logo
All charges withdrawn against Stelco after 2 workers died from burns at Nanticoke, Ont., plant

All charges withdrawn against Stelco after 2 workers died from burns at Nanticoke, Ont., plant

CBC11-03-2025
The provincial Crown has withdrawn all charges against Stelco, after two workers suffered severe burns they later died from.
All but one Ministry of Labour charge was also withdrawn against John Kenyon Ltd., the sheet metal contractor and employer of Gabriel Cabral, 32, and Sean MacPherson, 56, who were badly injured on April 25, 2023 at the Stelco Lake Erie Works plant in Nanticoke.
At the Ontario Court of Justice in Cayuga last week, John Kenyon instead pleaded guilty to one count of failing to take every reasonable precaution to protect a worker. It was ordered to pay a $250,000 fine and 25 per cent victim fine surcharge, said the Ministry of Labour.
John Kenyon and Stelco did not respond to CBC Hamilton's request for comment.
Cabral's mother, Pam Fraser, said earlier this year, she was shocked to learn the Crown wasn't pursuing all the charges through a trial.
While excruciating to sit through, a trial would've meant Fraser heard evidence and testimony that would've helped her understand how 70 per cent of her son's body sustained severe burns while on the job.
"I want assurance this is not going to happen to another person or family again" Fraser said, speaking to CBC Hamilton on Friday — a few days after the court case concluded.
"I am just so angry. My son died in vain."
Died weeks later in hospital
Cabral and MacPherson were burned by steam while repairing steel cladding on a quench tower, a structure used for cooling hot coke in the steelmaking process, their families previously told CBC Hamilton.
John Kenyon and Stelco had each initially faced four charges under the Occupational Health and Safety Act including failing to provide information, instruction and supervision to workers.
Among those withdrawn, John Kenyon had been charged with failing to provide equipment, materials and protective devices to protect workers from hot steam, and Stelco with failing to have an emergency stop device on the mogul/quench car.
The Ministry of Labour said it could not comment on the Crown seeking a conviction on only one charge because the matter was decided by the court.
In the hours after the incident, Cabral was in critical condition and airlifted to Sunnybrook Hospital in Toronto, said Fraser. He had sustained third and fourth degree burns on most of his body, including on his face and lungs, was in a coma and on life support.
Over the next three weeks, his condition worsened, Fraser said. The tips of his fingers would need to be cut off, doctors told her, and he may not be able to see again. He died on May 16, 2023 from his injuries.
"My beautiful boy was gone," Fraser wrote in her victim impact statement read in court. "The feeling was surreal. It was over, but the horror of what had happened still remains."
Cabral's death has devastated his two brothers, partner, and large group of friends, said Fraser. She is no longer able to work full-time and experiences difficulty sleeping, panic attacks, nightmares, regret and guilt.
"The pain he must have been in at the moment of his accident — I relive the nightmare," Fraser said.
MacPherson was also hospitalized at Sunnybrook's critical care burn unit for several months, but died in November 2023. His obituary said he would be "deeply missed" by his many relatives and friends.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Supreme Court of Canada considers appeal application from Via Rail terror case
Supreme Court of Canada considers appeal application from Via Rail terror case

National Observer

time3 hours ago

  • National Observer

Supreme Court of Canada considers appeal application from Via Rail terror case

The Supreme Court of Canada is set to decide Thursday whether to hear the appeal of Raed Jaser, who was convicted of planning to commit murder for the benefit of a terrorist group. It's the latest chapter in a long-running legal saga that began 12 years ago with charges against Jaser and Chiheb Esseghaier for plotting attacks, including the planned sabotage of a Via Rail passenger train. The Crown alleged that Jaser and Esseghaier had agreed to kill Canadian citizens to force Canada to remove its military troops from Afghanistan. The Crown's evidence consisted mainly of intercepted communications and the testimony of an undercover US Federal Bureau of Investigation agent assigned to befriend Esseghaier. A jury could not reach a verdict for Jaser on the rail plot charge but found him guilty of three other terrorism-related offences: one count of conspiring to commit murder for the benefit of a terrorist group and two counts of participating in the activities of a terrorist group. Esseghaier was found guilty on all counts. The two men appealed their convictions. Counsel for Jaser and a court-appointed lawyer for Esseghaier argued the jury at the trial was improperly constituted. In August 2019, the Ontario Court of Appeal ordered a fresh trial for the men on the grounds that the jury was chosen incorrectly. The Crown successfully argued in a subsequent Supreme Court hearing that the convictions should not be overturned on the basis of an error in the jury-selection process that did not deny the men fair trial rights. With the jury issue settled, the top court remitted the case to the Ontario Court of Appeal to deal with the men's outstanding challenges of their convictions. While Esseghaier abandoned his appeal, Jaser persisted. Last year, the Court of Appeal dismissed Jaser's challenge of his conviction and life sentence, prompting him to seek a fresh hearing at the Supreme Court. In a written submission to the top court to request a hearing, Jaser's lawyers say there is disagreement across Canada about how to instruct juries in conspiracy cases — a problem they say the court should address. "Jury instructions on the law of conspiracy are too complex," the brief says. "The facts of the proposed appeal present this Court with an ideal opportunity to guide trial judges on simplifying and distilling their instructions." Jaser's lawyers also raise questions about the application of the Canada Evidence Act concerning sensitive information and whether "entrapment-like conduct" should be taken into account upon sentencing. In a response to the Supreme Court, the Crown says Jaser's application should be dismissed. "These issues are not novel and were properly rejected by the Court of Appeal," the Crown's submission says. "Although the facts giving rise to them are unique, they are specific to the circumstances of the applicant and do not raise any issue of public importance."

Supreme Court of Canada weighs appeal application from Via Rail terror case
Supreme Court of Canada weighs appeal application from Via Rail terror case

Toronto Sun

time6 hours ago

  • Toronto Sun

Supreme Court of Canada weighs appeal application from Via Rail terror case

Published Aug 06, 2025 • Last updated 10 minutes ago • 2 minute read Chiheb Esseghaier, left, and Raed Jaser are pictured at Toronto's University Ave. courthouse on Jan. 29, 2015. Photo by PAM DAVIES SKETCH / TORONTO SUN OTTAWA — The Supreme Court of Canada is set to decide Thursday whether to hear the appeal of Raed Jaser, who was convicted of planning to commit murder for the benefit of a terrorist group. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. THIS CONTENT IS RESERVED FOR SUBSCRIBERS ONLY Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. SUBSCRIBE TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. REGISTER / SIGN IN TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account. Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments. Enjoy additional articles per month. Get email updates from your favourite authors. THIS ARTICLE IS FREE TO READ REGISTER TO UNLOCK. Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments Enjoy additional articles per month Get email updates from your favourite authors Don't have an account? Create Account It's the latest chapter in a long-running legal saga that began 12 years ago with charges against Jaser and Chiheb Esseghaier for plotting attacks, including the planned sabotage of a Via Rail passenger train. The Crown alleged that Jaser and Esseghaier had agreed to kill Canadian citizens to force Canada to remove its military troops from Afghanistan. The Crown's evidence consisted mainly of intercepted communications and the testimony of an undercover U.S. Federal Bureau of Investigation agent assigned to befriend Esseghaier. A jury could not reach a verdict for Jaser on the rail plot charge but found him guilty of three other terrorism-related offences: one count of conspiring to commit murder for the benefit of a terrorist group and two counts of participating in the activities of a terrorist group. Esseghaier was found guilty on all counts. Your noon-hour look at what's happening in Toronto and beyond. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. Please try again This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. The two men appealed their convictions. Counsel for Jaser and a court-appointed lawyer for Esseghaier argued the jury at the trial was improperly constituted. In August 2019, the Ontario Court of Appeal ordered a fresh trial for the men on the grounds that the jury was chosen incorrectly. The Crown successfully argued in a subsequent Supreme Court hearing that the convictions should not be overturned on the basis of an error in the jury-selection process that did not deny the men fair trial rights. With the jury issue settled, the top court remitted the case to the Ontario Court of Appeal to deal with the men's outstanding challenges of their convictions. While Esseghaier abandoned his appeal, Jaser persisted. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. Last year, the Court of Appeal dismissed Jaser's challenge of his conviction and life sentence, prompting him to seek a fresh hearing at the Supreme Court. In a written submission to the top court to request a hearing, Jaser's lawyers say there is disagreement across Canada about how to instruct juries in conspiracy cases — a problem they say the court should address. 'Jury instructions on the law of conspiracy are too complex,' the brief says. 'The facts of the proposed appeal present this Court with an ideal opportunity to guide trial judges on simplifying and distilling their instructions.' Jaser's lawyers also raise questions about the application of the Canada Evidence Act concerning sensitive information and whether 'entrapment-like conduct' should be taken into account upon sentencing. In a response to the Supreme Court, the Crown says Jaser's application should be dismissed. 'These issues are not novel and were properly rejected by the Court of Appeal,' the Crown's submission says. 'Although the facts giving rise to them are unique, they are specific to the circumstances of the applicant and do not raise any issue of public importance.' Columnists Sunshine Girls World Sunshine Girls Opinion

Via Rail terror case: Supreme Court to decide whether to hear appeal
Via Rail terror case: Supreme Court to decide whether to hear appeal

Global News

time7 hours ago

  • Global News

Via Rail terror case: Supreme Court to decide whether to hear appeal

The Supreme Court of Canada is set to decide Thursday whether to hear the appeal of Raed Jaser, who was convicted of planning to commit murder for the benefit of a terrorist group. It's the latest chapter in a long-running legal saga that began 12 years ago with charges against Jaser and Chiheb Esseghaier for plotting attacks, including the planned sabotage of a Via Rail passenger train. The Crown alleged that Jaser and Esseghaier had agreed to kill Canadian citizens to force Canada to remove its military troops from Afghanistan. The Crown's evidence consisted mainly of intercepted communications and the testimony of an undercover U.S. Federal Bureau of Investigation agent assigned to befriend Esseghaier. A jury could not reach a verdict for Jaser on the rail plot charge but found him guilty of three other terrorism-related offences: one count of conspiring to commit murder for the benefit of a terrorist group and two counts of participating in the activities of a terrorist group. Esseghaier was found guilty on all counts. Story continues below advertisement The two men appealed their convictions. Counsel for Jaser and a court-appointed lawyer for Esseghaier argued the jury at the trial was improperly constituted. 2:00 Men found guilty in Via Rail terror plot granted new trial In August 2019, the Ontario Court of Appeal ordered a fresh trial for the men on the grounds that the jury was chosen incorrectly. Get daily National news Get the day's top news, political, economic, and current affairs headlines, delivered to your inbox once a day. Sign up for daily National newsletter Sign Up By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy The Crown successfully argued in a subsequent Supreme Court hearing that the convictions should not be overturned on the basis of an error in the jury-selection process that did not deny the men fair trial rights. With the jury issue settled, the top court remitted the case to the Ontario Court of Appeal to deal with the men's outstanding challenges of their convictions. While Esseghaier abandoned his appeal, Jaser persisted. Last year, the Court of Appeal dismissed Jaser's challenge of his conviction and life sentence, prompting him to seek a fresh hearing at the Supreme Court. Story continues below advertisement In a written submission to the top court to request a hearing, Jaser's lawyers say there is disagreement across Canada about how to instruct juries in conspiracy cases — a problem they say the court should address. 'Jury instructions on the law of conspiracy are too complex,' the brief says. 'The facts of the proposed appeal present this Court with an ideal opportunity to guide trial judges on simplifying and distilling their instructions.' Jaser's lawyers also raise questions about the application of the Canada Evidence Act concerning sensitive information and whether 'entrapment-like conduct' should be taken into account upon sentencing. In a response to the Supreme Court, the Crown says Jaser's application should be dismissed. 'These issues are not novel and were properly rejected by the Court of Appeal,' the Crown's submission says. 'Although the facts giving rise to them are unique, they are specific to the circumstances of the applicant and do not raise any issue of public importance.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store