BBC, an inquest jury at Buckinghamshire Coroner's Court concluded that Ruth, from the city of Salisbury, was unlawfully killed after she was left unaccompanied at the hospital for around 15 minutes. Ruth, who was being treated for an eating disorder, was transferred to the location in October 2021, per the BBC. The teenager was on the Thames Ward, which is a psychiatric intensive care unit known as a PICU, at the hospital and CCTV footage played to the jury showed her in the television room with her support worker, a man who went by the name Ebo Achempong, in her final moments, Sky News reported. Achempong was allegedly hired by an agency after using a false name and fake documents, the outlet stated, adding that he repeatedly left Ruth on her own, despite her needing constant observation. He's allegedly since returned to Ghana. On the night of Ruth's fatal injuries, she was seen on CCTV going to her bedroom at around 8 p.m. local time after her support worker left the TV room, the BBC reported. The inquest heard that the unit where Ruth had been was regularly understaffed, adding that on the day the teenager harmed herself, 50 percent of the workers were agency staff, Sky News reported, noting that Ruth was also not prevented from accessing harmful content online. Never miss a story — sign up for to stay up-to-date on the best of what PEOPLE has to offer, from celebrity news to compelling human-interest stories. The jury found that the care Ruth had been given was "not suitable nor conducive" to helping her recovery, and that contributions to her death included staff not being trained properly, per the BBC. Another contributing factor was that visiting arrangements only allowed one family member to see her at a time. The hospital had previously been rated inadequate in February 2021, before being listed as "requires improvement" that September in two separate inspections by the Care Quality Commission (CQC) in 2021, the BBC reported. A Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC) spokesperson said in a statement obtained by PEOPLE, 'Our deepest sympathies are with Ruth's family and friends. This is a shocking case and it is clear that care at the Huntercombe Hospital fell far below the standards we expect." 'Young people with mental health issues have not been getting the care they need where they need it," the statement added, noting that the department had instructed the U.K.'s National Health Service (NHS) to prioritize "increasing the availability of mental health beds." The department said it's investing around almost $102 million this year "to reduce inappropriate out of area placements so that patients can receive care closer to home." Thames Valley Police said in a statement obtained by PEOPLE, 'Following a thorough investigation into the circumstances surrounding this death, we can confirm that our enquiries have now concluded and the death is now a matter for His Majesty's Coroner," adding, 'Our thoughts remain with Ruth's family.' Ruth's parents, Kate and Mark Szymankiewicz, spoke out about the jury's conclusion in a statement outside Buckinghamshire Coroner's Court, per the BBC. Mark said, "When at our most vulnerable as a family we reached out for help." "We ultimately found ourselves trapped in a system that was meant to care for her, to help her, to keep her safe but instead locked her away and harmed her," he added. Kate shared, "There is an empty space at our table, a silent bedroom in our home and a gaping hole in our family that will never be filled." The Active Care Group said in a statement obtained by PEOPLE, "We extend our heartfelt condolences to Ruth's family, friends, and all those affected by her passing. We deeply regret the tragic event that occurred, and we are truly sorry for the distress this has caused and [recognize] the profound impact it has had on everyone who knew her." "We are disappointed that a third-party company we engaged in good faith explicitly breached the terms of our contract with them and this played a role in the circumstances leading to Ruth's tragic death," the statement continued, adding that ACG no longer works with the recruitment company used to hire Acheampong following Ruth's death. "We have not engaged this agency since the incident. The safety and wellbeing of those we support must never be compromised, and we expect every [organization] we work with to consistently uphold the highest possible standards," the company said, insisting that "in recent years, we have made significant improvements to the quality and safety in all of our services." If you or someone you know is struggling with an eating disorder, The Alliance for Eating Disorders provides a fully-staffed helpline at 1-866-662-1235, as well as free, therapist-led support groups. If you or someone you know needs mental health help, text "STRENGTH" to the Crisis Text Line at 741-741 to be connected to a certified crisis counselor. Read the original article on People