logo
Three Crucial Topics From The Berkshire Hathaway 2025 Annual Meeting

Three Crucial Topics From The Berkshire Hathaway 2025 Annual Meeting

Forbes04-05-2025

Though still sharp and more energized than last year, Warren Buffett stunned the massive crowd at ... More the annual meeting by announcing his plan to step down from the CEO role at Berkshire Hathaway at year-end. (Photo by)
If it makes a difference to you that your stocks are down 15%, you need to find a new investment philosophy. – Warren Buffett
Berkshire Hathaway's annual 'Woodstock for Capitalists' was held on Saturday, May 3. It was beyond a packed house on Saturday, with additional attendees spurred on by the 60th anniversary of Berkshire Hathaway as we know it. Warren Buffett, CEO and Chairman, and Greg Abel, Vice Chairman of Non-insurance, answered questions from shareholders for over five hours. Ajit Jain, Vice Chairman of Insurance, joined in answering questions for the first part of the meeting.
Buffett spoke briefly about first-quarter earnings. He noted that Berkshire's insurance earnings were as good as they get in 2024, so starting less well this year is unsurprising. Operating earnings fell by 14% higher than last year's same quarter. Previously, Buffett has said that operating earnings are the 'most descriptive' way to view Berkshire since it removes the short-term volatility of market fluctuations in the net earnings.
Berkshire Hathaway 1Q 2025 Earnings
Insurance underwriting was the primary culprit behind the decline in operating earnings, with wildfire losses negatively impacting results. Other income also declined significantly, primarily due to accounting for foreign currency swings. Excluding insurance and the 'other' segment, operating earnings were 9% higher.
Berkshire Hathaway Earnings By Segment
Berkshire was a net seller of over $1.5 billion in publicly traded stocks, marking the tenth quarter in a row in which Berkshire trimmed its publicly traded stock portfolio. More details will be provided in the upcoming 13F filing. Through stock sales and earnings, Berkshire's cash hoard has reached over $342 billion. This is a record cash level on an absolute basis and relative to the size of Berkshire Hathaway.
Berkshire Hathaway Cash Holdings
Buffett said that Berkshire 'holds a lot more cash and Treasury bills than I would like.' He is always looking for investments, but 'things don't come along in an orderly fashion.' He'd like less cash on hand, even as low as $50 billion. 'Occasionally, we will be bombarded with opportunities that we will be happy we have the money for,' he said.
Regarding the recent stock sell-off, Buffett said, 'This is not a huge move,' or a 'dramatic bear market.' He did note that Berkshire had recently come close to making a $10 billion purchase, but it did not happen.
The first question of the day was about tariffs. Buffett did not directly answer the question, but said, 'You can make some very good arguments for the fact that balanced trade is good for the world.' He continued, 'There is no question that trade can be an act of war.' Buffett stated that more trade is better and that 'Trade should not be a weapon.'
In response to a question about his views on DOGE, Buffett again spoke in more general terms. He said, 'The problem of how you control revenue and expenses in government is one that is never really solved, and is one that has hurt many civilizations.' Regarding the US's enormous fiscal deficits, he noted that 'We are doing something that is unsustainable.' Buffett said that the job of reducing costs 'should be done.'
After being asked whether American exceptionalism is over, Buffett said, 'America has been in revolutionary change since it started.' He was clear in his views when he noted, 'I would not get discouraged.'
Buffett made the most significant announcement at the end of the meeting, stating that he planned to step down from the CEO role at the end of the year, pending approval from the board of directors. He was recommending that Greg Abel assume the CEO role and that Greg should have the 'final word on operations or capital deployment.'
Though it was not explicitly stated, Buffett would likely retain the Chairman title since he promised to be around to help. Buffett added that he had no intention of selling one share of Berkshire. He noted that it was an 'economic decision' since the 'prospects for Berkshire will be better under Greg than me.'
While it was already clear that Abel was making most of the operational decisions, assuming the final responsibility for all capital allocation decisions is a significant change. Buffett's capital allocation decisions were a major force in the company's fantastic performance and in making Berkshire Hathaway what it is today. He transformed a textile company, destined for the trash heap of history, into the sixth-largest company in the S&P 500.
While Buffett's mind was sharp and seemed more energized this year than last year's meeting, he is 94 years old. As much as the transition saddens many of us as the Buffett era ends, it is the correct long-term change to give Greg Abel time in the role while Buffett is still around. There will not be another Warren Buffett in my lifetime, but Greg Abel doesn't need to be Warren Buffett or Charlie Munger. He inherits a Berkshire Hathaway, which owns some outstanding businesses and a Fort Knox balance sheet.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Uncertainty looms as 2025 nears the halfway mark. How to make sure your portfolio is prepared
Uncertainty looms as 2025 nears the halfway mark. How to make sure your portfolio is prepared

CNBC

time16 minutes ago

  • CNBC

Uncertainty looms as 2025 nears the halfway mark. How to make sure your portfolio is prepared

Stocks have made a recovered from this year's lows, but uncertainty remains a key theme as the second half of the year approaches – and investors can prepare for it. President Donald Trump's rollout of sharply higher tariffs in April sent stocks on a wild ride, with the S & P 500 at one point dipping more than 20% from its all-time high. Traders' hopes for progress in trade negotiations, along with solid first-quarter earnings, helped the market recover since then, however. The S & P 500 is now less than 2% below its its all-time high. Don't just kick back and wait for a continued recovery, though. "Our little tagline here is 'diversifying for resilience,'" said Michael Arone, SPDR chief investment strategist at State Street Global Advisors. "The thought behind the theme for the second half, is that markets are in suspense," he said. Some of the issues for investors to cinsider now include trade policy, soft economic data and the chance that the Federal Reserve holds off on rate cuts for too long, Arone added. Here's how to get your portfolio ready for the remainder of the year Review and rebalance Ignoring your portfolio's asset allocation, particularly at a time when markets are strong, can result in lopsided positions. For starters, think about how large-cap tech stocks in the U.S. were responsible for the market's surge last year. Failure to prune some of those big positions now, and add to underweight sectors, could result in a portfolio that doesn't reflect your goals and risk appetite. This year, investors who shied away from international markets may have found themselves missing out on sizable appreciation. Consider that the Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US ETF (VEU) has returned 16% in 2025, while the S & P 500's return over the same period is a little more than 2%. VEU .SPX YTD mountain The Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US ETF (VEU) versus the S & P 500 in 2025 "If we look through a stock lens, U.S. allocation peaked at 67%, and today it's at 64%," said Arone. "I can tell you there are very few investors I meet with who have 36% of their portfolio invested outside of the U.S. from a stock standpoint." Diversifying into international funds also helps investors gain exposure to sectors outside of Big Tech, said Christine Benz, director of personal finance and retirement planning for Morningstar. "The U.S. is still very tech dominated and growth leaning, but broad non-U.S. indexes are dominated by financials and health care. It's a different set of market components relative to the U.S." Benz likes the idea of investors using a broad global stock benchmark as a guide to determine how much to invest overseas, noting that the split is generally about 60% toward the U.S. and 40% non-U.S. Reassess your goals and risk appetite The market's slide in April might have been a good chance for investors to do a gut check of whether their asset allocation reflects the risk they are willing to take. "My big [issue] is the value of derisking for people who are getting close to retirement," said Benz. "It might not have felt like a great idea to derisk in the throes of tariff-related market losses, but now stocks have clawed their way back into positive territory." Investors who are nearing retirement might want to consider adding safer assets to their portfolios to take advantage of today's higher yields, she added. "Consider taking advantage of the fact that yields are decent today and it will translate to better returns for fixed income versus when yields were very low," said Benz. For savers in retirement plans, this can also mean reviewing where you're directing your contributions. "Let's say you're not ready to retire, but retirement is in the next five to 10 years," said Marguerita Cheng, CFP and chief executive officer of Blue Ocean Global Wealth in Gaithersburg, Md. "You can have some of your existing dollars in something a little more conservative, and when you dollar-cost average you can be a little more growth oriented," she said. Dollar-cost averaging refers to making incremental investments into a certain asset at fixed intervals, say every two weeks, every month or every quarter. By spreading out these investments, you're buying into stocks at different prices over time, instead of trying to wait for the "right" time. Tax-loss harvesting Tax-loss harvesting opportunities may await investors who have taxable brokerage accounts. This involves selling losing positions and using the realized losses to offset gains elsewhere in the portfolio. Be sure to avoid violating the wash-sale rule, which involves selling an asset at a loss and then buying a "substantially identical" security within 30 days before or after the transaction. In such cases, the IRS can block you from taking the loss. Lagging stock sectors this year include energy, health care and consumer discretionary, which might all be solid contenders for tax-loss sales. "Investors with individual stocks, sector funds or ETFs might have an opportunity to take a tax loss in those areas," said Benz.

Opinion - Higher ed reform shouldn't punish low-income students
Opinion - Higher ed reform shouldn't punish low-income students

Yahoo

time25 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Opinion - Higher ed reform shouldn't punish low-income students

Congress is understandably concerned about the return on federal investment in higher education and the $1.6 trillion in federal student loan debt. But in its rush to fix a system that too often fails low-income students, the Trump administration's 'one big, beautiful bill' would further reduce opportunity and access for those very students and jeopardize the work of colleges and universities doing the most to serve them. If passed, the bill would enact sweeping changes to federal financial aid and accountability rules. Some of its goals are worthy. Colleges should be transparent about student outcomes. They should be accountable for quality. And no student should graduate, or drop out, with insurmountable debt. But reducing access to loans for the students who face the steepest barriers to opportunity is not the way to achieve those goals. One provision of the proposed bill would eliminate subsidized federal loans, which currently prevent interest from accruing while undergraduates are still in school. For students from low-income backgrounds who already borrow more than their wealthier peers, this would significantly increase the cost of a college degree. Another proposal would cap the amount of aid a student could receive at a national median cost by program, without regard for the individual student's or family's specific economic need. The legislation would also eliminate PLUS Loans and raise the minimum course load required to receive full Pell Grant aid, even though many working students enroll part-time by necessity, not choice. Reducing Pell Grant access is counterproductive to lowering student debt. Pell Grant recipients already account for seven of every 10 federal student loan borrowers, and, on average, incur $4,500 more in debt than other non-Pell graduates Capping graduate student borrowing, especially in health and public service fields, would undercut workforce development just as we face national shortages of nurses, teachers and social workers. And the bill's 'risk-sharing' proposal, which would penalize colleges when student loans are forgiven, even through programs like Public Service Loan Forgiveness, would shift resources away from need-based aid and student support and discourage institutions from enrolling those most in need. That includes institutions like the University of Mount Saint Vincent, which I lead. Ours is a small, private, nonprofit university in the Bronx founded in 1847 to educate young women at a time when few others would. Today, we serve students of every background, and more than half are the first in their family to attend college. More than half of our undergraduates receive Pell Grants. Ninety percent of our graduate students are preparing for public service careers in education, nursing or healthcare. And like many mission-driven colleges, we make enormous investments in financial aid and academic support, precisely because we know what it takes for low-income and first-generation students to thrive. This bill threatens our ability to invest in students and potential. It would impose a six-figure penalty, rising annually, because we enroll the very students we were founded to serve. That's not accountability. That's a deterrent. And we are not unique. Hundreds of small, private colleges across the country, many of them religiously affiliated, offer intimate learning environments, close faculty support and flexible programs that enable students to work while pursuing their degrees. These institutions are among the most accessible and most responsive options for students who are otherwise being left behind in higher education. The better path forward is one that strengthens accountability for all institutions without dismantling the tools that low-income students need to access and afford college in the first place. That means preserving need-based aid, not narrowing it. And it means supporting colleges that produce teachers, nurses and public servants, not penalizing them. At a time when the U.S. risks falling behind in educational attainment and workforce readiness, we should be doubling down on institutions that help students rise. The question isn't whether reform is needed, but whether we're reforming the right things. Susan R. Burns, Ph.D., is president of the University of Mount Saint Vincent in the Bronx. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Reddit (NYSE:RDDT) Appoints Adam Collins As First Chief Communications Officer
Reddit (NYSE:RDDT) Appoints Adam Collins As First Chief Communications Officer

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Reddit (NYSE:RDDT) Appoints Adam Collins As First Chief Communications Officer

Reddit saw an 8% increase in its share price over the past month, coinciding with several developments. The appointment of Adam Collins as the Chief Communications Officer could improve the company's communications strategy, potentially enhancing investor confidence. Additionally, integration with Smartly's platform might bolster advertising capabilities, aligning with the company's growth objectives. While Reddit's price movement is consistent with broader market gains seen in the tech-heavy indices, which are benefiting from ongoing trade discussions between the U.S. and China, these internal changes could have added weight to its upward trajectory. We've discovered 1 risk for Reddit that you should be aware of before investing here. The end of cancer? These 23 emerging AI stocks are developing tech that will allow early identification of life changing diseases like cancer and Alzheimer's. The recent appointment of Adam Collins as Chief Communications Officer and the integration with Smartly's platform could significantly influence Reddit's international growth narrative by enhancing communication strategies and boosting advertising capabilities. These developments are expected to drive user engagement and advertiser expansion, particularly in key non-U.S. markets. Over the past year, Reddit's total shareholder return was a considerable 97.10%, suggesting strong performance. This highlights the company's ability to capitalize on market opportunities despite challenges, outperforming the US Interactive Media and Services industry's 12.7% return for the same period. With revenue forecasts predicting a 21.3% annual growth and earnings anticipated to increase 36.9% annually, the introduction of advanced ad solutions and data licensing could further strengthen financial projections. These initiatives align with Reddit's strategic goals, potentially enhancing its profitability margins and positioning the company for sustained growth. The current share price of US$110.86, compared to the analyst price target of US$149.28, reflects a 25.7% discount, suggesting room for appreciation as Reddit continues to execute its strategic initiatives effectively. The valuation report we've compiled suggests that Reddit's current price could be inflated. This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Companies discussed in this article include NYSE:RDDT. This article was originally published by Simply Wall St. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@ Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store