
Deadly Hospital Superbug Could Eat Patient's Dressings, Implants and Sutures
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources.
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
A potentially deadly hospital superbug is able to feast on and break down medical-grade plastics—including those used to make implants, sutures and wound dressings.
This is the conclusion of a study by researchers from Brunel University of London, England, who warn that this trick could allow the bacteria, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, to survive longer both within patients and on surfaces around hospital wards.
The common hospital-acquired, antibiotic-resistant bacterial infection is known to cause infections in the blood, lungs and urinary tract after surgery. While symptoms can vary depending on the site of infection, they can include pus discharge, aches, cough, fever, tiredness, confusion and shock.
Notably, the bacteria is known as a major cause of catheter-related urinary tract infections (UTIs) and ventilator-associated pneumonia—both of which are associated with plastic-based medical equipment.
The findings challenge the long-held assumption that pathogens are unable to degrade medical plastics, say the researchers.
"Plastic is everywhere in modern medicine—and it turns out some pathogens have adapted to degrade it," said paper author and biomedical researcher professor Ronan McCarthy. He added: "We need to understand the impact this has on patient safety."
Pictured: an artist's impression of Pseudomonas aeruginosa bacteria, main, and plastic medical equipment, inset.
Pictured: an artist's impression of Pseudomonas aeruginosa bacteria, main, and plastic medical equipment, inset.
ivan68 / quantic69/iStock / Getty Images Plus
In their study, McCarthy and colleagues isolated an enzyme known as Pap1 from a strain of Pseudomonas aeruginosa that was originally sampled from a patient's wound.
In lab tests, the enzyme degraded 78 percent of a sample of polycaprolactone (PCL) within just seven days. PCL is a plastic commonly used in drug-delivery patches, stents, surgical mesh, sutures and wound dressings.
This capacity, the team says, allows the bacteria to consume PCL as its sole source of carbon.
Moreover, the researchers found that Pseudomonas aeruginosa can use broken-down plastic fragments to form tougher biofilms—coatings of protective slime that can increase antibiotic resistance and make infections harder to treat.
With signs of similar enzymes seen in other pathogens, the team fears that other medical-grade plastics may also be vulnerable to becoming a bacterial feast—including such commonly used materials as polyethylene terephthalate (PET) and polyurethane (PUR).
These compounds are used, for example, to make bone scaffolds, breast implants, bandages, catheters, dental implants and wound dressings.
McCarthy said the findings mean that we need to reconsider how pathogens such as Pseudomonas aeruginosa exist in hospital environments.
"Plastics, including plastic surfaces, could potentially be food for these bacteria. Pathogens with this ability could survive for long in the hospital environment," McCarthy added.
"It also means that any medical device or treatment that contains plastic could be susceptible to degradation by bacteria."
Further studies will be needed, the researcher added, to determine how many pathogenic bacterial species use plastic-degrading enzymes, as well as what impacts such might have on their virulence.
Going forward, McCarthy concluded, we may need to switch to using different, harder-to-digest plastics in medical applications, alongside factoring in the possibility of plastic-degrading enzymes playing a role in unexplained, long-lasting outbreaks.
Do you have a tip on a health story that Newsweek should be covering? Do you have a question about superbugs? Let us know via science@newsweek.com.
Reference
Howard, S. A., Dios, R. de, Maslova, E., Myridakis, A., Miller, T. H., & McCarthy, R. R. (2025). Pseudomonas aeruginosa clinical isolates can encode plastic-degrading enzymes that allow survival on plastic and augment biofilm formation. Cell Reports. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2025.115650
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Topo Chico Recalled From Costco and Other Retailers Over Bacterial Contamination Concerns
If you recently stocked up on Topo Chico's sparkling mineral water, you'll want to pay close attention to this under-the-radar recall. Topo Chico 18-packs sold at Costco and potentially other retailers may have been contaminated with the bacteria pseudomonas aeruginosa. Here's what to look out for: 18-packs of Topo Chico Mineral Water bottles, 16.9 ounces Lot Codes: #11A2543, #12A2543, or #13A2541 (You'll find the lot code both on the packaging and on the bottle necks.) Purchased between May 20 and May 29, 2025 The recall was first announced on June 2 in a message to Costco members who may have purchased the item. But a new statement sent by the manufacturer—Coca-Cola—seems to expand the recall beyond Costco and the two states, Texas and Louisiana, mentioned in the Costco letter. According to the statement provided to Real Simple: "Due to a potential contamination of pseudomonas, we have voluntarily recalled a limited quantity of Topo Chico Mineral Water 16.9oz glass bottle products. All impacted product has been removed from store shelves at the approximate 40 retail locations across Arizona, Louisiana, Nevada, New Mexico, and Texas, and no illnesses have been reported." Related: The 10 Foods Most Linked to Recalls and Disease Outbreaks If you have Topo Chico with lot numbers #11A2543, #12A2543, or #13A2541, don't drink it. You can bring it back to the place of purchase for exchange or refund. You can also call Coca-Cola at 1-800-GET-COKE for more information. Pseudomonas aeruginosa is a bacteria that is commonly found in soil and water, and can cause infections in the blood, lungs, and urinary tract, according to the CDC. Infections with pseudomonas are more common in healthcare settings, especially in people with compromised immune systems. Some types of this bacteria are resistant to antibiotics, making them particularly difficult to treat. Read the original article on Real Simple
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Popular Mineral Water Sold at Costco Recalled Over Bacterial Contamination
Coca-Cola has issued a voluntary recall of 18-packs of 16.9-ounce glass Topo Chico mineral water due to possible contamination with Pseudomonas, a bacterium that can cause serious infections in people with weakened immune systems. The recall affects products sold between May 20 and May 29 at 40 Costco locations across five states: Arizona, Louisiana, Nevada, New Mexico, and Texas. The impacted lot is labeled '#13A2541.' No illnesses have been reported, and Coca-Cola states that the health risk is very low for the general population. Affected customers can return the product to Costco for a full you recently purchased any Topo Chico mineral water, then it's time to check your fridge or pantry. On Wednesday, Coca-Cola issued a voluntary recall of its Topo Chico mineral water in five states due to concerns about potential contamination with a deadly bacteria for individuals with weakened immune systems known as Pseudomonas. As the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) explains, Pseudomonas is a group of bacteria that is "commonly found in the environment, like in soil and water." However, if it flourishes, it can "cause infections in the blood, lungs (pneumonia), urinary tract, or other parts of the body after surgery." A spokesperson confirmed to USA Today that the bottles were shipped to 40 retail locations across Arizona, Louisiana, Nevada, New Mexico, and Texas, with Costco included among the affected retailers. Individuals who purchased contaminated Topo Chico are encouraged to return them to their local Costco for a full refund. Those who have further questions can call Coca-Cola at 1-800-GET-COKE (1-800-438-2653). Related: The Food Recall System Is Broken, and Experts Say We're All at Risk According to the brand's letter sent to Costco members on June 2, the recalled product bears the Lot Code #13A2541 on both the outer box and the neck of each bottle. It specifically affects the 18-packs of glass 16.9-ounce Topo Chico mineral water. The notice from Coca-Cola also stated that if you purchased one of the recalled packages, you can return it to your nearest Costco for a full refund. A Costco spokesperson noted that the products were all purchased between May 20 and May 29. No illnesses have been reported in connection with the recall. Coca-Cola also noted that the health consequences for those who accidentally consume the mineral water containing pseudomonas are "very low." However, the CDC advises that those most at risk include anyone on "breathing machines, have devices such as catheters, [or] have open wounds from surgery or burns." The Cleveland Clinic additionally noted that "It's rare for a Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection to develop in people with a healthy immune system. But it can be serious and potentially deadly if you have a weakened immune system (immunocompromised)." That includes individuals living with conditions such as lupus, rheumatoid arthritis, cancer, HIV, diabetes, liver disease, or those who are pregnant. Symptoms of an infection may include fever, chills, muscle pain, earache, headache, nausea, or vomiting. If you experience any symptoms, seek out a medical expert immediately. Product recalled: 18-packs of glass 16.9-ounce Topo Chico mineral waterReason for recall: Potential Pseudomonas contaminationLot Code: #13A2541 States affected: Arizona, Louisiana, Nevada, New Mexico, and TexasStores affected: 40 separate Costco locationsRead the original article on Food & Wine


Newsweek
2 hours ago
- Newsweek
These Are the Best and Worst States for Aging in Place
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. A new report from Seniorly ranked the best and worst states for aging at home for seniors, and Florida surprisingly earned the lowest spot of all. "These findings reinforce what we already know," one expert told Newsweek, "aging well isn't just about personal health; it's also about where you live and what resources that place can provide." As millions of Americans turn 65 this year, more and more are hoping to continue living in their homes rather than move to assisted living facilities or retirement homes. In 2025, a record 4.2 million Americans will reach senior age, and 75 percent of older Americans said they wanted to stay living in their own homes in a recent AARP survey. Why It Matters Many Americans hope to stay at home to maintain their independence and remain in the communities where they've already built support systems. However, not all locations make this easiest for seniors, as cost of living, transportation, and access to high-quality health care all play a role in whether a senior is able to successfully live outside of a retirement home. Shirley Gooding, a physical Therapy Aid, helps William Rexroat, a WWII Navy veteran exercise during a physical therapy session at the Quincy Veterans Home February 17, 2005, in Quincy, Illinois. Shirley Gooding, a physical Therapy Aid, helps William Rexroat, a WWII Navy veteran exercise during a physical therapy session at the Quincy Veterans Home February 17, 2005, in Quincy, To Know Best States Utah took the best state spot for aging in place, as only 35 percent of seniors live alone. They also have relatively good weather, with just 10.1 inches of rain and snow each year on average. The state also had a significant level of smart home tech use at 37 percent. The top 10 state list for seniors was as follows: Utah North Dakota New Jersey Idaho Texas Nebraska California New Mexico Kansas Washington Seniorly's list was compiled using data on home health care quality and availability, emergency care services, housing costs, road safety, walkability, weather hazards and more. They also took into account the risk of isolation, as roughly 43 percent of U.S. seniors live alone. The top states generally had short ER wait times, with North Dakota coming in at second place, as well as a high level of meal deliveries for older Americans. Home care quality also mattered, with 31 percent of New Jersey's agencies earning a 4.5 or 5-star rating. Worst States Meanwhile, the worst states for aging in places were as follows: Florida Kentucky North Carolina Georgia Alabama Tennessee Mississippi Vermont Oklahoma Hawaii Many retirees may be surprised to find Florida ranked the lowest for aging in place. This is because of its limited access to home health aides, with 50 seniors per available aide. Floridians also deal with high housing costs, with 30.7 percent of older homeowners spending more than 30 percent of their income on housing. The state also experiences high precipitation of 53 inches annually, which could heighten safety risks for seniors. The other Southern states ranked low struggled for different reasons. Kentucky had one of the highest rates of fatal car crashes involving seniors, at 28.2 deaths per 100,000 drivers. Meanwhile, seniors in North Carolina spent an average of 195 minutes in the emergency room, longer than nearly all other states. "What is definitely eye-opening is how many Southern states ranked near the bottom," Kevin Thompson, the CEO of 9i Capital Group and the host of the 9innings podcast, told Newsweek. "These are states with historically high poverty rates and heavy reliance on social insurance programs." What People Are Saying Drew Powers, the founder of Illinois-based Powers Financial Group, told Newsweek: "Utah ranks first and Florida ranks last. Does that mean we should always retire in Utah and never in Florida? Not really. The bottom line is aging in place requires a network, and aging seniors need to be located where their network is located. Aside from being financially prepared for longevity, access to both skilled and non-skilled assistance is the key and is most likely to come from family and close friends." Kevin Thompson, the CEO of 9i Capital Group and the host of the 9innings podcast, told Newsweek: "There's a clear relationship between income and aging outcomes. The wealthier the state, the more likely it is to support aging in place through quality care, better roads, and stronger support systems. These findings reinforce what we already know: aging well isn't just about personal health, it's also about where you live and what resources that place can provide." Alex Beene, a financial literacy instructor for the University of Tennessee at Martin, told Newsweek: "What's most surprising about these rankings are how perceptions do not always equal reality with America's aging population. Florida has been for decades perceived as a haven for retirees; however, in the years following the pandemic, housing costs have risen dramatically and the state has been slow to adopt the home health measures other states have to better medically serve their communities." What Happens Next From 2025 to 2050, the number of people aged 65 and older is expected to skyrocket from 63.3 million to 82.1 million. "States like Utah benefit from more seniors being less alone and having more access to smart home features that assist in the aging process," Beene said. "At the end of the day, aging isn't just about saving some tax dollars. It's about the overall quality of life."