logo
Alberta cities face higher election costs this fall after province bans electronic vote counters

Alberta cities face higher election costs this fall after province bans electronic vote counters

CBC4 hours ago
As municipalities around Alberta prepare for local elections this fall, some cities are projecting higher costs and longer wait times in light of new rules set out by the province last year.
When the Alberta government passed Bill 20, it banned the use of electronic vote tabulators, a method some cities have used to count ballots in every municipal election for decades. The vote counting machines speed up the process, allowing municipalities to save money and offer results to the public more quickly, compared to counting votes manually.
But counting votes by hand is what every municipality will need to do this fall, and some cities are looking at costs double or triple what they spent in the 2021 municipal elections. The rise is partly due to increased staffing municipalities will need to count ballots in a process that could last much longer than the public is used to waiting to hear results.
Since introducing Bill 20, the province has maintained that manually counting votes will better maintain voters' trust in election integrity. But Alberta Municipalities president Tyler Gandam said he hasn't seen evidence to back up that assertion, and he's frustrated municipalities weren't consulted more about how to run their own elections.
"We're using automated tellers for grocery stores and retail, we're using these kinds of machines for testing in schools. I'm just not seeing the data that supports that there's going to be a higher level of confidence in an election result through hand-counting versus a voting machine," said Gandam.
He added that large population centres will especially feel the strain of manual counts. Voter turnout in Calgary and Edmonton in 2021 saw hundreds of thousands of votes cast, and with the population growth Alberta has seen in the years since then, Gandam said the strain of even more ballots to count could be placed on elections staff this fall.
Rising costs to operate elections
Within the last year, several municipalities around Alberta have released projections of how much more they expect to spend to operate local elections.
Last October, City of Edmonton officials projected nearly $5 million in extra costs will be needed to run this fall's election. Further south, a recent report commissioned by the City of Lethbridge expects its election to cost the city roughly twice as much as in 2021, largely due to hiring 300 to 400 additional workers.
Red Deer as well, with an additional $940,000 planned. And in Medicine Hat, the city's budget of $400,000 for the election is up from an initial $270,000 projection, while it also plans to cut the number of polling stations it opens in half, from 20 to 10, as a way to contain costs.
In St. Albert, the city's elections budget has tripled to $930,700, compared to $261,200 in 2021.
The City of Calgary said will not publicize how much it expects to spend in this fall's election until it can confirm a final number, which it expects to do in September.
The municipal election is scheduled for Oct. 20.
Added cost a burden we pay for transparent democracies: provincial minister
Municipal Affairs Minister Dan Williams said he's "very happy" even despite increased costs, to improve election integrity
"That's the burden we pay here in the west for having transparent and open democracies," Williams said in an interview on Thursday.
"I think it's business as usual."
Williams argued only five or six municipalities have raised the vote counter ban as an issue to him since he became municipal affairs minister in May, adding that it's how federal election ballots are already counted.
Most Alberta municipalities aren't worried about having to count votes by hand, Williams said, and are instead "dealing with work they should be dealing with," such as water delivery, filling potholes, attracting investment and keeping taxes down.
"I wish luck to every single [municipal] candidate so that they can do the work that they need to, which is, to be honest, not worrying about if we should have vote tabulators," said Williams.
"The province has decided for certainty in our elections and confidence in the way that we run our municipal elections, this is the best way to do it. It's how we decide to do it at the federal level, it's how we decide to do it at the provincial level, it's also good enough for our municipalities. That's the priority of this government, and the priority of municipalities should be making sure that those basic services are being rendered to all the ratepayers."
But Bonnie Hilford, Lethbridge's city clerk, points out her city has used electronic tabulators in every election for more than 30 years without hearing concerns about election integrity.
"We've been using tabulators in the city of Lethbridge since 1989, and we've never had a challenge or a contested election," said Hilford.
"We're kind of wondering why we have to move to hand-counting, which will take a lot longer [and] cost a lot more."
Because voters in Lethbridge select more than one candidate for city council and school trustee roles, Hilford said the city expects the public won't receive full election results for two days after polling stations close.
The added wait time for results, coupled with increased staffing costs, has pushed Lethbridge city council to advocate for the province to reverse course. Hilford said she expects council to take that same position after this year's election, as a way to try and save taxpayers' money.
Advocacy expected to continue after election
Along with his role at Alberta Municipalities, Gandam is also the mayor of Wetaskiwin, a city of roughly 13,400 people.
Wetaskiwin previously counted votes manually as a cost-effective alternative to vote tabulators, but Gandam said they paid for it in the length of time it required. When the city struggled to recruit enough reliable elections staff in 2021, Gandam said they decided to begin using vote counters in its next election as a more efficient and reliable method. But now the province has blocked that move.
Last fall, Alberta Municipalities members voted to adopt a resolution calling for a reversal on the province's ban of vote-counting machines. Gandam said the organization plans to connect with its members after this year's elections, and bring any relevant concerns to the province to potentially make changes before the next election in 2029.
Williams said he's interested in seeing the vote tabulator ban continue, but that he's open to having that conversation with municipalities.
"If municipalities do bring it up as their biggest concern, not funding for wastewater, not making sure they can lower taxes … then I'll hear that conversation, if this is their priority coming out of the election," said Williams.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

NFLPA names former SAG-AFTRA exec David White interim executive director
NFLPA names former SAG-AFTRA exec David White interim executive director

National Post

time22 minutes ago

  • National Post

NFLPA names former SAG-AFTRA exec David White interim executive director

The NFL Players Association took a bit of time but, with teams at training camps, moved to fill its leadership void from outside the union. Article content Player representatives voted Sunday night to appoint David P. White the NFLPA's interim executive director. Article content Article content The election of White, the other finalist when the union elected Lloyd Howell in 2023, came 17 days after Howell's resignation a little more than two years into his term as executive director. Article content 'I am grateful to the NFLPA's player leadership for entrusting me with the privilege and responsibility to guide their union as interim executive director,' White said in a statement released Sunday night by the NFLPA. 'It's a duty I do not take lightly, and I'm committed to reestablishing trust and ensuring the union is serving its members best. I look forward to working with the entire NFLPA team to protect players' health and safety, secure their financial well-being, and further strengthen their voice to shape their futures.' Article content The players on the NFLPA's executive committee voted, 10-1, in 2023 to recommend White, the former national executive director and chief negotiator for the Screen Actors Guild-American Federation of Television and Radio Artists (SAG-AFTRA), over Howell, a player who was on the executive committee and another person familiar with the situation told The Washington Post last month. But the recommendation was never delivered to the team-by-team player representatives who elected Howell. Article content 'We wanted [the player reps] to make up their own mind,' the player said last month. 'We did that in case we were asked for our recommendation.' Article content Now the NFLPA has turned back to White. Article content 'This decision is the result of a comprehensive, player-led process,' free agent linebacker Jalen Reeves-Maybin, the NFLPA president, said in a statement. 'We understood the urgency to fill this role and did our due diligence to identify the right person to lead our union in this moment. We have full faith in David to take the union forward and operate in the best interests of our membership. David has spent much of his career fighting for collectively bargained rights in the labor movement and is committed to putting players first in all the union does. We are confident that he will inspire solidarity and provide the necessary stability during this period of transition.' Article content Multiple internal candidates and multiple external candidates were on the list of finalists for the interim job, according to a person familiar with the voting process. Each was interviewed by the player reps over the past two weeks. A representative of each team participated in Sunday night's vote.

Three Yukon First Nations lay out expectations for Gladiator Metals
Three Yukon First Nations lay out expectations for Gladiator Metals

CBC

timean hour ago

  • CBC

Three Yukon First Nations lay out expectations for Gladiator Metals

The Kwanlin Dün First Nation and Ta'an Kwäch'än Council have proposed multiple conditions before Gladiator Metals is approved to expand drilling in the Whitehorse copper belt. The First Nations submitted public submissions to the Yukon Environmental and Socio-Economic Assessment Board (YESAB) on July 22. The public comment period for the project closed July 24. Gladiator Metals, a B.C.-based mineral exploration company, has been drilling in the Whitehorse copper belt since April 2023. The company is applying to increase its permit from class 1 to class 3, which would allow it to expand work over the next five years throughout its whole 35-kilometre Copper Belt project, most of which is within Whitehorse city limits. The First Nations are calling for specific mitigation measures against environmental damage in the area. In its submission, Kwanlin Dün First Nation recommended that Gladiator receive a "specific term of approval" restricting intensive drilling activities to the identified work areas, not the entire claim block. It made several specific recommendations for environmental mitigation, such as halting work whenever caribou pass within one kilometre of a work area. The First Nation is also asking that mineral claims be relinquished within the boundary of Chasàn Chùa, or McIntyre Creek, which was just established as a territorial park in June. It wants activities on current claims in the park to be restricted to non-ground disturbing activities. The Ta'an Kwäch'än Council said its primary concern is risk to the Chasàn Chùa corridor. It wants the distance between mining activities and headwaters in Chasàn Chùa to be doubled from 30 metres to 60 metres. Carcross/Tagish First Nation, which has some settlement land near the project, said in its submission it's opposed to the project being approved. The First Nation wants a heritage assessment in the area and a buffer established around anything with heritage value. It also says C/TFN personnel should be permitted to conduct a survey of medicinal plants in the area, and that a buffer should be established to protect those values from any mining activity. Public comment period attracts more than 100 submissions YESAB received 108 public submissions on the project proposal. Approximately 43 of them spoke in favour of Gladiator expanding its work. Six of those commenters identified themselves as being directly affiliated with Gladiator Metals. Another seven submissions represented local businesses that serve the mining and exploration industry. Some citizens in favour of the project praised mining as a pillar of Yukon's history and economy. Other comments said copper mining is important for the clean energy transition. A handful of people said they work in the industry and would like industry opportunities that allow them to work and live in the city. About 49 submissions were against the project. A handful of the negative comments came from people who live near the project, didn't want drilling so close to their home and are concerned about the potential impact on well water. Nearly all the negative submissions expressed concern about the environmental impact. Some said they didn't trust Gladiator Metals because of the company's previous infractions in the area. The remaining submissions were neutral or provided specific recommendations for environmental protection without taking a stance. YESAB has also put in a request for additional information from Gladiator Metals before the assessment process can proceed. Among other questions, it asked Gladiator to provide scientific evidence for its claims that exploration drilling doesn't typically affect residential wells beyond very short distances. It also asked Gladiator to clarify its intentions for claims in or near Chasàn Chùa Territorial Park. The deadline for Gladiator's response is Aug. 26.

CHARLEBOIS: CUSMA-Exempt — the 93% Mirage
CHARLEBOIS: CUSMA-Exempt — the 93% Mirage

Toronto Sun

timean hour ago

  • Toronto Sun

CHARLEBOIS: CUSMA-Exempt — the 93% Mirage

President Donald Trump holds a chart as he announces a plan for tariffs on imported goods during an event April 2 in the Rose Garden at the White House. MUST CREDIT: Demetrius Freeman/The Washington Post Photo by Demetrius Freeman / The Washington Post Since Aug. 1, many Canadian commentators have downplayed the impact of the 35% tariffs the United States has imposed on select Canadian goods, citing the Canada–United States–Mexico Agreement (CUSMA) and its oft-repeated claim that 90% to 93% of Canadian exports remain exempt. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. THIS CONTENT IS RESERVED FOR SUBSCRIBERS ONLY Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. SUBSCRIBE TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. REGISTER / SIGN IN TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account. Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments. Enjoy additional articles per month. Get email updates from your favourite authors. THIS ARTICLE IS FREE TO READ REGISTER TO UNLOCK. Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments Enjoy additional articles per month Get email updates from your favourite authors Don't have an account? Create Account While technically true, this statistic masks the much more complicated — and far less reassuring —reality for Canada's agri-food sector. A prominent December 2024 study from the University of Sherbrooke concluded that 93% of Canadian exports to the U.S. are tariff-exempt. On paper, that number may seem comforting. But it tells only part of the story — especially when it comes to food. Tariff exemptions are not automatic. To qualify for duty-free access under CUSMA, Canadian agri-food products must meet strict rules of origin and complex documentation standards. For many small and mid-sized food processors, these bureaucratic hurdles are burdensome and costly. Products with mixed or processed ingredients — such as snack bars, frozen meals, or nut butters —often fall into grey zones that create uncertainty at the border. Your noon-hour look at what's happening in Toronto and beyond. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. Please try again This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. The result? Products deemed 'exempt' in theory may still be delayed, penalized, or rejected in practice. Recommended video Most analyses, including the Sherbrooke study, fail to account for this nuance. As a result, the 93% figure is not only misleading — it's largely irrelevant for food companies navigating real-world trade. Worse still, these studies often overlook the geopolitical dynamics shaping food trade. Under President Donald Trump, tariffs have become less about technical qualifications and more about political leverage. The real risk today isn't simply tariffs themselves — it's the mere threat of tariffs. Many Canadian food exporters have already lost long-standing American customers spooked by the unpredictability of trade with Canada. Even in the absence of formal tariffs, the perception of risk is enough to drive U.S. buyers toward domestic suppliers. That's the real game Trump is playing — and winning. Whether a product qualifies for exemption no longer matters if market confidence is eroded. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. And make no mistake: for the food industry, where net margins are often razor-thin — typically in the range of 2% to 10% — a 35% tariff is not just inconvenient; it's existential. It can erase profitability overnight, making entire product lines unviable and undermining long-term investment. There is no country in the world currently protected by trade agreements in any meaningful way. If you provoke Washington, tariffs — or their threat — will follow. Since Trump's return, no countries have drawn more retaliatory attention than China and Canada. Both have responded with countermeasures, unlike Japan, South Korea, the U.K., or the European Union — all of which have successfully negotiated more stable trade terms and now face significantly lower tariff exposure than Canada. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. Since Mark Carney became Prime Minister in March, Canada has faced more tariffs from the U.S., not fewer. His strategy — if it can be called that — appears to be waiting for the U.S. economy to falter under the weight of its own tariffs. But that's a dangerous gamble. The American economy, for all its recent job market volatility, remains remarkably resilient. Betting against it has never been a winning strategy — just ask Warren Buffett. Some Canadians might believe that reduced access to U.S. markets will lead to food surpluses here at home, pushing prices down. That's a fundamental misunderstanding of how food economics work. Canadian food exporters rely on scale. Export markets allow companies to spread fixed costs and keep domestic prices affordable. If demand from U.S. buyers dries up, Canadian processors will have no choice but to raise prices domestically to stay afloat. The result? Higher—not lower—food prices for Canadian consumers. In short, the 93% tariff exemption statistic may provide political cover or academic reassurance, but it is a mirage. For those of us who work with food companies, study supply chains, and understand export-driven pricing models, the message is clear: Canada's food economy is far more exposed — and vulnerable — than many realize. — Dr. Sylvain Charlebois is Director of the Agri-Food Analytics Lab at Dalhousie University, co-host of The Food Professor Podcast and Visiting Scholar at McGill University. Columnists World Wrestling Sunshine Girls Sex Files

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store