logo
Amid immigration raids and a military parade, a reenactment at Bunker Hill aims to recall the values a young nation fought for

Amid immigration raids and a military parade, a reenactment at Bunker Hill aims to recall the values a young nation fought for

Boston Globe13-06-2025
On Monday, amid a tumultuous season in American democracy, a group of historically minded musicians, artists, and members of the public are staging an elaborate recreation, with parades, toasts, and music to match. Their goal is to celebrate the bicentennial anniversary of the cornerstone, and perhaps in the process recall what all those people came to celebrate that day.
Advertisement
'The laying of the cornerstone reminds us of the long work of remembering this battle,' said historian Nat Sheidley, who leads the nonprofit
Advertisement
Lee Eiseman, a longtime Charlestown resident, has been the driving force behind the event. A musical impresario who also edits the Boston Musical Intelligencer online journal, Eiseman said he was asked to join the Monument Association in 2023 to arrange the commemoration because he had also organized a similar event in 1993. That was
for the 150th anniversary of the 221-foot obelisk's 1843 dedication.
Numerous regional newspapers covered the cornerstone laying in detail, and that documentation allowed Eiseman to piece together the music and poetry that the crowd would have heard there. 'It was an all-day affair that lasted through dinner,' he said.
When Eiseman read the speeches delivered at the event, he found passages 'talking about how the cornerstone is plumb and level, the way our behavior should be: moral and upright,' he said. 'The sentiments are lofty, and I'm happy to be involved in celebrating those ideals.'
The 200th anniversary features several free events Monday, beginning with a 9:30 a.m. procession from the Charlestown Navy Yard to the Bunker Hill Monument. That will be followed by a reenactment of the ceremony, with actors portraying orator and famed lawmaker Daniel Webster and the Marquis de Lafayette, the French hero of the Revolutionary War who laid the cornerstone. The professional Dee Opera Orchestra and Chorus, led by conductor Stephanie Beatrice, will perform some of the music known to have been heard at the original event.
There's one intentional and significant change: Webster's morning speech at the original event lasted 45 minutes, but at the reenactment, it'll be abridged to five. 'Imagine addressing 60,000 people and being heard without any amplification,' Eiseman said. 'You really needed to have a trumpet for a voice.'
Advertisement
Later that day at 6 p.m., Old South Meeting House will host an event Eiseman is calling a 'civic exercise and grand monumental celebration,' featuring ceremonial toasts paired with apropos period music, which was collected by Eiseman and arranged by several other musicians. A few of those selections will be familiar to modern ears, Beatrice said – 'Yankee Doodle' was played, for one, as well as 'The Anacreontic Song,' which modern Americans know as 'The Star-Spangled Banner.'
Beatrice said he grew up in Massachusetts and 'being able to supply historic tunes to this reenactment is really special for me.' Across the morning and evening events, Beatrice and the ensemble will be responsible for around 25 pieces. 'Each one is paired with a toast or an ode tied to a historical figure, and this all shows the relationship between the ideology of their words and the music that would have rallied the forces,' she said. 'It's going to be fun.'
Sheidley often finds it a challenge to make the history of the founding era feel approachable, because it's 'saturated in mythology, and it's divisive,' he said. 'We currently are having a national argument about how we should remember our founding history … people can be on opposite sides of a political divide on that question, and we want them to be in dialogue with each other."
Art and music can help guide that dialogue Sheidley wants to foster, because when people take part in a common experience, he said, it's easier for them to see themselves 'as part of writing that story.'
Advertisement
At heart, whenever Americans talk about the nation's founding era, they're never 'just having a conversation about history,' said Sheidley. It's also 'a conversation about where we are now and who we want to be.'
A.Z. Madonna can be reached at
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

What ‘Love Island' breakup rumors teach us about phone snooping
What ‘Love Island' breakup rumors teach us about phone snooping

CNN

timea few seconds ago

  • CNN

What ‘Love Island' breakup rumors teach us about phone snooping

Social media Tech giantsFacebookTweetLink Follow Put yourself in Emma's shoes: You're scrolling on your phone and get a text notification that says, 'Hey girly, your boyfriend said you guys would have a threesome with me, and I think he didn't tell you about that.' Would you (a) ignore the message or (b) look through his conveniently unattended phone? If you chose (b), don't feel too bad. Nearly 30% of American adults say it's at least sometimes acceptable to look through a significant other's phone without permission, according to a Pew Research Center survey. 'I have looked through many of my partners' phones, and I definitely have quite a few stories,' said Emma, who didn't want to include her last name to protect her privacy. An age-old debate surrounding phone snooping has been revived by the July breakup between JaNa Craig and Kenny Rodriguez, stars of the 2024 season of the reality dating show 'Love Island USA.' 'Discovering that someone you loved isn't who you thought they were and that the relationship you thought you were building hasn't been genuine since day one has been truly devastating,' Craig wrote in an Instagram story post confirming the split. Craig's friend then took to Instagram to advise other women in relationships to 'go thru your mans phone TODAY' if they had access. (Craig and Rodriguez haven't confirmed the more specific details of their breakup.) Searching through someone's phone may not be aligned with a person's character and values, but they might have valid suspicions and no other way find the truth — so they look. Doing so may turn out to be fair game when you learn incriminating information, according to divorce lawyer Dennis R. Vetrano, who is also a mediator and content creator based in New York's Hudson Valley. Not so much to this psychologist. 'In general, I think that invading another person's private space — whether it's snooping on their phone, reading their personal journal, or invading their physical space — is unethical without their permission,' said Dr. Cortney Warren, board certified clinical psychologist and adjunct clinical professor of psychiatry at the University of Nevada, Las Vegas. Snooping also can be illegal, depending on privacy laws in your state or other jurisdiction, so it's not advised that you go through your partner's phone, according to Vetrano. But is such snooping even necessary anymore? With so much out in the public sphere online, do you really need to snoop? Why not replace snooping with sleuthing? The easy answer is no. While snooping is considered a breach of privacy because you're searching for information someone hasn't given you permission to access, with sleuthing you're working with information that's available in an online public space. And so many people are online: Seventy percent of American adults are on Facebook, 50% on Instagram, and 33% on TikTok, according to a 2024 survey. Sleuthing is easier these days with the creation of websites that can locate dating profiles, apps that track location, and most notably, social media platforms that allow you to see everyone who a person follows and the content they like. It's all there for anyone to mine. That was the case with Emma. 'I had already been kind of suspicious of this boyfriend for a while,' Emma said. 'So I was sleuthing through (his) TikTok following, and it was just girl after girl after girl of those OnlyFans models and anime cosplayers that, you know, cosplay minor characters in very inappropriate ways.' 'Technology is out there to track everything that you do, so I think the question — is it the right thing to do — is really something that we have to center on,' said Dr. Angela Corbo, a professor and chair of the department of communication studies at Widener University in Chester, Pennsylvania. As far as Emma was concerned, going through her previous partners' social media followings was justified because she was accessing public information and she ended up finding evidence of behavior she didn't like. 'I had been very straight up with my partners, and I don't like (them) following OnlyFans models because honestly, it was kind of embarrassing when everybody can see that your partner is liking photos and sharing weird adult content videos publicly,' she said. When it comes to social media, people can formulate an image of what another person is like based on who they follow and the content with which they interact. 'I think social media is a great way of getting an idea without waiting for someone to show you, or without having to break someone's boundaries and invade their privacy,' said Diana Prime, a relationship coach on Instagram and TikTok. 'If someone has adult-rated content, if they're following OnlyFans models, that is enough to not continue a relationship with that person because it gives you an insight to what they do.' Yes, Warren said. Snooping is also a sign of other troubles, such as not respecting your partner, Prime said. In that case, you're 'not going to think twice about invading their privacy.' Generally, sleuthing 'is different in the sense that the material online is often public — so the deceptive element of violating a partner's personal boundaries is less pronounced,' said Warren, author of 'Letting Go of Your Ex: CBT Skills to Heal the Pain of a Breakup and Overcome Love Addiction.' Think of it like this: Say you're sitting beside a partner and happen to glimpse a notification on their phone. 'You've done nothing wrong,' Corbo said. 'I think it's when you go behind somebody's back to retrieve information that they're not giving you permission for — I think that's when a violation has occurred.' You're already in breakup territory if you're feeling like your partner's behavior leaves you no other option but to snoop. 'That's a deeper-rooted problem that will lead to bigger issues down the road, and that's enough to walk away from someone, because what happens when you find information by snooping is that you hurt your own feelings times 10,' she said. 'It will do you more damage to snoop through that person's phone than to honor your own intuition about something being off,' Prime added. 'What within you wants to play things out, versus just trusting yourself the first time?' If your ex-partners have treated you badly and you're regularly suspicious of a partner who hasn't given you a reason to be, Corbo suggested evaluating your feelings and considering the evidence before you assume the worst. Get inspired by a weekly roundup on living well, made simple. Sign up for CNN's Life, But Better newsletter for information and tools designed to improve your well-being. CNN's Kristen Rogers contributed to this report.

White House reviewing Smithsonian exhibits to make sure they align with Trump's vision
White House reviewing Smithsonian exhibits to make sure they align with Trump's vision

NBC News

timea minute ago

  • NBC News

White House reviewing Smithsonian exhibits to make sure they align with Trump's vision

The White House is conducting an expansive review of the Smithsonian's museum exhibitions, materials and operations ahead of America's 250th anniversary to ensure it aligns with President Donald Trump's views of history, an administration official confirmed to NBC News. The assessment, which was first reported by the Wall Street Journal, will include reviews of museum exhibitions, online content, internal curatorial processes, exhibition planning, the use of collections and artist grants, and wording related to museum exhibit messaging, the official said. The Smithsonian Institution includes 21 museums, 14 education and research centers and the National Zoo. The news of the review was outlined in a letter dated Tuesday and sent to Lonnie Bunch, the secretary of the Smithsonian Institution. White House senior associate Lindsey Halligan, Domestic Policy Council Director Vince Haley and White House Office of Management and Budget director Russ Vought signed the letter. 'This initiative aims to ensure alignment with the president's directive to celebrate American exceptionalism, remove divisive or partisan narratives, and restore confidence in our shared cultural institutions,' the administration official quoted the letter as saying. The official said the review is aimed at making sure the museums reflect the 'unity, progress, and enduring values that define the American story' and reflect the president's executive order calling for 'Restoring Truth and Sanity to American History.' That order, which was signed on March 27, calls for removing "improper ideology" from the Smithsonian museums and the National Zoo. 'This is about preserving trust in one of our most cherished institutions," Halligan said in a statement. "The Smithsonian museums and exhibits should be accurate, patriotic, and enlightening—ensuring they remain places of learning, wonder, and national pride for generations to come.' The impeachment exhibition at The Smithsonian Institution's National Museum of American History, on Aug. 1. Andrew Leyden / ZUMA Press Wire via Reuters NBC News reported in May that historical leaders and critics were questioning why exhibits at the Smithsonian's National Museum of African American History and Culture on the National Mall were rotating out. NBC News found at least 32 artifacts that were once on display had been removed. Among those items were Harriet Tubman's book of hymns filled with gospels that she is believed to have sung as she led enslaved people to freedom through the underground railroad, and the 'Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass,' the memoir by one of the most important leaders in the abolition movement. The Smithsonian's National Museum of American History also recently made headlines after it removed a placard referring to Trump from an impeachment exhibit, sparking concerns over his influence on the cultural institution. Mention of his two impeachments was later restored to the exhibit after criticism of the removal. In a statement, the Smithsonian said that the exhibit was temporarily removed because it"did not meet the museum's standards in appearance, location, timeline, and overall presentation. 'It was not consistent with other sections in the exhibit and moreover blocked the view of the objects inside its case. For these reasons, we removed the placard," the statement added. Trump's executive order called for changes at the museum system, charging that the 'Smithsonian Institution has, in recent years, come under the influence of a divisive, race-centered ideology. This shift has promoted narratives that portray American and Western values as inherently harmful and oppressive.' '[W]e will restore the Smithsonian Institution to its rightful place as a symbol of inspiration and American greatness –- igniting the imagination of young minds, honoring the richness of American history and innovation, and instilling pride in the hearts of all Americans,' the order said. Trump has also gotten more involved at another federally controlled D.C. institution, the John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts. He has named himself the Kennedy Center chairman and fired the previous bipartisan board of trustees after vowing there would be no "anti-American propaganda" at the venue. 'We don't need woke at the Kennedy Center,' he said in February. House Republicans have moved to rename the center the 'Donald J. Trump Center for Performing Arts,' but the law creating the center prohibits any of the facilities from being renamed. Trump seemed to acknowledge the House effort in a post on Truth Social Tuesday. "GREAT Nominees for the TRUMP/KENNEDY CENTER, whoops, I mean, KENNEDY CENTER, AWARDS. They will be announced Wednesday," he wrote.

Trump's Fed nominee Stephen Miran critical of China monetary policies
Trump's Fed nominee Stephen Miran critical of China monetary policies

UPI

timea minute ago

  • UPI

Trump's Fed nominee Stephen Miran critical of China monetary policies

1 of 2 | Stephen Miran, President Trump's nominee for the Federal Reserve Board, walks outside the White House on Tuesday. Photo by Francis Chung/UPI | License Photo Aug. 12 (UPI) -- Stephen Miran is President Donald Trump's nominee to become the Federal Reserve's next governor, but his name is largely unknown to the American public. Miran, 41, visited the White House on Tuesday for reasons unknown, but his candidacy to temporarily fill a vacancy on the Federal Reserve Board of Governors likely will make Miran's name more familiar with those who pay attention to the Federal Reserve's lending rate. Miran is a Harvard-educated tariffs advocate with a doctorate in economics who views China as rigging the global monetary system to ensure it has a competitive edge over the United States, according to a recent Fortune profile of Miran. Miran told Fortune that, while working as a currency-focused economist on Wall Street in his late 20s, he noticed China's monetary policies devalued its renminbi currency while boosting the value of the U.S. dollar. "The currency markets are a bit of the wild wild West," he told Fortune. "All sorts of things happen that shouldn't happen in an economics textbook." Miran said nations such as China heavily manage their respective currencies, which makes global markets "behave in weird ways." China's monetary policies cause the U.S. dollar to be overvalued while undervaluing its renminbi, he explained. The result, he said, is a U.S. trade deficit with China due to increased exports from China to the United States while greatly reducing the flow of U.S.-made goods to China. China ranks as the world's second-largest economy, while the United States remains the world's economic leader. China has erected market barriers for U.S.-made goods by imposing tariff rates that are higher than the U.S. tariffs on Chinese-made goods, stealing Internet technologies and utilizing other "non-market barriers," Miran said. "Watching the accumulation of Chinese currency reserves in dollars accruing from exports was absolutely eye-opening," he told Fortune. China's monetary and trade policies robbed the United States of jobs while punishing it for being the world's largest economy, Miran said. Miran chairs the Council of Economic Advisers and likely will become the Federal Reserve's next governor for a temporary term through January. "He has been with me from the beginning of my second term," Trump said when announcing Miran's nomination. "His expertise in the world of economics is unparalleled," Trump added. "He will do an outstanding job." If confirmed by the Senate, Miran will replace former Federal Reserve Gov. Adriana Kugler, who was nominated by President Joe Biden in 2023 and was to serve until January. Kugler resigned her position as one of seven Fed governors without saying why and ended her governorship on Friday. Trump suggested Kugler resigned because she dissented from the Federal Reserve's recent announcement that it would maintain its current lending rate of between 4.25% and 4.5% instead of lowering it. Miran would serve the remainder of the term for Kugler's vacant seat and would be eligible for a subsequent 14-year term, which is the standard term for a member of the Federal Reserve's Board of Governors. The Senate is in recess but will reconvene in early September and would vote on Miran's nomination prior to the Federal Reserve's Open Market Committee meeting that is scheduled Sept. 16-17. Trump said he likely will nominate someone else to permanently replace Kugler. The president also will seek a replacement for Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell, whose term ends in May. Trump has contemplated firing Powell due to the Federal Reserve not reducing its current lending rate since shortly before the Nov. 5 general election. Federal officers, National Guard patrol Washington President Donald Trump announced he is placing the D.C. Metropolitan Police Department under federal control and deploy the National Guard to the district to assist in crime prevention. Photo by Bonnie Cash/UPI | License Photo

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store